Law Commons^™

Introduction—Corporate And Securities Law Responses To Climate Change: Law And Political Economy Perspectives, Sarah C. Haan, Faith Stevelman

Scholarly Articles

This introductory essay has two parts. First, we address differences between the Law and Economics perspective and the Law and Political Economy (LPE) perspective on business and securities law and climate change. For example, an LPE approach—with its concern for discerning winners and losers and how power operates through law—rejects the facile separation of public and private law concerns. LPE repudiates the common notion that business law is and should solely be about maximizing shareholder wealth, with all else falling to government ex post. Indeed, elsewhere we have written about this as a misleading and harmful “separate spheres” conceit (Stevelman …

Injunctive Restraint, Cassandra Burke Robertson

Faculty Publications

Preliminary injunctions against government action have evolved from extraordinary remedies into routine instruments of political contestation, with both Republican and Democratic administrations finding their initiatives halted by nationwide judicial orders. These injunctions serve vital functions in our constitutional system—preventing irreparable harm to fundamental rights and providing necessary checks on executive power in an era of congressional gridlock. Yet their increasing use has generated legitimate institutional concerns, particularly when a single district judge, often selected through strategic forum shopping, can unilaterally suspend national policies of significant importance. This Article examines this tension between the necessary role of nationwide injunctions in protecting …

The Eighth Amendment’S Paper Tiger: Pain, Executions, And The Cruel And Unusual Punishment Clause, Alexandra L. Klein

Scholarly Articles

The Eighth Amendment prohibits “cruel and unusual punishments.” This prohibition applies to the way states carry out executions: states may impose capital punishment but may not do so in a way that is unconstitutionally cruel. Over a trilogy of cases that began with Baze v. Rees in 2008, the Court developed a test for analyzing whether a state’s proposed method of execution violated the Eighth Amendment. Under Baze/Glossip/Bucklew, a person challenging a state’s method of execution must show that the method of execution poses a severe risk of “superadded” pain and suffering that can be alleviated by a readily …

Criminal Caselaw Notebook 2025, Hon. Ronald Kessler

Washington State Books

This publication from King County Superior Court judge Ronald Kessler is updated semi-annually and is distributed free of charge. It includes citations to Washington state case law on a variety of criminal law topics.

A Lawyer’S Duty To Maintain Prospective Client Confidentiality To Avoid Disqualification In Bankruptcy Matters, Victoria Rey

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The legal profession imposes strict ethical duties on attorneys to maintain client confidentiality. While this duty is traditionally associated with formal attorney-client relationships, it also extends to prospective clients–individuals who consult an attorney about potential representation, even if they do not ultimately retain the attorney. In bankruptcy proceedings, where prospective clients often disclose sensitive financial information, the duty of confidentiality is crucial. This duty is essential for preserving the integrity of the bankruptcy process, preventing conflicts of interest, and ensuring fairness for all parties involved. As a result, a breach of this duty may warrant the disqualification of counsel. …

Applicability Of Section 109(A)’S Debtor Eligibility Requirements To Chapter 15 Cases, Aisha K. Sabar

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Upon a petition for recognition, a foreign insolvency case may be recognized in the United States under chapter 15 of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"). Courts are divided as to whether section 109(a)’s debtor eligibility requirements, which apply to U.S. bankruptcy cases, apply to a chapter 15 case. In the Second Circuit, a foreign representative will have to demonstrate that the debtor satisfies section 109(a)’s requirement of being "a person who resides or has a domicile, a place of business, or property in the United States, or a municipality," while debtors situated in the …

The Rooker-Feldman Doctrine In The Bankruptcy Context, Brendan Mclaughlin

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

An unfavorable state court judgment can lead to the losing party seeking a second bite at the apple in federal court, but the Rooker-Feldman doctrine blocks second attempts with limited exceptions. The jurisdictional doctrine is derived from two United States Supreme Court cases: Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. and District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, where the collective holdings stand for the principle that a state court judgment is conclusive and that the lower federal courts lack jurisdiction to review such judgments. The Supreme Court is the only federal court authorized to review state court judgments. …

Causation’S Due Process Dimensions, Cassandra Burke Robertson, Charles W. "Rocky" Rhodes

Faculty Publications

For decades, courts have grappled with the tension between compensating victims of mass harms and maintaining fairness to defendants when causation is difficult to prove. This Article argues that the Supreme Court’s due process jurisprudence provides a relevant framework for navigating this tension. We contend that the Court over the last three decades has established a consistent due process approach in punitive damages and personal jurisdiction cases, which is rooted in antecedents tracing to the nineteenth century and relies on a nexus of interests that balances individual rights, state interests, and federalism concerns. This framework, we argue, has significant implications …

Table Of Contents, Annals Of Health Law & Life Sciences

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

No abstract provided.

Foreword, Megan Baumgardner

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

No abstract provided.

A Band-Aid Solution: The Need For A Better Treatment Plan For The Physician Burnout Crisis, Sarah Mangroo

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents, Annals Of Health Law & Life Sciences

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

No abstract provided.

Foreword, Megan Baumgardner

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

No abstract provided.

Imperfect Access: Structural Barriers And External Threats To Preventative Care, Richard Hughes Iv, Dorit R. Reiss

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

No abstract provided.

Dignity In Detention: Addressing Gynecological Healthcare Needs Of People Detained By U.S. Immigration Authorities, Glykeria Teji, Esq., Shira Wisotsky, Esq.

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

People who require gynecological and obstetric care and who are detained by U.S. federal immigration authorities face unique challenges. This article examines how the current legal and administrative landscape fails to hold those responsible for providing healthcare accountable, effectively blocking access to gynecological care, and, assuming no immediate abolition of immigrant detention facilities, how international human law principles can and should guide a reimagining of the system. We also propose interim steps that U.S. authorities can take to protect access to basic and needed gynecological care for the people that they detain. Beginning with an overview of immigration detention as …

Defending Olmstead: Strategies For Combatting Institutional Bias To Improve Access To Mental Health Services In The Least Restrictive Setting, Craig Ismaili, Esq., Adrienne Langlois, Esq., Bren Pramanik, Esq.

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

No abstract provided.

Not Demented Enough: Dementia And Competency To Stand Trial, Rashmi Goel

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

Although competency to stand trial holds a vaunted position among the due-process rights in our criminal justice system, its current application is a mere shadow of the original promise articulated in Dusky v. United States. The competency-to-stand-trial requirement is supposed to protect the mentally ill and the mentally impaired from criminal trial, but the requirement has been continually chipped away, both doctrinally and practically. As a result, it no longer protects the most vulnerable. People with dementia, most often elderly with cognitive impairments, face a perilous ordeal when caught in the criminal justice system. And, as dementia rates increase, more …

Labor And Environment Entwined: A Radical Green New Deal And Just Transition In Applachia, Anne Marie Lofaso, Nicholas F. Stump

Faculty Articles and Other Publications

In this Article, Professor Lofaso and Professor Stump propose a genuinely transformative Green New Deal and Just Transition in Appalachia. The Article opens by tracing the long history of the Appalachian labor and environmental movements. Next, the Article interrogates the common contention that the Appalachian environmental and labor movements are opposed. While this contention has substantial truth, more complex forces have been at work in the region. Fossil fuel industry elites, for instance, have wielded exaggerated “jobs versus environment” rhetoric to maximize profits and quash emergent solidarities among local workers, residents, and activists.

This Article contends that a key solution …

Pushing Boundaries, Paula A. Monopoli

Faculty Scholarship

This essay was originally published in Balkinization as part of an online symposium and it is reprinted with permission. The essay engages with Julie Suk's book, After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do About It. It suggests that feminist legal scholars have been considering their intellectual options in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. In After Misogyny, Professor Suk offers a conceptual path forward in a post-Dobbs world. Suk’s trenchant analysis of the failure of law to render substantive gender equality and her …

Policing As General Warrants, Warren Buff, Brandon Hasbrouck

Scholarly Articles

The drafters of the Bill of Rights and its proponents envisioned a document constitutionalizing protections against some of the worst abuses they had experienced under English rule. Prominent businessmen—many of them engaged in smuggling— found their homes ransacked in search of contraband on flimsy evidence and without any reason given for the disruption of their business and consequent enrichment of government agents. The Fourth Amendment addressed the use of general warrants and writs of assistance to allow government agents to conduct broad searches with limited scrutiny. In the early years of the Constitution, this had little practical effect, because public …

Religious Exemptions To Anti-Discrimination Law: Children's Rights In The Constitutional Calculus, Tanya Washington, Catherine Smith, Robin Walker Sterling

Scholarly Articles

Increasingly, religious actors in the public sphere--whether in the provision of goods and services (Masterpiece Cakeshop) or in government contracting (Fulton)--are simply invoking a person's sexual orientation as inconsistent with their religious tenets to benefit from a legal doctrine that shields them from the requirement that they offer an underlying rationale for LGBTQ discrimination. Over the past decade, we have filed amicus briefs in United States Supreme Court cases advancing children's constitutional rights, including briefs providing a check on these religious-based arguments when they adversely impact children's rights in the familial and child regulation contexts and …

“Fly Me To The Moon . . . & Back”: The Intricate Interplay Between Copyright Law And Space Law, Marco Franzoso

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

This research focuses on the intricate interplay between two branches of law: copyright and space law. Through various scenarios, some real and some hypothetical, it underlines the inefficacy of the terrestrial copyright principle, namely the lex loci protection, when applied to outer space endeavors. In outer space, the law where the infringement arises is useful only when the jurisdiction is clear, which is on board of registered space objects; however, that is not even the case for all space objects. On board poli-jurisdictional entities, such as the ISS, the lex loci protectionis fails to provide a clear legal framework, at …

Transformative Experiences, Anticipatory Regret, And Informed Consent, Elizabeth Lanphier, Shannon Fyfe

Scholarly Articles

Regret risk is not consistently part of information sharing within informed consent. Yet two kinds of decisions that often invoke concerns about future regret, abortion and sterilization, raise considerations for the role of regret in clinical decision-making and informed consent, particularly regarding decisions about potentially transformative experiences. We distinguish between first-personal and second-personal anticipatory regret and argue that first-personal anticipatory regret can play a productive role, but second-personal anticipatory regret can function in ways that are pernicious. Introducing second-personal anticipatory regret into medical informed consent processes is, we argue, not only not required for informed medical decision-making, but impermissible within …

State Legislatures And Trans* Genocide (?) In The United States, Shannon Fyfe

Scholarly Articles

Certain state legislatures in the United States have targeted trans* people and other members of the queer community through an onslaught of legislative efforts since early 2020. Many of these efforts have targeted trans* youth specifically, by banning or limiting their access to gender-affirming care. As I have shown, gender-affirming care is necessary health care for trans* youth and is crucial for their mental and physical health and well-being. Some have argued that these legislative efforts targeting trans* youth are genocidal, that they are intentionally aimed at destroying the trans* community. I agree that the harm experienced by the trans* …

Copyright Doctrine Before The Tribunal Of Science: A Response To Professor Silbey, Matt Blaszczyk

Fellow, Adjunct, Lecturer, and Research Scholar Works

This is a response to Jessica Silbey’s article, A Matter of Facts: The Evolution of the Copyright Fact-exclusion and Its Implications for Disinformation and Democracy, which appeared in Volume 70(3) of the Journal of the Copyright Society.

Table Of Contents

Florida A & M University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Leadership

Florida A & M University Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Cartwithout A Mule: Comparing Solutions To Heirs Property And Other Real Property Issues Across Legal Systems In The Americas

Florida A & M University Law Review

This Article will examine historical real property issues in two legal systems in the Americas—Saint Lucia and Colombia—and draw comparisons to the heirs property plight in the United States. From this analysis, the Article will conclude that the United States must heed the lessons learned from the real property reforms of other legal systems and take more concerted and vigorous steps if the injustices of heirs property are to ever be truly resolved.

Agriculture And Family Farms:Intestate Succession And Allegations Of Fraud In Transfers

Florida A & M University Law Review

This Article is intended to contribute to the scholarship regarding family farms by focusing on caselaw in three distinct areas. First, this Article examines the legal issues that may arise with intestate succession of a family farm. The second part of this Article analyzes the legal issues surrounding family farms and alleged fraudulent transfers, conveyances, and deeds. In conclusion, given the myriad of considerations that arise with the transfer of family farms, producers and agricultural law practitioners must be aware of the risks of intestate succession and alleged fraudulent transfers, conveyances, and deeds to ensure the smooth succession of family …

A Cart Without Amule:Comparing Solutions To Heirs Property And Other Real Property Issues Across Legal Systems In The Americas

Florida A & M University Law Review

This Article will examine historical real property issues in two legal systems in the Americas—Saint Lucia and Colombia—and draw comparisons to the heirs property plight in the United States. From this analysis, the Article will conclude that the United States must heed the lessons learned from the real property reforms of other legal systems and take more concerted and vigorous steps if the injustices of heirs property are to ever be truly resolved.