Law Commons^™

Brief Amicus Curiae Of The Taxpayers Asset Project Of The Center For Study Of Responsive Law In Support Of Petitioners, Genetics Institute, Inc., Et. Al. V. Amgen Inc., 502 U.S. 856 (1991), Michael H. Davis

Law Faculty Briefs and Court Documents

Although a patent appears to be a private right, that private right is only "secondary," as this Court has stated, to the public bargain of which it is but a part. The focus must always be whether the public has received full information about the nature of the invention so that future inventors may reuse and improve it. The decision below reflects a failure to recognize the patent's monopoly nature and as a result abandons the "best mode" rule forbidding the inventor form concealing the best way of replicating the invention. By turning the subjective test of "best mode" into …

The 1988 Revision Of 28 U.S.C. 1391(C): Corporate Venue Is Now Equivalent To In Personam Jurisdiction Effects On Civil Actions For Patent Infringement, Thomas W. Adams

Cleveland State Law Review

Venue in federal cases is controlled by the general venue statute unless there exists an applicable special venue statute that attaches to the particular cause of action under consideration. This note is concerned with the section of the general venue statute applicable to corporate defendants and its interaction with the special venue statute for civil actions in patent infringement cases ("patent venue statute"). As a first step in the discussion of venue, it is necessary to go back in history over 200 years. This note reviews the history of venue, both generally and in cases of patent infringement, the historical …

The 1988 Revision Of 28 U.S.C. 1391(C): Corporate Venue Is Now Equivalent To In Personam Jurisdiction Effects On Civil Actions For Patent Infringement, Thomas W. Adams

Cleveland State Law Review

Venue in federal cases is controlled by the general venue statute unless there exists an applicable special venue statute that attaches to the particular cause of action under consideration. This note is concerned with the section of the general venue statute applicable to corporate defendants and its interaction with the special venue statute for civil actions in patent infringement cases ("patent venue statute"). As a first step in the discussion of venue, it is necessary to go back in history over 200 years. This note reviews the history of venue, both generally and in cases of patent infringement, the historical …

Bent Fish: Issues Of Ownership And Infringement In Digitally Processed Images, John Gastineau

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Expert In U.S. And German Patent Litigation, James Maxeiner

All Faculty Scholarship

The expert often plays a crucial role in patent litigation in both Germany and the United States. Determination of facts and application of law to facts frequently require a technical understanding that only an expert can provide. Despite the similarity of the problem of conveying information to the decision-maker, the role of the expert in the two systems and the manner in which the problem of providing technical knowledge necessary for the decision is solved are so very different, that German jurists who transfer their German experiences and expectations over to US procedures, are in danger of experiencing great disappointment …

Justice O'Connor's Intellectual Property Opinions: Currents And Crosscurrents, Marci A. Hamilton

Articles

No abstract provided.

The "Moral Rights" Of Creators Of Intellectual Property, Rufus C. King

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Contradiction And Context In American Copyright Law, Keith Aoki

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Right Of Publicity: Star Vehicle Or Shooting Star?, Barbara Singer

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Impact Of The Deposit Requirement For Patenting Biotechnology: Present Concerns, Proposed Solutions, Brandi L. Wickline

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Patenting the fruits of biotechnological research often involves problems unique to that scientific field, especially when the resulting inventions employ micro-organisms that cannot be described easily because of their novelty to the field. The importance of satisfactorily resolving these problems increases because most developed states now allow biotech inventors to patent the novel organism itself. In response to the concern that words are often inadequate to identify completely these microbes, states began allowing biotech patent applicants to deposit a sample culture of the novel micro-organism as a supplement to the written description. This Note addresses the shortcomings of the deposit …

The Doctrine Of Elections: Has The Need To Choose Been Lost?, Douglas R. Wolf

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Vices Of Originality, Paul J. Heald

Scholarly Works

Lately, the Constitution has become an unwelcome guest at the parties of those claiming rights lying on the periphery of intellectual property. Two terms ago, in Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats Inc., the Court held that federal patent law preempted a Florida statute forbidding the reproduction of boat hulls by use of any direct molding process. The Court's decision effectively provided a limited constitutional right to copy unpatented product shapes and designs. Most recently, in Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service, Inc. the Intellectual Property Clause was held to create positive restraints on Congress's ability to …

The Substantial Identity Rule Under The Japanese Novelty Standard, Toshiko Takenaka

Articles

This article compares the novelty standard under Japanese patent law with the novelty standard under American patent law. This article first explains the structure of the novelty and inventive step provisions under Japanese patent law and examines the interpretation and basic legal theories of these provisions. The inventive step standard developed out of the novelty standard. Thus, to understand the inventive step standard, it is necessary to understand the novelty standard.

Next, this article discusses the unique features of the Japanese novelty standard. The strict novelty requirements of the patent laws of the United States and European countries are contrasted …

Copyright Law: Integrating Successive Filtering Into The Bifurcated Substantial Similarity Inquiry In Software Copyright Infringement Cases: A Standard For Determining The Scope Of Copyright Protection For Non-Literal Elements Of Computer Programs , Maury M. Tepper Iii

Campbell Law Review

The non-literal elements of a computer program, such as its user interface, are crucial in determining that program's success on the commercial market. Such non-literal elements represent a substantial portion of the development costs of a program, but they are quite inexpensive to copy. Courts are currently unable to agree on the extent to which copyright law offers protection to the non-literal elements of computer programs, leaving the industry uncertain and hesitant to develop new user interfaces. This article develops a principled approach for determining the proper scope of copyright protection for the nonliteral elements of computer programs.

Field-Of-Use Restrictions As Precompetitive Elements In Patent And Know-How Licensing Agreements In The United States And The European Communities, Thomas C. Meyers

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

The courts of both the United States and the European Communities have upheld the legality of various licensing restrictions. One such restriction, the "field-of-use" restriction, is the subject of this article. A field-of-use restriction prohibits a licensee from realizing the benefits of the license in certain technical fields. Field-of-use restrictions are usually written as restricting use to a particular field rather than listing prohibited fields… This article first sets forth an economic justification for the legality of field-of-use restrictions, concluding that such restrictions are usually pro-competitive. The article then analyzes the relevant law in both the United States and the …

The Legal Protection Of Ideas, Grant Hammond

Osgoode Hall Law Journal

The received wisdom is that an idea as such is not legally protected. But now courts are embarking on a course which, at least in some respects, embraces the proposition that ideas will sometimes be protected. This essay suggests that these contemporary developments in the common law world should be regarded with disquiet. Courts are sanctioning the commercial exploitation of ideas in the face of an apparent desire of human beings to reduce every aspect of themselves to divisible, saleable commodities. Short term commercial gain is preferred to the timeless importance of ideas in the seamless web of humanity. This …

Combatting Piracy Of Intellectual Property In International Markets: A Proposed Modification Of The Special 301 Action, Theodore H. Davis

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Increasing losses attributable to the piracy of United States intellectual property rights in international trade have forced domestic policymakers to reexamine how best to protect these rights. This Article examines the United States most recent bilateral strategy to protect intellectual property, the Special 301 action, which creates a virtually mandatory United States Trade Representative (USTR) investigation into states that have inadequate intellectual property laws or that deny fair market access to United States citizens who rely on intellectual property protection. Part One of this Article discusses the historic interaction between United States intellectual property protection and trade measures. Part Two …

Retroactivity And Reliance Rights Under Article 18 Of The Berne Copyright Convention, Katherine S. Deters

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

This Note addresses the principle of retroactive copyright protection as it applies to new adherents to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (the Convention). The Note first examines the primary purposes of retroactivity as evidenced by the Convention's history and subsequent revisions. Next, the Note analyzes the language of the retroactivity principle as it appears in the most recent version of the Convention. The Note then discusses problems that may result from the United States recent adherence to the Convention. The author concludes that the current domestic copyright law of the United States violates international …

Protecting United States Intellectual Property Abroad: Toward A New Multilateralism, Marshall A. Leaffer

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Badlands: Artist-Personal Manager Conflicts Of Interest In The Music Industry, Hal I. Gilenson

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

New Technologies On The Block: New Kids On The Block V. News America Publishing, Inc. , Randy S. Frisch

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Protecting Plant-Derived Drugs: Patents And Beyond, Liz Hanellin

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Introduction, Ronald J. Palenski

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Authors And Exploitations In International Private Law: The French Supreme Court And The Huston Film Colorization Controversy, Jane C. Ginsburg, Pierre Sirinelli

Faculty Scholarship

On May 28, 1991, France's Supreme Court, the Cour de cassation, rendered its long-awaited decision in Huston v. la Cinq, a controversy that opposed the heirs of film director John Huston against the French television station Channel 5 and its licensor, Turner Entertainment. Defendants sought to broadcast a colorized version of Huston's black and white film classic, The Asphalt jungle. Plaintiffs, John Huston's children and Ben Maddow, who collaborated with Huston on the film's screenplay, asserted that broadcast of a colorized version violated Huston's and Maddow's moral right of integrity in the motion picture. The central question before the Cour …

Intellectual Property, John C. Yates, Michael W. Mattox

Mercer Law Review

This Article is divided in the following sections: (1) Recent History of Intellectual Property Developments; (2) Trade Secrets; (3) Trademarks and Unfair Competition; (4) Restrictive Covenants and Employment Issues; (5) Copyright and Fine Art; (6) Computer Crime; and, (7) Future Trends. Driven by the explosive growth of technology, the protection of intellectual property in the 1990s will undoubtedly prove to be one of the most dynamic and controversial areas of the law. The state legislature and the United States Congress are considering numerous bills which will affect intellectual property. This area of the law, therefore, requires careful monitoring of legislative …

Copyright, Computer Software, And Work Made For Hire, Matthew R. Harris

Michigan Law Review

Prior to the Supreme Court's 1989 decision in Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, the Circuits had disagreed over the question of whether independent contractors could qualify as "employees" under the doctrine. The Fifth, Ninth, and D.C. Circuits defined "employee" narrowly, thereby excluding the majority of commissioned works from potential work for hire status. Applying a much broader definition of the term, the Second and Seventh Circuits included virtually all commissioned works as work for hire. The disagreement was not surprising, since the copyright statute does not include a definition of the term, and the legislative history fails to …

"Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church Of Cyprus V. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts, Inc".: Entrenchment Of The Due Diligence Requirement In Replevin Actions For Stolen Art, Stephen L. Foutty

Vanderbilt Law Review

Art prices are reaching spectacular heights. Current estimates place annual worldwide retail sales between ten billion and forty billion dollars;' each auction season, bidders smash previous price records. For example, at a May 9, 1989 Sotheby's auction, a buyer paid 47.9 million dollars for Picasso's self-portrait "Yo-Picasso"; Gaugin's "Mata Mau (In Olden Times)" sold for 24.2 million dollars. The next day at Christie's, an investor purchased a Monet for 14.3 million dollars, twice it's estimated value.' The inflated prices have inspired people without a prior interest in art to conceive a sudden passion for collecting by any available means. As …

Realizing The European Community Common Market By Unifying Intellectual Property Law: Deadline 1992, Victor Vandebeek

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Fordham University Sesquicentennial 1841-1991 And Dedication, Editorial Board

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Free Press-Fair Trial Conflict–What's A Lawyer To Say?, C. Evan Stewart

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.