Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (30)
- Internet Law (17)
- Legislation (16)
- International Law (9)
- Computer Law (8)
-
- Constitutional Law (8)
- Contracts (8)
- Courts (7)
- Science and Technology Law (7)
- Litigation (6)
- Legal Remedies (5)
- Supreme Court of the United States (5)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (4)
- Jurisdiction (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Legal History (4)
- Common Law (3)
- Communications Law (3)
- Consumer Protection Law (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Business (2)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Commercial Law (2)
- Conflict of Laws (2)
- International Trade Law (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Institution
-
- Columbia Law School (57)
- University of Georgia School of Law (26)
- University of Richmond (14)
- University of Michigan Law School (10)
- Marquette University Law School (8)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (8)
- New York Law School (8)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (8)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (5)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (5)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (4)
- Pepperdine University (4)
- Seattle University School of Law (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- The University of Akron (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Mississippi Christian University School of Law (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Santa Clara Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (49)
- Georgia Journal of Law & Technology (16)
- Kernochan Center for Law, Media, and the Arts (10)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (10)
- NYLS Law Review (8)
-
- Scholarly Works (8)
- Touro Law Review (8)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (7)
- Michigan Law Review (6)
- Journal Publications (5)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (5)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (4)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (3)
- IP Theory (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Seattle University Law Review (3)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (3)
- Akron Law Review (2)
- Cleveland State Law Review (2)
- Court Briefs (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (2)
- Publications (2)
- Supreme Court Case Files (2)
- All Faculty Publications (1)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 197
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Humanist Copyright, Jane C. Ginsburg
Humanist Copyright, Jane C. Ginsburg
Faculty Scholarship
This exploration of the role of authorship in copyright law proceeds in three parts: historical, doctrinal, and predictive. First, I will review the development of author-focused property rights in the pre-copyright regimes of printing privileges and in early Anglo-American copyright law through the 1909 U.S. Copyright Act. Second, I will analyze the extent to which the present U.S. copyright law does (and does not) honor human authorship. Finally, I will consider the potential responses of copyright law to the claims of proprietary rights in AI-generated outputs. I will explain why the humanist orientation of U.S. copyright law validates the position …
Characters In Copyright Law: Extraordinary Rules For Ordinary Content, Robert F. Helfing
Characters In Copyright Law: Extraordinary Rules For Ordinary Content, Robert F. Helfing
Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review
Characters are a breed apart in copyright law. Only they have a special standard of creativity. Only they must have unique elements to qualify for protection. Only they are exempt from analysis as derivative works when they appear in multiple works, and only they are required to maintain consistent features in order to maintain protection previously earned. These and other idiosyncrasies do not follow naturally from precedent or statutory law, but operate heedless of and even contrary to legal authority.
This article shows that, after fifty years of undifferentiated treatment, the courts suddenly began to apply divergent rules to characters. …
Streaming Service Arms Race: Protection And Distribution Of Live Sports Broadcasting In A Cord-Cutting Environment, Leo Bourgeois
Streaming Service Arms Race: Protection And Distribution Of Live Sports Broadcasting In A Cord-Cutting Environment, Leo Bourgeois
Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies
This paper highlights the disparity in meeting consumer expectations for broadcasting sports content. The current shift to online streaming services creates accessibility and affordability challenges, leading to an increase in illegal streaming. The existing copyright laws in Canada and the U.S. have some limitations in enforcing the rights of sports media rights holders against primary or secondary infringement, and intermediaries face difficulties in removing infringing content. While injunctions and site-blocking orders are potential solutions, they may not completely combat online piracy. A possible solution is a centralized streaming service to address piracy while improving customer satisfaction. However, concerns about feasibility, …
The Unbargained-For-Exchange In Copyright, Justin Ponds
The Unbargained-For-Exchange In Copyright, Justin Ponds
MC Law Review
Copyright law in the United States is more than the letter "C" in a circle. The visual impression of someone clutching a book prevails in many minds. The use of the phrase "it's copyrighted" has become common. Many people consider a "copyright" to be "property." The true story of copyright law is so steeped in history - a great deal from England - that it makes even Betty White seem middle aged. This Article examines some of that history and compares mistaken connotations about "property" within the realm of contract law - a better association.
Fair Use In The Us Redux: Reformed Or Still Deformed?, Jane C. Ginsburg
Fair Use In The Us Redux: Reformed Or Still Deformed?, Jane C. Ginsburg
Faculty Scholarship
In 2019, Professor Ginsburg delivered the Distinguished Visitor in Intellectual Property Lecture at the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore. Titled “Fair Use in the US: Transformed, Reformed, Deformed?”, the lecture explored US caselaw applying the statutory fair use exception, highlighting its excesses and apparent rebalancing. Four and half years (and a pandemic) later, the Supreme Court has rendered decisions in two fair use cases (Google v Oracle; Andy Warhol Foundation v Goldsmith). Together, these controversies prompt inquiry whether the Supreme Court has redrawn the landscape of US fair use and copyright law, expanding fair use …
A Matter Of Facts: The Evolution Of Copyright’S Fact-Exclusion And Its Implications For Disinformation And Democracy, Jessica Silbey
A Matter Of Facts: The Evolution Of Copyright’S Fact-Exclusion And Its Implications For Disinformation And Democracy, Jessica Silbey
Faculty Scholarship
The Article begins with a puzzle: the curious absence of an express fact-exclusion from copyright protection in both the Copyright Act and its legislative history despite it being a well-founded legal principle. It traces arguments in the foundational Supreme Court case (Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service) and in the Copyright Act’s legislative history to discern a basis for the fact-exclusion. That research trail produces a legal genealogy of the fact-exclusion based in early copyright common law anchored by canonical cases, Baker v. Selden, Burrow-Giles v. Sarony, and Wheaton v. Peters. Surprisingly, none of them …
One Test To Rule Them All: Retiring The Dual Standard For Fictional Character Copyrightability In The Ninth Circuit, Kiersten Daly
One Test To Rule Them All: Retiring The Dual Standard For Fictional Character Copyrightability In The Ninth Circuit, Kiersten Daly
St. John's Law Review
(Excerpt)
From Captain Jack Sparrow sailing on the Black Pearl in Pirates of Caribbean to Frodo Baggins trekking through Mordor in Lord of the Rings, well-developed characters are vital to the success of a story. Iconic characters like Captain Jack and Frodo Baggins have each developed a cult following as a result of their interesting storylines and character development. The instant recognition and nostalgia associated with such iconic characters has motivated companies to monetize their likenesses. Whether it is car companies recreating the Batmobile or the recent trend in creating story-based pop-up shops, there is a lot of value …
Toward A Canadian Right To Repair: Opportunities And Challenges, Anthony D. Rosborough
Toward A Canadian Right To Repair: Opportunities And Challenges, Anthony D. Rosborough
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
This Article draws a picture of the past, present, and future of the right to repair in Canada. It looks to early successes toward automotive right to repair, challenges faced in proposing consumer protection reforms in Ontario and Quebec, and the utility of a proposed copyright “Technological Protection Measure (TPM) exception” allowing circumvention for repair purposes. In light of right to repair priorities identified by Canada’s current federal government, the Article identifies a selection of reforms that could achieve these goals. Such reforms include creating regulations under the Copyright Act governing the use and implementation of TPMs, passing an exception …
Of Lock-Breaking And Stock Taking: Ip, Climate Change And The Right To Repair In Canada, Graham Reynolds
Of Lock-Breaking And Stock Taking: Ip, Climate Change And The Right To Repair In Canada, Graham Reynolds
All Faculty Publications
This paper argues that Canadian governments have both legal and moral obligations to act to combat climate change. In seeking to fulfill these obligations, Canadian governments should pay particular attention to Canada’s intellectual property (IP) regime. This paper argues that given the centrality of IP to Canada’s economy, a comprehensive review is required in order to determine whether and the extent to which elements of Canada’s IP regime contribute to climate change or impede climate action. To illustrate the need for such a review, this paper will highlight one example of how Canada’s IP regime, as currently structured, impedes the …
United States Response To Questionnaire, Philippa Loengard, Anne Diamond, Lily Henderson, Jenica Wang
United States Response To Questionnaire, Philippa Loengard, Anne Diamond, Lily Henderson, Jenica Wang
Kernochan Center for Law, Media, and the Arts
ALAI-USA is the U.S. branch of ALAI (Association Littèraire et Artistique Internationale). ALAI-USA was started in the 1980's by the late Professor Melville B. Nimmer, and was later expanded by Professor John M. Kernochan.
Copyright Protection For Works In The Language Of Life, Nina Srejovic
Copyright Protection For Works In The Language Of Life, Nina Srejovic
Washington Law Review
In 2001, the DNA Copyright Institute sought to capitalize on the fear of human cloning by offering celebrities the opportunity to use copyright to secure exclusive rights in their DNA. At the time, a Copyright Office spokesperson pointed out that a person’s DNA “is not an original work of authorship.” That statement is no longer self-evident. A scientist claims to have used CRISPR technology to create a pair of twin girls with human-altered DNA that may provide immunity to HIV infection and improved cognitive function. Through gene therapy, doctors can “author” changes to patients’ DNA to cure disease. Scientists “edit” …
The Institutionalist Turn In Copyright, Shyamkrishna Balganesh
The Institutionalist Turn In Copyright, Shyamkrishna Balganesh
Faculty Scholarship
The institutionalist turn refers to the reality that over the last decade and a half, the Court’s copyright jurisprudence has come to focus less and less on directly resolving substantive issues within the landscape of copyright doctrine. It has instead become a principal site of debate and disagreement over issues that have a direct bearing on the role, competence, and legitimacy of the Court within the copyright system. The institutionalist turn does not imply that the Court’s decisions have altogether avoided engaging substantive copyright issues; merely that its engagement of copyright doctrine has come to be intertwined with — and …
Comments On Preliminary Draft 7 [Black Letter And Comments], Jane C. Ginsburg, June M. Besek
Comments On Preliminary Draft 7 [Black Letter And Comments], Jane C. Ginsburg, June M. Besek
Faculty Scholarship
PD7 is often confusing, largely as a result of failure to provide important explanations or definitions, or to tell the reader where that information can be found. Key terms, such as “edicts of law” and “formalities” remain undefined. Formalities are a principal topic of PD7; they deserve a more thorough description than the draft contains, addressing what formalities are, whether every declaratory obligation (or option) is a “formality,” or only those that go to the existence or enforcement of copyright (this is the Berne Convention meaning of “formality”).
United States Response To Questionnaire Concerning Copyright, Competition And Innovation, Philippa Loengard, Joshua Berlowitz, Stephany Kim
United States Response To Questionnaire Concerning Copyright, Competition And Innovation, Philippa Loengard, Joshua Berlowitz, Stephany Kim
Kernochan Center for Law, Media, and the Arts
ALAI-USA is the U.S. branch of ALAI (Association Littèraire et Artistique Internationale). ALAI-USA was started in the 1980's by the late Professor Melville B. Nimmer, and was later expanded by Professor John M. Kernochan.
Letter To Council Members Regarding Council Draft 5, Jane C. Ginsburg, June M. Besek
Letter To Council Members Regarding Council Draft 5, Jane C. Ginsburg, June M. Besek
Faculty Scholarship
We understand that the ALI Council will consider Council Draft 5 (CD5) of the Restatement of the Law, Copyright (Copyright Restatement) project at its meeting on January 20-21, 2021. We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on CD5. We hope that you will give careful consideration to these comments and send CD5 back to the Reporters to address the problems we describe below.
Comments On Preliminary Draft 6, Jane C. Ginsburg, June M. Besek
Comments On Preliminary Draft 6, Jane C. Ginsburg, June M. Besek
Faculty Scholarship
We briefly reiterate the principal General Comments we made with respect to PD5, because PD6 continues, including in its two new sections, to manifest the same overall shortcomings: (i) the relationship of the draft to the statute remains highly inconsistent; (ii) the Restatement needs a consistent and transparent methodology for restating a statute; and (iii) continuing to carry on without clear methodological principles will undermine the utility of this project and the credibility of the ALI.
Comments On Preliminary Draft 5 [Black Letter And Comments], Jane C. Ginsburg, June M. Besek
Comments On Preliminary Draft 5 [Black Letter And Comments], Jane C. Ginsburg, June M. Besek
Faculty Scholarship
We appreciate the considerable work that has gone into PD5, and believe that several of its provisions and Comments accurately quote or state and explain the law. Nonetheless, PD5 manifests several of the earlier drafts’ shortcomings. We remain particularly concerned that the relationship of this draft to the statute remains highly inconsistent, not to say erratic. We are not sanguine that our oft-repeated calls that the Reporters and ALI devise a consistent and transparent methodology for restating a statute will finally be heeded. (To the extent there is a guiding principle behind this Restatement, and PD5, it often appears to …
Thin Separability: An Answer To Star Athletica, Angelo Marchesini
Thin Separability: An Answer To Star Athletica, Angelo Marchesini
Seattle University Law Review
Courts have consistently struggled to adopt a test that appropriately interprets the Copyright Act’s language protecting works of art incorporated into useful articles. The analysis that allows protections of these works of art is called “separability,” and it has been an ambiguous area of copyright law since its inception. In essence, this analysis gives copyright protection to a work of art incorporated into a useful article as long as the work of art is “separate” from the utilitarian aspects of the useful article. The Supreme Court was positioned to end the uncertainty surrounding the separability analysis in its recent decision, …
The “Foul” Protection For A Photographer’S Original And Creative Choices In A Photograph: Exploring The Implications Of Rentmeester V. Nike, Inc. On Creativity In Photography, Olivia Lattanza
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Copyright Protection For Applied Art And Works Of Artistic Craftsmanship After Star Athletica, Jane C. Ginsburg
Copyright Protection For Applied Art And Works Of Artistic Craftsmanship After Star Athletica, Jane C. Ginsburg
Faculty Scholarship
As the very first session proclaimed, the Star Athletica case has not been a model of total clarity on the Supreme Court’s part. I’m going to explore that proposition. I will go through some basic elements of the copyright statute, and will then apply those rules to several examples. The Copyright Act sets out the category of pictorial, graphic, and sculptural (“PGS”) works, whose statutory definition includes applied art. That was the subject matter at issue in Star Athletica. The statute also provides that PGS works “shall include works of artistic craftsmanship insofar as their form but not their mechanical …
Letter To Council Members Regarding Council Draft 4, Jane C. Ginsburg
Letter To Council Members Regarding Council Draft 4, Jane C. Ginsburg
Faculty Scholarship
We understand that the ALI Council will consider Council Draft 4 (CD4) of the Restatement of the Law, Copyright (Copyright Restatement) project at its meeting on January 16-17, 2020. We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on CD4. We hope that you will give careful consideration to these comments and send CD4 back to the Reporters to address the problems we describe below.
Foreign Contracts And U.S. Copyright Termination Rights: What Law Applies? – Comment, Richard Arnold, Jane C. Ginsburg
Foreign Contracts And U.S. Copyright Termination Rights: What Law Applies? – Comment, Richard Arnold, Jane C. Ginsburg
Faculty Scholarship
The U.S. Copyright Act gives authors the right to terminate assignments of copyrights in works other than works for hire executed on or after 1 January 1978 after 35 years, and to do so notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary. Given that agreements which are subject to the laws of other countries can assign U.S. copyrights, and purport to do so in perpetuity, U.S. law’s preclusion of agreements contrary to the author’s right to exercise her termination right can give rise to a difficult choice of law issue. Two recent cases which came before courts in the U.S. and England …
Copyrighting Experiences: How Copyright Law Applies To Virtual Reality Programs, Alexis Dunne
Copyrighting Experiences: How Copyright Law Applies To Virtual Reality Programs, Alexis Dunne
The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law
This note will attempt to shed light on the question of what kind of protection copyright law affords VR experiences. Part II discusses the nature of VR experiences and their implementation through specifically tailored VR technology. Part III provides an overview of copyright protection, its limitations, and specifically the history of the copyrightability of computer programs. Parts IV and V outline case law relevant to the discussion of the copyrightability of different types of VR experiences and how that case law similarly or dissimilarly apply to the protection of VR experiences. Part IV focuses on protecting VR experiences as a …
Letter To Council Members Regarding Council Draft 3, Jane C. Ginsburg, June M. Besek
Letter To Council Members Regarding Council Draft 3, Jane C. Ginsburg, June M. Besek
Faculty Scholarship
We understand that the ALI Council will consider Council Draft 3 (CD3) of the Restatement of the Law, Copyright (Copyright Restatement) project at its meeting on October 17-18, 2019. The Council may not appreciate how controversial a project this is: the U.S. Copyright Office, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the American Bar Association’s Section of Intellectual Property Law, the New York City Bar Association’s Committee on Copyright and Literary Property, academics and other Advisers and Liaisons have expressed serious concerns about this and previous Council Drafts and Preliminary Drafts; indeed, the Register of Copyrights deplored the project as a …
United States Response To Questionnaire Concerning Managing Copyright, June M. Besek, Jane C. Ginsburg, Philippa Loengard, Ralph Peer
United States Response To Questionnaire Concerning Managing Copyright, June M. Besek, Jane C. Ginsburg, Philippa Loengard, Ralph Peer
Faculty Scholarship
ALAI-USA is the U.S. branch of ALAI (Association Littèraire et Artistique Internationale). ALAI-USA was started in the 1980's by the late Professor Melville B. Nimmer, and was later expanded by Professor John M. Kernochan.
Comments On Preliminary Draft 4 [Black Letter And Comments], Jane C. Ginsburg, June M. Besek
Comments On Preliminary Draft 4 [Black Letter And Comments], Jane C. Ginsburg, June M. Besek
Faculty Scholarship
In many respects, PD4 is a helpful synthesis of the law, likely to provoke less controversy than drafts of earlier Chapters. Nevertheless, we remain concerned about this draft’s, like its predecessors’, inconsistent treatment of legal issues. As in earlier drafts, this one sometimes traverses the line between restating positive law and “improving” it. In several instances, these departures from positive law adopt policy positions we would endorse in a different kind of endeavor, such as a “Principles” project, or an acknowledged advocacy piece. But we do not believe it accurate to characterize these departures, however substantively desirable, as “restating” the …
Embedding Content Or Interring Copyright: Does The Internet Need The "Server Rule"?, Jane C. Ginsburg, Luke Ali Budiardjo
Embedding Content Or Interring Copyright: Does The Internet Need The "Server Rule"?, Jane C. Ginsburg, Luke Ali Budiardjo
Faculty Scholarship
The “server rule” holds that online displays or performances of copyrighted content accomplished through “in-line” or “framing” hyperlinks do not trigger the exclusive rights of public display or performance unless the linker also possesses a copy of the underlying work. As a result, the rule shields a vast array of online activities from claims of direct copyright infringement, effectively exempting those activities from the reach of the Copyright Act. While the server rule has enjoyed relatively consistent adherence since its adoption in 2007, some courts have recently suggested a departure from that precedent, noting the doctrinal and statutory inconsistencies underlying …
Derivative Works And Making Sense Of The Maxim That 'Others Are Free To Copy The Original. They Are Not Free To Copy The Copy.', David E. Shipley
Derivative Works And Making Sense Of The Maxim That 'Others Are Free To Copy The Original. They Are Not Free To Copy The Copy.', David E. Shipley
Scholarly Works
This is a paper about some of the most entertaining and challenging cases in America’s copyright law jurisprudence concerning derivative works as copyrightable subject matter, and the closely related right to prepare derivative works. The cases are entertaining because they involve very familiar works of authorship, and they are challenging because the rulings are often difficult to reconcile due to the fact that the courts are grappling with copyright’s elusive originality standard as applied to derivative works as well the copyright owner’s right to prepare derivative works. Instead of attempting to say something ‘original’ about originality, my goal for this …
Letter To Council Members Regarding Council Draft 2, Jane C. Ginsburg, June M. Besek
Letter To Council Members Regarding Council Draft 2, Jane C. Ginsburg, June M. Besek
Faculty Scholarship
We understand that the ALI Council will consider Council Draft 2 (CD2) of the Restatement of the Law, Copyright (Copyright Restatement) project at its meeting on October 18-19, 2018. We have had – and continue to have – significant concerns about the project and the work to date. We note that numerous parties have expressed concerns about CD2, including the US Patent and Trademark Office, the American Bar Association’s Section of Intellectual Property Law, academics and other Advisers, and that the US Copyright Office and the New York City Bar Association’s Committee on Copyright and Literary Property have done so …
United States Response To Questionnaire Concerning Copyright In Action: International Perspectives On Remedies, Philippa Loengard, Julia Ambros, Andrew Elliott, Daniel Lee
United States Response To Questionnaire Concerning Copyright In Action: International Perspectives On Remedies, Philippa Loengard, Julia Ambros, Andrew Elliott, Daniel Lee
Kernochan Center for Law, Media, and the Arts
ALAI-USA is the U.S. branch of ALAI (Association Littèraire et Artistique Internationale). ALAI-USA was started in the 1980's by the late Professor Melville B. Nimmer, and was later expanded by Professor John M. Kernochan.