Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (36)
- Law and Race (16)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (15)
- Legal History (13)
- Criminal Procedure (12)
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (12)
- Courts (10)
- Sexuality and the Law (9)
- First Amendment (8)
- Privacy Law (7)
- Education Law (6)
- Law and Society (6)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (5)
- Judges (5)
- Legal Education (5)
- Evidence (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Law and Gender (4)
- Religion Law (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Torts (4)
- Common Law (3)
- International Law (3)
- Labor and Employment Law (3)
- Legal Biography (3)
- Legal Remedies (3)
- Legal Writing and Research (3)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (33)
- William & Mary Law School (13)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (8)
- University of Richmond (8)
- New York Law School (6)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- Roger Williams University (4)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (4)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Southern Methodist University (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- Wayne State University (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Connecticut (1)
- University of Dayton (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (36)
- Supreme Court (15)
- Race (9)
- Brown v. Board of Education (8)
- Lawrence v. Texas (8)
-
- Affirmative action (7)
- Equal protection (6)
- Grutter v. Bollinger (6)
- Kamisar (Yale) (6)
- Race and law (6)
- Admissibility (5)
- Discrimination (5)
- Diversity (5)
- History (5)
- Sixth Amendment (5)
- Virginia (5)
- Civil rights (4)
- Confrontation Clause (4)
- Crawford v. Washington (4)
- Cross-examination (4)
- Federalism (4)
- Fifth Amendment (4)
- Garner (Tyron) (4)
- Gays (4)
- Homosexual Conduct (4)
- LGBTQ (4)
- Lawrence (John) (4)
- Ohio v. Roberts (4)
- Segregation (4)
- Sodomy laws (4)
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (17)
- Articles (10)
- Supreme Court Preview (9)
- City University of New York Law Review (8)
- University of Richmond Law Review (6)
-
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- NYLS Law Review (5)
- Publications (5)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (3)
- American Indian Law Review (2)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (2)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (2)
- Oklahoma Law Review (2)
- Other Publications (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal (1)
- Court Briefs (1)
- Educational Leadership Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Articles and Papers (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Maurer Law Events (1)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (1)
- Psychology Faculty Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 111
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Brief Of Keith N. Hylton As Amicus Curiae In Support Of Petitioners In Greg Johnson, Et Al. V. Ford Motor Company, Keith N. Hylton
Brief Of Keith N. Hylton As Amicus Curiae In Support Of Petitioners In Greg Johnson, Et Al. V. Ford Motor Company, Keith N. Hylton
Faculty Scholarship
This Court last addressed the legal framework for setting the amount of punitive damages in Adams v. Murakami (1991) 54 Cal.3d 105. In Adams, this Court declined to reach the argument advanced by the Association for California Tort Reform advocating “the profitability of the defendant’s misconduct” as the appropriate financial measure in fixing punitive damages. Id. at 116 n.7. For this argument to be advanced by such a pro-defendant trade association is hardly an anomaly. It appears typical, evidently based on the sensible assumption that in the setting of punitive damages, a focus on a defendant’s illicit profits will frequently …
Brief Amicus Curiae Of Professors David L. Callies, James T. Ely, Paula A. Franzese, Nicole Stelle Garnett, James E. Krier, Daniel R. Mandelker, John Copeland Nagle, John Nolon, J.B. Ruhl, Shelley Ross Saxer, A. Dan Tarlock, Laura Underkuffler, And Edward F. Ziegler In Support Of Petitioners, David L. Callies, Nicole Stelle Garnett, John Copeland Nagle
Brief Amicus Curiae Of Professors David L. Callies, James T. Ely, Paula A. Franzese, Nicole Stelle Garnett, James E. Krier, Daniel R. Mandelker, John Copeland Nagle, John Nolon, J.B. Ruhl, Shelley Ross Saxer, A. Dan Tarlock, Laura Underkuffler, And Edward F. Ziegler In Support Of Petitioners, David L. Callies, Nicole Stelle Garnett, John Copeland Nagle
Court Briefs
No. 04-108
Susette Kelo v. City of New London
On Writ Of Certiorari To The Supreme Court of Connecticut
From the Summary of Argument
The Connecticut Supreme Court's decision was in keeping with Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229 (1984), which provides that legislative assertions of public use should be subjected to rational basis review. The application of such broadly deferential review in public use cases is inappropriate. Application of rational basis review to the exercise of eminent domain in cases such as this effectively eviscerates the Fifth Amendment's public use limitation. Moreover, lower courts' responses to …
Government Corruption And The Right Of Access To Courts, Una A. Kim
Government Corruption And The Right Of Access To Courts, Una A. Kim
Michigan Law Review
This Note addresses the question left unanswered in Harbury: whether these denial of access-to-courts cases, which Justice Souter termed "backward-looking" access claims, are valid exercises of a constitutional right. Backward-looking access claims such as Harbury's differ from traditional denial of access-to-courts claims in that their aim is not to remove impediments to bringing causes of action in the future. Rather, backward-looking access claims allege that a suit that could have been filed in the past was not brought or was not litigated effectively, because access to the courts was at that time denied or obstructed by government officials. …
Hess V. Indiana Revisited: A Panel Discussion With Case Participants (Video), Ralph F. Gaebler, Richard Vaughan
Hess V. Indiana Revisited: A Panel Discussion With Case Participants (Video), Ralph F. Gaebler, Richard Vaughan
Maurer Law Events
On November 19th, 2004, a panel discussion was held in the Moot Court Room of the Indiana University-Bloomington School of Law. The topic of the discussion was the landmark United States Supreme Court case, Hess v. Indiana. The case is particularly relevant to the law school because two members of the faculty (Tom Schornhorst and Pat Baude) served as lawyers to the defendant Greg Hess. Additionally, the protest and arrest took place half a block from the law school in front of the University's administration building (Bryan Hall) in 1970.
Joining Professors Schornhorst and Baude on the panel are three …
Brown And The Desegregation Of Virginia Law Schools, Carl W. Tobias
Brown And The Desegregation Of Virginia Law Schools, Carl W. Tobias
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Virginia's Next Challenge: Economic And Educational Opportunity, Mark R. Warner
Virginia's Next Challenge: Economic And Educational Opportunity, Mark R. Warner
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comparison To Criminal Sanctions In The Constitutional Review Of Punitive Damages, Colleen P. Murphy
Comparison To Criminal Sanctions In The Constitutional Review Of Punitive Damages, Colleen P. Murphy
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Comparison To Criminal Sanctions In The Constitutional Review Of Punitive Damages, Colleen P. Murphy
Comparison To Criminal Sanctions In The Constitutional Review Of Punitive Damages, Colleen P. Murphy
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Promise Of Equality: Reflections On The Post-Brown Era In Virginia, Robert R. Mehrige Jr.
The Promise Of Equality: Reflections On The Post-Brown Era In Virginia, Robert R. Mehrige Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Environmental Law, Benjamin A. Thorp Iv, William K. Taggart
Environmental Law, Benjamin A. Thorp Iv, William K. Taggart
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Call To Leadership: The Future Of Race Relations In Virginia, Rodney A. Smolla
A Call To Leadership: The Future Of Race Relations In Virginia, Rodney A. Smolla
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 1: Moot Court, Roper V. Simmons, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Moot Court, Roper V. Simmons, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 9: Miscellaneous, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 9: Miscellaneous, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 4: International Law At The U.S. Supreme Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 4: International Law At The U.S. Supreme Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 7: Business Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 7: Business Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 2: The Law Under George W. Bush, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 2: The Law Under George W. Bush, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 3: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 3: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 5: Criminal Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 5: Criminal Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 8: Update & Looking Ahead, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 8: Update & Looking Ahead, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 6: Federalism, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 6: Federalism, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Returning The Language Of Fairness To Equal Protection: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Affirmative Action Jurisprudence In Grutter And Gratz And Beyond Celebrating The Jurisprudence Of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Shira Galinsky
City University of New York Law Review
No abstract provided.
Implementing Brown: A Lawyer’S View, Robert A. Sedler
Implementing Brown: A Lawyer’S View, Robert A. Sedler
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Implications Of The Altmann Decision On Former Yugoslav States, Milena Sterio
Implications Of The Altmann Decision On Former Yugoslav States, Milena Sterio
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
The law of state succession is one of the most complicated areas of law. Scholars and politicians have seldom reached a consensus on the exact public international law rules in this area. The recent breakup of former Yugoslavia exemplifies some of the difficulties relating to, inter alia, the distinction between dissolution and secession, the allocation of debt and assets among successor states, and more particularly, the resolution of individual disputes among citizens of former Yugoslav republics. The latter issue has been particularly important, as numerous individuals have lost their life savings and immovable property during the internal war that ravaged …
Twin Pillars Of Judicial Philosophy: The Impact Of The Ginsburg Collegiality And Gender Discrimination Principles On Her Separate Opinions Involving Gender Discrimination, Rebecca L. Barnhart, Deborah Zalesne
Twin Pillars Of Judicial Philosophy: The Impact Of The Ginsburg Collegiality And Gender Discrimination Principles On Her Separate Opinions Involving Gender Discrimination, Rebecca L. Barnhart, Deborah Zalesne
City University of New York Law Review
No abstract provided.
Scrupulous In Applying The Law: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg And Capital Punishment, Sidney Harring, Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier
Scrupulous In Applying The Law: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg And Capital Punishment, Sidney Harring, Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier
City University of New York Law Review
No abstract provided.
Real Differences And Stereotypes - Two Visions Of Gender, Citizenship, And International Law, M. Isabel Medina
Real Differences And Stereotypes - Two Visions Of Gender, Citizenship, And International Law, M. Isabel Medina
City University of New York Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: An Annotated Bibliography, Sarah E. Valentine
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: An Annotated Bibliography, Sarah E. Valentine
City University of New York Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction: Learning To Listen To Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Linda Greenhouse
Introduction: Learning To Listen To Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Linda Greenhouse
City University of New York Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remarks Of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, March 11, 2004, Cuny School Of Law, Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Remarks Of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, March 11, 2004, Cuny School Of Law, Ruth Bader Ginsburg
City University of New York Law Review
No abstract provided.