Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

The Apathy Economy: Patents, Advertising, And Consumer Indifference, Gavin J. Milczarek-Desai, Derek E. Bambauer

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Patents function as signals as well as rights to exclude. They inform competitors, investors, employees, and consumers about the invention and its owner. How this information affects consumers is not well understood. Existing studies disagree about how advertising a product or service as patented, or patent pending, affects the price consumers will pay. This Article offers the first major empirical study of that question andfinds that consumers behave with surprising rationality: they will not pay any price premium for a patented product. A product's patent status conveys little information about whether it is superior to competing offerings. The results hold …

Spotify's Bundle Battle: Uncovering The Flaws Of The Music Modernization Act And The Struggle For Fair Royalties In The Streaming Era, Jessica Jilla

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that Section 115 of the Music Modernization Act (MMA) is fundamentally flawed and fails to protect songwriters and publishers from systemic inefficiencies and exploitation. It contends that the current framework is too rigid to address emerging digital business models, necessitating a hybrid restructuring of the Mechanical Licensing Collective (MLC) and the statutory licensing system to ensure equitable compensation.

Seeing Is Believing? Deepfakes In Financial Markets, Hadar Y. Jabotinsky, Michal Lavi

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

An AI-powered tool recently mimicked Warren Buffett's image and voice so convincingly that even his own family could have been deceived. This striking example highlights the transformative potential of voice cloning and deepfakes. This innovative technology leverages artificial intelligence (AI) to create hyper-realistic audio and video content. By blurring the boundaries between authenticity and synthetic creation, deepfakes make it possible to fabricate moments that never occurred. Recent advancements in AI and user-friendly software have made deepfakes more accessible andfurther contributed to the proliferation of deepfakes, enabling even individuals with minimal technical skills to produce compelling deepfakes at little to no …

Dancing On The Edge Of Copyright: Why Copyright Law Should Protect Short Dance Routines, Tianai Song

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the Copyright Act should be amended to extend legal protection to short dance routines, regardless of their complexity or duration. This expansion aims to prevent the unauthorized appropriation of distinctive movements and ensure that creators, particularly those from Black and marginalized communities, are fairly recognized and compensated.

Power Play: The Battle For Copyright Control In Emulation, Ryan Borja

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the current legal framework prioritizes commercial interests and developer rights over the preservation of older video games. To reconcile the tension between copyright protection and the public interest in cultural preservation, the analysis proposes legislative solutions such as compulsory licensing schemes or the creation of a dedicated federal preservation agency.

Some Respect Reserved? Survey Experiment Insights On The Perception Of Creative Commons And Copyright Infringement, Thomas H. Rousse

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Since its inception, Creative Commons has introduced new ways for creators to grant licenses to the public without cost or the need for negotiation by breaking up rights provided by copyright and making a subset of those rights available to anyone willing to abide by the conditions of the license. Its widespread adoption has democratized open licensing for creators beyond the software context these licenses originated within. Although the success of Creative Commons as a community is plain, relatively little information is available about its perception by the general public. Aggressive litigation by Creative Commons licensors has put the organization …

The Case For A New International Instrument On Copyright Limitations And Exceptions, Faith O. Majekolagbe

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

A new international instrument on copyright limitations and exceptions (L&Es) is pertinent to fostering education and research and enhancing the work of educational, research, and cultural institutions, including libraries, archives, and museums. The existing international instrument on L&Es, the Marrakesh Treaty, sits alone amongst many international copyright instruments for the protection of rightsholders, the Marrakesh Treaty only covering exceptions for print-disabled persons. There is currently no international obligation on countries to guarantee the interests of copyright users in education and research through a set of copyright limitations and exceptions. This has signficant negative effects on access to education and research …

Empowering Digital Consent: A Risk-Focused Due Diligence Tool, Bar Fargon Mizrahi

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

We live in an era of almost infinite digital interactions, many of which involve risks to our rights stemming from various problematic practices, such as data-protection infringements, user profiling, and consumer protection violations. Currently, the protection of digital consumers against these risks rests primarily on a "notice-and-consent" regulatory model-users are legally presumed to have consented to the terms of service (ToS) and privacy policy agreements (PPAs) of the digital services they use. In reality, despite the gravity of the risks involved, users routinely fail to study these binding agreements. Thus, it is widely accepted that this model is ineffective at …

Language Models' Verbatim Copying: Copyright Infringement Analysis Through The Lens Of The New York Times Co. V. Microsoft Corp., Openai, Inc. Et Al., Tian "Tony" Chen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

In their high-profile suit in late 2023, The New York Times Company ("The Times") alleged that OpenAI's Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) language models might output "near-verbatim" copies ("memorizations") of the works of The Times based on certain user prompts and thus might have infringed on The Times's exclusive rights over its content. One of the central issues is whether the embodiment of unauthorized reproductions of Times content in the GPT models constitutes a copyright infringement. This comment argues that OpenAI might have a colorable fair use affirmative defense despite the plaintiff's prima facie copyright infringement claim.

Existing literature on the …

Harmonizing Copyright: Navigating Pop Music's Creative Landscape In The Era Of Arnstein And Krofft, Evan Joseph

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

This Note explores how the Arnstein and Krofft tests negatively impact pop music in an age where pop music is constantly evolving. It discusses the specific ways in which the tests can discourage creativity, innovation, and fair competition in the pop music industry. It also argues for reform of copyright law to address the shortcomings of the Arnstein and Krofft tests. Part I defines and provides a brief overview of the history of pop music and copyright infringement, while also discussing the importance and economic value of pop music in society. This Part also explains the gravity behind these claims, …

Al Assisted Inventing And Its Impact On The Patent System, Ben Gross

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note examines the challenges posed by AI-assisted inventing to the patent system, particularly focusing on the "black box" nature of AI, which obscures the inventive process and complicates patent requirements such as inventorship and disclosure.

Duped: The Implications Of The Proliferaiton Of Superfake Luxury Goods And What Consumers May Not Have Considered, Riann Colbert

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The proliferation of "Superfake" luxury goods, which are high-quality counterfeit items nearly indistinguishable from authentic products, poses significant challenges to trademark law, consumer protection, and the broader economy. These items, often sold through e-commerce platforms, not only undermine legitimate businesses but also expose consumers to health risks, support organized crime, and perpetuate environmental harm. The note advocates for enhanced legal frameworks and consumer education to mitigate these issues.

Spotify's Dj Algo: An Analysis Of Copyright Infringement Risks In A.I.- Powered Music Curation, Eddie Halwani

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note examines the legal and policy implications of Spotify's AI-powered music curation, arguing that while its use of copyrighted material may constitute copyright infringement, it qualifies as fair use under the transformative and non-expressive purposes doctrine. However, the analysis highlights the need for economic reforms to ensure equitable compensation for rights holders and sustainable innovation.

How Do You Solve A Problem Like Artistic Freedom In The American Theatre?: A Plea For Denying Copyright Protection To Staging Requirements, Michael Ecker

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that extending copyright protection to theatrical stage directions would severely threaten the collaborative nature of American theater, stifling creativity and inclusivity. It contends that stage directions, as a unique aspect of dramatic works, should not be eligible for copyright protection under the Copyright Act of 1976, particularly due to the merger doctrine, which denies protection when ideas and their expression are inseparable. The note emphasizes the importance of preserving theater as a collaborative and interpretive art form, where the interplay between playwrights, directors, and performers is essential to its vitality.

Closed Doors To Justice: How The Copyright Claims Board Is Shutting Out Pro Se Litigants, Melissa Eckhause

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The Copyright Claims Board (CCB), established under the Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement Act of 2020, was intended to provide an accessible forum for resolving small-value copyright disputes, particularly for pro se parties. However, the CCB has failed to fulfill this promise, with nearly 90% of pro se claims being dismissed without resolution on the merits. The CCB's strict compliance requirements and failure to liberally construe pro se claims have created a system more burdensome than federal court, contrary to Congress' intent. The article proposes reforms to align the CCB's practices with its original purpose of accessibility and simplicity for …

"The Gift Of A Golden Voice": Shaping The Right Of Publicity To Protect Performers From A.I. Abuses, Sebastian Saavedra

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note explores the evolving nature of the right of publicity, a unique area of intellectual property and privacy law that protects individuals' control over their likeness and persona. It examines the challenges posed by emerging technologies, particularly AI-generated content, and advocates for a balanced approach that integrates elements from trademark and copyright law while respecting First Amendment rights. The analysis emphasizes the need to protect performers' rights to their public image without undermining established legal frameworks.

Flexing The Celebrity Muscle: Celebrity Leverage In Trademark Law And Why Small Businesses Deserve Equitable Treatment, Victoria M. Lopez

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note examines the imbalance in trademark law disputes between celebrities and small businesses, arguing that celebrities often leverage their fame and resources to gain an unfair advantage. It highlights how this dynamic can overshadow the rights of small businesses, even when they have prior use of a trademark, as seen in the case of Beauty Concepts vs. Kim Kardashian. The analysis advocates for a more equitable approach to trademark law to protect small businesses from being disadvantaged by celebrity influence.

Can Commercials Be Art? An Analysis Of Intellectual Property Preawareness In The Barbie Era, Shreya Kalidindi

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note examines the evolution of advertising, particularly native advertising, and critiques the inadequacy of current regulatory frameworks in addressing its deceptive potential. It highlights how modern advertising practices, such as product placement in films like Barbie, blur the line between commercial speech and artistic expression, challenging the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) ability to protect consumers. The analysis argues that strengthening existing regulations is insufficient and advocates for empowering consumers to make informed decisions, as the legal system struggles to keep pace with innovative advertising strategies.

"Be Thankful I Don't Take It All ('Cause I'M The Taxman)": Music Transactions, Catalog Sales, And Tax Treatment, Hannah M. Bartfield

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

This Note examines music catalog transactions from a tax perspective to determine the key considerations, benefits, and consequences of such a transaction, and then addresses why these characteristics are inconsistent with the purpose of copyright law. First, this Note addresses the copyright concepts that govern the music industry in Part I.B. In Part II, royalties are discussed as one method that musicians can rely on to earn revenue from their music, including a summary of how those earnings are taxed. In Part III, these findings will be weighed against similar considerations for the sale of an artist's music catalog, including …

Jack Daniel's And The Unfulfilled Promise Of Trademark Use, Stacey Dogan, Jessica Silbey

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article examines the Supreme Court's decision in Jack Daniel's v. VIP Products and its implications for the use of trademarks in artistic and expressive works. The Court's ruling established a "trademark use" doctrine, distinguishing between uses of trademarks as a designation of source for goods and non-trademark, expressive uses. While the decision does not overturn the Rogers v. Grimaldi test, it creates uncertainty in applying Rogers to expressive works, leading to inconsistent lower court decisions and threatening First Amendment protections for creative uses of trademarks.

The Law Of The New Musical Author, Eyal Brook

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The process of musical creation has been transformed materially in the Digital Age due to technological developments, both regarding the technologies for making music and regarding novel stylistic developments. New musical practices, based on novel technology, afford entirely new modes of creative authorship. The effects of such shifts have redefined the nature of music and the role of musicians in fundamental ways. This article opens a new debate regarding the identity ofthe new musical author and the changes to the musical creative process.

As such changes have impacted the musical creative process, there are necessary changes required to adapt the …

Dance Like Everyone Is Watching: Why Tiktok Choreography And Copyright Aren't In Sync, Roseanne Planker

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that viral dances on platforms like TikTok should not be protected under the U.S. Copyright Act due to their ephemeral nature, social functionality, and the incompatibility of copyright's exclusivity with the viral dissemination process. It advocates for statutory reforms to ensure fair compensation and attribution for creators, proposing that platforms like TikTok be held accountable for these protections, similar to the EU's Copyright Directive. The analysis emphasizes the need for new legal frameworks to address the unique challenges of viral choreography, balancing artistic progress and creator rights.

(In)Dependence Day: Why The Modern Streaming Industry Requires Modern Antitrust Enforcement, Samuel Kahn

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the contemporary streaming industry, dominated by a few major platforms, mirrors the pre-Paramount era's anticompetitive practices, necessitating a reexamination of antitrust laws to address oligopolistic structures, protect independent creators, and ensure consumer access to diverse content. It contends that the repeal of the Paramount Decrees and the failure of current antitrust frameworks to adapt to the streaming industry's unique challenges have allowed media giants to grow unchecked, stifling competition and innovation.

For The Love Of The Game: Examining The Legality Of Unofficial Fan Video Game Remakes, Madeleine Higgs

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note explores the legal challenges faced by creators of fan remakes of delisted video games under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and proposes potential solutions to address these issues. It argues that expanding exemptions for such works and adopting a statutory licensing regime could provide a legal framework that balances the rights of copyright holders with the creative interests of fan creators. The analysis emphasizes the need for reforms to prevent overly broad enforcement of copyright protections and to incentivize fair use considerations.

Can Chatgpt And The Like Be Your Co-Authors?, Hadar Y. Jabotinsky, Michal Lavi

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

On November 30, 2022, OpenAI released an AI based chatbot called ChatGPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer). This AI system uses natural language processing (NLP) techniques to generate written text by learning the patterns and structures of natural language. ChatGPT is a versatile chatbot with the ability to write speeches, news articles, and essays either wholly or partially. Some users acknowledge ChatGPT as a co-author of the generated text, while others only acknowledge its use in writing the document. In fact, this issue became so pressing in academia that Springer Nature, the world's largest academic publisher, announced that software like ChatGPT cannot …

Introductory Remarks, Carly Rothstein

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

This introductory remark explores the implications of recent Supreme Court decisions in Bad Spaniels and Andy Warhol on intellectual property law, focusing on the evolving landscape of copyright and trademark protections. It highlights the challenges and opportunities these rulings present for balancing artistic expression, cultural norms, and legal frameworks. The symposium serves as a platform for scholars and practitioners to discuss these developments and their broader impact on IP law and policy.

Panel 2: Trademark Law, Stacey Dogan, Christine Haight Farley, Jessica Silbey, Rebecca Tushnet, Felix Wu

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Why The Supreme Court Rejected The Prospect Theory Of Copyright Scope, Michael W. Carroll

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

In Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. ("Google v. Oracle"), and again in Andy Warhol Found. for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith ("Warhol"), the parties and various amici presented the Court with a variety of arguments about the relationship between a copyright owner's right to make derivative works from a protected work and a user's right to make fair uses of that same work. At bottom, these arguments were about the proper, or even optimal, scope of copyright.

This Essay argues that these arguments were instead grounded in a form of "prospect theory" of copyright scope that …

Trademark Fair Use Is No Joke, Christine Haight Farley

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article critiques the Supreme Court's decision in Jack Daniel's Properties v. VIP Products, arguing that the Court missed an opportunity to clarify the relationship between trademark law and the First Amendment. While the Court acknowledged the importance of protecting parodies, it failed to develop a comprehensive framework for balancing trademark rights with free speech. Instead, it introduced a narrow rule that limits the application of the Rogers test, potentially undermining speech protections in trademark disputes. The article contends that the Court's reliance on the likelihood of confusion test is insufficient to address the broader First Amendment implications of …

Reclaiming Feudalism For The Technological Era, Shelly Kreiczer-Levy

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article argues that traditional personal property law fails to adequately address the complexities of AI-capable assets, such as robots, which require a new framework to balance manufacturer control with user rights. It proposes two models—the connection model and the competition model—to regulate these relationships, emphasizing the need for collaboration, data ownership, and consumer protection in the evolving landscape of technological ownership.