Law Commons^™

The Primacy Of International Treaties In The Republic Of Kosovo: A Critical Review Of The Kosovo Constitutional Court Case No. 95/13 Through The Lenses Of The Law Of Treaties, Besfort T. Rrecaj

UC Law SF International Law Review

In 2013, the Constitutional Court of Kosovo (the Court) issued an important verdict in its constitutional review of the first agreement between Kosovo and Serbia. In its obiter dictum, the Court made conclusions regarding the relationship between international treaties and domestic law, and the hierarchy between these two norms as well as signature, ratification, and entry into force of treaties. Ten years post-judgment, this research returns to the Court’s arguments presented by the Court and argues that the Court made significant mistakes in its arguments and therefore made erroneous interpretations in its rather short arguments of the judgment. Using well …

Tenant Rights Deserve Consumer Protections: The Case For Overturning State V. Schwab, Robert S. Colton

Washington Law Review

Tenancy is a precarious housing arrangement—tenants do not own their homes yet depend on housing stability as a foundation for engaging in almost all aspects of life. For more than fifty years, Washington law has decreed it a landlord’s responsibility to maintain safe and secure housing for their tenants. As the Washington State Legislature has declared, “[d]ecent housing for the people of Washington state is a most important public concern.” This strong rhetoric remains at odds with State v. Schwab, the sweeping decision issued by the 1985 Washington State Supreme Court removing tenants from the reach of the Consumer …

Growing Pains: The Evolution Of Jlwop Sentences In Washington, Selena M. Galvan

Washington Law Review

In 2021, the Washington State Supreme Court abolished de facto life sentences— those that amount to a life sentence despite not carrying the life without parole label—for juvenile offenders, finding them unconstitutional under article 1, section 14 of the Washington Constitution. In 2022, less than a year later, the Court reversed course in the case of State v. Anderson by upholding a sixty-one-year sentence for crimes a juvenile offender committed at age seventeen. The Washington State Supreme Court’s decision in Anderson runs contrary to what modern science demonstrates about the diminished culpability of juvenile offenders, and it runs contrary to …

Can Personal Identification Information Be Collected On Online Purchases Under California’S Song-Beverly Credit Card Act?, John B. Lafave Iii

North Carolina Banking Institute

No abstract provided.

Social Contracts: The State Convention Drafting History Of The Lockean Natural Rights Guarantees, Anthony B. Sanders

UMKC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Missouri's Law Of Constitutional Interpretation, Michael L. Smith

UMKC Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Right To "Health Care Freedom" In State Constitutions, Quinn Yeargain

UMKC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Central Clearing The U.S. Treasury Market, Yesha Yadav, Joshua Younger

University of Chicago Law Review

The market for Treasury securities represents its own kind of “taproot”—a deep and liquid market for risk-free debt that has anchored an ambitious and creative U.S. dollar economy, while also ensuring the safety and soundness of its financial and monetary system. It has more than quintupled in size over the past. This Essay considers this regulatory response. It focuses on the introduction of mandatory central clearing for most trades in U.S. Treasuries—a proposal seeking to significantly reshape the day-to-day functioning of the Treasury market. Central clearing is a well-established means by which to reduce the risk of loss associated when …

Judicial Courage, Contrarianism, And Candor, Michael L. Smith

Hofstra Law Review

Contemporary discussions of judicial courage are muddled. Despite a vast literature on virtue ethics, as well as a more specialized literature applying lessons from virtue ethics in legal contexts, discussions of courage feature malleable and imprecise conceptions of the term. This Article cuts through the mess by examining two particularly misguided accounts of judicial courage and demonstrating that they advance a vision of judicial contrarianism. Justice Clarence Thomas and Fifth Circuit Judge James Ho each portray judicial courage to involve judges facing down bad-faith critics, remaining true to their own visions of the law, and learning to embrace criticism rather …

Front Matter

ACTEC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Unleashed Non-Grantor Trust Potential, Brent W. Nelson

ACTEC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Death And Debts, Kevin Bennardo

ACTEC Law Journal

Uniform Probate Code section 2-606(a)(1) provides for automatic non-ademption of the unpaid purchase price of specifically devised property that was sold by the decedent after their will was executed but before their death. Rather than receiving the specific property that was left to them in the will, the named beneficiary receives the balance of any outstanding payments that are owed at the time of the decedent's death. This rule doesn't make sense. It doesn't square with the decedent's likely intent. The amount that the beneficiary will receive is largely arbitrary. It is tied to factors that have nothing to do …

Reform The Grantor Trust Rules, Jay A. Soled

ACTEC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Silent Trusts And The Conflict Of Laws, Jeffrey Schoenblum

ACTEC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Betting On Privacy: Safeguarding Data In The Era Of Online Gambling, Yanaisi Gordon

UNLV Gaming Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Editor's Note, Valerie Andalibi-Alvarenga

UNLV Gaming Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Introduction, Danielle Finn

UNLV Gaming Law Journal

No abstract provided.

For The Dads, Brads, And Chads: The Future Of Transferring Active Sports Wagers, Krystal Kay Petersen

UNLV Gaming Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Objectives And Principles For An Instrument On Limitations And Exceptions: Relevant Excerpts And Proposals, Sean Flynn, Luca Schirru

Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series

The Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR) has been mandated by the 2012 General Assembly to work toward “an appropriate international legal instrument or instruments (whether through model law, joint recommendation, treaty, and/or other forms)”. In SCCR 43, the Committee adopted a Work Program (SCCR/43/8) to draft “objectives, principles, and options” for potential instruments. With the goal of facilitating the discussion within the Committee and the design of principles and objectives, our research team systematically gathered and organized relevant excerpts from a variety of sources including existing treaties, laws, SCCR documents, academic contributions, and civil society proposals. This document …

Cracking The Façade: Analyzing Ohio's "Don't Say Gay" Legislation As Disguised Discrimination Under The First And Fourteenth Amendments, Sydni L. Porter

Journal of Law and Health

The Ohio State Legislature is among the growing nationwide trend in attacking LGBTQ+ rights. Chief among these is Ohio House Bill 8, which claims to limit the types of content children encounter in schools. While the drafters cite this noble intent, the bill's actual impact further harms queer students and teachers, who already bear heavier mental health burdens due to such legislation and its societal implications. This type of legislation recently originated in Florida, where it was signed into law by Governor Ron DeSantis in 2022 and garnered national media attention. As Ohio Governor Mike DeWine signed a near-identical bill …

Social Movement Lawyering And Due Process Values, Susan D. Carle

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

As I send this Essay off to the Fordham Law Review in early January 2025, many people in the United States remain in a state of shock following the recent election of Donald J. Trump to a second term as President. Theories abound as to why a person who espoused so much hate won the allegiance of a majority of American voters; some commentators have suggested that “anti-wokeism” is to blame. To be sure, the Trump campaign manipulated conservative social values to gain support. But conservative values are not necessarily anti-woke values. Ancient values oppose treating people badly and interfering …

Social Movement Lawyering And Due Process Values, Susan D. Carle

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Government Lawyers, Ethical Dilemmas: The Case Of Herbert Wechsler And Japanese American Incarceration, Eric L. Muller

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Law Jobs: Professional Regulation, The Division Of Legal Labor, And Institutional Change, Emily S. Taylor Poppe

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Democratic Self-Defense, Claudia E. Haupt

Fordham Law Review

Four U.S. states recently took diametrically opposed approaches to address fundamental problems that their respective state legislatures identified in the online speech environment. While controversial legislation in Florida and Texas sought to limit the ability of platforms to remove users or content, New York and California passed laws ultimately aimed at curbing hate speech and other forms of abuse on platforms. In isolation, each of these legislative approaches raises significant First Amendment concerns, and all are likely insufficient to address the problems posed by online speech. But what if the impetus behind these laws were combined into a unified regulatory …

Properly Partitioning Prejudice: Analyzing Mixed Brady And Napue Claims, Patrick Scariano

Fordham Law Review

Due process affords criminal defendants the right to receive evidence possessed by the government that would aid in their defense. This right was codified in Brady v. Maryland. Brady’s lesser-known ancestor is Napue v. Illinois, which gave defendants the right to a new trial if the government knowingly offered perjured testimony in their original trial. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that these rights are critical to support verdicts worthy of confidence necessary to ensure due process.

Unfortunately, defendants victimized by misconduct are often affected by multiple violations of their rights. Courts have developed ways to examine …

Minimal Justiciability, Riley T. Keenan

Minnesota Law Review Vols. 106:2 onward (2021-present)

Federal courts adjudicate only justiciable disputes. But justiciable as to whom? The Supreme Court has hinted at an answer, holding that at least one plaintiff must show standing for each remedy sought in a federal case. But it has never explained this “one-plaintiff rule,” and recently some scholars have criticized it, arguing that Article III instead requires each plaintiff to show standing in every federal case. This Article offers the missing explanation. Justiciability limits judicial power, it contends, and judicial relief is the constitutionally relevant expression of that power. Thus, Article III requires only one plaintiff with standing and a …

Judging Demeanor, Kiel Brennan-Marquez, Julia Simon-Kerr

Minnesota Law Review Vols. 106:2 onward (2021-present)

This Article challenges the conventional wisdom that defendant demeanor—affect, body language, and physical appearance—helps juries assess guilt. On the contrary, we show that demeanor evidence poses an inherent risk of propensity-based reasoning. It invites jurors to convict defendants based on whether they “look like criminals,” rather than on the actual facts of the case. In doing so, demeanor evidence facilitates cultural and racial subordination. It enables members of dominant groups—consciously or not—to penalize members of less-dominant groups for failing to appear innocent or credible. We argue that existing law has things backwards. It treats defendant demeanor as presumptively useful and …

A Democratic Participation Model For Corporate Goverance, Grant M. Hayden, Matthew T. Bodie

Minnesota Law Review Vols. 106:2 onward (2021-present)

Corporate law is in the grip of a fundamental conundrum: whether corporations should seek only to serve shareholders or instead attend to the interests of all stakeholders. The doctrine of shareholder primacy, which focuses the corporation’s attention on the goal of maximizing shareholder wealth, has been startingly successful, capturing the theory and practice of corporate governance for roughly fifty years. But recently the costs of this monomaniacal focus on the financial interests of one set of corporate participants have become clearer. At a time when the original reasons for restricting the corporate franchise to shareholders have been shown to rest …

Legal Academia's White Gaze, Renee Nicole Allen

Minnesota Law Review Vols. 106:2 onward (2021-present)

For Black law faculty, Blackness, the Black experience, and Black legal and social identity are not trends. Yet, there are inflection points where legal scholarship about race, particularly Blackness, is in vogue. The most recent rise in such legal scholarship came in the aftermath of George Floyd’s murder and the worldwide Black Lives Matter protests in 2020. When antiracist sentiment is high, the regard for scholarship central to the personhood of Black legal scholars is high. Even then, there is an expectation that Black authors write in ways that conform to the White norms of legal scholarship. Though central to …