Law Commons^™

Copyright, Creativity, And Skill: Authorship And Ai-Assisted Works, Lucas S. Osborn

Scholarly Works

Generative artificial intelligence ("Al") has increasingly become a focal point in legal discussions, raising complex issues across multiple domains, including algorithmic bias, defamation, intellectual property, and privacy. This Article specifically examines the implications of Al-assisted works, with a focus on text-to-image generators, such as Midjourney, that possess the ability to create detailed visual art from simple text prompts. The tools are not, however, limited to simple prompts. Users retain the ability to introduce greater complexity by specifying a host of variables that define the resulting image. Al-assisted art implicates significant legal rights and responsibilities. As to responsibilities: Can the image …

“It Doesn’T Matter What Your Name Is:” The Case Against Corporate Ownership Of Persona Rights In Modern Professional Wrestling, Calvin Holle

Marquette Sports Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Interaction Between Privacy Laws And Restrictive Licensing Agreements In Cross-Border Satellite Imagery, Ida Samardar

IP Theory

No abstract provided.

A Personal Interview With William Patry: His Thoughts On Music, Ai, And Copyright

IP Theory

No abstract provided.

The Vicious Patent Cycle: Addressing The Current Conflict Facing Startup Valuation And Patent Risk Through Policy Change, Karlie Hinton

IP Theory

Young, startup, and growth companies play an increasingly important role in driving innovation and economic growth, but they face distinct challenges when attempting to leverage valuable assets to secure funding and scale their ventures. The valuation of startup companies, especially those built around new technologies and corresponding intellectual property, presents a complex challenge. With limited financial history and uncertain futures, investors often turn to proxies like patents to ascribe potential value. In recent years, the practice of startups using patents to secure investment and higher valuations has become increasingly common. However, this growing reliance on patents raises important questions about …

Paternity, Protection, And Pirates: A Queer Theory Analysis Of Intellectual Property Metaphors, Eden Sarid

IP Theory

Intellectual Property and queer theory share a fundamental concern with the interplay between private and public, tangible and intangible, and language and form. Queer theory emphasizes how language impacts the construction of identity and belonging, highlighting that discourse plays a pivotal role in structuring gender, sexuality, and normativity. Intellectual Property is often portrayed as strictly neutral, laser-focused on spurring creativity and innovation. However, is this portrayal reflective of reality? And does this purported neutrality hold up in IP’s rhetoric? By examining two principal IP terminologies through a queer lens – the term “protection” to describe IP legal privilege, and the …

The Mathematics Of Regulatory Fragmentation: Understanding The Multiplicative Costs Of State-Level Platform Requirements, Amanda Reid

IP Theory

The recent wave of state-level social media regulation represents an unprecedented experiment in territorial control of digital platforms. While constitutional questions around state authority remain central to these debates, this article examines a distinct but complementary concern: the mathematical reality of how overlapping technical requirements multiply compliance burdens. These laws aim to protect youth online through technical mandates, yet they create a regulatory patchwork that generates multiplicative rather than additive costs. Following combination theory [N(N-1)/2], each new state regulation creates conflict points with existing requirements.

This article analyzes how this regulatory multiplication affects platform architecture, user experience, and safety outcomes. …

Under The Radar: The Hidden Harms Of Patent Practices In Defense Contracting, Hunter Schmittou

IP Theory

28 U.S.C. § 1498 allows the federal government and its contractors to use patented technologies without prior authorization, with the government assuming liability for infringement. While originally intended to facilitate procurement, its modern application has weakened patent protections, allowing contractors to incorporate patented innovations with minimal legal or financial consequences. This system disincentivizes private-sector investment in military technology, distorts competition, and increases procurement inefficiencies, ultimately placing the burden of infringement on taxpayers. The resulting imbalance not only stifles innovation but also entrenches reliance on a small group of dominant defense contractors, reducing technological diversity and slowing progress. Addressing these shortcomings …

Generative Ai's Copyright Enigma: A Comparative Study Of Fair Use And Fair Dealing, Taysir Awad

IP Theory

At the dawn of this decade, generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) models were at the apogee of modern science and technology. Their emergence introduced the world to a new paradigm of creativity and innovation, where machines can synthesize art, literature, and design with unprecedented sophistication, blurring the boundaries between human ingenuity and algorithmic computation. These models have the capacity to regenerate Oscar Wilde with the depiction of Ansel Adams, rewrite Harry Potter with William Shakespear’s proverbial tongue, and redesign St. Peter’s Basilica with Gothic arches, Seljuk carved stones, and an Antoni Gaudi roof architecture, relocated in the heart of New York …

"Sufficiently Distinct" Is Insufficient To Determine Design Patent Infringement, Perry Saidman

IP Theory

The “ordinary observer” test for design patent infringement essentially asks whether the patented and accused designs are “substantially the same” in overall appearance. Although courts are very skilled in listing differences between the two designs, the final infringement determination is very subjective, being based on the personal observations and feelings of the fact-finder.

In the 2008 en banc decision of Egyptian Goddess v. Swisa, the Federal Circuit abolished the “point of novelty” test that, despite its flaws, had brought some objectivity to the infringement determination. In its place, the Court in Egyptian repeatedly emphasized the need to view the …

Makeup And Made-Up Protection: Unveiling The Need For Stronger Legal Protections Against Makeup Dupes Within The Luxury Beauty Industry, Crystal Couso

St. Thomas Law Review

To strengthen trademark protections for luxury beauty brands against makeup dupes, this Comment proposes amending the Lanham Act to combat the rise of makeup dupes. Part II provides a brief background on trade dress laws and the elements required to establish a claim under the Lanham Act. Part III highlights the current inadequacies of the current trade dress protections afforded by the Lanham Act, including its failure to account for generic product designs and the irrelevance of consumer confusion in makeup dupe cases. Part IV proposes a novel solution to modify the Lanham Act to accommodate the makeup dupe phenomenon. …

The Invisibility Of Tpms In Academic Libraries How Digital Content Protection Has Become Part And Parcel Of Platform Design, Anthony D. Rosborough, Katherine Silins

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

This article investigates a growing divide in how TPMs are understood and encountered across two domains: digital content access and software-dependent device controls. Through legal and qualitative empirical lenses, it reveals that TPMs guarding digital content access across Canadian academic institutions (particularly relating to e-books, journals, and streaming media) have become seamlessly embedded into platform design and licensing schemes. This facilitates their ubiquity and invisibility, while at the same time making them difficult to challenge from a law and policy reform perspective. It also makes content TPMs difficult to identify, measure, or challenge in furtherance of lawful exceptions and limitations …

Perception Pending: What Do Patents Signal To Consumers?, Alexander Billy, Neel Sukhatme

Articles

Patent law encourages inventors to label their products as “patented,” to mark their legal status and potentially secure monetary damages from infringing competitors. We examine whether such labels might have a separate and direct impact on consumers, by affecting how they view patented products and influencing what they purchase. We develop and conduct two experiments to isolate the impact of patent status on consumer behavior. In an online randomized experiment, we demonstrate how increasing the salience of patent status heightens consumers' beliefs that products are innovative and well made. We also reveal consumers' surprisingly sophisticated understanding of the patenting process …

Boden Lecture: Taxation Of Autonomous Artificial Intelligence, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah, Lucas Brasil Salama, Herbert Snitz, W. Robert Thomas

Articles

This Article proposes that tax can be a useful supplement to other measures to regulate Autonomous Artificial Intelligence (AAI) and limit its potential harmful effects. This proposal differs from command-and-control regulation of AAI along the lines of European Union legislation that may unduly limit the development of AAI. It also differs from existing proposals to tax AAI to generate revenue to help workers displaced by AAI programs, or to tax the data used by AAI The proposal is based on granting AAI programs like ChatGPT separate legal personhood, like corporate personhood, while incentivizing or requiring their corporate owner to place …

Patents Used In Patent Office Rejections As Indicators Of Value, Christopher A. Cotropia, David L. Schwartz

Law Faculty Publications

This paper introduces a novel approach to measure a patent's economic value by examining whether the patent's disclosure leads to rejection of another pending US patent application. This approach considers the use of the patent by the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in office action rejections on the grounds of novelty or obviousness, as well as its citation as an X or Y reference in a European Patent Office (EPO) search report, which provides analogous information. Unlike conventional citation metrics widely employed by economists, the novel metric is arguably more closely tied to private value, as it is centered …

Recent Changes In Discretionary Denials Of Drug Patent Challenges, S. Sean Tu, Arti K. Rai, Aaron S. Kesselheim

Faculty Scholarship

Recent policy shifts at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) have sharply limited the use of two administrative pathways for patent reviews, inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR). Congress created these administrative pathways to provide a faster and less costly way to challenge weak patents. Recently, the USPTO has expanded the use of “discretionary denials,” invoking a new “settled expectations” rationale that blocks IPR petitions for patents more than about six years old. From May to September 2025, 60% of 506 requests for discretionary denial were granted, triple historical levels, including one-third involving drug patents. These changes …

The Reliability Response To Patent Law’S Ai Challenges, Arti K. Rai

Faculty Scholarship

Pervasive AI use adds newfound importance to longstanding debates over patent timing and reliability. Patent claims on speculative ideas generated by AI, or even the infusion of speculative AI-generated ideas into the public domain, may defeat patent incentives for more careful research. Although challenges that AI use poses for patent validity requirements like human inventorship and nonobviousness have received more attention, reliability is equally important.

Indeed, as this Article argues, the issues are linked. If requirements for inventorship and nonobviousness were adjusted to emphasize reliability, a human role could be preserved, and AI use would not necessarily threaten patents. Currently, …

Deceptive Exploitation: Deepfakes, The Rights Of Publicity And Privacy, And Trademark Law, Michael D. Murray

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

This article addresses the application of right of publicity, right of privacy, and trademark law to the problem of deepfakes. It will explore the routine and not so routine ways that personality and persona attributes are exploited in traditional privacy contexts and publicity contexts. It will also examine the use of First Amendment defenses in legal actions traditionally associated with the exploitation of celebrities, sports figures, and other persons under state law theories of name-image-likeness exploitation, as well as and federal trademark law theories of false endorsement and false designation of origin.

Part I provides an introduction and background to …

Best Kept Secret: The Hidden Health Costs Of Corporate Confidentiality, Cynthia M. Ho

Faculty Publications & Other Works

Although patents are well known to negatively impact health when drugs are unaffordable, trade secrets also harm health, and in more ways than patents. Patented drugs harm public health simply by temporarily increasing prices on treatments. Trade secrets, on the other hand, can not only increase treatment costs, but also hide knowledge needed for effective medical treatment. Also, because patents, but not trade secrets, have a limited term, patent health harms clearly terminate while trade secret harms do not. Moreover, the public may not even be fully aware of all trade secret health harms because trade secret information is, by …

Re-Defining Direct Copyright Infringement In The Digital Age: The Shortcomings Of Abkco, Inc. V. Sagan's "Presses The Button" Standard, Shelby Mcswan

Buffalo Law Review

This Comment offers a broader reading of direct copyright infringement. The definition of a direct infringer must go beyond the person who “presses the button,” and extend to those who authorize, instruct, or force another to commit an act of infringement. A broader reading not only ensures that direct liability in copyright law is uniform with other areas of the law, but it also ensures that copyright law protects those who it was meant to protect and punishes those who are truly at fault. Part I of this Comment provides history and background information on the development of intellectual property …

Front Matter

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Ai-Copyright Trap, Carys Craig

All Papers

As AI tools proliferate, policy makers are increasingly being called upon to protect creators and the cultural industries from the extractive, exploitative, and even existential threats posed by generative AI. In the haste to act, however, they risk running headlong into the Copyright Trap: the mistaken conviction that copyright law is the best tool to support human creators and culture in our new technological reality, when in fact it is likely to do more harm than good. This is a trap in the sense that it may satisfy the wants of a small group of powerful stakeholders, but it will …

Dividing Trademark Use, Jeremy N. Sheff

Faculty Publications

The trademark law of the United States places special emphasis on whether and how a trademark is used in commerce. But over the long history of the Lanham Act—including some less-than-careful drafting by Congress and some aggressive acts of interpretation by the federal courts—the concept of “use” has become complicated and in many ways confused. Two recent Supreme Court cases—Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC and Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc.—reflect and in some ways exacerbate that confusion. But the opinions in these cases also expose an interesting property of “use” in trademark law …

A Program To Improve The Efficiency And Quality Of Patent Examination, N. Hylton, Keith, Lynn Richards, Madisyn

Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal

In this article we suggest three novel amendments to U.S. patent law to increase efficiency and decrease costs. We first contend that while the assertion of invalid patents is detrimental because of anticompetitive effects, such competition concerns should place no duty upon applicants to disclose prior art at the outset. Additionally, we argue that to avoid resource waste, the USPTO should outsource prior art searches for certain applications, as in Japan. Finally, we propose a system where patentees have the option to elect to a patent box regime that reduces their taxes on patent profits substantially (e.g., from 21% to …

Transportation Security Administration Use Of Facial Recognition Technology: Turbulence Surrounding Traveler Rights, Mckenly Redmon

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

Facial recognition technology has been employed by law enforcement agencies and private companies for decades. This technology promises safer and more efficient processes to identify individuals in the name of safety. However, not everyone approves of their biometric data being collected. This Article provides an overview of the current use of facial recognition technology by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in airport security checkpoints. It begins by explaining the underlying technology behind facial recognition and explores the safety and security concerns behind it. Building on this foundation, this Article then evaluates how the TSA’s use of facial recognition influences science …

Front Matter

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Debugging The Trademark Laws Part Ii: Criminal Penalties For Trafficking In Counterfeit Microelectronics, Patricia E. Campbell

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

Counterfeit microelectronics have been a persistent problem in government and industry supply chains for many years. Counterfeit electronic parts (e.g., integrated circuits, transistors, capacitors) pose serious risks to human health and safety, harm the economy, and jeopardize national security. Trafficking in counterfeit goods and services was first criminalized in 1984, and Congress has acted on several occasions to increase the corresponding penalties. Nevertheless, the trade in counterfeit microelectronics continues to evolve to meet market demands, and relatively few criminal cases have been brought for trafficking in counterfeit microelectronics. While several factors may contribute to this apparent lack of enforcement, the …

The Artificial Intelligence Trolley Problem: Governance In The Post-Chevron World, James M. Cooper, Kashyap Kompella

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

This Essay addresses a growing Constitutional challenge in public governance: the increasing delegation of consequential decisions to algorithmic systems that encode value trade-offs between liberty and security, equity and efficiency, and expression and control, without visibility, legal justification, or institutional oversight. We view this hidden normative choice an example of the “Artificial Intelligence (AI) Trolley Problem.” Like the classic moral dilemma, it involves unavoidable sacrifices among competing goods. Unlike its philosophical counterpart, however, algorithmic trade-offs occur silently. They are embedded in data proxies, optimization logic, and model design, and insulated from scrutiny by claims of technical neutrality. This Essay argues …

Systemic Risk And The Social Contract, Kevin Frazier

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

The stability of the constitutional order turns, in part, on a stable economy and reliable advances in technology. Political order cannot withstand economic collapse or a massive technological failure. Such crises chip away at the collective will to adhere to the social contract because they indicate the government may not have the capacity to uphold its end of the bargain—protecting individual liberty from broad threats. “Unprecedented” economic downturns, however, have a precedent of emerging from the very deliberate decision of some actors to pursue extremely risky behavior in their self-interest at the expense of the public. Societal disruption from over-dependence …

Retail Innovation Through Ai: Benefits And Liabilities, W. Michael Schuster, Simon E. Corrigan

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

This article investigates the transformative capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) within the retail industry. We highlight significant opportunities for product customization, innovation, and enhanced supply chain efficiency, while also examining complex legal challenges associated with AI-generated content. In particular, concerns in the copyright realm are highlighted— including documented biases against AI-produced works. Recognizing these issues, retailers should adopt proactive legal strategies, ensure transparency, and consider hybrid human-AI collaborative approaches. Strategically addressing these issues will help maximize consumer and business benefits while mitigating legal exposure.