Law Commons^™

Understanding The Effect Of Carried Interest Provisions On Fairness And Equality In The Taxation Of Hedge Fund Profits, Nathan D. Madden

Widener Commonwealth Law Review

Private equity and hedge fund managers (General Partners) typically receive a percentage share of the profits from the funds that they manage as part of their compensation for managing the investments made by investors. This compensation is commonly referred to as “Carried Interest.” General Partners are then entitled to a more favorable tax treatment of their compensation—as compared to most other taxpayers—by deferring the tax on Carried Interest and having it taxed at a lower, preferential rate. Many view these Carried Interest tax provisions as providing an unfair and unjustified tax advantage. This paper will explore alternatives that would arguably …

Divergent Journeys From Kabul And Kyiv: How Congress Can Ensure Equal Pathway Programs For Parolees To The United States, Erika C. Firestone

Widener Commonwealth Law Review

Scenes of Afghan citizens rushing United States military aircraft and handing their babies off to soldiers at the Kabul airport in August of 2021 shocked the conscience of the West. The Taliban entered Afghanistan’s capital city that month, completely unopposed, after twenty years of United States presence. As Kabul fell and the deadline for the United States’ withdrawal on August 30 approached, the streets outside of the airport grew crowded. People had no shelter from the scorching sun. A child-care center was created quickly after panic-stricken parents disappeared, leaving their children behind, hopeful that they would be delivered to safety. …

Yes, Your Broken Tailight Does Matter: Why Enforcement Of Minor Traffic Violations Is Integral For A Safe Society, Richard E. Berner

Widener Commonwealth Law Review

“At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst.” These words serve as a reminder that within the framework of law and order, human beings are the most spectacular creatures to walk the face of the Earth. Outside of this framework, we are no greater than the most savage of beasts. The United States has historically faced challenges with the presence of racial bias within the legal system. In particular, traffic laws have been subject to uneven enforcement across the country, with one study indicating that black drivers were approximately …

Flag Fever: Adoption Of New State Flags, Brian Craig

The Guardianship Journal

Several states are experiencing flag fever, and it just might be contagious. Minnesota and Utah adopted new state flags that took effect in the first half of 2024. After years of debate, the new Utah state flag officially took effect on March 9, 2024. The Minnesota state flag officially became law on May 11, 2024, replacing a controversial flag that some people called racist and ugly. Other states are also considering new flag designs. Many states still incorporate their “seal on a bedsheet” designs that are difficult to distinguish from other states and lack good attributes for flag design. The …

Procedural Learning And Reform In Federal Administrative Adjudication, Jeremy S. Graboyes

Widener Commonwealth Law Review

In the mid-twentieth century, in cases like Goldberg v. Kelly, the Supreme Court found a right to “some kind of hearing” in program after program and set about constructing a “fixed list of procedural protections required by due process.” Constitutionalizing procedural choices in this manner gave courts substantial control over how administrative adjudication operated. However, the approach was criticized. Dissenting in Goldberg, Justice Hugo Black wrote that by imposing significant procedural requirements on agencies without a clear constitutional or statutory basis for doing so, courts “wander[ed] out of their field of vested powers and transgress[ed] into the area constitutionally assigned …

The Not-So-Obvious And Inconvenient Truth: Reexamining A Right To Counsel For Parents And Children In Abuse And Neglect Administrative Proceedings, Tiffany Williams Brewer

Widener Commonwealth Law Review

The right to counsel for parents in administrative abuse and neglect cases, as well as for the children that are the subject of these matters, is a necessity that may not be obvious. This Article seeks to elucidate the fundamental interests that are at stake and justify why the sacrosanct protections of the landmark Gideon v. Wainwright right to counsel case should be extended to an administrative proceeding involving parents who are facing inclusion on a state child abuse and neglect registry. The Article also reveals an inconvenient truth–that communities of color are disproportionately impacted by the consequence of adverse …

Congress And The Shifting Sands In Administrative Law, Christopher J. Walker

Widener Commonwealth Law Review

In recent years, we have seen an anti-administrativist turn in the federal judiciary, with the Supreme Court limiting agency power in important respects. These shifting sands in administrative law seem to be motivated, at least in part, by the Court’s perception of the rise of presidential administration and decline in legislative activity. As part of the Widener Commonwealth Law Review Judging in Administrative Law Symposium, this Essay assesses how the Court has responded to concerns about overpresidentialism and then sketches out several ways Congress can respond to reassert itself in federal lawmaking.

Undo Process: Examining Agency Procedural Levers To Access To Counsel, Haiyun Damon-Feng

Widener Commonwealth Law Review

Every day, through internal adjudicative proceedings, agencies make thousands of rights determinations that affect critical matters such as financial security, family unity, personal safety, and individual liberty. Scholars and policymakers have recognized the significant impact that representation can have on adjudicative outcomes across the administrative state. Many agencies have implemented policies affirmatively seeking to boost an individual’s ability to bring an advocate to assist with the adjudication process. In the immigration context, however, agencies have enacted procedural hurdles that have made it more difficult for individuals to reap the benefits of this assistance.

This Essay uses recent developments in the …

Corporate Exceptionalism: What's Behind The Business Community's Newfound Love Of Jury Trials, Richard H. Frankel

Widener Commonwealth Law Review

2024 was another year of blockbuster Supreme Court decisions. These range from expanding presidential immunity from criminal prosecution, overruling the Chevron doctrine, addressing access to the abortion drug mifepristone, setting standards regarding the power of federal agencies, and others. One case that has flown under the radar, at least outside of administrative law circles, is SEC v. Jarkesy. On its surface, the Supreme Court narrowly held that “the Seventh Amendment entitles a defendant to a jury trial when the [Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)] seeks civil penalties against him for securities fraud,” rather than being required to proceed in an …

The Disintegration Of Administrative Adjudicatory Enforcement Authority, Robert L. Glicksman

Widener Commonwealth Law Review

In Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy, the Supreme Court held that the SEC violated Mr. Jarkesy’s Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial by pursuing its charges that he engaged in securities fraud in an administrative forum rather than in federal court. This Essay reviews and critiques the Jarkesy decision, concluding that it ignores several important issues in boiling the case down to whether statutory securities fraud is sufficiently similar to common law fraud to demand attachment of the jury trial right. This decision also distorts decades’ worth of Supreme Court precedents concerning the Seventh Amendment and Article III, …

Navigating The New Loper Bright Regime, Adam G. Crews

Widener Commonwealth Law Review

For many ordinary Americans—the ones who do not spend their days concerned with the minutia of administrative law doctrine—the biggest release of 2024 might have been international pop sensation Taylor Swift’s eleventh studio album, The Tortured Poets Department. The album’s standard edition ends with the track “Clara Bow,” which reflects on the entertainment industry’s habit of cycling through young female performers. Swift’s own experiences inform the song: she has explained how powerful record label executives would compare her to some other artist who came before her, then gratuitously disparage that woman, and then assure Swift that she is an improvement …

Chevron On The Eve Of Loper Bright, Nicholas R. Bednar

Widener Commonwealth Law Review

Chevron is dead. What does this mean for judicial review of agency interpretations of statutes in the lower courts? Perhaps not much. Using new data of circuit court decisions from 2012 and 2022, this Essay examines how lower courts changed their decision-making as the Supreme Court became more skeptical of Chevron deference. This Essay finds that---contrary to the assertion of some justices-circuit courts had not stopped applying Chevron in the lead up to Loper Bright. Moreover, courts agreed with agency interpretations of statutes at similar rates in both 2012 and 2022.

Bernard Bronner V. Robert E. Hardy, Ii, Order For Motion For Judgment Notwithstanding The Verdict, Kelly L. Ellerbe

Superior Court of Fulton County: Metro Atlanta Business Case Division Opinions

No abstract provided.

Winter 2025 - Cool Tools For Productivity, University Of Michigan Law Library

Legal Tech Series

This session will highlight technology designed to make your life easier as a law student and as a new attorney. Tools covered will include Boolean search operators, specialized legal writing keyboards, project management / note taking tools, artificial intelligence for drafting professional writing like emails, and more! If you are interested in maximizing your productivity and efficiency to make your life easier (and who isn't?) then this is the session for you!

Resources covered: LegalPad Keyboards. Search terms/connectors for Lexis, Westlaw, & Google. Google docs note taking. Anki for flashcards.

Note: In the Libguide as "Cool Tools to Boost Efficiency", …

The Green Wall Of Silence, Frank Rosenblatt

Journal Articles

This chapter contemplates the “Green Wall of Silence” through several examples. In Iraq, following the detainee abuse scandal at the U.S. military operated prison in Abu Ghraib in 2004, military officials announced that the abuse was the result of just a “few bad apples,” reaching this conclusion through a series of investigations that chilled or blocked witnesses from revealing actual truths, and avoided examining the role of higher-level officials who contributed to the abuses. In Afghanistan, military leaders lauded U.S. Army Corporal Pat Tillman for his conduct in a heroic firefight with the enemy, but concealed from the public the …

The Unremarked: A Cultural Analysis On Access To Applied Behavior Analysis Therapy For Autism By Ethnic-Minority And Immigrant Children, Yamel C. Herrera

The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Nurse Practitioner Autonomy: How The Rejection Of Sb 1700 Restricts Access To Necessary Healthcare In Rural South Texas, Cara Hudson

The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Is The Us Exit Tax Constitutional?, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Law & Economics Working Papers

The recent US Supreme Court decision in Moore vs. United States raised the possibility that the Court would declare that realization is required for a tax provision to be constitutional. The US exit tax on expatriations is the most likely vehicle for a post-Moore constitutional challenge to taxation without realization because (a) it involves individual taxpayers; (b) it does not involve attribution, because the tax is imposed directly on the expatriating taxpayer, and (c) it involves precisely the kind of tax that was the direct target of the Moore litigation, namely a mark to market tax on rich taxpayers (the …

Indigenous Communities Suffer Multi-Generational Trauma (“Susto”) From The Trafficking And Slavery Of Native Women And Children, Bill Piatt, Karagan Carson, Meghan Monahan, Makayla Perez

The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Come And Take It: Prosecutorial Discretion Impositions On Black Communities Regarding Unlawful Carrying Of A Weapon Charges, Karagan Carson

The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice

No abstract provided.

La Jurisdicción De La Corte Interamericana Para Revisar Judicialmente La Invalidez De La Denuncia A La Convención Americana Sobre Derechos Humanos Efectuada Por Venezuela En 2012 Bajo Los Estándares De La Convención De Viena Y La Opinión Consultiva Oc-26/20, Claudio Grossman, Carlos Ayala Corao, Juan Mendez, Claudia Martin, Robert Goldman, Gabriel J. Ortiz Crespo

Amicus Briefs & Court Filings

No abstract provided.

Vol. 68, No. 06 (February 17, 2025)

Indiana Law Annotated

No abstract provided.

Appeal, Arbitrate, Appraise: A Forthcoming Rallying-Cry For The Victims Of The California Wildfires, Thomas Riley

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (CJCR) Blog

Seven days into the 2025 new year, the most expensive natural disaster in United States history broke out. 29 people were killed, and at least 16,000 structures were destroyed. Damages estimations have been varied. One analyst firm reasoned the fires could cost as much as $35 billion[3], another thought $45 billion, and the University of Southern California thinks $75 billion. Among the hardest hit neighborhoods was Altadena, California. Northwest Altadena stood as one of the few areas black families could purchase homes in Southern California, as “81% of Black households in Altadena own homes, compared with 32% across Los Angeles …

On Constitutional Crises, Donald Roth

Faculty Work Comprehensive List

"Our government becomes stronger for the challenges that it overcomes, as the interplay of the branches gets better defined."

Posting about ­­­­­­­­the nature of American government from In All Things, an online hub that offers insight into maintaining and faithful and orthodox Reformed Christian worldview while fearlessly engaging in every aspect of contemporary life – until all is made new.

On Constitutional Crises

Ndls Communicator: Week Of 02.17.25, Notre Dame Law School

NDLS Communicator

The Latest News

• ND Law Global Human Rights Clinic advocates for human rights before United States International Trade Commission
• ND Law's Black Students Association celebrates Black History Month and the pursuit of justice
• Professor Jorge Barrera-Rojas defends dissertation to earn two doctoral degrees
• Notre Dame Law School's Religious Liberty Clinic secures asylum for Iranian Christian convert facing persecution

Faculty News and Briefs

• Paul Miller was cited in an important dissenting opinion by Justices Gordon, Edelman, and Steward of the High Court of Australia for his work on fiduciary obligations.
• This week, A.J. Bellia will speak on the legal implications of …

Should Country-By-Country Reporting Be Public?, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

Under action 13 of the base erosion and profit shifting project, large multinational enterprises are obligated to file country-by-country reports with tax authorities. As of April 2024, over 80 countries have adopted a multilateral agreement on exchanging CbC reports. The United States has not adopted the multilateral agreement, but regulations require U.S.-based MNEs to file these reports with the IRS, which can then exchange them with other countries under tax treaties.

Mmu: 02/17/25–02/23/25, Student Bar Association

Monday Morning Update

This Week @ NDLS

Mass Times

Commons Daily Menu

Saint of the Week

General Announcements

How To Stop Employees From Stealing Your Trade Secrets: Shifting The Focus To Prevention And Mitigation, Spencer Rabe

The University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Strengthening Legal Frameworks And Patient Safety: A Narrative Review Of Medical And Dental Malpractice In Indonesia, Ghulam Mustafa, Ede Surya Darmawan

Jurnal ARSI : Administrasi Rumah Sakit Indonesia

Many cases of medical and dental malpractice in Indonesia are still related to patient safety and healthcare quality. This narrative review aims to identify solutions that can be implemented. The main focus is to compare the incidence of malpractice in clinical medical and dental practice, emphasizing legal implications, coverage, and internal organizational issues. A systematic literature search was conducted through databases such as Pubmed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Springer, Garuda, and other online databases. Articles published no later than 2024. Eleven studies were selected that discussed the problem of malpractice in Indonesia. Independent screening and critical appraisal were carried out to …

Trespass To Chattel And The Fourth Amendment, Will Baskin

Texas A&M Journal of Property Law

Like an adolescent maturing into adulthood, Fourth Amendment search doctrine has gone through phases. Scholars may debate the underlying principles that have governed each phase, but they agree that two Supreme Court decisions dominate the doctrine as it stands today: Katz v. United States and United States v. Jones. The younger of these two rivals, Jones, has caused its share of consternation. Courts have struggled to consistently apply its trespass-based test, despite the test’s seemingly simple formulation. This Note considers the Jones test in the context of personal property, or chattel, making two arguments: first, careful adherence to common-law principles …