Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (984)
- Fordham Law School (980)
- UC Law SF (879)
- UIC School of Law (829)
- American University Washington College of Law (815)
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (660)
- University of Michigan Law School (595)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (520)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (431)
- University of Washington School of Law (403)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (393)
- Marquette University Law School (385)
- Boston University School of Law (363)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (358)
- Seattle University School of Law (355)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (350)
- Santa Clara Law (328)
- University of Richmond (322)
- Columbia Law School (314)
- Duke Law (302)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (282)
- William & Mary Law School (267)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (252)
- The University of Akron (208)
- Southern Methodist University (202)
- Universitas Indonesia (183)
- University of New Hampshire (179)
- Georgetown University Law Center (176)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (164)
- BLR (163)
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (2091)
- Intellectual property (1578)
- Patent (871)
- Patents (757)
- Trademark (599)
-
- Patent law (550)
- Copyright law (533)
- Intellectual Property (414)
- Fair use (372)
- Technology (369)
- Intellectual Property Law (354)
- Infringement (298)
- Internet (298)
- Copyright infringement (287)
- Law (249)
- Innovation (233)
- Trademarks (213)
- Lanham Act (207)
- Copyright Act (197)
- Antitrust (187)
- First Amendment (185)
- Licensing (182)
- IP (179)
- Trademark law (170)
- Google (165)
- Federal Circuit (159)
- Patent infringement (154)
- Software (150)
- Privacy (143)
- Artificial intelligence (141)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1115)
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (846)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (823)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (550)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (495)
-
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law (467)
- Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. (374)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (355)
- Articles (313)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (309)
- Faculty Publications (282)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (273)
- Seattle University Law Review (236)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (233)
- Michigan Law Review (229)
- Scholarly Works (185)
- Cardozo Law Review (181)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (180)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (173)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (158)
- ExpressO (157)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (150)
- Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix) (147)
- SMU Science and Technology Law Review (146)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (143)
- Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal (143)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (142)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (138)
- Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series (134)
- Law Faculty Publications (132)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 14461 - 14490 of 17086
Full-Text Articles in Law
Optimal Standardization In The Law Of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle, Thomas W. Merrill, Henry E. Smith
Optimal Standardization In The Law Of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle, Thomas W. Merrill, Henry E. Smith
Faculty Scholarship
A central difference between contract and property concerns the freedom to "customize" legally enforceable interests. The law of contract recognizes no inherent limitations on the nature or the duration of the interests that can be the subject of a legally binding contract. Certain types of promises – such as promises to commit a crime – are declared unenforceable as a matter of public policy. But outside these relatively narrow areas of proscription and requirements such as definiteness and (maybe) consideration, there is a potentially infinite range of promises that the law will honor. The parties to a contract are free …
The Promise And Perils Of Strategic Publication To Create Prior Art: A Response To Professor Parchomovsky, Rebecca S. Eisenberg
The Promise And Perils Of Strategic Publication To Create Prior Art: A Response To Professor Parchomovsky, Rebecca S. Eisenberg
Articles
In a provocative recent article in the Michigan Law Review, Professor Gideon Parchomovsky observes that a firm racing with a competitor to make a patentable invention might find it strategically advantageous to publish interim research results rather than risk losing a patent race. This strategy exploits legal rules limiting patent protection to technological advances that are new and "nonobvious" in light of the "prior art" or preexisting knowledge in the field. By publishing research results, a firm adds to the prior art and thereby limits what may be patented in the future. Parchomovsky posits that, before it is able to …
Analyze This: A Law And Economics Agenda For The Patent System, Rebecca S. Eisenberg
Analyze This: A Law And Economics Agenda For The Patent System, Rebecca S. Eisenberg
Articles
Legal scholars and economists might enhance the value and impact of their work by making more effective use of each other's knowledge and capabilities. Legal scholars can offer a more nuanced understanding of the legal rules that underlie the patent system and the doctrinal levers that might be manipulated in furtherance of public policy goals. Economists bring to bear a set of analytical and methodological tools that could shed considerable light on what these doctrinal levers are doing and which of them we ought to be manipulating. Together, we have a better chance of asking the right questions and thinking …
The Constitutionality Of Copyright Term Extension: How Long Is Too Long, Jane C. Ginsburg, Wendy J. Gordon, Arthur R. Miller, William F. Patry
The Constitutionality Of Copyright Term Extension: How Long Is Too Long, Jane C. Ginsburg, Wendy J. Gordon, Arthur R. Miller, William F. Patry
Faculty Scholarship
I am Professor William Patry of the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. I will be the moderator of this star-studded debate on the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act.
This panel will try to determine, on the great continuum of limited times that the Constitution prescribes for copyright in Article I, Section 8, Clause 8, the term of protection that Congress has actually fixed. In other words: How long is too long? Sonny's bill establishes a term of protection of life plus seventy years for individual authors for works created on or after January 1, 1978. The bill retroactively …
The Public Choice Of Choice Of Law In Software Transactions: Jurisdictional Competition And The Dim Prospects For Uniformity, Edward J. Janger
The Public Choice Of Choice Of Law In Software Transactions: Jurisdictional Competition And The Dim Prospects For Uniformity, Edward J. Janger
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Extending Copyright And The Constitution: "Have I Stayed Too Long", Michael H. Davis
Extending Copyright And The Constitution: "Have I Stayed Too Long", Michael H. Davis
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
On October 27, 1998, President Clinton signed into law the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-298, 112 Stat. 2827 (hereinafter the “Bono Law”). The Bono Law extended the term of copyright protection by an additional twenty years, both prospectively and retrospectively. The former is probably constitutionally proper; the latter is almost certainly forbidden by the Constitution's copyright clause. But most criticism5 has not forcefully distinguished between retrospective as opposed to prospective extension and so far has failed to convince either Congress or the courts of any constitutional infirmity. This is because most critics agree-or …
The Screenwriter's Indestructible Right To Terminate Her Assignment Of Copyright: Once A Story Is 'Pitched' A Studio Can Never Obtain All Copyrights In The Story, Michael Henry Davis
The Screenwriter's Indestructible Right To Terminate Her Assignment Of Copyright: Once A Story Is 'Pitched' A Studio Can Never Obtain All Copyrights In The Story, Michael Henry Davis
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
It is probably not quite fraud, though it comes terribly close to it, when motion picture and television production companies convince their writers to part with the rights to their stories when they sign with the companies. Despite contracts that claim the writer has no rights to the resulting script (either because the author has assigned his rights “in perpetuity” or because he has agreed to produce a “workfor hire”), U.S. copyright law provides many authors, perhaps the vast majority of them, with a future right that cannot be lost and can always be regained, irrespective of any written contract …
Sweeping The E-Commerce Patent Minefield: The Need For A Workable Business Method Exception, William Krause
Sweeping The E-Commerce Patent Minefield: The Need For A Workable Business Method Exception, William Krause
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment will trace the history of patent protection for methods of doing business over the past two decades, then it will inspect the problems that this protection has wrought: litigation, increased barriers to e-commerce entrepreneurs, and the threat of a less vibrant electronic marketplace. Because each traditional method of protecting intellectual property -- patent, copyright, and trade secret -- has strengths and limitations in protecting advancements in software technology, this Comment will examine the relative benefits of each method. Finally, this Comment will suggest a simple, easily applied test that will offer patent protection to true innovations while reserving …
Copyright, Wendy J. Gordon, Robert G. Bone
Copyright, Wendy J. Gordon, Robert G. Bone
Faculty Scholarship
Copyright is the branch of Intellectual Property Law that governs works of expression such as books, paintings and songs, and the expressive aspects of computer programs. Intellectual products such as these have a partially public goods character: they are largely inexhaustible and nonexcludable. Intellectual Property Law responds to inexcludability by giving producers legal rights to exclude nonpayers from certain usages of their intellectual products. The goal is to provide incentives for new production at fairly low transaction costs. However, the copyright owner will charge a price above marginal cost and this, coupled with the inexhaustibility of most copyrighted products, creates …
Fine-Tuning Tasini: Privileges Of Electronic Distribution And Reproduction, Wendy J. Gordon
Fine-Tuning Tasini: Privileges Of Electronic Distribution And Reproduction, Wendy J. Gordon
Faculty Scholarship
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is arguably the soundest copyright court in the nation. In Tasini v. New York Times, it handled a challenge brought by a group of freelance writers against publishers and database proprietors. The controversy, now pending in the United States Supreme Court, has wide importance because it will determine what entitlements attach to a publisher who purchases a privilege to include a freelancer's story in the publisher's magazine or newspaper. Essentially, the issue is whether a publisher, who has not purchased the story's copyright and has not obtained an explicit …
Toward A Doctrine Of Fair Use In Patent Law, Maureen A. O'Rourke
Toward A Doctrine Of Fair Use In Patent Law, Maureen A. O'Rourke
Faculty Scholarship
The intellectual property laws are becoming increasingly stressed as their largely time-worn doctrines grapple with problems posed by new technology. In this Article, Dean O'Rourke argues that this pressure has become particularly acute in patent law where policymakers have expanded protection without concomitantly evaluating the impact of that move on follow-on innovation. The traditional assumption that patentees will efficiently license their inventions is breaking down as market failures are becoming endemic. Dean O'Rourke argues that to ensure that patent law achieves its constitutional goals, it shuld, like copyright law, use a fair use defense to address problems of market failure. …
The Constitutionality Of Copyright Term Extension: How Long Is Too Long?, Jane C. Ginsburg, Wendy J. Gordon, Arthur R. Miller, William F. Patry
The Constitutionality Of Copyright Term Extension: How Long Is Too Long?, Jane C. Ginsburg, Wendy J. Gordon, Arthur R. Miller, William F. Patry
Faculty Scholarship
I am Professor William Patry of the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. I will be the moderator of this star-studded debate on the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act.
Patent Rights And Licensing, Michael S. Baram, Ashley Stevens, Thomas Meyers, Michael J. Meurer
Patent Rights And Licensing, Michael S. Baram, Ashley Stevens, Thomas Meyers, Michael J. Meurer
Faculty Scholarship
This panel will discuss intellectual property - the patent incentive, patentability issues, licensing, and litigation-related matters. It will be moderated by Dr. Ashley Stevens, the Director of the Office of Technology Transfer at Boston University. Ashley has multiple degrees, including a doctorate in physical chemistry from Oxford University. He has worked in the biotech industry for a number of years, mostly with startup companies and academic research organizations such as the Dana Farber Cancer Institute, where he was also Director of Technology Transfer. Ashley was instrumental in the startup and operations of firms such as Biotechnica International, and started his …
Copyright At The Supreme Court: A Jurisprudence Of Deference, Marci A. Hamilton
Copyright At The Supreme Court: A Jurisprudence Of Deference, Marci A. Hamilton
Articles
No abstract provided.
Is The Use Of The Doctrine Of Equivalents To Fix Mistakes A Mistake?, Martin Adelman
Is The Use Of The Doctrine Of Equivalents To Fix Mistakes A Mistake?, Martin Adelman
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same: Implications Of Pfaff V. Wells Electronics, Inc. And The Quest For Predictability In The On-Sale Bar, Timothy R. Holbrook
The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same: Implications Of Pfaff V. Wells Electronics, Inc. And The Quest For Predictability In The On-Sale Bar, Timothy R. Holbrook
Faculty Articles
This Article posits a two prong approach to the on-sale bar. First, for the anticipatory version, the courts should expressly incorporate the law of enablement under 35 U.S.C. § 112 and of utility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 into the on-sale bar, thus providing a well-known body of law to promote predictability. Procedurally, the courts should establish a hierarchy of evidence, similar to the approach used in claim construction, that considers certain, more readily available information as the most pertinent while eschewing the use of expert testimony and other litigation based evidence. Second, for the obviousness version of the on-sale …
Understanding Internet Co-Branding Deals, Eric Goldman, Candice Lee
Understanding Internet Co-Branding Deals, Eric Goldman, Candice Lee
Faculty Publications
The Internet has spawned new business practices regarding the ways users access and obtain information and services. Because linking can create a network of web pages that appear integrated and seamless to users, many Internet companies enter what are known as co-branding relationships. This article addresses a common type of co-branding relationship in which a "provider" maintains a set of pages ("the co-branded site") that looks and feels like the "brander's" web site. The co-branded site is promoted on the brander's web site through linking.
Introduction: Tiger Woods And The First Amendment, Tyler T. Ochoa
Introduction: Tiger Woods And The First Amendment, Tyler T. Ochoa
Faculty Publications
Although the right of publicity has been recognized as a distinct common-law doctrine since 1953, only in recent years have courts begun to take the First Amendment seriously as a limit on the extent to which sports figures and other celebrities can use the doctrine to control the use of their images. It is widely recognized that the government may prohibit false and misleading speech, such as an advertisement that falsely implies an endorsement of a product by an individual, without violating the First Amendment. Similarly, it is generally acknowledged that the First Amendment protects the depiction of celebrities in …
World Music On A U.S. Stage: A Berne/Trips And Economic Analysis Of The Fairness In Music Licensing Act, Laurence R. Helfer
World Music On A U.S. Stage: A Berne/Trips And Economic Analysis Of The Fairness In Music Licensing Act, Laurence R. Helfer
Faculty Scholarship
This article analyzes the dispute settlement proceedings pending before the World Trade Organization (WTO) concerning the Fairness in Music License Act of 1998, a new provision of the US Copyright Act that exempts many bars, restaurants, and retail stores from paying license fees for performing broadcast music in their establishments. In May 1999, the European Community challenged the Act, and its predecessor "homestyle exemption," as a violation of the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) and the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (Berne). The FMLA dispute is the first time in …
Re-Examining The Role Of Patents In Appropriating The Value Of Dna Sequences, Rebecca S. Eisenberg
Re-Examining The Role Of Patents In Appropriating The Value Of Dna Sequences, Rebecca S. Eisenberg
Articles
As public and private sector initiatives race to complete the sequence of the human genome, patent issues have played a prominent role in speculations about the significance of this achievement. How much of the genome will be subject to the control of patent holders, and what will this mean for future research and the development of products for the improvement of human health? Is a patent system developed to establish rights in mechanical inventions of an earlier era up to the task of resolving competing claims to the genome on behalf of the many sequential innovators who elucidate its sequence …
Fighting The Phantom Menace: The Motion Picture Industry's Struggle To Protect Itself Against Digital Piracy, S. E. Oross
Fighting The Phantom Menace: The Motion Picture Industry's Struggle To Protect Itself Against Digital Piracy, S. E. Oross
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
Digital technology, combined with the influence of the Internet, represents an increasingly dangerous threat to the protection of copyrights in the global marketplace. Industries like Hollywood with business models based primarily on selling and/or licensing intellectual property have much to lose if that protection falters.
Jack Valenti, the president of the MPAA, knows this all too well. In recent testimony before the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Trade and Consumer Protection of the Commerce Committee, he described how the growing availability of certain digital technology could turn online piracy into the bane of the motion picture industry. Noting that Internet pirates …
Patents, Patients, And Public Policy: An Incomplete Intersection At 35 U.S.C. 287 (C), Cynthia M. Ho
Patents, Patients, And Public Policy: An Incomplete Intersection At 35 U.S.C. 287 (C), Cynthia M. Ho
Faculty Publications & Other Works
No abstract provided.
Splicing Morality And Patent Law: Issues Arising From Mixing Mice And Men,, Cynthia M. Ho
Splicing Morality And Patent Law: Issues Arising From Mixing Mice And Men,, Cynthia M. Ho
Faculty Publications & Other Works
No abstract provided.
The United States' Doctrine Of Exhaustion: Parallel Imports Of Patented Goods, Margreth Barrett
The United States' Doctrine Of Exhaustion: Parallel Imports Of Patented Goods, Margreth Barrett
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Presidents And Mummies And Patents, Oh My: Why Patenting Special Effects Technology Is Like A Box Of Chocolates, You Never Know What You're Going To Get, J.D. Roberts
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
No More Clowning Around: Ringling Bros.-Barnum & (And) Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. V. Utah Division Of Travel Development Evaluates The Federal Trademark Dilution Act, Christina M. Bidlingmaier
No More Clowning Around: Ringling Bros.-Barnum & (And) Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. V. Utah Division Of Travel Development Evaluates The Federal Trademark Dilution Act, Christina M. Bidlingmaier
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
Web Word War (Www): A New Approach To Trademark Infringement And Unfair Competition Claims Under The Lanham Act In Brookfield Communications, Inc. V. West Coast Entertainment Corp., Melissa M. Mcgann
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
Where Have You Gone, Fair Use: Document Delivery In The For-Profit Sector, James S. Heller
Where Have You Gone, Fair Use: Document Delivery In The For-Profit Sector, James S. Heller
Library Staff Publications
No abstract provided.
The Emerging Law Of The Digital Domain And The Contract/Ip Interface: An Antipodean Perspective, Samuel K. Murumba
The Emerging Law Of The Digital Domain And The Contract/Ip Interface: An Antipodean Perspective, Samuel K. Murumba
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Proprietary Rights And Why Initial Allocations Matter, Clarisa Long
Proprietary Rights And Why Initial Allocations Matter, Clarisa Long
Faculty Scholarship
Initial allocations of proprietary rights matter because who starts out holding the rights helps determine who ends up holding the rights. In patent law, proprietary rights are granted to those who are first to invent. But entities who win the race to patent an invention are not necessarily the final, or best, or most efficient users of the technology. If proprietary rights, particularly patents on basic research results, could be traded efficiently so that downstream innovators could obtain them from initial rights holders easily, then initial allocations of proprietary rights would not matter so much. Transferring proprietary rights is costly, …