Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (3237)
- Courts (2066)
- Judges (1464)
- State and Local Government Law (1301)
- Jurisprudence (1140)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1050)
- Legal History (982)
- First Amendment (960)
- Criminal Procedure (948)
- Legislation (883)
- Law and Politics (867)
- Criminal Law (857)
- Fourteenth Amendment (701)
- Administrative Law (670)
- Law and Society (631)
- Law and Race (629)
- Civil Procedure (618)
- Health Law and Policy (507)
- Jurisdiction (501)
- Labor and Employment Law (491)
- Civil Law (480)
- Litigation (479)
- Human Rights Law (475)
- Fourth Amendment (472)
- Religion Law (471)
- International Law (456)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (454)
- Law and Gender (452)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1618)
- William & Mary Law School (667)
- University of Richmond (466)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (307)
- University of Colorado Law School (287)
-
- Seattle University School of Law (238)
- Notre Dame Law School (205)
- St. John's University School of Law (173)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (157)
- Cleveland State University (134)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (133)
- University of Georgia School of Law (132)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (113)
- Roger Williams University (112)
- Brooklyn Law School (111)
- Emory University School of Law (111)
- Fordham Law School (111)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (111)
- New York Law School (104)
- Columbia Law School (99)
- UIC School of Law (96)
- Boston University School of Law (95)
- American University Washington College of Law (93)
- The University of Akron (88)
- Duke Law (86)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (81)
- Georgetown University Law Center (70)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (69)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (69)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (1565)
- Supreme Court (1047)
- Constitution (411)
- Constitutional law (271)
- First Amendment (244)
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (205)
- Congress (199)
- Discrimination (187)
- Federalism (184)
- Judicial review (164)
- Due process (154)
- SCOTUS (148)
- Federal (138)
- Police (130)
- Abortion (129)
- Fifth Amendment (126)
- History (121)
- Jurisprudence (117)
- State (116)
- Equal Protection Clause (113)
- Supreme court (113)
- Constitutional Law (112)
- Sixth Amendment (112)
- Race and law (109)
- Statutory interpretation (109)
- Equal protection (106)
- Courts (96)
- Originalism (96)
- Constitutional interpretation (95)
- Fourteenth Amendment (95)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (837)
- Articles (487)
- Faculty Scholarship (402)
- University of Richmond Law Review (394)
- Supreme Court Preview (286)
-
- Touro Law Review (279)
- Faculty Publications (258)
- Publications (258)
- Seattle University Law Review (227)
- Faculty Articles (126)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (114)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (96)
- William & Mary Law Review (90)
- Scholarly Articles (89)
- Akron Law Review (81)
- All Faculty Scholarship (81)
- Journal Articles (78)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (75)
- Court Briefs (67)
- Cleveland State Law Review (66)
- Georgia Law Review (66)
- UIC Law Review (65)
- Scholarly Works (64)
- Law Faculty Publications (61)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (60)
- Northwestern University Law Review (59)
- St. John's Law Review (59)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (56)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar (54)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 6931 - 6960 of 7921
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Book Review Of The Supreme Court And Constitutional Democracy, Neal Devins
Book Review Of The Supreme Court And Constitutional Democracy, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Legislative Veto, The Constitution, And The Courts, Robert F. Nagel
The Legislative Veto, The Constitution, And The Courts, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Nlra Preemption Of State Law Actions For Wrongful Discharge In Violation Of Public Policy, Thomas Bean
Nlra Preemption Of State Law Actions For Wrongful Discharge In Violation Of Public Policy, Thomas Bean
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Note considers the circumstances under which the NLRA should preempt state law tort suits for discharge in contravention of public policy by employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and by at-will employees. Part I discusses the rationale behind the preemption doctrine and outlines the tests the Supreme Court has adopted for determining when the NLRA preempts state laws. Part II argues that the specific rationale behind the Court's preemption tests are inapplicable to the typical public policy wrongful discharge action. Part III identifies the ways in which public policy wrongful discharge actions might infringe on the NLRA. It …
Interstate Commerce Commission V. American Trucking Associations, Inc.
Interstate Commerce Commission V. American Trucking Associations, Inc.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Secular Meaning Behind The Lemon Test: Lynch V. Donnelly
The Secular Meaning Behind The Lemon Test: Lynch V. Donnelly
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The State Of New York's State Federal-Judicial Council, Hon. George C. Pratt
The State Of New York's State Federal-Judicial Council, Hon. George C. Pratt
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Does Mississippi's System For Financing Public Schools From "School Lands" Violate Federal Law?, Richard B. Collins
Does Mississippi's System For Financing Public Schools From "School Lands" Violate Federal Law?, Richard B. Collins
Publications
No abstract provided.
Economic Analysis Of Liberty And Property: A Critique, Peter N. Simon
Economic Analysis Of Liberty And Property: A Critique, Peter N. Simon
Publications
No abstract provided.
Can Consent Waive Absolute Rights To An Article Iii Court (85-621) (85-642), Ronald Filler
Can Consent Waive Absolute Rights To An Article Iii Court (85-621) (85-642), Ronald Filler
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Government Nonacquiescence Case In Point: Social Security Litigation
Government Nonacquiescence Case In Point: Social Security Litigation
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Arbitrability Of Domestic Antitrust Claims: An Evaluation Of The American Safety Doctrine, Edward G. Heilig
The Arbitrability Of Domestic Antitrust Claims: An Evaluation Of The American Safety Doctrine, Edward G. Heilig
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Can Mental Health Professionals Predict Judicial Decisionmaking? Constitutional And Tort Liability Aspects Of The Right Of The Institutionalized Mentally Disabled To Refuse Treatment: On The Cutting Edge, Michael L. Perlin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Of Lollipops And Law -- A Proposal For A National Policy Concerning Tender Offer Defenses, Ted J. Fiflis
Of Lollipops And Law -- A Proposal For A National Policy Concerning Tender Offer Defenses, Ted J. Fiflis
Publications
Early last year, Mesa Petroleum Company made a tender offer for shares of Unocal Corporation in an effort to take over Unocal. Unocal responded by using the "lollipop" defense, which is a discriminatory issuer self-tender offer. Unocal's use of this defense resulted in huge economic losses to many of Unocal's small shareholders who were not knowledgeable about the ramifications of their participation or non-participation in the tender offer. The Delaware Supreme Court upheld Unocal's use of this defense as an appropriate exercise of business judgment. A federal district court in California refused to strike down the lollipop under federal law …
Does A Monopolist Have A Duty To Deal With Its Rivals? Some Thoughts On The Aspen Skiing Case, Arthur H. Travers Jr.
Does A Monopolist Have A Duty To Deal With Its Rivals? Some Thoughts On The Aspen Skiing Case, Arthur H. Travers Jr.
Publications
No abstract provided.
Washington's Ballot Restriction For Minor Party Candidates: When Is A Primary Not A Primary?, Emily Calhoun
Washington's Ballot Restriction For Minor Party Candidates: When Is A Primary Not A Primary?, Emily Calhoun
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Possible Final Word On Employment Discrimination Relief, Neal Devins
The Possible Final Word On Employment Discrimination Relief, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Righting Past Wrongs: When Affirmative Action May Be Reverse Discrimination, Neal Devins
Righting Past Wrongs: When Affirmative Action May Be Reverse Discrimination, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of Life In The Balance: Procedural Safeguards In Capital Cases, David Robinson Jr.
Book Review Of Life In The Balance: Procedural Safeguards In Capital Cases, David Robinson Jr.
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
The Formulaic Constitution, Robert F. Nagel
The Formulaic Constitution, Robert F. Nagel
Michigan Law Review
This essay explores the ways in which the formulaic style is different from other, older forms of constitutional doctrine. It argues that the modern style affects the content that the Court finds in the Constitution and that it illuminates the current interpretive functions of the judiciary. Perhaps most importantly, the formulaic style establishes an identifiable relationship between the Court and the public and thus constrains how the Court's version of the Constitution bears upon the larger political culture.
The Class-Based Animus Requirement Of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3): A Limiting Strategy Gone Awry?, Devin S. Schindler
The Class-Based Animus Requirement Of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3): A Limiting Strategy Gone Awry?, Devin S. Schindler
Michigan Law Review
This Note focuses on Scott's impact on attempts to determine what groups fall within the statute. Part I examines the various class-based animus formulas generated by the circuits since Griffin and the potential impact of Scott on these formulas. Part II argues that the key to understanding the scope of the class-based animus requirement lies in traditional fourteenth amendment equal protection analysis.
Supreme Court Doctrine In The Trenches: The Case Of Collateral Estoppel, John Bernard Corr
Supreme Court Doctrine In The Trenches: The Case Of Collateral Estoppel, John Bernard Corr
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Second Death Of Federalism, William W. Van Alstyne
The Second Death Of Federalism, William W. Van Alstyne
Michigan Law Review
In 1976, in National League of Cities v. Usery, the Supreme Court distinguished acts of Congress regulating commercial relations from acts of Congress commanding the terms of state services. Last Term, in Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, the Court abandoned the distinction and held that it was principally for Congress to determine federalism questions. In this Comment, Professor Van Alstyne criticizes the Court on both counts.
Two Models Of The Fourth Amendment, Craig M. Bradley
Two Models Of The Fourth Amendment, Craig M. Bradley
Michigan Law Review
Fourth amendment critics rank in rows, and it has been repeatedly pointed out that individual cases are inconsistent with each other or that whole chunks of doctrine, such as the automobile exception or the plain view exception, are either misconceived, too broad, or too narrow. But these critics all play the Court on its own field, simply arguing as tenth Justices that the doctrines should be tinkered with in different ways than the Court has done. This Article, in contrast, suggests that current fourth amendment law, complete with the constant tinkering which it necessarily entails, should be abandoned altogether. Instead, …
Motions For Appointment Of Counsel And The Collateral Order Doctrine, Michigan Law Review
Motions For Appointment Of Counsel And The Collateral Order Doctrine, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note argues that denials of motions for appointment of counsel should be immediately appealable under the collateral order exception to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Part I examines the extent to which the collateral order doctrine modifies the finality rule. It argues that recent Supreme Court decisions that at first appear to have narrowed the doctrine have in fact only restated it. Part II applies the collateral order doctrine to orders denying appointment of counsel, concluding that such denials qualify for immediate review. Part III argues that policy considerations support this conclusion.
Rejoinder: Truth, Justice, And The American Way--Or Professor Haddad's "Hard Choices", John M. Burkoff
Rejoinder: Truth, Justice, And The American Way--Or Professor Haddad's "Hard Choices", John M. Burkoff
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
I frankly think that Professor Haddad's response to my article on pretext searches is first-rate. It is articulate; it is thoughtful and scholarly; it sharpens the issues and the analysis in this area; and, for the most part, I think his criticisms of various portions of my own work present my positions fairly and honestly. On the other hand, I think that Professor Haddad is dead wrong.
Pretextual Fourth Amendment Activity: Another Viewpoint, James B. Haddad
Pretextual Fourth Amendment Activity: Another Viewpoint, James B. Haddad
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Pretextual detentions, arrests, and searches pose knotty fourth amendment problems. With an air of plausibility, defense attorneys often accuse police of pretextual use of arrest warrants, search warrants, and various exceptions to the warrant requirement. Specifically, they contend that officers have utilized a particular fourth amendment doctrine to obtain certain evidence even though courts have not assigned as a reason for approving the doctrine the need to discover such evidence.
Affirmative Action After Stotts: The United States Supreme Court's 1985 Term, Albert Broderick
Affirmative Action After Stotts: The United States Supreme Court's 1985 Term, Albert Broderick
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Bottom Line Limitation To The Rule Of Griggs V. Duke Power Company, James P. Scanlan
The Bottom Line Limitation To The Rule Of Griggs V. Duke Power Company, James P. Scanlan
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Part I of this article analyzes the background to the Teal decision and the treatment by the majority and dissent of the issue known in employment discrimination law as the "bottom line" limitation to the disparate impact theory of employment discrimination. Part II explains why, for reasons beyond those considered by the Teal majority, not only was the Court's rejection of the bottom line theory manifestly correct, but a contrary result would have had grievous consequences. Part III then argues for a similar rejection of the bottom line limitation in those situations where most observers have taken for granted that …
The Rise Of The Supreme Court Reporter: An Institutional Perspective On Marshall Court Ascendancy, Craig Joyce
The Rise Of The Supreme Court Reporter: An Institutional Perspective On Marshall Court Ascendancy, Craig Joyce
Michigan Law Review
This Article will first explore the antecedents to, and beginnings of, the reporter system under Alexander J. Dallas and William Cranch. Next, the Article will examine the transformation of the system under the Court's first official Reporter, the scholarly Henry Wheaton. Finally, the Article will recount the struggle between Wheaton and his more practical successor, Richard Peters, Jr., that culminated in 1834 in the Court's declaration that its decisions are the property of the people of the United States, and not of the Court's Reporters.
The Delegation Doctrine: Could The Court Give It Substance?, David Schoenbrod
The Delegation Doctrine: Could The Court Give It Substance?, David Schoenbrod
Michigan Law Review
Part I of this Article demonstrates the need for a new approach to the delegation doctrine. It shows that the Court has failed to articulate a coherent test of improper delegation and that the alternative tests offered by commentators are not sufficient. Part II then sets forth a proposed test of improper delegation. The basic principles of an approach prohibiting delegations of legislative power are outlined and illustrated. This Article does not, however, attempt anything so grand as to suggest a final definition of the doctrine or to pass broadly on the validity of statutes. Such an encompassing analysis is …