Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Supreme Court of the United States Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Book Gallery

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication

Articles 1 - 30 of 37

Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States

A Conversation On Ethics & The Law With The Honorable Ruth Pickholz, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law, Cardozo Criminal Law Society, Ruth Pickholz Apr 2026

A Conversation On Ethics & The Law With The Honorable Ruth Pickholz, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law, Cardozo Criminal Law Society, Ruth Pickholz

2025–2026 Flyers

Retired Justice of the Supreme Court, New York City County.


Zivotofsky V. Kerry Commentary From The Counsel Behind The Case, Jewish Law Student Association (Jlsa), Jewish Graduate Student Initiative, Alyza Lewin, Akiva Shapiro Mar 2026

Zivotofsky V. Kerry Commentary From The Counsel Behind The Case, Jewish Law Student Association (Jlsa), Jewish Graduate Student Initiative, Alyza Lewin, Akiva Shapiro

2025–2026 Flyers

Join Alyza Lewin, President of Us Affairs for Combat Antisemitism Movement, and Akiva Shapiro, partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, as they share their experience litigating the landmark Supreme Court case Zivotofsky v. Kerry before the Supreme Court. In Zivotofsky, the court ruled that only thе president has the exclusive power to formally recognize a foreign sovereign and its territorial boundaries. This case paved the way for president Donald J. Trump to declare Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.


The Containment, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy, Black Law Students Association (Blsa), Alexander Reinert, Michellle Adams, James Forman Jr. Sep 2025

The Containment, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy, Black Law Students Association (Blsa), Alexander Reinert, Michellle Adams, James Forman Jr.

2025–2026 Flyers

Join us for a special evening with Michelle Adams, the Henry M. Butzel Professor of Law at the University of Michigan, and former Cardozo Professor, as she discusses her acclaimed new book The Containment: Detroit, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for School Desegregation.


Michelle Adams On Detroit, The Supreme Court, And School Segregation, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy, Black Law Students Association (Blsa), Alexander A. Reinert, Michelle Adams, James Foreman Jr. Sep 2025

Michelle Adams On Detroit, The Supreme Court, And School Segregation, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy, Black Law Students Association (Blsa), Alexander A. Reinert, Michelle Adams, James Foreman Jr.

2025 Event Invitations

Join us for a special evening with Michelle Adams, the Henry M. Butzel Professor of Law at the University of Michigan, and former Cardozo Professor, as she discusses her acclaimed new book The Containment: Detroit, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for School Desegregation.


The Court We Need: Why The Supreme Court Is Worth Saving—Especially From Itself With Professor Steven I. Vladeck, Stephen I. Vladeck Feb 2025

The Court We Need: Why The Supreme Court Is Worth Saving—Especially From Itself With Professor Steven I. Vladeck, Stephen I. Vladeck

2025 Event Invitations

For all of the ink that has been spilled over the Supreme Court in recent years, no one has been able to bridge the growing divide between those who think we should bury the Court and those who think we should praise it. Meanwhile, public faith in the Court continues to decline. The result has been an erosion of the Court’s moral authority and an impasse about how to restore it at the exact moment when we most need it—with the other institutions of government increasingly unable or unwilling to check each other. Now, more than ever, we need a …


The Misguided Use Of The Harvard/Unc Ruling To Thwart Law Firm And Other Private Employer Dei Efforts, Ronald A. Norwood Apr 2024

The Misguided Use Of The Harvard/Unc Ruling To Thwart Law Firm And Other Private Employer Dei Efforts, Ronald A. Norwood

SLU Law Journal Online

This article explores the Harvard/UNC ruling and what, in the author’s view, is the misguided efforts by certain political and well-financed private actors to use that ruling to justify the eradication of private employers and law firm DEI efforts. It is the author’s firm belief that because the Supreme Court’s holding is limited to an analysis of the Constitution’s Equal Protection clause (limited to state actors) and Title VI (covering private actions receiving federal funding), that ruling should not be used by courts to quash DEI programs designed to level the employment playing field for minorities, women and other protected …


The Future Of “History And Tradition”: The First Amendment Implication Of Bruen, The Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy Mar 2024

The Future Of “History And Tradition”: The First Amendment Implication Of Bruen, The Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy

2023–2024 Flyers

No abstract provided.


The Future Of “History And Tradition”: The First Amendment Implications Of Bruen, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy Mar 2024

The Future Of “History And Tradition”: The First Amendment Implications Of Bruen, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy

2024 Event Invitations

Did SCOTUS turn all lower court judges into armchair historians? Could landmark free speech precedents like New York Times Co. v. Sullivan be at risk? How will the Court address modern questions like social media content moderation?


Ethics In The Judiciary And The Legal Profession: Are We In Crisis?, Cardozo Law Review, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy, Jacob Burns Center For Ethics In The Practice Of Law Mar 2024

Ethics In The Judiciary And The Legal Profession: Are We In Crisis?, Cardozo Law Review, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy, Jacob Burns Center For Ethics In The Practice Of Law

2024 Event Invitations

The recent conduct of Supreme Court justices and lawyers acting on behalf of former president Trump has led many to think that something has gone profoundly wrong at the most elite levels of the American legal profession.


Ethics In The Judiciary And The Legal Profession: Are We In Crisis?, Cardozo Law Review, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy, Jacob Burns Center For Ethics In The Practice Of Law Mar 2024

Ethics In The Judiciary And The Legal Profession: Are We In Crisis?, Cardozo Law Review, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy, Jacob Burns Center For Ethics In The Practice Of Law

2023–2024 Flyers

No abstract provided.


The 2024 Cardozo Colloquium On Global And Constitutional Theory, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law Feb 2024

The 2024 Cardozo Colloquium On Global And Constitutional Theory, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

2024 Event Invitations

The US Supreme Court is currently experiencing a significant decrease in public approval, as are several courts in many other parts of the world, such as the Israel Supreme Court and top courts in various Eastern European countries. At the same time, in certain other parts of the world, such as Western Europe, constitutional courts persist as well integrated and are widely perceived as trustworthy guarantors of workable checks and balances. The Colloquium will explore what accounts for these differences and whether the various crises concerning judicial review arise from similar or different types of circumstances. To what extent are …


Livestream Of Supreme Court Oral Argument: Trump V. Anderson, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy Feb 2024

Livestream Of Supreme Court Oral Argument: Trump V. Anderson, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy

2023–2024 Flyers

No abstract provided.


The 2024 Cardozo Colloquium On Global And Constitutional Theory Presents: Linda Greenhouse On The Roberts Court, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law Feb 2024

The 2024 Cardozo Colloquium On Global And Constitutional Theory Presents: Linda Greenhouse On The Roberts Court, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

2024 Event Invitations

Join Linda Greenhouse, Senior Research Scholar in Law at Yale Law School, to discuss the exceptional trajectory of the Roberts Court. Greenhouse is also a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter who has covered the United States Supreme Court for nearly three decades for The New York Times.


A Conversation On The Supreme Court With Adam Liptak, Jacob Burns Center For Ethics In The Practice Of Law Sep 2023

A Conversation On The Supreme Court With Adam Liptak, Jacob Burns Center For Ethics In The Practice Of Law

2023 Event Invitations

Join the Burns Center for a conversation on the Supreme Court with Adam Liptak, who is considered one of the most highly regarded legal affairs journalists in the country. He will be joined by two distinguished Cardozo law professors, Jessica Roth and Alexander Reinert. They will discuss current ethical issues surrounding the court, challenges to the court's legitimacy and upcoming and recently decided cases on issues such as abortion rights, gun regulations, same sex marriage and more.


A Conversation On The Supreme Court With Adam Liptak, Jacob Burns Center For Ethics In The Practice Of Law Sep 2023

A Conversation On The Supreme Court With Adam Liptak, Jacob Burns Center For Ethics In The Practice Of Law

2023–2024 Flyers

No abstract provided.


The Future Of Voting: State Courts, Independent Legislatures & The Supreme Court, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy, Wisconsin Law School State Democracy Research Initiative Mar 2023

The Future Of Voting: State Courts, Independent Legislatures & The Supreme Court, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy, Wisconsin Law School State Democracy Research Initiative

2022–2023 Flyers

Click here to view the event invitation.


The Supreme Court And New Frontiers In Religious Liberty, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy Mar 2023

The Supreme Court And New Frontiers In Religious Liberty, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy

2023 Event Invitations

The Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy is proud to present The Supreme Court and New Frontiers in Religious Liberty. Join us for a conversation with First Amendment experts to discuss the future of First Amendment Free Exercise and Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

Professor Michael Pollack will lead a discussion on the Court’s jurisprudence and its impact on civil liberties, religious liberty, and separation of church and state.

Panelists:

  • Nelson Tebbe, Cornell Law School
  • Mark L. Movsesian, St. John's University School of Law
  • Elizabeth Reiner Platt, Columbia Law School
  • Giselle Klapper, Sikh Coalition

Click here to view the flyer.


The Supreme Court And New Frontiers In Religious Liberty, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy Mar 2023

The Supreme Court And New Frontiers In Religious Liberty, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy

2022–2023 Flyers

Click here to view the event invitation.


The Supreme Court In Crisis, David M. Hunt Library Feb 2023

The Supreme Court In Crisis, David M. Hunt Library

2023 Event Invitations

The speakers will discuss recent decisions affecting abortion and gun rights, the public’s trust and confidence in the high court and cases the Court will decide before the summer involving LGBTQ rights, affirmative action, election law and immigration policy.

Speakers:

  • Tom Gerety, former President of Amherst and Trinity Colleges, former Executive Director of the Brennan Center for Justice
  • Adam Liptak, New York Times Supreme Court Correspondent
  • David Rudenstine, Sheldon H. Solow Professor of Law at Cardozo and former Dean


Scotus On Immigration: A Review Of Recent Decisions & What's To Come, Cardozo Journal Of Equal Rights And Social Justice Nov 2022

Scotus On Immigration: A Review Of Recent Decisions & What's To Come, Cardozo Journal Of Equal Rights And Social Justice

2022 Event Invitations

Please join the Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice for a panel discussion with seven immigration attorneys. The discussion will cover recent SCOTUS decisions impacting immigration, the impacts of these decisions and important cases on the docket for this upcoming session.

Moderator: Mauricio Noroña, Visiting Clinical Assistant Professor of Law in the Kathryn O. Greenberg Immigration Justice Clinic, Cardozo Law

Panelists:

  • Peter Markowitz, Associate Dean of Equity in Curriculum and Teaching and Professor of Law, Founding Faculty Member and Co-Director of the Kathryn O. Greenberg Immigration Justice Clinic, Cardozo Law
  • Lindsay Nash, Associate Professor of Law, Co-Director of …


Scotus On Immigration: A Review Of Recent Decisions & What's To Come, Cardozo Journal Of Equal Rights And Social Justice Nov 2022

Scotus On Immigration: A Review Of Recent Decisions & What's To Come, Cardozo Journal Of Equal Rights And Social Justice

2022–2023 Flyers

Click here to view the event invitation.


Where There Is A Right, There Is A Remedy—Or Is There?, Grace Panicola Oct 2022

Where There Is A Right, There Is A Remedy—Or Is There?, Grace Panicola

SLU Law Journal Online

Courts have repeatedly declined to allow causes of actions under the Constitution when Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights are violated by government officials. In this article, Grace Panicola discusses a pocket of governmental immunity that creates serious implications for Plaintiffs as they ultimately face inadequate remedies.


The End Of The Eviction Moratoriums, Public Interest Law Student Association (Pilsa) Nov 2021

The End Of The Eviction Moratoriums, Public Interest Law Student Association (Pilsa)

2021–2022 Flyers

No abstract provided.


Clark Memorandum: Spring 2015, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Byu Law School Alumni Association, J. Reuben Clark Law Society Apr 2015

Clark Memorandum: Spring 2015, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Byu Law School Alumni Association, J. Reuben Clark Law Society

The Clark Memorandum


A Nation Of Widening Opportunities: The Civil Rights Act At 50, Ellen D. Katz, Samuel R. Bagenstos Jan 2015

A Nation Of Widening Opportunities: The Civil Rights Act At 50, Ellen D. Katz, Samuel R. Bagenstos

Books

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was an extraordinary achievement of law, politics, and human rights. On the fiftieth anniversary of the Act's passage, it is appropriate to reflect on the successes and failures of the civil rights project reflected in the statute, as well as on its future directions. This volume represents an attempt to assess the Civil Rights Act's legacy.

On October 11, 2013, a diverse group of civil rights scholars met at the University of Michigan Law School in Ann Arbor to assess the interpretation, development, and administration of civil rights law in the five decades since …


The Deciding Factor: The U.S. Supreme Court, Minnesota State University, Mankato Jan 2013

The Deciding Factor: The U.S. Supreme Court, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Democracy/Government

Bibliography and photographs of a display of government documents from Minnesota State University, Mankato.


Fdr And Chief Justice Hughes: The President, The Supreme Court, And The Epic Battle Over The New Deal, James F. Simon Jan 2012

Fdr And Chief Justice Hughes: The President, The Supreme Court, And The Epic Battle Over The New Deal, James F. Simon

Books

By the author of acclaimed books on the bitter clashes between Jefferson and Chief Justice Marshall on the shaping of the nation’s constitutional future, and between Lincoln and Chief Justice Taney over slavery, secession, and the presidential war powers. Roosevelt and Chief Justice Hughes's fight over the New Deal was the most critical struggle between an American president and a chief justice in the twentieth century.

The confrontation threatened the New Deal in the middle of the nation’s worst depression. The activist president bombarded the Democratic Congress with a fusillade of legislative remedies that shut down insolvent banks, regulated stocks, …


Fordham Law & The Supreme Court: Celebrating Our Relationship, Michael M. Martin, Constantine N. Katsoris Jan 2011

Fordham Law & The Supreme Court: Celebrating Our Relationship, Michael M. Martin, Constantine N. Katsoris

Miscellaneous Publications

"Fordham Law School has enjoyed a long and distinguished relationship with the Supreme Court of the United States that dates back more than a century. In 1908, just three years after the Law School's founding, New York State Governor Charles Evans Hughes served as principal speaker at Fordham Law's first commencement ceremony. Hughes would later be appointed Chief Justice of the Supreme Court by President Herbert Hoover."--Michael M. Martin, Interim Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law


Supreme Court Of The United States, Poplar Creek Public Library District Jan 2007

Supreme Court Of The United States, Poplar Creek Public Library District

Democracy/Government

Bibliography and photograph of a display of government documents from Poplar Creek Public Library District, Illinois.


Lincoln And Chief Justice Taney: Slavery, Secession, And The President's War Powers, James F. Simon Jan 2007

Lincoln And Chief Justice Taney: Slavery, Secession, And The President's War Powers, James F. Simon

Books

The clashes between President Abraham Lincoln and Chief Justice Roger B. Taney over slavery, secession, and the president's constitutional war powers went to the heart of Lincoln's presidency. James Simon, author of the acclaimed What Kind of Nation, brings to vivid life the passionate struggle during the worst crisis in the nation's history, the Civil War. The issues that underlaid that crisis -- race, states' rights, and the president's wartime authority -- resonate today in the nation's political debate.