Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (3045)
- Science and Technology Law (2855)
- Internet Law (1904)
- Computer Law (1592)
- Communications Law (1422)
-
- International Law (1147)
- International Trade Law (1090)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (938)
- Privacy Law (895)
- Constitutional Law (808)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (797)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (705)
- Health Law and Policy (690)
- Law and Society (675)
- Litigation (611)
- Food and Drug Law (610)
- First Amendment (599)
- Legislation (581)
- Law and Economics (540)
- Library and Information Science (537)
- Human Rights Law (530)
- Courts (505)
- Administrative Law (502)
- Commercial Law (500)
- Contracts (494)
- Environmental Law (481)
- Cultural Heritage Law (464)
- Agriculture Law (446)
- Institution
-
- Fordham Law School (979)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (978)
- UC Law SF (873)
- UIC School of Law (829)
- American University Washington College of Law (810)
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (654)
- University of Michigan Law School (592)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (517)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (427)
- University of Washington School of Law (403)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (391)
- Marquette University Law School (385)
- Boston University School of Law (362)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (358)
- Seattle University School of Law (355)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (349)
- Santa Clara Law (328)
- Columbia Law School (314)
- University of Richmond (311)
- Duke Law (302)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (279)
- William & Mary Law School (267)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (252)
- The University of Akron (207)
- Southern Methodist University (202)
- Universitas Indonesia (183)
- University of New Hampshire (179)
- Georgetown University Law Center (174)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (164)
- BLR (163)
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (2083)
- Intellectual property (1568)
- Patent (871)
- Patents (755)
- Trademark (600)
-
- Patent law (548)
- Copyright law (533)
- Intellectual Property (412)
- Fair use (372)
- Technology (370)
- Intellectual Property Law (356)
- Internet (298)
- Infringement (297)
- Copyright infringement (287)
- Law (248)
- Innovation (233)
- Trademarks (212)
- Lanham Act (206)
- Copyright Act (197)
- Antitrust (187)
- First Amendment (184)
- Licensing (180)
- IP (178)
- Trademark law (167)
- Google (165)
- Federal Circuit (159)
- Patent infringement (154)
- Software (150)
- Privacy (142)
- NJTIP (138)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1106)
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (846)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (823)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (550)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (495)
-
- Georgia Journal of Law & Technology (467)
- Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. (372)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (351)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (309)
- Articles (306)
- Faculty Publications (280)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (273)
- Seattle University Law Review (236)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (230)
- Michigan Law Review (229)
- Cardozo Law Review (181)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (180)
- Scholarly Works (179)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (173)
- ExpressO (157)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (156)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (150)
- Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix) (147)
- SMU Science and Technology Law Review (146)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (143)
- Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal (143)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (142)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (138)
- Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series (134)
- Scholarship Chronologically (132)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 961 - 990 of 17032
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Acf Response To Ostp Memo, 2022: Public Access Plan (December 2024)
Acf Response To Ostp Memo, 2022: Public Access Plan (December 2024)
Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.
ACF response to OSTP memo, 2022: Public Access Plan (December 2024)
United States Fish And Wildlife Service Response To The Office Of Science And Technology Policy Memo, 2022: Public Access Plan (December 2024)
Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.
FWS response to OSTP memo, 2022: Public Access Plan (December 2024)
The Grapes Of Roth, Bruce E. Boyden
The Grapes Of Roth, Bruce E. Boyden
Washington Law Review
Shortly after Roth Greeting Cards was decided in 1970, its offhand reference to the “total concept and feel” of the cards at issue became the dominant standard in copyright law for determining whether two works were substantially similar. That is a remarkable achievement for a phrase that, in the words of the influential Nimmer treatise, “threatens to subvert the very essence of copyright.” It nevertheless had enormous appeal for federal judges, and the reason extends well beyond copyright law. “Total concept and feel” appeared at a critical juncture for the federal judiciary, as an older model of decision-making, based on …
Legal Chefs’ Appetizing Taglines To Engage Consumers In The Age Of Social Media: The Struggle Against Trademark Genericide, Emily Mcdonald
Legal Chefs’ Appetizing Taglines To Engage Consumers In The Age Of Social Media: The Struggle Against Trademark Genericide, Emily Mcdonald
Journal of Food Law & Policy
Many have heard the phrases “raisin bran,” “escalator,” “nylon,” and “aspirin,” all of which are “old” trademarks that have undergone genericide. Genericide occurs when a trademark has become common from the customer’s perspective concerning specific goods or services rather than associated with the source, which is usually the company that registered the trademark. In short, businesses are no longer able to use the trademark exclusively. Another common trademark phrase that became generic was “Taco Tuesday.” In light of the prolific use of social media today, recent data and statistics show that “food” has become a predominant category and trend on …
Reshaping Intellectual Property Scholarship From Within, Peter K. Yu
Reshaping Intellectual Property Scholarship From Within, Peter K. Yu
Faculty Scholarship
Written for the Symposium collecting papers from the Race + IP 23 Conference, this article explores intellectual property scholarship that has been either overlooked or marginalized. Because scholars of color are often outsiders looking in, the article identifies opportunities to reshape intellectual property scholarship from within. Even though the focus of this article was chosen with readers of this Symposium in mind, its insights will be relevant to all scholars.
This article begins by calling on scholars to develop a deeper appreciation of the intrinsic motivations of authors and inventors. It then discusses the oft-overlooked inequalities of creativity and innovation …
Make America Healthy: Reducing High Pharmaceutical Prices Without Reducing Innovation, Srividhya Ragavan
Make America Healthy: Reducing High Pharmaceutical Prices Without Reducing Innovation, Srividhya Ragavan
Faculty Scholarship
Cost of medication in the United States has historically remained one of the highest in the world. The conundrum that the United States has faced in balancing innovation with affordability of life-saving medications is palpable, especially when faced with the reality of patent monopolies conflicting with healthcare obligations. The result is an overflow of issues, which emphasize the need to delineate limits on innovation to balance pharmaceutical novelty with robust public health within the United States. This has increasingly shifted the focus of patent law into the realm of healthcare issues. Naturally, it leads to an inquiry about how best …
Intellectual Property, Global Inequality, And Subnational Policy Variations, Peter K. Yu
Intellectual Property, Global Inequality, And Subnational Policy Variations, Peter K. Yu
Faculty Scholarship
This chapter criticizes the oversimplification of the binary North–South debate on intellectual property, innovation, and global inequality and highlights the wide geographic, sectoral, and income inequalities within middle-income countries. It begins by explaining why the arrival of these countries has called into question the North–South debate. The chapter then moves from the widely studied subject of global inequality to the underexplored topic of national inequality. Focusing on the intellectual property context, the discussion highlights the considerable subnational variations in the economic and technological conditions of middle-income countries. To combat national inequality, this chapter concludes by recommending interventions in three areas: …
Introduction To Intellectual Property, Innovation And Economic Inequality, Daniel Benoliel, Peter K. Yu
Introduction To Intellectual Property, Innovation And Economic Inequality, Daniel Benoliel, Peter K. Yu
Faculty Scholarship
This chapter provides an introduction to Intellectual Property, Innovation and Economic Inequality. It begins by discussing the problem of economic inequality, including the scale of that problem, types of economic inequality, and extant research on such inequality. The chapter then outlines the structure of this volume, which is divided into three parts: (1) theoretical, empirical, and policy issues; (2) intellectual property and national inequality; and (3) intellectual property and global inequality.
Intellectual Property, Innovation And Economic Inequality, Daniel Benoliel, Peter K. Yu, Francis Gurry, Keun Lee
Intellectual Property, Innovation And Economic Inequality, Daniel Benoliel, Peter K. Yu, Francis Gurry, Keun Lee
Faculty Scholarship
While growing disparities in wealth and income are well-documented across the globe, the role of intellectual property rights is often overlooked. This volume brings together leading commentators from around the world to interrogate the interrelationship between intellectual property and economic inequality. Interdisciplinary and globally oriented by design, the book features economists, legal scholars, policy analysts, and other experts. Chapters address the impact of intellectual property rights on economic inequality, the effect of economic inequality on the protection and enforcement of these rights, and the potential use of innovation law and policy to help reduce economic inequality. The volume also tackles …
China, The Trips Waiver, And The Global Pandemic Response, Peter K. Yu
China, The Trips Waiver, And The Global Pandemic Response, Peter K. Yu
Faculty Scholarship
This chapter identifies three distinct reasons why China took a middle-of-the-road position in the debate on the COVID-19 TRIPS waiver at the WTO. It also recounts the country’s more assertive position in the run-up to the adoption of the Ministerial Decision on the waiver. Drawing eight lessons from the international debate on the waiver and the subsequent Ministerial Decision, the chapter offers insights into the future role China can or will play in future international policy debates at the intersection of intellectual property and public health, including during the next pandemic.
Time To Stop Trip-Ing: The World Needs A New Geographical Indications Agreement, Evan Glatt
Time To Stop Trip-Ing: The World Needs A New Geographical Indications Agreement, Evan Glatt
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
When it comes to purchasing food and alcohol, a product’s name carries weight and helps consumers make decisions. When the product’s name includes a place and establishes a certain level of quality and expectation, consumers trust that the product is what it purports to be. This concept, the reputation of a particular food product by name, is known as a geographical indication (GI). GIs cover a wide range of products, from the well-known champagne to lesser known products such as Roquefort cheese. GIs create financial value for local producers, contribute to sustainability initiatives, and raise the quality of goods for …
Data Scraping For Generative Ai—To What Extent?, Jae Yeon Cecilia Kim
Data Scraping For Generative Ai—To What Extent?, Jae Yeon Cecilia Kim
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Generative AI platforms are developed by scraping data from other platforms. This raises complex copyright infringement issues that are yet to be resolved. Courts have attempted to address these problems using the fair use doctrine, which evaluates four factors to determine whether a use infringes on copyright: (1) the purpose and character of the use, (2) the nature of the use, (3) the amount and substantiality of the copyrighted work’s use, and (4) the impact of the use on the market for the original work. Despite efforts to apply this long-established doctrine, challenges persist, including difficulties in identifying the copyright …
Emerging Compliance In The Generative Decentralized Era, Nizan Geslevich Packin
Emerging Compliance In The Generative Decentralized Era, Nizan Geslevich Packin
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Is it the end of compliance as we know it? Emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (“AI”), including Generative AI (“GenAI”), and blockchain are reshaping regulatory compliance in the Web 3.0 era. As machine-generated data becomes the norm, traditional models reliant on human oversight are becoming obsolete, necessitating swift adaptation from regulators and industry stakeholders. Historically, compliance was designed to be managed by humans due to the need for critical thinking, ethical considerations, and nuanced decision-making. Yet, in today’s era, this approach is no longer viable. Addressing this need, Regulatory Technology (“RegTech”) has played a key role in modernizing compliance …
Transforming Fair Use, Glynn Lunney
Transforming Fair Use, Glynn Lunney
Faculty Scholarship
In the United States, the fate of fair use, and by extension, copyright itself, hang in the balance. In recent years, courts have disagreed over fair use’s proper scope. On the one side are appellate decisions that interpret fair use broadly. While these decisions do not go so far as to suggest that every reuse is fair, they typically use the talismanic phrase “transformative use” and give it a generous and flexible interpretation. On the other side are appellate decisions that interpret fair use restrictively. While again they do not go so far as to suggest no reuse is fair, …
A Patent And A Prize, Keith N. Hylton
A Patent And A Prize, Keith N. Hylton
Faculty Scholarship
This paper examines a simple and old question: should innovators receive a patent or a prize? The answer I provide is equally simple: they should receive both. The literature on patents versus prizes has proceeded mostly under the assumption that there should be a choice between a regime of patents and a regime of prizes in which patents fall into the public domain upon award of the prize. There are significant “public choice costs” under the prize plans. By this I mean there are risks of inappropriate transfers to patentees – that is, looting – and of confiscation of patentees, …
Construction Of Data Factor Circulation Law System In The United States And Its Reflection For China, Zihan Lin, Youmei Ma, Feng Guo
Construction Of Data Factor Circulation Law System In The United States And Its Reflection For China, Zihan Lin, Youmei Ma, Feng Guo
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)
As a pioneer country in the global digital economy, the United States has established a relatively complete system for the circulation of data elements. The focus is on government data openness, with the United States forming a legislative system for data openness at both federal and state levels to ensure data freedom and openness. In the field of personal data trading, the United States has established a relatively relaxed legal environment and data brokers to promote data circulation and trading. At present, China is actively promoting the market-oriented allocation reform of data elements, building a multi-level data element market, and …
Understanding Music Copyright Through Legal Analysis And Music Theory, Gillian Radcliffe
Understanding Music Copyright Through Legal Analysis And Music Theory, Gillian Radcliffe
Master of Studies in Law Research Papers Repository
This paper focuses on the intersection of law and music. Specifically, the intersection between music copyright law and music theory, and the role of musicologists and music theorists in copyright infringement cases. In particular, the influence they have on court decisions when acting as expert witnesses, or forensic musicologists. Recent decisions regarding copyright infringement in popular music have been strongly influenced by testimony from these forensic musicologists due to the imbalance of musical understanding between the expert and the court.
Forensic musicology is a form of “public music theory,” an approach used by academics in the music theory field when …
How Eastern Europe Can Protect Their Cultural Heritage Via Copyright Protection Of Folk Music And How This Compares To Copyright Protection Of Music In The United States, Kostika Kosova
University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review
This note explores the intricate interplay between cultural heritage preservation and copyright protection, focusing on the distinctive case of Eastern European folk music. It delves into the historical and cultural significance of Eastern European folk music traditions, the challenges posed to their preservation, and the copyright protection mechanisms in place across the region. In parallel, the paper provides an in-depth analysis of copyright protection in the United States, highlighting its implications for folk music.
The comparative analysis showcases the unique approaches of Eastern European nations and the United States in safeguarding their respective folk music heritages. By examining key case …
Ai Fanfare & Fanfiction: Do Fanfiction Writers Have Protections Against Artificial Intelligence?, Sinbay Tan
Ai Fanfare & Fanfiction: Do Fanfiction Writers Have Protections Against Artificial Intelligence?, Sinbay Tan
Brooklyn Law Review
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes a familiar topic in everyday conversation and now increasingly in courts, there is a conflict between its use in creative and artistic spaces. While authors and artists enjoy copyright protections that might shield their works from being misused, there are millions of fanfiction writers who have no such protections. After all, the essence of fanfiction is rooted in writing about the characters, settings, and stories made by someone else. After decades of writing online, these fanfiction authors face the threat of having their works scraped up and fed into AI algorithms to be used in …
Attributing Ai Authorship: Towards A System Of Icons For Legal And Ethical Disclosure, Joseph J. Avery, Patricia Sánchez Abril, Alissa Del Riego
Attributing Ai Authorship: Towards A System Of Icons For Legal And Ethical Disclosure, Joseph J. Avery, Patricia Sánchez Abril, Alissa Del Riego
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
Over the past year, the pervasive role of large language models (LLMs) and artificial intelligence (AI) in text generation has precipitated concerns about ethical usage, authorship, and transparent attribution. This has been true in legal practice, academia, and the corporate world, as well as in countless other arenas. In this Article, we identify the gap that has opened between those demanding proper disclosure (we should know when and to what extent AI is an author) and those struggling to respond to these demands. Part of the problem is that there is no system in place, no lingua franca, no set …
Between Copyright And Computer Science: The Law And Ethics Of Generative Ai, Devin R. Desai, Mark Riedl
Between Copyright And Computer Science: The Law And Ethics Of Generative Ai, Devin R. Desai, Mark Riedl
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
Copyright and computer science continue to intersect and clash, but they can coexist. The advent of new technologies such as digitization of visual and aural creations, sharing technologies, search engines, social media offerings, and more, challenge copyright-based industries and reopen questions about the reach of copyright law. Breakthroughs in artificial intelligence research, especially Large Language Models that leverage copyrighted material as part of training, are the latest examples of the ongoing tension between copyright and computer science. The exuberance, rush-to-market, and edge problem cases created by a few misguided companies now raises challenges to core legal doctrines and may shift …
Regulating Chatbot Output Via Inter-Informational Competition, Jiawei Zhang
Regulating Chatbot Output Via Inter-Informational Competition, Jiawei Zhang
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
The advent of ChatGPT has sparked over a year of regulatory frenzy. Policymakers across jurisdictions have embarked on an AI regulatory “arms race,” and worldwide researchers have begun devising a potpourri of regulatory schemes to handle the content risks posed by generative AI products as represented by ChatGPT. However, few existing studies have rigorously questioned the assumption that, if left unregulated, AI chatbot’s output would inflict tangible, severe real harm on human affairs. Most researchers have overlooked the critical possibility that the information market itself can effectively mitigate these risks and, as a result, they tend to use regulatory tools …
Fair Use, Licensing, And Authors' Rights In The Age Of Generative Ai, Celeste Shen
Fair Use, Licensing, And Authors' Rights In The Age Of Generative Ai, Celeste Shen
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
The rise of generative AI technologies has introduced unprecedented challenges to copyright law, particularly around the fair use of copyrighted works in AI training processes. Generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, are trained on vast datasets that often include copyrighted material, typically without the consent of authors or compensation for use. This widespread, unauthorized use has led to legal disputes, with plaintiffs asserting that using protected texts in training AI models constitutes copyright infringement. This Note examines the application of the fair use doctrine to generative AI, analyzing each of the four statutory factors to demonstrate that generative AI’s commercial …
Kei Briefing Note 2024:8 The Basic Proposal For The Design Law Treaty (Dlt) And Its Inappropriate Restrictions On Transparency, James Love
Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is holding a diplomatic conference from November 11 to 22, 2024 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to conclude and adopt a Design Law Treaty (DLT). The negotiators will be working from the documents dated May 10, 2024: a thirty-one page “Basic Proposal For The Design Law Treaty” (DLT/DC/3), and a sixteen page “Basic Proposal For The Regulations Under The Design Law Treaty” (DLT/DC/4), both documents submitted by the Director General of WIPO, as well as a nineteen page, “Notes On The Basic Proposal For The Design Law Treaty” (DTL/DC/5), prepared by the WIPO Secretariat.
While …
Feasibility Of Technical Solutions For The Detection Of Falsified Images In Research, Phill Jones, Hylke Koers
Feasibility Of Technical Solutions For The Detection Of Falsified Images In Research, Phill Jones, Hylke Koers
Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.
In this report, we discuss the findings of an investigation into the feasibility of developing a research image integrity system. The focus was primarily on immunohistochemistry blots and microscopy images, although the findings are relevant to other types of research images such as gel blots and spectroscopy, geophysical, or astronomical images, as well as to any digital data type. The investigation comprised a mix of desk research and semi-structured (anonymized) interviews with nine stakeholders representing publishers, researchers, technologists, and microscopy companies.
We found that it would be possible to implement a system to assert image integrity and that the technology …
Generative Artificial Intelligence And Copyright In The Film And Media Industry, Victor A. Oberting Iv
Generative Artificial Intelligence And Copyright In The Film And Media Industry, Victor A. Oberting Iv
Washington and Lee Law Review Online
The development of generative artificial intelligence (“GAI” or “generative AI”) introduces compelling benefits and capabilities to filmmakers and artists, but also brings complications regarding copyright of creative works. The American film and media industry in particular illustrates the scope of GAI’s legal, economic, and ethical implications. Though GAI may exhibit characteristics of independent agency or intent, GAI models are best understood as a new set of tools that serve a diverse range of applications in the creative process. The potential benefits of this set of tools can only be realized, then, if the filmmakers who use them are not unreasonably …
A Jacksonian Theory Of Estoppel In Ip Litigation Against The United States, Leonard C. Brahin
A Jacksonian Theory Of Estoppel In Ip Litigation Against The United States, Leonard C. Brahin
Washington and Lee Law Review Online
As an intellectual property infringer, the federal government occupies a unique position as both the entity that approved the infringed patent or trademark and an entity capable of arguing for its invalidity. By arguing for invalidity, the federal government assumes that it should be exempt from the traditional rules of procedural estoppel. Indeed, the government believes that even though it granted intellectual property rights (after careful research and deliberation and following the express review of an officer appointed with the advice and consent of the Senate), it should have a second bite at the apple to invalidate a patent or …
Review: Copyright For Scholars: Osmosis Doesn’T Do The Trick Anymore, Janet Brennan Croft
Review: Copyright For Scholars: Osmosis Doesn’T Do The Trick Anymore, Janet Brennan Croft
Dialogue: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Popular Culture and Pedagogy
Reviews of:
Kevin L. Smith. Owning and Using Scholarship: An IP Handbook for Teachers and Researchers. American Library Association, 2014. 240 pages. ISBN: 978-083898747-6.
Kenneth Crews. Copyright Law for Librarians and Educator: Creative Strategies and Practical Solutions, 3rd edition. American Library Association, 2012. 192 pages. ISBN: 978-0-8389-1092-4.
Rebecca P. Butler. Copyright for Academic Librarians and Professionals. American Library Association, 2014. 278 pages. ISBN: 978-0-8389-1214-0.
Russell, Carrie. Complete Copyright for K-12 Librarians and Educators. American Library Association, 2012. 172 pages. ISBN: 978-0-8389-1083-2.
Sync Licenses, Soundtracking, And Infringement Claims: Oh My!, Women In Tech Law, Cardozo Entertainment Law Society, Intellectual Property Law Society, Cardozo Fame Center
Sync Licenses, Soundtracking, And Infringement Claims: Oh My!, Women In Tech Law, Cardozo Entertainment Law Society, Intellectual Property Law Society, Cardozo Fame Center
2024–2025 Flyers
No abstract provided.
Formulating Public Pharma, Shweta Kumar
Formulating Public Pharma, Shweta Kumar
IPIPC Papers & Reports
In 2022, prices for both brand-name and generic drugs in the U.S. were nearly three times as high as prices in comparably industrialized nations, with the cost of insulin products in particular being nearly ten times as high. As a result, 3 out of 10 American adults cannot afford to take their medication as prescribed. Furthermore, in 2024 the U.S. experienced its worst drug shortage in over a decade, with more than 300 drugs in short supply. Generic drugs are particularly vulnerable to shortage, as manufacturers have poor economic incentives to produce drugs with slim profit margins. While the Biden …