Law Commons^™

Engle V. Second Judicial District Court, 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 30 (Apr. 16, 2026), Andre Anaya

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Economic hardship excuses a probation violation for failure to pay restitution, but does not satisfy the separate requirement that a defendant fulfill all probation conditions before a conviction may be set aside.

Lennar Communities Nevada, Llc, And Greystone Nevada, Llc V. Pamela Whalen, 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 29 (Apr. 16, 2026), Christianne White

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Courts should employ a totality of the circumstances test when determining if a party acted inconsistently with the right to arbitrate.

Brushstrokes & Bequests: Estate Planning For Artist And Collectors, Cardozo Art Law Society, Cardozo Fame Center

2025–2026 Flyers

No abstract provided.

Cardozo Blsa Presents: Trivia Night, Black Law Students Association (Blsa)

2025–2026 Flyers

Have some fun before finals and compete in a few rounds of trivia!

The International Advocate For Peace Award Ceremony And Reception, Kukin Program For Conflict Resolution, Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, George E. Moore

2026 Event Invitations

April 16: 6 p.m. – 8:30 p.m.

The Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution will honor Ambassador George Moose, as the 25th recipient of the International Advocate for Peace Award. Ambassador Moose has served as U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Benin and to the Republic of Senegal eventually ascending to the role of Assistant Secretary of African Affairs and U.S. Permanent Representative to the European Office of the United Nations in Geneva. Between 2007- 2025 Ambassador Moose held leadership positions at the United States Institute of Peace, ultimately leading the organization as CEO.

April 17: 8:30 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. …

Brushstrokes & Bequests: Estate Planning For Artists And Collectors, Cardozo Fame Center, Cardozo Art Law Society, Samatha Anderson, Christopher Apgar, Pam Grutman, William Pearlstein, Parker Taylor

2026 Event Invitations

Estate Planning for Artists and Collectors

Who Wins? The Challenges And Potential Impacts Of State Courts’ Holdings In Fsu V. Acc, In Florida, And Acc V. Fsu, In North Carolina, Ethan Nickolaus Anagnos

University of Miami Business Law Review

Over the years, grant of rights (GOR) agreements have continually been the foundation for the transfer of exclusive rights between parties. In the ultra-competitive arena of the college football industry, these agreements have played an instrumental role in preserving and financing conferences and universities. Despite the prevalence of these GOR agreements, no university nor conference had ever attempted to challenge their validity before a court. That was until December 2023, when Florida State University (FSU) and the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) entered into a grueling and highly debated legal dispute regarding their GOR agreement, which is supposed to continue until …

Addictive By Design: Can States Regulate Social Media Algorithms In The Face Of Free Speech Challenges?, Niamh Kathleen Keane

University of Miami Business Law Review

The foe we did not know, the stranger that stole the show. Social media once presented itself as a friendly way to connect with loved ones through shared pictures and catchy captions. Yet, it has since shown its true colors; intentionally addicting its users—for its own financial benefit—and showing no remorse doing so.

Entranced, users set off on a digital journey, veering down paths they never imagined . . . Today, children as young as eight years old are exposed to extremely harmful content such as medically unsupported dieting techniques, substance abuse, and dangerous, life-threatening social media “trends,” all of …

Crossed Wires: How Current Federal Laws And Regulations Are Inadequate At Protecting Consumers From Sophisticated Wire Fraud Schemes, Emily Brafman

University of Miami Business Law Review

The shift to digital banking has redefined the financial services industry, allowing consumers to conduct everyday transactions, such as wire transfers, at the touch of a button. However, this convenience comes at a steep price: as digital banking becomes the norm, consumers are increasingly exploited by sophisticated cybercriminals, enabled by a legal system that is ill-equipped to handle modern phishing and wire fraud schemes, ultimately draining consumer accounts. Unfortunately, existing protective measures, such as the Electronic Funds Transfer Act (EFTA) and the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), have proven to be outdated and inadequate to address the unique risks posed by …

Originalism Chokes: The 2024 Trump Cases, Lawrence Rosenthal

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

By 2024, a majority of the Justices of the Supreme Court had expressed the view that to be legitimate, constitutional adjudication must be based on the original meaning of the Constitution’s text. Anything else, these Justices have argued, is illegitimate judicial policymaking. Yet, in what were likely the two most critical and high-profile cases decided in 2024, the Court, including its avowedly originalist Members, made no use of originalism. In the first case, the Court faced the question whether a State could bar President Trump from running for President under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. In the second, the …

Masthead

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

No abstract provided.

Editor-In-Chief's Foreword, Marlene Coss

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

No abstract provided.

Which Place Governs A Placeless Place: Predicting Jurisdiction In The Metaverse, Morrease Leftwich

University of Miami Business Law Review

Oliver Wendell Holmes’s famous characterization of legal study as “prediction” takes on renewed significance as courts confront novel jurisdictional questions in blockchain cases, particularly as technological innovation accelerates and transforms the digital landscape. Among these developments is the metaverse, which combines blockchain financial technology with early visions of the internet as a distinct realm for social interaction.

Concrete problems already emerging in these immersive environments underscore the stakes: Platform‑engineered anonymity and scale make user‑to‑user harms effectively unpoliceable, what recent work calls the “veil of scale,” frustrating redress even when laws apply. Amid this difficulty in identifying bad actors, scholars have …

Bruen, Levels Of Generality, And Our Historical Tradition Of The Regulatory “Why”, Kevin K. Wang

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

To pass Second Amendment muster under New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, gun laws encompassed by the Amendment’s plain text must align with our nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. A challenged law comports with history and tradition when it is sufficiently analogous to historical regulations along two metrics: “how” and “why” the regulation burdens the right to keep and bear arms.

One glaring ambiguity leftover from Bruen is the level of generality at which courts, when analogizing between laws past and present, must frame a regulation’s “how” and “why”—an issue of major consequence. Characterizing the “how” …

The Body At The Mercy Of The State: Sama V. Hannigan And The Fragmented Right To Refuse Across State Lines, Mallory Yeates

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Courts have long recognized bodily autonomy as a core constitutional value. Yet, doctrine governing reproductive healthcare tells a different story. Sama v. Hannigan exposes the fragility of the right to refuse medical treatment, particularly for incarcerated patients whose claims must survive the demanding standard of qualified immunity. When physicians removed Carrie Rahat Sama’s ovary despite her explicit refusal, her constitutional claim failed because no precedent with sufficiently similar facts had previously condemned such conduct. This case reveals how the “clearly established” prong of qualified immunity can foreclose redress for blatant violations of autonomy.

This Note argues that the viability of …

United States V. Skrmetti: On Realism, Reason, And Hope, Marc Spindelman

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

No abstract provided.

Alumni Updates: Spring 2026, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Law News Archive

A roundup of professional achievements and career milestones of Cardozo alumni during Spring 2026, including partner promotions, judicial and government appointments, publications, leadership positions, awards, and other notable accomplishments across the legal profession.

One Year Of The Papacy Of Leo Xiv: The Role Of The Catholic Church In International Conflict Resolution, Cardozo Christian Law Student Association (Clsa), Cardozo International Law Society, Cardozo Dispute Resolution Society

2025–2026 Flyers

A roundtable discussion examining the first year of the papacy of Pope Leo XIV and the role of the Catholic Church in international conflict resolution.

Speaker: Dmytro Vovk, Visiting Professor, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Final Cut Vs. Final Print, Who Shapes Consent On Set ?, Cardozo Entertainment Law Society

2025–2026 Flyers

Join entertainment attorneys and intimacy coordinators for candid discussion on how consent is negotiated, documented and enforced in film and television.

Save The Date, Latin American Law Students Association (Lalsa)

2025–2026 Flyers

Save the date and mark your calendar for FIESTA!

You Are Invited To Fiesta With Cardozo Lalsa, Latin American Law Students Association (Lalsa)

2025–2026 Flyers

Join us in celebrating the end of the year !

Public Understanding Of Ai-Enabled Cyber Threats And Its Impact On Cybersecurity Governance In The United States, Charlotte M. Barbrick

LSU Master's Theses

Artificial intelligence is spreading quickly in workplaces and everyday life, and that fast growth is creating cybersecurity and privacy risks that current laws and organizational practices do not fully address. This thesis asks whether AI-specific knowledge shapes public support for cybersecurity governance of AI-enabled systems in the United States. Using nationally representative survey data from the Pew Research Center’s American Trends Panel (ATP) Wave 119, fielded December 12--18, 2022, I estimate weighted regression models to test how objective AI knowledge shapes support for cybersecurity governance. I also test whether concern about data misuse helps explain that relationship and whether AI …

Eighty Years Of Gubernatorial Commutations In Ohio Death Penalty Cases: A Retrospective, Dale A. Baich

Akron Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reimagining Compassionate Release: A Lexicon For Change, Tom Nicklin, Sarah L. Cooper

Akron Law Review

No abstract provided.

Finality Is Not The Last Word, Bidish Sarma

Akron Law Review

Finality has long been upheld as a powerful governmental interest in the context of criminal adjudications. However, its nearly mythic status in our law belies its ongoing utility. Rather than fulfilling its historical goals of preserving resources and focusing incarcerated individuals on the task of rehabilitation, finality today undermines focus, facilitating mass incarceration and perpetual punishment. We are not required to accept finality as the last word; instead, we can and should interrogate its value in light of the system we have built.

This Essay briefly traces the historical development of finality in American jurisprudence. It then outlines the subsequent …

Exploring Concerns About Discretion And Disparity In Second Look Sentencing, Douglas A. Berman

Akron Law Review

This essay explores the emergence of “second look” sentencing laws in the United States, which allow judicial review of previously imposed prison sentences under certain circumstances. Highlighting the expansion of these laws, the essay examines the broad discretion granted to judges and prosecutors in deciding when and how to reduce prison sentences against the backdrop of an earlier era of structured sentencing reforms aimed at regulating sentencing discretion and reducing disparities. Somewhat ironically, the rigidity and severity of some structured sentencing reforms have contributed to modern mass incarceration to engender the emerging “second look” sentencing movement.

The essay details various …

American Mercy: The Case For Clemency, Mark Osler

Akron Law Review

After months of controversial and norm-busting clemency grants by both the Biden and second Trump administrations, many are calling for the presidential pardon power to be curtailed or eliminated. The complaints are understandable, but the death of clemency- in one fell swoop, or by a thousand cuts—would be a tragedy. Such a suggestion embodies the mistake we make so often in criminal law: imposing permanent solutions to short-term problems. Clemency’s role in national reconciliation, the mitigation of harsh laws, and in holding out hope for redemption to those convicted is too dear to lose. The answer to current harms lies …

Views, Knowledge, And Implications Of Abortion Law In Texas Obgyn Residencies, Jessica Harper, Sharon Barazani, Kate Mowry, Melissa Mendez

Central & West Texas and San Antonio GME Research Day 2026

No abstract provided.

The Fate Of Atkins In A Post-Dobbs Era: How State Discretion Risks Harm To Intellectually Disabled And Black Defendants, Chole Quinn Sotomayor

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice (ERSJ) Blog

The Supreme Court’s stance on the death penalty has evolved over time. In Furman v. Georgia, the Court held that the death penalty violated the Eighth Amendment, only to reinstate it in Gregg v. Georgia four years later.  As the Court continued to interpret “evolving standards of decency,” it later categorically barred the execution of defendants with an intellectual disability in Atkins v. Virginia.  To determine if an individual is intellectually disabled, they must demonstrate subaverage adaptive skills that existed before age eighteen.  The Court has also recognized that IQ scores carry a ±5 margin of error and has …

The Deregulation Of Cancer, Daniel G. Aaron

Texas A&M Law Review

Fifty years ago, the U.S. embarked on a radical new path. Under pressure from the environmental movement, Congress passed an array of statutes aimed at regulating carcinogens out of our world. This regulatory experiment sprawled from air and water to food and consumer products.

Legal scholars have paid scant attention to this wave of cancer regulation despite its size and importance and the public’s apparent interest in avoiding carcinogens. But there is a growing literature finding flaws with individual regimes within the framework, such as the Clean Air Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, and the Tobacco Control Act. In …