Law Commons^™

Involuntary Commitment And Forced Psychiatric Drugging In The Trial Courts: Rights Violations As A Matter Of Course, James B. (Jim) Gottstein

Alaska Law Review

No abstract provided.

Money For Nothing? Unconditional Payments And Unjust Enrichment In Jackman V. Jewel Lake Villa One, Benjamin J. Roesch

Alaska Law Review

No abstract provided.

Journal Staff

Alaska Law Review

No abstract provided.

Brief For Industry Plaintiffs - Appellants: Twentieth Annual Pace National Environmental Law Moot Court Competition, James Holder, Stephanie Rocha

Pace Environmental Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Arkansas And Republican River Compacts: Litigation And Lessons, John B. Draper

Publications

No abstract provided.

Rio Grande Reservoir Symposium: Federal Perspective - Upper Rio Grande Operations Model And Urwops Update, April Sanders

Publications

No abstract provided.

Abiquiu Reservoir Present And Future, Andrew Lieuwen, Ph.D.

Publications

No abstract provided.

An Environmental Perspective On Rio Grande Reservoirs, Kara Gillon

Publications

No abstract provided.

Rio Grande Reservoirs: Legal Framework And Operations, Herman Settemeyer

Publications

No abstract provided.

Enhancing Courtroom Presentation Through Technology, Fredric I. Lederer

Popular Media

No abstract provided.

Courtroom Technology, Fredric I. Lederer, Tom O'Connor, Timothy A. Piganelli

Popular Media

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Issue 5, North Carolina Law Review

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Does The Supreme Court's Current Doctrine Of Stare Decisis Require Adherence To The Supreme Court's Current Doctrine Of Star Decisis, Michael Stokes Paulsen

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Modesty, Of A Sort, In The Setting Of Precedents, David E. Klein

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Chief Justice Roberts And Precedent: A Preliminary Study, Frank B. Cross

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Irrepressibility Of Precedent, Michael J. Gerhardt

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

On The Capacity Of The Roberts Court To Generate Consequential Precedent, Lee Epstein, Barry Friedman, Nancy Staudt

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

From Judge To Justice: Social Background Theory And The Supreme Court, Tracey E. George

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Law Of Small Numbers: Gonzales V. Carhart, Parents Involved In Community Schools, And Some Themes From The First Full Term Of The Roberts Court, Pamela S. Karlan

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

From Judge To Justice: Social Background Theory And The Supreme Court, Tracey E. George

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

The Roberts Court Justices already have revealed many differences from one another, but they also share a (possibly) significant commonality: Presidents promoted all of them to the U.S. Supreme Court from the U.S. Courts of Appeals. This means, of course, that they initially learned how to be judges while serving on a circuit court. How might the Justices' common route to the Court affect their actions on it? Social background theory hypothesizes that prior experience influences subsequent behavior such as voting, opinion writing, and coalition formation. This Article empirically analyzes promotion to the Supreme Court and examines the implications of …

Exile: Why The Human Rights Council Will Not Work, Daniel J. Graeber

Human Rights & Human Welfare

The Economist writes in an April 24th edition that the U.N.’s Human Rights Council, the predecessor to the sixty-year-old U.N. Commission on Human Rights, is a “one-sided Israeli-bashing” organization. The Economist argues that the inclusion of second- and third-tier countries from the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) and the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) makes it a forum for targeting offenses committed by the Israeli government against the Palestinian people.

Christina M. Cerna On Truth And Reconciliation In South Africa, Did The Trc Deliver? Edited By Audrey R. Chapman And Hugo Van Der Merwe. Philadelphia: University Of Pennsylvania Press, 2008. 346 Pp., Christina M. Cerna

Human Rights & Human Welfare

A review of:

Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa, Did the TRC Deliver? Edited by Audrey R. Chapman and Hugo van der Merwe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008. 346 pp.

Stephen James On The Battle For Welfare Rights: Politics And Poverty In Modern America By Felicia Kornbluh. Philadelphia: University Of Pennsylvania Press, 2007. 287pp., Stephen James

Human Rights & Human Welfare

A review of:

The Battle for Welfare Rights: Politics and Poverty in Modern America by Felicia Kornbluh. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007. 287pp.

Pass Go, Collect $200.00, And Hire Yourself An Expert – Article 46 And The Right To Expert Assistance, David Coombs

Other Scholarship

No abstract provided.

A Case Analysis Of Explaining The Main Factors That Contribute To Rok's Decision Making In Procurement Of Defense Articles, Se Young Kim

Theses and Dissertations

The purpose of this research was to explore the various factors that contribute to ROK’s decision making in procurement of foreign countries defense articles. South Korea is one of the largest weapon purchasers from the U.S. and needs a more self-reliant defense force that can maintain its security with its own authority under the current cease-fire situation. Thus, this study focused on identifying the main factors to consider in deciding whether to purchase a major defense weapon system from other countries. Through the interview of experts who participated in specific weapon programs, thirteen specific factors were evaluated including Interoperability, Offset …

Documenting Discrimination?, Thomas J. Miles, Adam B. Cox

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

No abstract provided.

The Espionage Act And National Security Whistleblowing After Garcetti, Stephen I. Vladeck

American University Law Review

Should government employees ever have a right to disseminate classified national security information to the public? As a general matter, of course, the answer is "no." It is necessarily tautological that the central purpose of classifying information is to keep that information secret. But what if the information pertains to what we might describe as "unlawful secrets," and the individual in question has exhausted all possible non-public remedies - and to no avail? Are there any circumstances in which the law enables the government employee to come forward? Should there be? As this Essay suggests, because of the broad language …

Foreword, Cesare P.R. Romano

Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Cross-Fertilization Of Principles Relating To Procedure And Remedies In The Jurisprudence Of International Courts And Tribunals, Chester Brown

Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

National And International Courts—Deference Or Disdain, Monica Pinto

Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.