Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (34982)
- International Law (32265)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (29789)
- Criminal Law (27911)
- Environmental Law (18444)
-
- Intellectual Property Law (17072)
- Legal Education (16878)
- State and Local Government Law (16692)
- Courts (16647)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (14896)
- Health Law and Policy (14627)
- Legislation (14560)
- Law and Society (14114)
- Administrative Law (14113)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (14050)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (13882)
- Human Rights Law (12316)
- Criminal Procedure (12064)
- Legal Profession (11684)
- Labor and Employment Law (11185)
- Business Organizations Law (10759)
- Arts and Humanities (10734)
- Sociology (10391)
- Legal History (10009)
- Legal Studies (9827)
- Jurisprudence (9247)
- Torts (9012)
- Science and Technology Law (8821)
- Property Law and Real Estate (8398)
- Institution
-
- Brigham Young University Law School (37205)
- University of Michigan Law School (21829)
- Duke Law (14425)
- Fordham Law School (13334)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (11951)
-
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (11866)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (11515)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (10936)
- Southern Methodist University (10168)
- William & Mary Law School (9532)
- American University Washington College of Law (9074)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (8932)
- UC Law SF (8867)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (8799)
- Notre Dame Law School (8249)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (8031)
- University of South Carolina (7596)
- University of Minnesota Law School (7364)
- University of Missouri School of Law (7266)
- Cornell University Law School (7209)
- University of Colorado Law School (7193)
- University of Kentucky (6982)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6925)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (6749)
- Marquette University Law School (6614)
- University of Chicago Law School (6494)
- Seton Hall University (6196)
- University of Washington School of Law (6130)
- University of Richmond (6022)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (5729)
- Keyword
-
- Law (6238)
- Constitutional law (3540)
- International law (3379)
- Supreme Court (3330)
- Human rights (3205)
-
- Constitutional Law (3005)
- United States (2673)
- First Amendment (2663)
- Copyright (2559)
- Constitution (2538)
- Discrimination (2512)
- International Law (2282)
- Evidence (2258)
- Criminal law (2243)
- Regulation (2188)
- Jurisprudence (2141)
- United States Supreme Court (2103)
- University of Michigan Law School (2099)
- History (2072)
- Privacy (2071)
- Intellectual property (1970)
- Philosophy (1969)
- Legislation (1945)
- Politics (1910)
- Legal education (1897)
- Jurisdiction (1894)
- Ethics (1877)
- Courts (1820)
- Law students (1784)
- Contracts (1781)
- Publication Year
-
- 2026 (7580)
- 2025 (10543)
- 2024 (10969)
- 2023 (11463)
- 2022 (14827)
-
- 2021 (13133)
- 2020 (12812)
- 2019 (12038)
- 2018 (13590)
- 2017 (14046)
- 2016 (15271)
- 2015 (14369)
- 2014 (12634)
- 2013 (12812)
- 2012 (13465)
- 2011 (11717)
- 2010 (11499)
- 2009 (11211)
- 2008 (10753)
- 2007 (10551)
- 2006 (11365)
- 2005 (10092)
- 2004 (9683)
- 2003 (8863)
- 2002 (8338)
- 2001 (9172)
- 2000 (8631)
- 1999 (7767)
- 1998 (7674)
- 1992 (7926)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (21546)
- Articles (11521)
- Michigan Law Review (11192)
- Faculty Publications (8709)
- American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 (8590)
-
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (through 1995) (6781)
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (6683)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006) (6653)
- North Carolina Law Review (6028)
- Louisiana Law Review (5640)
- Fordham Law Review (5038)
- Indiana Law Journal (4891)
- Scholarly Works (4752)
- West Virginia Law Review (4375)
- Marquette Law Review (4292)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965) (4290)
- Law and Contemporary Problems (4157)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (through 1999) (4057)
- SMU Law Review (4056)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019) (4013)
- Case Western Reserve Law Review (3960)
- Missouri Law Review (3741)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (3653)
- Kentucky Law Journal (3638)
- South Carolina Law Review (3466)
- Notre Dame Law Review (3373)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020) (3368)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –) (3367)
- Washington Law Review (3365)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (3361)
- Publication Type
Articles 3811 - 3840 of 544812
Full-Text Articles in Law
Indeterminacy And The Political Economy: Cls, Legal Politics, And Defetishizing The Lpe Debate, Akbar Rasulov
Indeterminacy And The Political Economy: Cls, Legal Politics, And Defetishizing The Lpe Debate, Akbar Rasulov
Law and Contemporary Problems
No abstract provided.
Capitalism & Jurisprudence, Paulo Barrozo
Capitalism & Jurisprudence, Paulo Barrozo
Law and Contemporary Problems
No abstract provided.
Falling Flat: Why Ai Cannot Free Melodies From Copyright Protection With “All The Music” As An Example, Hayley Huber
Falling Flat: Why Ai Cannot Free Melodies From Copyright Protection With “All The Music” As An Example, Hayley Huber
Duke Law & Technology Review
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to surprise us with its humanlike abilities, it raises the question of whether AI-created music can or should be afforded legal protection. Particularly, how should copyright law treat melodies produced by an AI designed to algorithmically generate every possible melody? This article seeks to answer that question, ultimately concluding that AI-produced melodies are not copyrightable and that melodies are not merely facts undeserving of copyright protection, but something valuable to mankind and worth protecting by law.
The article explores Damien Riehl’s All the Music project (ATM) and his arguments for why ATM’s outputs should be …
Ndls Communicator: Week Of 03.30.26, Notre Dame Law School
Ndls Communicator: Week Of 03.30.26, Notre Dame Law School
NDLS Communicator
The Latest News
- Religious Liberty Clinic files amicus brief urging court to reject government’s efforts to suppress religious expression in the workplace
- Shaping the Next Generation: Notre Dame Law School Faculty Reflect on Teaching, Mentorship, and the Law
- Kelsey Zorzi Discusses High-Stakes Religious Liberty Cases Around the World
- Notre Dame Law School’s All-Women Jessup Team Advances to International Rounds for the First Time in ND Law History
- Notre Dame Law Students Contribute to U.N. Report on Religious Freedom and Honoring the Dead
Student News
- Dennis Wieboldt, a joint J.D./Ph.D. student in history at Notre Dame
Faculty Briefs
- Diane Desierto
- Jimmy …
Mmu: 03/30/26-04/05/26, Student Bar Association
Mmu: 03/30/26-04/05/26, Student Bar Association
Monday Morning Update
This Week @ NDLS
Mass Times
Commons Daily Menu
Saint of the Week
General Announcements
The Whitney Museum Of American Art, Cardozo Art Law Society
The Whitney Museum Of American Art, Cardozo Art Law Society
2025–2026 Flyers
No abstract provided.
What I Wish I Knew As A 1l Part 2: Journals And Honor Societies, Minority Law Student Alliance (Mlsa)
What I Wish I Knew As A 1l Part 2: Journals And Honor Societies, Minority Law Student Alliance (Mlsa)
2025–2026 Flyers
No abstract provided.
The 21st Annual Outlaw: Cardozo's Lgbtqia+ Law Student Association Presents E. Nathaniel Gates Awards, Cardozo Outlaw
The 21st Annual Outlaw: Cardozo's Lgbtqia+ Law Student Association Presents E. Nathaniel Gates Awards, Cardozo Outlaw
2025–2026 Flyers
No abstract provided.
Passover Tabling, Jewish Law Students Association (Jlsa)
Passover Tabling, Jewish Law Students Association (Jlsa)
2025–2026 Flyers
Join us in the lobby for pre-Passover bagels!
The Together Lawsuit: What Will Matter After The Motion To Dismiss, Zeyu Liu
The Together Lawsuit: What Will Matter After The Motion To Dismiss, Zeyu Liu
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog
On February 20, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California denied a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant William Morris Endeavor Entertainment (WME) in a copyright infringement claim brought forth by Plaintiff StudioFest, a production company. It is alleged that WME’s film Together infringed on the screenplay of the movie Better Half, whose copyright is owned by the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff only claimed a screenplay violation and alleged that in 2020, it sent the full script and synopsis to the agents of codefendants Dave Franco and Alison Brie as part of an offer to have them …
Berbagai Masalah Hukum Bersangkutan Dengan Rumah Susun Dan Pemilikan Satuan Rumah Susun, Prof. Boedi Harsono, S.H.
Berbagai Masalah Hukum Bersangkutan Dengan Rumah Susun Dan Pemilikan Satuan Rumah Susun, Prof. Boedi Harsono, S.H.
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Abstract
HawaiʻI’S Housing Crisis: Unpacking The Limits Of S.B. 2919, Carley Matsumoto
HawaiʻI’S Housing Crisis: Unpacking The Limits Of S.B. 2919, Carley Matsumoto
Seattle University Law Review Online
The State of Hawaiʻi is facing a housing crisis exacerbated by natural disasters and public health emergencies. Hawaiʻi’s legislature seeks to ameliorate Hawaiʻi’s housing crisis with Senate Bill 2919, which gives all counties in Hawaiʻi the broad power to regulate short-term rentals. While this law was adopted with laudable intentions, it has significant shortcomings and will likely not solve Hawaiʻi’s longstanding housing crisis. This Comment argues for an alternative, tax-based solution to address the housing crisis.
Chancery Court Rules That Dgcl § 271 Does Not Require Stockholder Approval Of Foreclosure Sale Of Corporate Assets, Robert S. Reder, Emily Batuner
Chancery Court Rules That Dgcl § 271 Does Not Require Stockholder Approval Of Foreclosure Sale Of Corporate Assets, Robert S. Reder, Emily Batuner
Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc
No abstract provided.
Chancery Court Rules That Legacy Charter Provision Governing Amendments Did Not Opt Out Of Revised Dgcl § 242(D)’S Lower Voting Standard For Increasing Authorized Shares, Robert S. Reder, Joshua Hiero
Chancery Court Rules That Legacy Charter Provision Governing Amendments Did Not Opt Out Of Revised Dgcl § 242(D)’S Lower Voting Standard For Increasing Authorized Shares, Robert S. Reder, Joshua Hiero
Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc
No abstract provided.
“External Restraints” On Article Ii?, Elias Neibart
“External Restraints” On Article Ii?, Elias Neibart
Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc
No abstract provided.
Cardozo Law News Brief: March 27, 2026, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law
Cardozo Law News Brief: March 27, 2026, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law
Cardozo Law News Briefs
Highlights from the March 27, 2026, Cardozo Law News Brief include:
- Professor Rachel Landy was quoted in the Los Angeles Times and Newsweek on a Supreme Court ruling limiting internet providers’ liability for copyright infringement, noting the music industry may need to seek legislative solutions.
- Sarah Chu, Director of Policy & Reform at the Perlmutter Center for Legal Justice, spoke to Undark about a new study challenging the reliability of firearms analysis in forensic science.
- Professor Peter Markowitz was quoted in NewsNation on the rise of no-bond ICE detention cases and the growing number of successful legal challenges.
- Professor …
Brief Of Former Federal Circuit Chief Judge Paul R. Michel And Scholars Of Law And Economics As Amici Curae In Support Of Respondents, In Hikma Pharmaceuticals Usa, Inc. V. Amarin Pharma, Inc., Jess Miers, Emily Michiko Morris, Mark F. Schultz, Kristina M.L. Acri, Bowman Heiden, Joshua Kresh, Honorable Paul Michel, Kristen Jakobsen Osenga, Douglas Park, Ted M. Sichelman
Brief Of Former Federal Circuit Chief Judge Paul R. Michel And Scholars Of Law And Economics As Amici Curae In Support Of Respondents, In Hikma Pharmaceuticals Usa, Inc. V. Amarin Pharma, Inc., Jess Miers, Emily Michiko Morris, Mark F. Schultz, Kristina M.L. Acri, Bowman Heiden, Joshua Kresh, Honorable Paul Michel, Kristen Jakobsen Osenga, Douglas Park, Ted M. Sichelman
Akron Law Faculty Publications
- Innovation in Identification and Clinical Trials Testing of New Indications Yields Great Public Benefits but Requires the Incentive of Patent Protection.
- Section viii [skinny label statemetnts] was Never Intended to be a Safe Harbor for Infringement of Method of Use Patents.
- Allowing this Case to Proceed Past the Rule 12 Stage will not Deter Section viii Carve-Outs.
Kodak To Deepfakes: Publicity Rights And Abuse Of Our Likenesses, Michael Goodyear
Kodak To Deepfakes: Publicity Rights And Abuse Of Our Likenesses, Michael Goodyear
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
The Uva Softball Invitational, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law, University Of Virginia School Of Law
The Uva Softball Invitational, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law, University Of Virginia School Of Law
2025–2026 Flyers
Join the Cardozo Law softball team and hundreds of law students in Charlottesville to enjoy a weekend of softball and camaraderie!
Brief Of Amici Curiae Immigration Law Professors In Support Of Respondent, Peter L. Markowitz, Lindsay Nash
Brief Of Amici Curiae Immigration Law Professors In Support Of Respondent, Peter L. Markowitz, Lindsay Nash
Amicus Briefs
Amicus curiae brief submitted by immigration law professors in support of the respondent in Bondi v. Lau before the Supreme Court of the United States. The brief argues that lawful permanent residents returning from travel abroad may not be treated as seeking admission unless they satisfy the statutory criteria set forth in the Immigration and Nationality Act. It further contends that ambiguities in deportation statutes should be resolved in favor of noncitizens under the longstanding immigration rule of lenity.
Access To Justice After Medina V Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, Daniel G. Aaron, Nicole Huberfeld
Access To Justice After Medina V Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, Daniel G. Aaron, Nicole Huberfeld
Faculty Scholarship
Access to justice is “the ability of all people to seek and obtain effective remedies through accessible, affordable, … and culturally competent institutions of justice.”1 Historically, patients and physicians have worked together to protect the integrity of medical care as well as patients’ rights by challenging unlawful government actions in court. Yet the US Supreme Court recently issued decisions that may impede access to justice, potentially empowering federal, state, and local governments to interfere with evidence-based care. We explore constraints on access to justice that may arise after Medina v Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (PPSA) (606 US 357, 2025), …
Lost And Found, Katherine M. Houlden
Lost And Found, Katherine M. Houlden
Nebraska Journal on Advancing Justice
No abstract provided.
Home Of The Brave, Land Of The Free: The Star-Spangled Banner's Contested History, Michael H. Hoffheimer
Home Of The Brave, Land Of The Free: The Star-Spangled Banner's Contested History, Michael H. Hoffheimer
Nebraska Journal on Advancing Justice
No abstract provided.
Pearl's Perfect Last Will - Crushed By Infantilism Bias, Edward F. Fogarty Mr
Pearl's Perfect Last Will - Crushed By Infantilism Bias, Edward F. Fogarty Mr
Nebraska Journal on Advancing Justice
No abstract provided.
Dangerous Or Neglected, Amanda Landaverde
Dangerous Or Neglected, Amanda Landaverde
Nebraska Journal on Advancing Justice
No abstract provided.
The Call To Action, And My Reluctant Answer, Audrey R. Svane
The Call To Action, And My Reluctant Answer, Audrey R. Svane
Nebraska Journal on Advancing Justice
No abstract provided.
Legacy: Introduction To Issue 2, Nicholas L. Marti
Legacy: Introduction To Issue 2, Nicholas L. Marti
Nebraska Journal on Advancing Justice
No abstract provided.
Volume 2, Issue 2 Masthead, Njaj Editorial Board
Volume 2, Issue 2 Masthead, Njaj Editorial Board
Nebraska Journal on Advancing Justice
No abstract provided.
Lawyers’, Law Professors’ And Law Students’ Free Speech: The Rule Of Law, Civility, And Informed Engagement, Eli Wald
Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development
(Excerpt)
The Article is organized as follows. Part I summarizes the traditional doctrine governing lawyers’ free speech, as well as the related doctrines of free speech, academic freedom, and tenure on college campuses. Part II explores twenty-first century developments that have thrown these old established doctrines into a state of flux.
Part III consists of three sections. The first suggests a new understanding of lawyers’ free speech, arguing that unprecedented twenty-first-century attacks on the rule of law justify recognizing a third, narrowly tailored restriction on lawyers’ free speech. In addition to the traditional restrictions grounded in protecting clients from lawyers’ …
Some Thoughts About Free Speech And Hostile Environment Discrimination On College Campuses, Mark Tushnet
Some Thoughts About Free Speech And Hostile Environment Discrimination On College Campuses, Mark Tushnet
Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development
(Excerpt)
Section I examines which kinds of utterances may be considered in determining whether a hostile environment exists, and how those utterances may be taken into account. After distinguishing between targeted utterances directed at an identifiable individual and general statements that disparage a racial or nation-origin group, this Section focuses on targeted utterances.
Section II then turns to general statements, typically of a more clearly political sort. After describing the quite limited nature under which individuals can be held liable for general statements, the Section argues that such statements can be part of the “dossier” relevant to hostile environment discrimination, …