Law Commons^™

Prosecutorial Data Transparency And Data Justice, Perry Moriearty

Articles

The U.S. criminal legal system is notoriously racialized. Though Black and Latinx people make up less than 30% of U.S. residents, they constitute more than 50% of the nearly two million people currently in U.S. prisons and jails. For decades, research has indicated that one group of decision-makers has had an outsized influence on these numbers: prosecutors. From whom to charge to what sentences to recommend, no actor plays a greater role in determining who goes to prison in this country. Highly subjective and lacking in formal guidance and accountability, prosecutorial decisions are especially vulnerable to racial bias. They are …

The Right To Fail, Alexander Boni-Saenz

Articles

In 2013, the Department of Justice entered into a consent decree with the state of New York concerning the lives of 4,000 people with mental illness who had been segregated into group homes in the state. These group homes were overcrowded and dangerous, and New York agreed to move all but the most severely mentally ill people into supportive housing, if they desired it. This outcome was seen as vindicating the dignity of risk, a foundational value of disability rights scholarship and politics. This principle holds that it is normatively desirable for individuals to be able to make their own …

When An Indicted Candidate Wins The Presidency: What Happens To The Trials If Donald Trump Wins The Election?, Richard Painter, Claire Finkelstein

Articles

For the first time in U.S. history, one of the two leading candidates for President is a convicted felon and is in the middle of multiple criminal trials on other charges in both state and federal courts. This set of unprecedented circumstances raises a series of urgent legal questions of first impression, particularly in the case in which Donald Trump wins the election. Three questions in particular require urgent examination in the run-up to the 2024 presidential election, and potentially in the immediate post-election period, depending on the outcome. First, with regard to the federal charges prosecuted by the Department …

The Three-Verdict Problem, Jack Whiteley

Articles

!n Scotland, for hundreds of years, juries have chosen between three criminal verdicts: “guilty,” “not guilty,” and “not proven.” The “not proven” verdict’s legal meaning remains mysterious. In this article, I aim to describe and solve the problem. Applying modern ideas about standards of proof to the intellectual history of “not proven” yields eight plausible meanings for the verdict. With the extent of the problem in mind, I offer a solution. In the three-verdict system, jurors should deliver a “guilty” verdict when they believe that the accused has committed the crime and a “not guilty” verdict when they believe that …

Scotus House: Can A Supreme Court Ethics Lawyer And Inspector General Help Get This Fraternity Under Control?, Richard Painter

Articles

Today, the United States Supreme Court is immersed in an ethics crisis of unprecedented proportions. Public confidence in the Court is at an all-time low and Congress is considering action. The Court is less likely to police itself than it was over fifty years ago when Justice Abraham Fortas resigned over a scandal that was probably less serious than that facing at least one justice today. This article discusses the Court’s recent scandals and explains multiple factors that make the Court prone to ethics lapses, perhaps more so than the other two branches of government. This Article then proposes that …

Stakeholder Engagement, Brett H. Mcdonnell

Articles

No abstract provided.

Chevron On The Eve Of Loper Bright, Nicholas Bednar

Articles

Chevron is dead. What does this mean for judicial review of agency interpretations of statutes in the lower courts? Perhaps not much. Using new data of circuit court decisions from 2012 and 2022, this Essay examines how lower courts changed their decision-making as the Supreme Court became more skeptical of Chevron deference. This Essay finds that---contrary to the assertion of some justices---circuit courts had not stopped applying Chevron in the lead up to Loper Bright. Moreover, courts agreed with agency interpretations of statutes at similar rates in both 2012 and 2022. Nevertheless, the data shows that the Supreme Court's …

Opportunistic Breach Of Contract, Francesco Parisi, Brian H. Bix, Ariel Porat

Articles

Law and economics scholarship has traditionally analyzed efficient breach cases monolithically. By grouping efficient breach cases together, this literature treats the subjective motives and the distributive effects of the breach as immaterial. The Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment introduced a distinction based on the intent and the effects of the breach, allowing courts to use disgorgement remedies in cases of ‘opportunistic’ breach of contract (i.e., ‘deliberate and profitable’ breaches). In this article, we evaluate this approach, focusing on the effects of disgorgement remedies on allocative and productive efficiency, information-forcing and competitive effects, and restraint of breach-searching incentives. We …

The Seven Essential Law School Simulation Courses, Mitch Zamoff

Articles

As we mark the ten-year anniversary of the American Bar Association’s six-credit experiential learning requirement and the launch of the NextGen bar exam, it is critical for U.S. law schools to conduct rigorous assessments of their experiential education curricula. While most law schools now offer students meaningful opportunities to develop lawyering skills in clinics and field placements, there is much less consistency in their simulation course offerings. Simulation courses are a critical component of experiential legal education. While students in clinics and field placements gain valuable, realistic experience addressing the issues presented by their actual clients, those issues may sometimes …

Why Mass Incarceration Is Uniquely American, Michael Tonry

Articles

Mass incarceration, among Western countries a uniquely American phenomenon, resulted from a transformation of American criminal justice systems. Indeterminate sentencing systems in which legislatures established maximum sentences, prosecutors processed cases, judges decided who went to prison, and parole boards decided how long people stayed there were replaced by determinate systems in which legislatures prescribed minimum sentences, prosecutors made the key charging and sentencing decisions, judges processed cases and sentenced minor crimes, and parole boards lost much of their authority. Parole boards and judges become largely irrelevant whenever prosecutors file charges subject to mandatory sentence, three-strikes, truth-in-sentencing, and life without parole …

Metals Derivatives Markets And The Energy Transition, James W. Coleman, Colleen M. Baker

Articles

Despite their escalating importance, thus far, there has been minimal legal scholarship on metals derivatives markets. Given the key role of these markets in the transition to a clean energy future, increased focus on them is imperative.

Hence, it is not surprising that the agendas for the last four meetings of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Energy and Environmental Markets Advisory Committee each dedicated a significant portion of the meeting to metals derivatives markets and their role in the transition to a clean energy future.

Fundamentally, the United States and the world are moving from their long-term dependence on the …

Derivatives Markets Fragilities And The Energy Transition, James W. Coleman, Colleen Baker

Articles

It is common knowledge that climate change concerns have prompted countries around the world to plan for a reduction in their fossil fuel dependencies. Yet while much attention has been placed on new low-carbon sources of energy such as wind, solar, and nuclear, comparatively little focus has centered on the commodity inputs, critical metals, needed to create this clean energy. In this article, we argue that at the heart of the energy transition is a commodities transition representing an unprecedented international reliance on critical metals, traditionally capricious commodities traded in global markets. Indeed, nations around the world have begun to …

What Should Caremark Encompass?, Claire A. Hill, Zohreh Zakiani

Articles

Under In re Caremark Int’l Inc. Derivative Litig., decided in 1996, directors are required to oversee corporate compliance and can be liable for breaching their fiduciary duties if their oversight efforts do not suffice. Since it was decided, Caremark has been very influential, notwithstanding its high bar to liability. Notably, its influence far exceeds the actual probability that directors would be found liable under the doctrine. Instead, much of Caremark’s force is “soft,” through extra-legal mechanisms such as norms and pressures from various constituencies. Caremark clearly covers oversight for violations of law or regulation. But what, beyond those two things, …

Redefining Public Benefits, Naomi Cahn, June R. Carbone

Articles

This Article considers the interaction between marriage, households, and public welfare-type benefits. In light of constant cultural and media attention to “the two-parent privilege,” the article argues that the very purpose of public benefits in the modern era is up for redefinition. The information age, much like the industrial revolution before it, has remade the preconditions for entry into the middle class and contributed to new middle-class family strategies geared to the changing labor market realities. This new era, which has increased income instability and employment insecurity, has increased economic inequality and eroded what were once secure pathways into middle-class …

Access To Justice: A Roadmap To Creating And Launching Consumer Bankruptcy Experiential Programs In Law Schools, Ishaq Kundawala

Articles

It is increasingly difficult for people who need consumer bankruptcy relief to access it. Ironically, many of the people who most need it cannot afford it, and oftentimes they come from underserved communities. Large-scale solutions to this access to consumer bankruptcy problem have been discussed, and even proposed, but not yet implemented. While law schools cannot solve the access problem without congressional intervention, they can, at least, take steps to improve the status quo. One way law schools can address this problem is to create experiential programs focusing on consumer bankruptcy.

These types of programs offer a dual benefit. They …

Building Tomorrow's Consumer Bankruptcy Lawyers, Ishaq Kundawala

Articles

The consumer bankruptcy bar is aging, with many seasoned practitioners nearing retirement. A recent article from the American Bar Association highlights that nearly 14% of lawyers in the United States are 65 or older. I think the percentage of older lawyers may be even higher in the consumer bankruptcy bar. Next time you attend a bankruptcy conference, do me a favor and look around you. I promise you will be shocked by the glaring absence of newer lawyers.

Reconciling Riverside Bayview Homes, Sackett, And County Of Maui, Stephen Johnson

Articles

Near the end of the 2022 term, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Sackett v. EPA. The case has been described as "the most important Clean Water Act case the Court has ever decided, and ... probably ... one of the most impactful environmental decisions in the Court's history."  For the fourth time, the Court interpreted the meaning of the term "navigable waters" in the Clean Water Act (CWA), and the Sackett Court narrowed the interpretation of the term in a manner that critics claim will eliminate federal protection for more than 50% of the wetlands in the United …

Solving A Sixth Amendment Crisis: The Case For Resource Parity In Georgia's Indigent Defense System, Meagan R. Hurley

Articles

The United States criminal legal system employs what is said to be an “adversary” system—one in which opposing parties—the prosecution and the defense—present their evidence and arguments (usually in conflict with one another) to a neutral third party (a judge or jury) for adjudication. The idea behind the adversarial process is that a judge or jury is best positioned to make determinations of guilt or innocence once provided with reliable information from competent, zealous, and prepared advocates on both sides of the podium. At its core, the adversarial system is meant to function as the mechanism by which constitutional principles …

The Government Speech Doctrine Ate My Class: First Amendment Capture And Curriculum Bans, Caroline Mala Corbin

Articles

Because of the government speech doctrine, public school curriculum restrictions like “Don’t Say Gay” mandates and bans on teaching critical race theory may escape free speech review. This exemplifies “First Amendment capture.” The term “capture” comes from “agency capture,” which occurs when regulated entities effectively gain control over the agency meant to oversee them. First Amendment capture occurs when speech becomes controlled by the government when the Free Speech Clause should be regulating the government.

Generally, laws that censor content trigger strict scrutiny under the Free Speech Clause. Curriculum bans, however, may trigger no scrutiny at all. Under the government …

Attributing Ai Authorship: Towards A System Of Icons For Legal And Ethical Disclosure, Joseph J. Avery, Patricia S. Abril, Alissa Del Riego

Articles

Over the past year, the pervasive role of large language models (LLMs) and artificial intelligence (Al) in text generation has precipitated concerns about ethical usage, authorship, and transparent attribution. This has been true in legal practice, academia, and the corporate world, as well as in countless other arenas. In this Article, we identify the gap that has opened between those demanding proper disclosure (we should know when and to what extent Al is an author) and those struggling to respond to these demands. Part of the problem is that there is no system in place, no lingua franca, no set …

Sails Essay Collection: Foreword, Kathleen Claussen

Articles

No abstract provided.

The Submerged Administrative State, Gabriel Scheffler, Daniel E. Walters

Articles

The United States government is experiencing a reputation crisis: after decades of declining public trust, many Americans have lost confidence in the government's capacity to perform its basic functions. While various explanations have been offered for this worrying trend, these existing accounts overlook a key factor: people are unfamiliar with the institutions that actually do most of the governing-administrative agencies-and they devalue what they cannot easily observe. The "submerged" nature of the administrative state is, we argue, a central reason for declining trust in government.

This Article shows that the administrative state is systematically submerged in two ways. First, administrative …

Assemblages And Actor Networks In The Borderlands - The Apposition Of Reproductive Rights Along The Mexican-American Border, Madeleine M. Plasencia

Articles

In 1971, Sarah Weddington argued Roe v. Wade as a class action on behalf of pregnant women living in Texas, many of whom, including herself had to flee the State to obtain an abortion in Mexico. In 2021, Texas enacted S. B. 8, otherwise known as the Texas Heartbeat Act, which created a private cause of action for injunctive relief and statutory damages awards against any person assisting in and any physician accused of performing an abortion, thus reigniting the cross-border flows that historically have made Mexico a haven for runaway enslaved people and pregnant persons heading south to freedom. …

Can The United States Curb Its Debt?, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

After the upcoming presidential election, the United States is almost certainly going to have a president who is barred from running for reelection, regardless of the outcome in November. This situation has never happened before and it presents an important opportunity for fundamental tax reform.

The Dividend Puzzle Redux, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

The news that Meta will for the first time pay a dividend to its shareholders has prompted discussion of whether dividends will make a comeback as a major component of investor returns for high-flying corporations. Before this latest development, the largest U.S. companies (that is, the digital giants) tended to engage in stock buybacks and did not usually pay dividends.

Corporate Taxpayers And Frivolous Arguments, Part 1, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

In two recent cases, corporate taxpayers have made legal arguments that seem on their face to be frivolous.

The first example, as Robert Goulder explains in his excellent recent column, is the argument made by Liberty Global (LGI) involving the source of the gain on the sale of a foreign subsidiary. LGI sold the shares of a Japanese subsidiary for a gain of $3.25 billion, of which $438 million was dividend income under section 1248. The issue was the source of the remaining $2.8 billion gain. LGI argued that it should be foreign source despite the explicit source rule for …

Try Again: The Problems Of Befit, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

In September 2023, the European Commission proposed the directive Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT) for corporate income taxation of large groups (COM(2023) 532 final (Sept. 12, 2023)). This is the latest iteration of the EU’s effort to harmonize corporate taxation within the single market. But like its predecessor the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base, BEFIT suffers from flaws that undermine its stated goals. The EU can do better, especially given that pillar 1 of the base erosion and profit-shifting’s project 2.0 shows the way forward.

Locating Liability For Medical Ai, W. Nicholson Price Ii, I. Glenn Cohen

Articles

When medical AI systems fail, who should be responsible, and how? We argue that various features of medical AI complicate the application of existing tort doctrines and render them ineffective at creating incentives for the safe and effective use of medical AI. In addition to complexity and opacity, the problem of contextual bias, where medical AI systems vary substantially in performance from place to place, hampers traditional doctrines. We suggest instead the application of enterprise liability to hospitals—making them broadly liable for negligent injuries occurring within the hospital system—with an important caveat: hospitals must have access to the information needed …

The Right To Remove In Agency Adjudication, Christopher J. Walker, David Zaring

Articles

In SEC v. Jarkesy, the Supreme Court will decide the constitutional future of agency adjudication, especially in the context of agency enforcement actions and the imposition of civil penalties. If the Court agrees with the Fifth Circuit on any of its three independent reasons for unconstitutionality, agency enforcement and adjudication schemes across the federal regulatory state will be severely disrupted, in ways that are detrimental to both the regulator and the regulated. In this Essay, we propose a path forward: In certain circumstances, the regulated party should have a right to remove an enforcement action from an in-house agency adjudication …

Effects From Moore: Does The Corporate Tax Require Realization?, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

This paper explores the history of the corporate tax as an excise versus income tax and explains potential effects from the Moore and Altria cases.