Law Commons^™

The St. Thomas Effect: Law School Mission And The Formation Of Professional Identity, Jennifer Wright

Jennifer Wright

The legal profession has long been criticized for declining standards of professionalism. Recent studies have pointed to the crucial role of legal education in forming the professional identity of lawyers. Law schools must take seriously their duty to intentionally and thoughtfully shape their students’ sense of what it means to be a lawyer and of how their professional identities will align and coexist with their other personal and ethical commitments. In this article, I examine a case study of one law school, the University of St. Thomas School of Law, whose self-proclaimed raison d’etre is to produce a “different kind …

Hanging In A Balance: Freedom Of Expression And Religion, Puja Kapai, Anne Sy Cheung

Puja Kapai

When the liberty to freely express oneself is at odds with another’s right to freedom of religion, we are confronted with the classic dilemma of choosing between two equally fundamental, constitutionally and internationally protected rights. The contours of the said two rights however, are far from clear. Whilst freedom of expression is not an absolute right, its limits are controversial. Equally, while it is undisputed that freedom of religion is an internationally protected human right enshrined in various international instruments, there is no comprehensive international treaty which addresses as its subject the content and extent of the right of freedom …

Between Rogues And Liberals: Towards Value Pluralism As A Theory Of Freedom Of Religion In International Law, Peter G. Danchin

Peter G. Danchin

No abstract provided.

Constitution By Compromise, Howard Schweber, Amnon Cavari

Howard Schweber

The question of empowering the court and the limits of constitutional protection are at the heart of the debate over constitutional design in Israel. Lacking a comprehensive written constitution, Israel nonetheless has a set of basic laws which encompass many of the functions of a constitutional text making it a near-complete constitution. Nonetheless, there continues to be considerable support for the idea of a single, formally adopted constitutional text. Recently, several proposals have been brought to the forefront of political discussions through the actions of various interest groups outside the government, and energized and committed efforts by government officials and …

The Continuing Threshold Test For Free Exercise Claims, Andy G. Olree

Andy G Olree

When a claimant challenges some governmental law or action under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, courts have long required the claimant to make out a prima facie case that the government has burdened the exercise of the claimant’s sincerely held religious beliefs. This requirement has been referred to as the threshold test for free exercise claims, since claimants must make this showing as a threshold matter before courts will proceed to evaluate the burden and the governmental interest at stake under some standard of scrutiny. This Article argues that, while the U.S. Supreme Court has recently adopted …

Clitoridectomy And The Economics Of Islamic Marriage & Divorce Law, Ryan M. Riegg

Ryan M. Riegg

Suicide, Law And Morality, Edward Rubin

Edward Rubin

Dear Editors,

The enclosed article argues that blanket prohibitions against assisted suicide are unconstitutional. This position has been advanced by a number of commentators, who have generally based their argument on the so-called right to die. From a constitutional perspective, however, this right can only be grounded on either substantive due process or the right of privacy, that is, the penumbra of the first eight amendments. While the argument isn’t necessarily wrong, it suffers from its reliance on aggressive and controversial interpretations of the constitutional text.

The position this article advances is that prohibitions against assisted suicide violate the First …

When Churches Divide: On Neutrality, Deference, And Unpredictability, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

Predictions that the Anglican Communion would be torn asunder have proven false, at least for now. Nonetheless, continuing disagreements about whether Bishop Gene Robinson should be a bishop and about whether same-sex unions should be recognized provide an ever-present reason for a possible break within that Communion. Were there such a break, there might well be numerous suits regarding the ownership of various properties.

Historically, churches have split off from their denominational affiliations for a whole host of reasons including disagreements over property ownership, church leadership, or member equality. When such divisions take place, the ownership of particular buildings or …

The Political Origins Of Secular Public Education: The New York City School Controversy, 1840-1842, Ian C. Bartrum

Ian C Bartrum

THE ORIGINS OF SECULAR PUBLIC EDUCATION: THE NEW YORK SCHOOL CONTROVERSY, 1840-1842 As the title suggests, this article explores the historical origins of secular public education, with a particular focus on the controversy surrounding the Catholic petitions for school funding in nineteenth-century New York City. The article first examines the development of Protestant nonsectarian common schools in the northeast, then turns to the New York controversy in detail, and finally explores that controversy’s legacy in state constitutions and the Supreme Court. It is particularly concerned with two ideas generated in New York: (1) Bishop John Hughes’ objection to nonsectarianism as …

The Kosovo Crisis: A Dostoievskian Dialogue On International Law, Statecraft, And Soulcraft, Robert J. Delahunty

Robert J. Delahunty

No abstract provided.

The Coercion Test: On Prayer, Offense, And Doctrinal Inculcation, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

Several different tests have been proposed to determine whether a state practice violates the Establishment Clause, including the Lemon test, the Endorsement test, and the Coercion test. While no test yet commands the consistent support of members of the Court, it is clear that several members of the Court favor some version of the Coercion test. Interpretation and evaluation of that test are rather difficult, however, because Court members differ greatly both about what kind of coercion triggers the relevant protections and about what the test is designed to prevent. The great disparity in views both about the reach and …

The Congressional Chaplaincies, Christopher C. Lund

Christopher C Lund

Twenty five years ago, in Marsh v. Chambers, the Supreme Court considered the congressional chaplaincies, and concluded that they were not “an ‘establishment’ of religion or a step toward establishment,” but instead were “simply a tolerable acknowledgment of beliefs widely held among the people of this country.” That latter phrase has been repeated hundreds of times in cases and law review articles; it suggests that the chaplaincies are uninteresting and uncontroversial and that they have been so throughout our history.

The Court in Marsh looked only briefly at the history of the chaplaincies. But a deeper look at that history …

Bloodstains On A "Code Of Honor", Kenneth Lasson

Kenneth Lasson

Abstract In the real world of the Twenty-first Century, deep biases against women are prevalent in much of Muslim society. Although there is no explicit approval of honor killing in Islamic law (Sharia), its culture remains fundamentally patriarchal. As unfathomable as it is to Western minds, “honor killing” is a facet of traditional patriarchy, and its condonation can be traced largely to ancient tribal practices. Justifications for it can be found in the codes of Hammurabi and in the family law of the Roman Empire. Unfortunately, honor killings in the Twenty-first Century are not isolated incidents, nor can they be …

"The Servant Of Two Masters": The Influence Of Church/State Paradigms On The Rise And Fall Of Clergy Disqualification Clauses In The United Kingdom And United States, Hunter M. Abell

Hunter M Abell

The role of clergy in American politics grows more hotly debated with each passing election cycle. This submission examines the competing loyalties a politically active member of the clergy experiences as he or she attempts to simultaneously serve their faith and the body politic. In doing so, it reviews the practice of clergy disqualification which prohibited clergy from serving in a representative body. It examines the rich and intriguing history the practice enjoyed in both the United States and United Kingdom and offers the theory that the use of clergy disqualification in both countries arose out of each country’s unique, …

Public Law, Private Law, And Legal Science, Chaim Saiman

Working Paper Series

This essay explores the historical and conceptual connections between private law and nineteenth century classical legal science from the perspective of German, American, and Jewish law. In each context, legal science flourished when scholars examined the confined doctrines traditional to private law, but fell apart when applied to public, administrative and regulatory law. Moving to the contemporary context, while traditional private law scholarship retains a prominent position in German law and academia, American law has increasingly shifted its focus from the language of substantive private law to a legal regime centered on public and procedural law. The essay concludes by …

What Counts As Discrimination In Ledbetter And The Implications For Sex Equality Law, Deborah L. Brake

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Civil Resolution Of Ecclesiastical Disputes, Paul E. Salamanca

Law Faculty Popular Media

In this article for Bench & Bar Magazine (the Kentucky Bar Association's magazine), Professor Paul E. Salamanca discusses three historically prominent approaches to solving legal problems in ecclesiastical disputes.

The Protection And Alienation Of Religious Minorities: On The Evolution Of The Endorsement Test, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

The Endorsement test is one of the tests currently used by the United States Supreme Court to determine whether a particular state practice implicating religion passes constitutional muster and has been described as the test to make that determination. While commentators have noted that the current test is difficult for lower courts to apply and is likely to result in relevantly similar cases being decided dissimilarly, too little attention has been paid to the ways that the test itself has evolved. The Court’s more recent applications of the test have conveyed a message far different from the one previously communicated, …

“What’S The Matter With You Catholics?” Soundings In Catholic Social Thought: Traditions In Turmoil. By Mary Ann Glendon, Patrick Mckinley Brennan

Working Paper Series

This review essay of Mary Ann Glendon's Traditions in Turmoil (2006) explores such topics as tradition, moral discourse, human rights, subsidiarity, natural law, the common good, civil society, and constitutional and statutory interpretation. In doing so, it provides an introduction both to Catholic social thought and to the thought of Bernard Lonergan.

Differentiating Church And State (Without Losing The Church), Patrick Mckinley Brennan

Working Paper Series

There is an ongoing debate about whether the U.S. Constitution includes -- or should be interpreted to include -- a principle of "church autonomy." Catholic doctrine and political theology, by contrast, clearly articulated a principle of "libertas ecclesiae," liberty of the church, when during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries the Church differentiated herself from the state. This article explores the meaning and origin of the doctrine of the libertas ecclesiae and the proper relationship among churches, civil society, and government. In doing so, it highlights the points at which church and state should cooperate and the points at which …

Beware The "One-Flesh Union": Conservatives Coalesce In Opposition To Same-Sex Marriage, William B. Turner

William B Turner

This article explores the notion of "one-flesh union" as the definitional basis for marriage according to Christian conservatives, and as an indication of the ways in which various types of Christian conservatives are overcoming their historical animosity to unite in opposition to same-sex marriage. The phrase, "one-flesh union," comes directly from the Biblical book of Genesis.

Book Review, Eric Heinze

Prof. Eric Heinze, Queen Mary University of London

Book Review: Randall Baldwin Clark, "The Law Most Beautiful and Best: Medical Argument and Magical Rhetoric in Plato’s Laws", Lexington Books, 2004 (pp. 178 + xiv) Randall Clark has distinguished himself among a growing number of scholars taking a new look at theories of law in ancient Greek texts. The review examines a number of original features of Clark’s approach, and shows how the book sheds new light on important themes in Plato’s Republic and Laws.

Religion In The Schools, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

This Article traces the development of modern Establishment Clause jurisprudence with respect to religion in the public schools, noting how the Court’s analyses and justifications have changed over time, protestations to the contrary notwithstanding. The Article examines how the logic of the Court’s current approach would permit practices long thought to violate Establishment Clause guarantees, concluding that the current approach is radically misconceived as a matter of both constitutional law and good public policy.

The Place Of Storytelling In Legal Reasoning: Abraham Joshua Heschel’S Torah Min Hashamayim, Stefan H. Krieger

Stefan H Krieger

This article reads the teachings of two rabbis from the Second Century through the lenses of cognitive science on legal thinking and shows the relationship of their narratives and legal opinions. Cognitive scientists posit that both logical and narrative thinking are essential modes of cognitive functioning. The stories and legal decisions of Rabbi Akiva and Rabbi Ishmael, as described by Abraham Joshua Heschel in his masterpiece, Torah Min Hashamayim (Heavenly Torah) support these insights. Both rabbis lived in a critical period in Jewish history. The Temple, the central focus of the people’s connection with God, had been destroyed; large numbers …

The Devil Is In The Details: Policing The Implementation Of The Military Chaplaincy, Liam J. Montgomery

Liam J Montgomery

While a court has validated the military chaplaincy as not violating the First Amendment, no court has properly scrutinized the implementation of the chaplaincy. Recent events illustrate that the military is not implementing this clear (and yet necessary and proper) establishment of religion in the most constitutionally permissible manner. By requiring prospective chaplains to obtain and retain the endorsement of an approved ecclesiastical endorsing agency, the military raises both serious Establishment and Free Exercise issues. This paper explores the constitutional implications of the chaplain endorsement system, including an examination of the history of the chaplaincy and the difficult roles that …

Chaos, Law, And God: The Religious Meanings Of Homosexuality, Jay Michaelson

Jay Michaelson

What is the meaning of gay rights in contemporary religious-political discourse? Though some explain homosexuality's disproportionate prominence in terms of homophobia, "church and state," or traditional values versus progressive ones, this article suggests that the legal regulation of sexuality has a far deeper, and more specific, religious meaning: sexuality is a primary site in which religious law is engendered, where the lawfulness of religion meets the chaos beyond it. Arguments about gay rights, same-sex marriage, and related issues are not merely arguments informed by religious values; they are arguments about the nature of religion itself. The article begins by providing …

Color Me Bad: An Indigenous & Pluralist Reclamation Of Arab American Identity, Khaled A. Beydoun

Khaled A Beydoun

The piece titled, "Color Me Bad: Toward an Indigenous Reclamation of Arab American Identity," addresses the unilateral and conflicting ethnic designations imposed on Arab Americans. Post-9/11 legislation and institutional reshuffling, and the ultimately foundation of the Dept. of Homeland Security, led to the categorical profiling of Arab Americans as political menace, subversives, or to quote Edward Said, society's "other." However, the formal designation constructed by the Office of Business & Management (which informs the Census and other statistical data) classifies Arab Americans as "Caucasian," which runs contrary to the sociopolitical treatment of this community on the ground.

Does The Constitutional Norm Of Separation Of Church And State Justify The Denial Of Tax Exemption To Churches That Engage In Partisan Political Speech?, Johnny Buckles

Johnny Buckles

The Internal Revenue Service is aggressively investigating churches for their alleged political endorsements of candidates in the 2008 presidential election. At issue is whether these churches have violated section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, which imposes a ban on electioneering by churches and other charities as a condition of maintaining federal income tax exemption. The ban has been justified as necessary to ensure the proper separation of church and state. This article critically analyzes this rationale for the ban. Four major variants of the separationist argument are articulated and thoroughly analyzed in the context of relevant Supreme Court case …

Mis-Under-Standing Freedom From Religion: Two Cents On Madison's Three Pence, Kyle Duncan

Kyle Duncan

Forty years ago in Flast v. Cohen, the Supreme Court created, for Establishment Clause cases only, a dramatic exception to a bedrock principle of standing doctrine, based on one catchy phrase from a famous historical document—James Madison’s 1785 Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments. The Court has been notoriously bad at Establishment Clause history, but Flast seemed to push the envelope. Yet neither the Court nor commentators seemed to question Flast’s historical credentials over the last four decades. Recently, the Supreme Court took up the standing question again in Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. Unhappily, the justices’ various …

Shari'ah's Black Box: Civil Liability And Criminal Exposure Surrounding Shari'ah-Compliant Finance, David Yerushalmi

David Yerushalmi

This article examines the multitude of legal issues - both criminal and civil - that Shari'ah-compliant finance (SCF) presents to U.S. financial institutions and their professional advisers. In short, SCF is the practice of investing in conformity with Islamic law (Shari'ah). Such investment appears at first glance innocuous. With only a modicum of probing, however, SCF turns out to be a black box, where the financial industry and their legal professionals have hidden a doctrine at war with the West and have ignored the dangers and risks posed by Shari'ah authorities who determine the rules and principles of this industry. …