Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (3236)
- Courts (2066)
- Judges (1464)
- State and Local Government Law (1301)
- Jurisprudence (1139)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1049)
- Legal History (981)
- First Amendment (960)
- Criminal Procedure (948)
- Legislation (883)
- Law and Politics (867)
- Criminal Law (857)
- Fourteenth Amendment (701)
- Administrative Law (669)
- Law and Society (630)
- Law and Race (629)
- Civil Procedure (618)
- Health Law and Policy (507)
- Jurisdiction (501)
- Labor and Employment Law (491)
- Civil Law (480)
- Litigation (479)
- Human Rights Law (475)
- Fourth Amendment (472)
- Religion Law (471)
- International Law (456)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (454)
- Law and Gender (451)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1618)
- William & Mary Law School (666)
- University of Richmond (466)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (307)
- University of Colorado Law School (287)
-
- Seattle University School of Law (238)
- Notre Dame Law School (205)
- St. John's University School of Law (173)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (157)
- Cleveland State University (134)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (132)
- University of Georgia School of Law (132)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- Roger Williams University (112)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (112)
- Brooklyn Law School (111)
- Emory University School of Law (111)
- Fordham Law School (111)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (110)
- New York Law School (104)
- Columbia Law School (99)
- UIC School of Law (96)
- Boston University School of Law (95)
- American University Washington College of Law (93)
- The University of Akron (88)
- Duke Law (86)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (81)
- Georgetown University Law Center (70)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (69)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (69)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (1565)
- Supreme Court (1047)
- Constitution (411)
- Constitutional law (271)
- First Amendment (244)
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (205)
- Congress (199)
- Discrimination (187)
- Federalism (184)
- Judicial review (164)
- Due process (154)
- SCOTUS (148)
- Federal (138)
- Police (130)
- Abortion (129)
- Fifth Amendment (126)
- History (121)
- Jurisprudence (117)
- State (116)
- Equal Protection Clause (113)
- Supreme court (113)
- Constitutional Law (112)
- Sixth Amendment (112)
- Race and law (109)
- Statutory interpretation (109)
- Equal protection (106)
- Courts (96)
- Originalism (96)
- Constitutional interpretation (95)
- Fourteenth Amendment (95)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (837)
- Articles (487)
- Faculty Scholarship (400)
- University of Richmond Law Review (394)
- Supreme Court Preview (286)
-
- Touro Law Review (279)
- Faculty Publications (258)
- Publications (258)
- Seattle University Law Review (227)
- Faculty Articles (126)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (114)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (96)
- Scholarly Articles (89)
- William & Mary Law Review (89)
- Akron Law Review (81)
- All Faculty Scholarship (81)
- Journal Articles (78)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (75)
- Court Briefs (67)
- Cleveland State Law Review (66)
- Georgia Law Review (66)
- UIC Law Review (65)
- Scholarly Works (64)
- Law Faculty Publications (61)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (60)
- Northwestern University Law Review (59)
- St. John's Law Review (59)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (56)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar (54)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 6571 - 6600 of 7916
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Thurgood Marshall And The Administrative State, Jonathan Weinberg
Thurgood Marshall And The Administrative State, Jonathan Weinberg
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Compounding Confusion And Hampering Diversity: Life After Finley And The Supplemental Jurisdiction Statute, Richard D. Freer
Compounding Confusion And Hampering Diversity: Life After Finley And The Supplemental Jurisdiction Statute, Richard D. Freer
Faculty Articles
It has been a tough couple of years for supplemental jurisdiction. In recent decades, the doctrine, which earlier had been called the "child of necessity and sire of confusion," had become somewhat less confusing. The Supreme Court created a flurry of concern over the future of the doctrine with a pair of restrictive decisions in the late 1970s, but showed no further interest; the lower courts generally interpreted those holdings narrowly. With exceptions in a couple of areas, the application of supplemental jurisdiction in the various joinder situations became relatively clear and predictable, and the doctrine played a major role …
Grasping At Burnt Straws: The Disaster Of The Supplemental Jurisdiction Statute, Thomas C. Arthur, Richard Freer
Grasping At Burnt Straws: The Disaster Of The Supplemental Jurisdiction Statute, Thomas C. Arthur, Richard Freer
Faculty Articles
Ah, the strawman model! Where would Professors Rowe, Burbank, and Mengler be without it? At a minimum, they would have a much shorter article. If Professor Freer in fact torched the entire farm, it is because there was so much dry straw lying around after the three drafters finished tilting with the strawmen they created in their response to Professor Freer's article. The drafters spend more than half of their article arguing the irrelevant points that a statute was needed after Finley, that the statute was consistent with recommendations of the Federal Courts Study Committee, and that Professor Freer …
Putting The Dormancy Doctrine Out Of Its Misery, Richard D. Friedman
Putting The Dormancy Doctrine Out Of Its Misery, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
Justice Antonin Scalia has put on the academic table the question of whether the doctrine of the dormant commerce clause should be abandoned. That is a significant contribution, for this is an issue that should be debated thoroughly. But Justice Scalia's campaign against the doctrine has been notably ambivalent. On the one hand, he argues that the doctrine lacks justification in constitutional text, history, and theory.1 On the other hand, assertedly feeling the pressure of stare decisis,2 he has gone along with, and even led, applications of the doctrine, although within narrow limits.3 In this essay, I argue that Justice …
To Tell What We Know Or Wait For Godot?, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
To Tell What We Know Or Wait For Godot?, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Articles
Professor Elliott raises two questions about the American Psychological Association's practice of submitting amicus briefs to the courts. First, are our data sufficiently valid, consistent, and generalizable to be applicable to the real world issues? Second, are amicus briefs adequate to communicate scientific findings? The first of these is not a general question, but must be addressed anew each time the Association considers a new issue. An evaluation of the quality and sufficiency of scientific knowledge about racial discrimination, for example, tells us nothing at all about the quality and sufficiency of scientific knowledge about sexual abuse. "Are the data …
Review Of Cardozo: A Study In Reputation, By R. Posner, Richard D. Friedman
Review Of Cardozo: A Study In Reputation, By R. Posner, Richard D. Friedman
Reviews
Judge Richard Posner has written a genial book about one of our greatest judicial icons, Benjamin N. Cardozo.1 He seeks not only to assess the merits of Cardozo's writings, both on and off the bench, but also to measure, and determine the causes of, Cardozo's reputation. The book is an outgrowth of a lecture series,2 and it reveals its origins in at least two ways. First, the book attempts to reach a mixed audience, composed of both lawyers and laypeople, and in this aspect it is very successful. Nonlawyers, I believe, will have little difficulty following Judge Posner's essential arguments, …
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Affirmative Action, Douglas Scherer, John Dunne
Affirmative Action, Douglas Scherer, John Dunne
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The First Amendment, Burt Neuborne
Environmental Law, Honorable Leon D. Lazer
A Comparison Of A Mentally Ill Individual's Right To Refuse Medication Under The United States And The New York State Constitutions, William M. Brooks
A Comparison Of A Mentally Ill Individual's Right To Refuse Medication Under The United States And The New York State Constitutions, William M. Brooks
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Structural Free Exercise, Mary Ann Glendon, Raul F. Yanes
Structural Free Exercise, Mary Ann Glendon, Raul F. Yanes
Michigan Law Review
In Part I of this article, we analyze the development of case law interpreting the religious freedom language of the First Amendment from the 1940s to the eve of the rights revolution as a casualty of the piecemeal approach to incorporation, compounded by a series of judicial lapses and oversights. Part II deals with the fate of the Religion Clause in the era of the rights revolution, when the free exercise and establishment provisions were deployed in the service of a constitutional agenda to which they were, in themselves, largely peripheral. The current period of doctrinal change is the subject …
Indigents And The Denial Of Due Process At Involuntary Treatment Hearings: The Need For Independent Psychiatric Assistance, Marcy H. Speiser
Indigents And The Denial Of Due Process At Involuntary Treatment Hearings: The Need For Independent Psychiatric Assistance, Marcy H. Speiser
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Freedom Of Speech And The Press