Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (3045)
- Science and Technology Law (2855)
- Internet Law (1904)
- Computer Law (1592)
- Communications Law (1422)
-
- International Law (1147)
- International Trade Law (1090)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (938)
- Privacy Law (895)
- Constitutional Law (808)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (797)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (705)
- Health Law and Policy (690)
- Law and Society (675)
- Litigation (611)
- Food and Drug Law (610)
- First Amendment (599)
- Legislation (581)
- Law and Economics (540)
- Library and Information Science (537)
- Human Rights Law (530)
- Courts (505)
- Administrative Law (502)
- Commercial Law (500)
- Contracts (494)
- Environmental Law (481)
- Cultural Heritage Law (464)
- Agriculture Law (446)
- Institution
-
- Fordham Law School (979)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (978)
- UC Law SF (873)
- UIC School of Law (829)
- American University Washington College of Law (810)
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (654)
- University of Michigan Law School (592)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (517)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (427)
- University of Washington School of Law (403)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (391)
- Marquette University Law School (385)
- Boston University School of Law (362)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (358)
- Seattle University School of Law (355)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (349)
- Santa Clara Law (328)
- Columbia Law School (314)
- University of Richmond (311)
- Duke Law (302)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (279)
- William & Mary Law School (267)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (252)
- The University of Akron (207)
- Southern Methodist University (202)
- Universitas Indonesia (183)
- University of New Hampshire (179)
- Georgetown University Law Center (174)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (164)
- BLR (163)
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (2083)
- Intellectual property (1568)
- Patent (871)
- Patents (755)
- Trademark (600)
-
- Patent law (548)
- Copyright law (533)
- Intellectual Property (412)
- Fair use (372)
- Technology (370)
- Intellectual Property Law (356)
- Internet (298)
- Infringement (297)
- Copyright infringement (287)
- Law (248)
- Innovation (233)
- Trademarks (212)
- Lanham Act (206)
- Copyright Act (197)
- Antitrust (187)
- First Amendment (184)
- Licensing (180)
- IP (178)
- Trademark law (167)
- Google (165)
- Federal Circuit (159)
- Patent infringement (154)
- Software (150)
- Privacy (142)
- NJTIP (138)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1106)
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (846)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (823)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (550)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (495)
-
- Georgia Journal of Law & Technology (467)
- Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. (372)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (351)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (309)
- Articles (306)
- Faculty Publications (280)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (273)
- Seattle University Law Review (236)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (230)
- Michigan Law Review (229)
- Cardozo Law Review (181)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (180)
- Scholarly Works (179)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (173)
- ExpressO (157)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (156)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (150)
- Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix) (147)
- SMU Science and Technology Law Review (146)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (143)
- Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal (143)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (142)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (138)
- Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series (134)
- Scholarship Chronologically (132)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 451 - 480 of 17032
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Soundexchange V. Sirius Xm: A Battle On Two Fronts, Catherine Stagliano
Soundexchange V. Sirius Xm: A Battle On Two Fronts, Catherine Stagliano
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog
In the United States, when an artist’s sound recording or track is played by a servicer like Pandora or satellite radio, a digital public performance royalty for the sound recording is collected by the organization, SoundExchange, or it may be negotiated between the parties via direct licenses. These non-terrestrial broadcast platforms perform in a non-interactive manner (i.e. the platform picks the tracks for the consumer to listen to) as opposed to in an interactive manner (i.e. listener picks the track) by a platform such as Spotify or Apple Music.
Brief Of Amici Curiae Intellectual Property Scholars In Support Of Petitioners, Laura A. Heymann, Alfred C. Yen
Brief Of Amici Curiae Intellectual Property Scholars In Support Of Petitioners, Laura A. Heymann, Alfred C. Yen
Briefs
No abstract provided.
Who Owns Your Adventure? A Need For Legislative Clarity For Streamed Performances Of Video Games, Harrison Busalacchi
Who Owns Your Adventure? A Need For Legislative Clarity For Streamed Performances Of Video Games, Harrison Busalacchi
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Video games contain copyrighted material that could easily be infringed upon by people streaming a performance of them playing the game. However, the streamers can protect themselves from infringement liability by transforming the content in some form or fashion such that their performance constitutes “fair use” of the copyrighted material. This is often accomplished by the streamer providing commentary while playing the game or adding a small video of themselves in the corner of the stream so that the viewers can see the streamers’ reactions to the content. With artificial intelligence seeing exponential growth in the past couple of years …
Are You The Sum Of Your Data? Appropriation Of Digital Persona As Appropriation Of Likeness, Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky
Are You The Sum Of Your Data? Appropriation Of Digital Persona As Appropriation Of Likeness, Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky
UF Law Faculty Publications
A review of Zahra Takhshid's article, Data as Likeness, 112 Geo. L. J. 1161 (2024).
Futurescape Libraries Ai Toolkit, Keith Webster
Futurescape Libraries Ai Toolkit, Keith Webster
Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.
A toolkit developed to explore scenario-specific strategies and activities that research libraries can undertake to prepare for various possible AI-influenced futures. The toolkit integrates the ARL/CNI AI Scenarios published in spring 2024 along with priorities trialed and refined by strategic thinkers working directly in, or adjacent to, the research library field during a Strategic Implications forum held December 7–8, 2024, in Washington, DC.
Inside Ai, Charles Duan
Inside Ai, Charles Duan
Contributions to Books
It is beautiful, the Mandelbrot set. In full, it resembles a horseshoe crab or a sideways Rorschach test, flecked with patterns of spikes and lobes. Zooming in at any point near its edge reveals infinite depths of swirls, reminiscent of Van Gogh’s Starry Night or an intricate paisley textile. The shape could easily hang on a wall, an example of fine abstract art. Yet the entirety of that shape can be computed by repeated application of a simple mathematical function:2 f(x) = x2 + c. Is all the beauty and complexity of the Mandelbrot set “inside” the symbols …
Uncovering The Ai-Copyright Trap, Carys Craig
Uncovering The Ai-Copyright Trap, Carys Craig
Conference Papers
As AI tools proliferate, law and policy makers are being called upon to protect creators and the cultural industries from the extractive, exploitative, and even existential threats posed by generative AI. Professor Carys Craig warns that, in our haste to act, we risk running headlong into a copyright trap. In this presentation, Craig will explain what she means by the “AI copyright trap”, the routes by which it draws people in, and why it threatens to obstruct the path towards responsible and ethical AI. (Note: Presentation delivered online on August 26, 2025, as part of the AI Literacy Center's programming).
Music Executives From Universal Music Group Speak To Cardozo’S Entertainment Law Society, Ansley Henderson
Music Executives From Universal Music Group Speak To Cardozo’S Entertainment Law Society, Ansley Henderson
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog
On Thursday, August 21, 2025, Cardozo’s Entertainment Law Society hosted a panel discussion with Jermaine “Maine” Maxwell (A&R at Def Jam, Universal Music Group), Shaniqua “Haarlem” Branch (VP of A&R at Republic Records, Universal Music Group), Trevor Casson (Senior Director Business & Legal Affairs at Universal Music Group for the East Coast labels), and Rachel Landy (Cardozo Professor with over a decade of experience in the music industry). The panel was moderated by Brennan Gerspach (Entertainment Law Society Music Co-Chair, Class of 2027). The event was promoted to students as, “From Studio to Statute: Navigating Creativity, Innovation, and Law …
"The Cake Is A Lie:" Locating Loot Boxes In Indian Gaming Framework, Aman Gupta, Samriddh Sharma
"The Cake Is A Lie:" Locating Loot Boxes In Indian Gaming Framework, Aman Gupta, Samriddh Sharma
Indian Journal of Law and Technology
Lootboxes have become endemic in modern video games. These microtransactions allow users to purchase virtual containers without knowing their content, which is determined by chance. There have been increasing concerns about the negative impact of loot-box purchases on mental health and whether these amount to gambling under various laws. In response, several countries have started applying existing gambling laws or legislating new measures to regulate lootboxes. This raises questions about the present state of regulations in the Indian context and whether they are adequate in meeting the risks posed by lootboxes. In the present article, the authors explain the concept …
Steering Indian Financial Services Towards Digital Operational Resilience: A Cross-Sectoral Approach, Vaibhav Vijay Nishad, Smruti Kulkarni
Steering Indian Financial Services Towards Digital Operational Resilience: A Cross-Sectoral Approach, Vaibhav Vijay Nishad, Smruti Kulkarni
Indian Journal of Law and Technology
In India, among the three financial regulators, RBI’s recent focus on creating a robust ICT risk management framework has been at the forefront of the country’s digital operational resilience strategy. The continuous cyber threats and recent digital operational failures have highlighted the need for further enhancements to strategies that establish strong ICT risk management. Addressing these cybersecurity vulnerabilities requires more than prescriptive rules; it demands holistic, flexible, adaptive, and coordinated regulatory approaches to strengthen digital operational resilience. This paper analyses the key issues that need resolution to advance these efforts. We identify the misalignment of economic incentives for compliance as …
Centring Marginalisation In The Development Of Digital Courts: Reflections From Argentina, India, Kenya, And Malaysia, Siddharth Peter De Souza, Varsha Aithala, Francisco Mignaquy, Mercy Muendo, Anisha Nadkarni
Centring Marginalisation In The Development Of Digital Courts: Reflections From Argentina, India, Kenya, And Malaysia, Siddharth Peter De Souza, Varsha Aithala, Francisco Mignaquy, Mercy Muendo, Anisha Nadkarni
Indian Journal of Law and Technology
This paper presents a multi-jurisdictional analysis of digitalisation of justice and the perceived role of courts as public institutions upholding the rule of law and ensuring access to justice to all. Using selected examples from Argentina, India, Kenya and Malaysia, it examines the impact of digitalisation efforts of these countries on their citizens, marginalised populations, the State and private sector. We propose to design an approach to digital justice that centres people on the margins of digital transformation of courts. This includes three elements – first, engagement with people centered perspectives; second, focus on disadvantage and addressing socio-technical factors; and …
From ‘Gig Work’ To Algorithmically Mediated Work: Shifting The Focus To Technological Control In Work Regulation, Jasoon Chelat
From ‘Gig Work’ To Algorithmically Mediated Work: Shifting The Focus To Technological Control In Work Regulation, Jasoon Chelat
Indian Journal of Law and Technology
Platform-based work is finding a place in legislative instruments in India in recent years, under the Code on Social Security, 2020, as well as state-level legislations. In this paper, I argue that these efforts to extend protections to gig or platform work are limited in their understanding of the way work is shaped by digital technologies both within and outside of platforms. Platform-based work regulation seems to have skipped a step: the regulatory discourse has moved on to a welfare-focused model present in informal work, without examining existing jurisprudence on worker rights relevant to digitally mediated work. These legislative instruments …
In The Pursuance Of A Robust Legal Framework To Address Deepfake Harms: An Analysis Of The Indian Legal Discourse, Jyothsna Gurumurthy
In The Pursuance Of A Robust Legal Framework To Address Deepfake Harms: An Analysis Of The Indian Legal Discourse, Jyothsna Gurumurthy
Indian Journal of Law and Technology
A common issue we face in the field of law and technology is the constant game of catch-up that the law is required to play to keep up with advances in technology. Deepfake Technology (primarily based on generative adversarial networks, as explored in this article) exemplifies this game of catch-up and provides a fertile ground for academics and regulators/law makers to explore and understand what it means for a technology regulating law or rule to be robust and enforceable. By examining the judicial handling of deepfake claims within a publicity rights discourse in India, this article suggests the adoption of …
Creative Expression Over Rigid Protection: Why The Ninth Circuit Is Correct To Permit De Minimis Sampling, Mitchell Brost
Creative Expression Over Rigid Protection: Why The Ninth Circuit Is Correct To Permit De Minimis Sampling, Mitchell Brost
Pepperdine Law Review
The legal world is at a crossroads following the Ninth Circuit’s decision to uphold de minimis sampling as a valid practice in VMG Salsoul, LLC v. Ciccone. On the one hand, the Ninth Circuit’s affirmation of de minimis sampling fosters creativity and gives aspiring artists greater access to resources they would not otherwise be able to afford. On the other hand, the Sixth Circuit’s earlier decision in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films that held de minimis sampling to be categorically illegal bolsters copyright protection and facilitates more predictable outcomes in copyright lawsuits. This Note analyzes both cases and ultimately …
Introduction: Symposium ‒ Ai Disrupting Law, Edward Lee
Introduction: Symposium ‒ Ai Disrupting Law, Edward Lee
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Files Are In The Computer: On Copyright, Memorization, And Generative Ai, A. Feder Cooper [email protected], James Grimmelmann
The Files Are In The Computer: On Copyright, Memorization, And Generative Ai, A. Feder Cooper [email protected], James Grimmelmann
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Creative Machines: Generative Artificial Intelligence And Copyright Law, Ryan Abott, Elizabeth Rothman [email protected]
Creative Machines: Generative Artificial Intelligence And Copyright Law, Ryan Abott, Elizabeth Rothman [email protected]
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Ai-Copyright Trap, Carys J. Craig
A Principle Of Artistic Data Sovereignty: Linking Creative Reuse To Author Remuneration, Georgia Jenkins
A Principle Of Artistic Data Sovereignty: Linking Creative Reuse To Author Remuneration, Georgia Jenkins
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Artificial Intellectual Property, Daniel J. Gervais
Artificial Intellectual Property, Daniel J. Gervais
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trade Secrecy Meets Generative Ai, Camilla A. Hrdy
Trade Secrecy Meets Generative Ai, Camilla A. Hrdy
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Innovate Responsibly: Post-Grant Mechanisms To Deter Unnecessarily Toxic Pharmaceutical Patents, Brianna De Frank
Innovate Responsibly: Post-Grant Mechanisms To Deter Unnecessarily Toxic Pharmaceutical Patents, Brianna De Frank
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Copyright And The Expression Engine: Idea And Expression In Ai-Assisted Creations, P. Bernt Hugenholtz
Copyright And The Expression Engine: Idea And Expression In Ai-Assisted Creations, P. Bernt Hugenholtz
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Copyright Accelerationism, Benjamin L.W. Sobel
Copyright Accelerationism, Benjamin L.W. Sobel
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Losing The Big Picture: An Argument For Preserving Irpa Rights For Emotional Damages, Stephen Luke Winbery
Losing The Big Picture: An Argument For Preserving Irpa Rights For Emotional Damages, Stephen Luke Winbery
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Copyright Re-Alignment: The Growth Of New Works Outside The Copyright System, Edward Lee
Copyright Re-Alignment: The Growth Of New Works Outside The Copyright System, Edward Lee
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Win-Win: How To Remove Copyright Obstacles To Ai Training While Ensuring Author Remuneration (And Why The Ai Act Fails To Do The Magic), Martin Senftleben
Win-Win: How To Remove Copyright Obstacles To Ai Training While Ensuring Author Remuneration (And Why The Ai Act Fails To Do The Magic), Martin Senftleben
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Paradise Lost In The Patent Law? Changing Visions Of Technology In The Subject Matter Inquiry, Dana Remus Irwin
Paradise Lost In The Patent Law? Changing Visions Of Technology In The Subject Matter Inquiry, Dana Remus Irwin
Florida Law Review
In recent decades, the Patent and Trademark Office and the federal courts have dramatically expanded the scope of patentable subject matter—the set of inventions eligible for patent protection. Existing scholarship has taken a narrow view of this expansion. Scholars argue on efficiency grounds that without more meaningful limits on the scope of patentable subject matter, future invention will be impeded rather than encouraged. This Article takes a broader view of the subject matter inquiry, tracing its historical development and its changing theories of technology, from the patent system’s inception to the present. This Article demonstrates that through these theories of …