Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

Friday Night Rights: Ornamental Use In Collegiate Sports Merchandising, Isabel M. Carvalho

University of Richmond Law Review

University logos and insignias—once limited to athletic uniforms and official stationery—now appear on everything from high-end apparel to mass-produced mugs. Collegiate merchandising is a massive industry, generating $14.8 billion in 2023 alone. Infringers have followed close behind, producing look-alike goods that blur the line between authorized merchandise and unauthorized imitation. As universities increasingly pursue infringers, defendants have seized on a principle of trademark law to fight back: the ornamental use doctrine. Originally intended to prevent the registration of marks that serve merely as decorative features rather than source identifiers, the doctrine has morphed into an affirmative defense that challenges the …

Diamonds Are Forever, As Are Trademarks: Articulating The Twists Of Section 43(A) Trade Dress Protection For Jewelry Designs Through The Facts Of David Yurman V. Mejuri, Daphne Singer

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

Jewelry is adornment—adornment that has “spawned cultural movements, launched political dynasties, and even started wars.”1This Article will analyze the application of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, which covers trade dress, to jewelry design. Trade dress law is a powerful tool for designers because it regulates the protection of designs rather than words. Despite this strength, trade dress has not been analyzed in the context of the jewelry industry because legal academics have dismissed jewelry as an accessory to fashion law. Luxury jewelry and watches are often used to convey status via “recognizable, distinguished designs that consumers associate with the …

Contracting Liability For Generative Ai, Taorui Guan

University of Richmond Law Review

Generative artificial intelligence (“AI”) is straining the boundaries of long-established secondary liability doctrines in copyright law—including contributory infringement, vicarious liability, inducement, and statutory safe harbors. Courts and policymakers have yet to adapt these doctrines to the challenges that AI’s massive scale, decentralized development network, and opaque “black box” architectures pose, creating considerable legal uncertainty. In response, leading AI providers increasingly rely on contractual solutions—embedding warranties, indemnifications, liability caps, and other provisions into user agreements—seeking to allocate infringement risks preemptively. These evolving contractual approaches both draw upon and diverge from classic doctrines, offering novel insight into how the pressure of generative …

Friday Night Rights: Ornamental Use In Collegiate Sports Merchandising, Isabel Mury Carvalho

Law Student Publications

University logos and insignias—once limited to athletic uniforms and official stationery—now appear on everything from high-end apparel to mass-produced mugs. Collegiate merchandising is a massive industry, generating $14.8 billion in 2023 alone. Infringers have followed close behind, producing look-alike goods that blur the line between authorized merchandise and unauthorized imitation. ...

Copyright Eligibility For Ai Works Under United States Law, Roger V. Skalbeck

Law Faculty Publications

This article examines copyright eligibility for works that incorporate generative AI elements under United States law, explaining that such works may be protected only to the extent they contain human-authored expression.  This expression can appear as creative selection, arrangement, editing, or other expressive contributions, while unedited or autonomously generated AI output is not copyrightable. The article highlights how the U.S. Copyright Office’s registration and review system, through disclosure requirements, refusals, and public registration records, creates meaningful evidence about boundaries of copyright protection for AI-assisted works. The article contrasts this U.S. registration framework with other legal systems, including European jurisdictions such …

Two Cheers For Cox V. Sony, James Gibson

Law Faculty Publications

There’s a lot to dislike about the Supreme Court’s opinion in Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment. It mischaracterizes, oversimplifies, and ignores precedent. It fails to engage with important arguments. It mangles the meaning of “intent.” And it introduces uncertainty into the workings of secondary liability across other intellectual property regimes.

For these reasons, the decision doesn’t deserve three cheers. But it deserves two. Because in two important ways, the Supreme Court has succeeded. First, the opinion fixes some misguided appellate court holdings by articulating a relatively workable standard for future copyright cases involving secondary liability. Second, despite …

Examining The Implications Of A Stricter Tacking Standard In The Aftermath Of Bertini V. Apple, Catherine S. Condyles

University of Richmond Law Review

Trademarks serve to indicate an item’s source of origin and distinguish it from other commodities in the market. When there are two or more entities with similar trademarks, who offer related goods or services, the entity to use the mark first has seniority over the other users. Furthermore, the senior user has priority, making him or her “entitled to enjoin other ‘junior’ users from using the mark, or one that is deceptively similar to it” in a way that is likely to confuse consumers. But under certain circumstances a trademark owner can claim priority over a mark by relying instead …

Ip, At, And Aaas: What Intellectual Property Can Teach Antitrust About The War On Amazon Basics, Kristen Jakobsen Osenga

Law Faculty Publications

Amazon is magical. Search the online marketplace for pretty much anything you can imagine—not to mention all the things you never imagined; you will likely find what you were searching for and be able to have it delivered in two days or less. The magic is not just in Amazon’s vast array of innovative consumer products but also in its providing access to goods that are unavailable locally. An extreme example of Amazon’s ability to supply goods that were not locally available may be found in the pandemic lockdowns of 2020, when neighborhood stores were out of toilet paper and …

Patents Used In Patent Office Rejections As Indicators Of Value, Christopher A. Cotropia, David L. Schwartz

Law Faculty Publications

This paper introduces a novel approach to measure a patent's economic value by examining whether the patent's disclosure leads to rejection of another pending US patent application. This approach considers the use of the patent by the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in office action rejections on the grounds of novelty or obviousness, as well as its citation as an X or Y reference in a European Patent Office (EPO) search report, which provides analogous information. Unlike conventional citation metrics widely employed by economists, the novel metric is arguably more closely tied to private value, as it is centered …

Examining The Implications Of A Stricter Tacking Standard In The Aftermath Of Bertini V. Apple, Catherine S. Condyles

Law Student Publications

Trademarks serve to indicate an item’s source of origin and distinguish it from other commodities in the market. When there are two or more entities with similar trademarks, who offer related goods or services, the entity to use the mark first has seniority over the other users. Furthermore, the senior user has priority, making him or her “entitled to enjoin other ‘junior’ users from using the mark, or one that is deceptively similar to it” in a way that is likely to confuse consumers. But under certain circumstances a trademark owner can claim priority over a mark by relying instead …

Internet Openness At Risk: Generative Ai's Impact On Data Scraping, Melany Amarikwa

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

Modern scraping practices—the automated extraction of data from online websites—by companies employing generative AI models threatens the foundational and essential openness of the internet. There are calls for regulating the use of scraping in generative AI models, but lawmakers, concerned about its impact on US global AI leadership, have failed to act. This article presents two legal frameworks aimed at regulating generative AI scraping. The adverse possession framework addresses property rights and allows for the use of copyrighted works where the author abandons or fails to claim their works. The public records framework addresses privacy rights and treats personal information …

Communal Authorship, Aman K. Gebru

University of Richmond Law Review

A literary or artistic expression created by an individual author fits neatly in the copyright system. Many of the rules were developed with the sole author and a distinct work in mind. Given this start, copyright law struggles to govern expressions generated by teams. But even in such scenarios, joint authorship rules, which were developed relatively recently, have addressed complicated ownership questions. In contrast to solo- and team-authored works, the copyright system fails in a third category, what this Article labels “communal authorship.” This Article describes communal authorship as a subset of mass-authored works having the key features of numerosity, …

Talking Scents: Copyrightability Of Fragrance & Intellectual Property Protection In The Perfume Industry, Margaret M. Donnelly

Law Student Publications

Designer fashion brands are well-known for their aggressive brand protection techniques and unwavering commitment to protecting the exclusivity of their products. After all, it is this exclusivity that drives demand for luxury products in the first place. Additionally, a new trend of duplicate or “dupe” products that are more accessible, noncounterfeited replicas of high-end goods presents a new problem for these luxury brands. Despite high-end brands’ best efforts, the luxury goods industry is still plagued by counterfeiting and piracy issues, as well as the emerging threat of replicated dupe products that drive luxury sales down. From notorious counterfeit marketplaces like …

Talking Scents: Copyrightability Of Fragrance & Intellectual Property Protection In The Perfume Industry, Margaret M. Donnelly

University of Richmond Law Review

Designer fashion brands are well-known for their aggressive brand protection techniques and unwavering commitment to protecting the exclusivity of their products. After all, it is this exclusivity that drives demand for luxury products in the first place. Additionally, a new trend of duplicate or “dupe” products that are more accessible, noncounterfeited replicas of high-end goods presents a new problem for these luxury brands. Despite high-end brands’ best efforts, the luxury goods industry is still plagued by counterfeiting and piracy issues, as well as the emerging threat of replicated dupe products that drive luxury sales down. From notorious counterfeit marketplaces like …

The Injunction Function: Is Ip Law Promoting Markets For Innovators And Creators?, Kristen Jakobsen Osenga

Law Faculty Publications

32 Federal Circuit Bar Journal 4 (2024) The Federalist Society hosted this panel on November 11, 2023, as part of their 2023 National Lawyers Convention in Washington, D.C. This panel focuses on the role injunctions play in the facilitation or constraining commercialization of patent technologies and copyright, the current state of the law, and its meaning for next-generation innovations like creative uses of artificial intelligence.

Applying The Fair Use Doctrine In Music Copyright "Borrowing" Infringement Cases, Shea Bettwy

University of Richmond Law Review

Copyright fair use is a broad, statutory doctrine that permits fair use of any type of copyrighted work. But the fair use defense is virtually nonexistent in copyright infringement cases involving musical compositions, such as the famous “Blurred Lines” case. Defendants and courts neglect to consider it for reasons unknown. One might conjecture that this simply reflects a tacit understanding in the music industry that original music should be untouched. In fact, musical borrowing is a longstanding and accepted tradition, which makes copyright fair use particularly amenable to musical compositions. Disconcertingly, ignoring fair use of musical compositions in infringement cases …

The Nil Glass Ceiling, Tan Boston

University of Richmond Law Review

Name, image, and likeness (“NIL”) produced nearly $1 billion in earnings for intercollegiate athletes in its inaugural year. Analysts argue that the shockingly high totals result from disproportionate
institutional support for revenue-generating sports.

Although NIL earnings have soared upwards of eight figures to date, first-year data reveals that significant gender disparities exist. Such disparities raise Title IX concerns, which this Article illustrates using a hypothetical university and NIL collective. As such, this Article reveals how schools can facilitate gender discrimination through NIL collectives, contrary to Title IX. Although plainly applicable to NIL transactions in which schools are involved, Title IX’s …

Memorizing Trade Secrets, Timothy E. Murphy

University of Richmond Law Review

The earliest trade secret cases recognized that remembered information raised unique issues in trade secret misappropriation claims. However, courts struggled with exactly how to address remembered information, as opposed to information taken in tangible form. The modern trend, according to one case from the Washington Supreme Court, is to ignore the distinction and treat remembered information the same as information taken in tangible form for purposes of trade secret misappropriation claims. However, this case may have prematurely signaled the demise of remembered information’s relevance to a trade secret claim. Particularly during the pandemic era, where increased employee mobility is placing …

Nonobviousness And Unmotivated, Yet Minor, Inventions, Christopher A. Cotropia

Law Faculty Publications

This brief essay on nonobviousness originates from a series of conversations, emails, and preliminary drafts between Dmitry Karshtedt and myself that, sadly, never got a chance to fully evolve. We were exploring what the law says, and perhaps should say, about inventions that are technologically small advances, yet unmotivated by prior art. As Dmitry so aptly framed it, “The question we’re dealing with is, what if everyone thought that something was really hard or unworkable, but turned out to be a straightforward, minor improvement? Obvious or no?” This essay puts to paper our exploration of this question. The law’s emphasis …

Hit The Road, Jack: The Auto Industry As The Next Vehicle For Predatory Infringement, Kristen Jakobsen Osenga

Law Faculty Publications

While patents, patent litigation, and patent pools have been part of the automotive industry since the late-1800s, the prevalence of technology covered by standards and accompanying standard essential patents (SEPs) is much more recent. Today’s smart cars and the widespread incorporation of telecommunication and Internet of Things standards in vehicles raise concerns about how well the automotive industry will be able to adapt to this new SEP-laden future. This article predicts that predatory infringement of SEPs for two related reasons. First, although some industries, such as telecommunications, have long dealt with SEPs, the incorporation of standardized technology is more recent …

A Music Industry Circuit Split: The De Minimis Exception In Digital Sampling, Michaela S. Morrissey

University of Richmond Law Review

When hip-hop icon Biz Markie released his album “All Samples Cleared!” he joked of the end of what was known as the “Golden Age” of digital sampling in the hip-hop and rap music industry. The Golden Age began in the late 1980s, and because there was no regulation of the practice, it was a period of musical enlightenment in which musicians could freely utilize digital sampling without legal repercussion. However, in 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit handed down an opinion that sent shock waves across the music industry. In Bridgeport Music Inc. v. Dimension …

Make Some Sense Of Scent Trademarks: The United States Needs A Graphical Representation Requirement, Gabrielle E. Brill

University of Richmond Law Review

When it comes to consumer loyalty, some businesses have decided to go beyond attracting the eyes. Why not keep customers via their nostrils? Accordingly, the scent marketing industry is booming. Jennifer Dublino, Vice President of Development at ScentWorld Events, remarks that “smell is one of the most unique of human senses. Scent enters the limbic system [of the brain] and bypasses all of the cognitive and logical thought processes and goes directly to the emotional and memory areas of the brain.” Companies like ScentAir have been created specifically to help stores design fragrances that best fit their image and objectives …

Copyright Takes To The Streets: Protecting Graffiti Under The Visual Artists Rights Act, Michaela S. Morrissey

Law Student Publications

Artists who choose the streets as their canvas—whether to beautify neighborhoods, spark political protest, or merely mark their territory—are faced with uncertainties when it comes to questions of copyright protection for their work. Prior to Castillo v. G&M Realty L.P., the rights granted to street artists had generally been uncharted territory. However, a verdict that pitted the rights of street artists against the rights of property owners finally gave street art the credibility many felt it long deserved. In Castillo, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recognized graffiti as a work of visual art, thus …

Copyright Takes To The Streets: Protecting Graffiti Under The Visual Artists Rights Act, Michaela S. Morrissey

Law Student Publications

Artists who choose the streets as their canvas—whether to beautify neighborhoods, spark political protest, or merely mark their territory—are faced with uncertainties when it comes to questions of copyright protection for their work. Prior to Castillo v. G&M Realty L.P., the rights granted to street artists had generally been uncharted territory. However, a verdict that pitted the rights of street artists against the rights of property owners finally gave street art the credibility many felt it long deserved. In Castillo, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recognized graffiti as a work of visual …

Copyright Takes To The Streets: Protecting Graffiti Under The Visual Artists Rights Act, Michaela S. Morrissey

University of Richmond Law Review

Artists who choose the streets as their canvas—whether to beautify neighborhoods, spark political protest, or merely mark their territory—are faced with uncertainties when it comes to questions of copyright protection for their work. Prior to Castillo v. G&M Realty L.P., the rights granted to street artists had generally been uncharted territory. However, a verdict that pitted the rights of street artists against the rights of property owners finally gave street art the credibility many felt it long deserved. In Castillo, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recognized graffiti as a work of visual art, thus …

Rethinking Music Copyright Infringement In The Digital World: Proposing A Streamlined Test After The Demise Of The Inverse Ratio Rule, Christina R. Dimeo

University of Richmond Law Review

This Comment will discuss the devastating blow to musicians inflicted by the Blurred Lines verdict’s embrace of the inverse ratio rule. Then, I will examine the Stairway to Heaven decision, in which the Ninth Circuit sharply changed course and decided to abrogate the inverse ratio rule. This welcome policy change nevertheless leaves questions as to how the Ninth Circuit will balance considerations of access with substantial similarity as it assesses copying in future cases. More importantly, the explosion of access in the digital world has fatally weakened—across all circuits—the role of access within the infringement test. In that light, I …

Trade Secrets And Personal Secrets, Lital Helman

University of Richmond Law Review

This Article aims to examine the different ways in which the law protects commercial and private secrets. The most fundamental difference is that the trade secrets regime forbids the unauthorized use of a business’s confidential information, while privacy law does not forbid the unauthorized use of a person’s confidential information. If a firm takes measures to protect information of value, the law forbids the use of this information. Yet, as to personal secrets, the mere fact that someone has taken measures to protect their privacy does not create an obligation to avoid misappropriation of their in- formation.

This asymmetry of …

Patents As Signal Of Quality In Crowdfunding, Christopher A. Cotropia

Law Faculty Publications

Patents and crowdfunding both attempt to foster early stage innovations. In theory, patents signal quality and value to attract investment and buyers and ultimately facilitate commercialization. Crowdfunding allows multiple individuals to make small contributions to finance start-up ventures. This Article reports on two related studies investigating the interaction between these two innovation tools by determining the impact of a crowdfunding campaign’s patent status on the campaign’s success and delivery. The first study examines 9,184 Kickstarter campaigns in patent-eligible categories to determine whether patented or patent-pending labeled projects are more likely to reach their funding goal and in turn achieve actual, …

Patents As Signals Of Quality In Crowdfunding, Christopher A. Cotropia

Law Faculty Publications

Patents and crowdfunding both attempt to foster early stage innova-tions. In theory, patents signal quality and value to attract investment and buyers and ultimately facilitate commercialization. Crowdfunding allows multiple individuals to make small contributions to finance start-up ven-tures. This Article reports on two related studies investigating the interac-tion between these two innovation tools by determining the impact of a crowdfunding campaign’s patent status on the campaign’s success and de-livery. The first study examines 9,184 Kickstarter campaigns in patent-eli-gible categories to determine whether patented or patent-pending labeled projects are more likely to reach their funding goal and in turn achieve actual, …

Striking The Right Balance: Following The Doj's Lead For Innovation In Standardized Technology, Kristen Jakobsen Osenga

Law Faculty Publications

Today’s technology standards are the result of an extraordinary amount of innovation, collaboration and competition. These concepts are interrelated, and each is enhanced or enabled by intellectual property. Where these three concepts come together in standards development, it is unsurprising that antitrust concerns are also present. Specifically, the interests of contributors, participants, and implementers must be fairly balanced to ensure that the appropriate types and levels of innovation, collaboration, and competition can occur—and that the public will benefit. It is important that antitrust enforcement involving standards development organizations and owners of standards essential patents recognize the careful balance of these …