Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (3045)
- Science and Technology Law (2855)
- Internet Law (1904)
- Computer Law (1592)
- Communications Law (1422)
-
- International Law (1147)
- International Trade Law (1090)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (939)
- Privacy Law (895)
- Constitutional Law (808)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (797)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (705)
- Health Law and Policy (690)
- Law and Society (675)
- Litigation (611)
- Food and Drug Law (610)
- First Amendment (599)
- Legislation (581)
- Law and Economics (540)
- Library and Information Science (538)
- Human Rights Law (530)
- Courts (505)
- Administrative Law (502)
- Commercial Law (500)
- Contracts (494)
- Environmental Law (481)
- Cultural Heritage Law (464)
- Agriculture Law (446)
- Institution
-
- Fordham Law School (979)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (978)
- UC Law SF (873)
- UIC School of Law (829)
- American University Washington College of Law (810)
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (655)
- University of Michigan Law School (592)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (517)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (427)
- University of Washington School of Law (403)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (392)
- Marquette University Law School (385)
- Boston University School of Law (362)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (358)
- Seattle University School of Law (355)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (349)
- Santa Clara Law (328)
- Columbia Law School (314)
- University of Richmond (311)
- Duke Law (302)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (279)
- William & Mary Law School (267)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (252)
- The University of Akron (207)
- Southern Methodist University (202)
- Universitas Indonesia (183)
- University of New Hampshire (179)
- Georgetown University Law Center (174)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (164)
- BLR (163)
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (2085)
- Intellectual property (1569)
- Patent (871)
- Patents (755)
- Trademark (600)
-
- Patent law (548)
- Copyright law (533)
- Intellectual Property (412)
- Fair use (372)
- Technology (370)
- Intellectual Property Law (356)
- Internet (298)
- Infringement (297)
- Copyright infringement (287)
- Law (248)
- Innovation (233)
- Trademarks (212)
- Lanham Act (206)
- Copyright Act (197)
- Antitrust (187)
- First Amendment (184)
- Licensing (180)
- IP (178)
- Trademark law (167)
- Google (165)
- Federal Circuit (159)
- Patent infringement (154)
- Software (150)
- Privacy (142)
- Artificial intelligence (138)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1106)
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (846)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (823)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (550)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (495)
-
- Georgia Journal of Law & Technology (467)
- Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. (373)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (351)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (309)
- Articles (306)
- Faculty Publications (280)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (273)
- Seattle University Law Review (236)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (230)
- Michigan Law Review (229)
- Cardozo Law Review (181)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (180)
- Scholarly Works (180)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (173)
- ExpressO (157)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (156)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (150)
- Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix) (147)
- SMU Science and Technology Law Review (146)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (143)
- Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal (143)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (142)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (138)
- Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series (134)
- Scholarship Chronologically (132)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 3241 - 3270 of 17034
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Table Of Contents, Editor-In- Chief
Table Of Contents, Editor-In- Chief
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
No abstract provided.
Plus Or Minus America: Spanski, Geoblocking Technology, And Personal Jurisdiction Analysis For Nonresident Defendants, Daniel Canedo
Plus Or Minus America: Spanski, Geoblocking Technology, And Personal Jurisdiction Analysis For Nonresident Defendants, Daniel Canedo
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
The use of a geoblock—technology that restricts access to websites based on user location—is a controversial topic, and one that plays a role in defining the scope under which nonresident defendants may be subjected to the personal jurisdiction of U.S. courts in copyright infringement cases. For example, a recent D.C. Court of Appeals case, Spanski Enterprises, Inc. v. Telewizja Polska, S.A., involved a Polish television network whose geoblock setting, known as “minus America,” failed to restrict website access in violation of a Canadian company’s exclusive rights under the U.S. Copyright Act. Cases like Carsey-Werner Co., LLC v. British Broadcasting Corp. …
Conventional Protections For Commercial Fan Art Under The U.S. Copyright Act, Rachel Morgan
Conventional Protections For Commercial Fan Art Under The U.S. Copyright Act, Rachel Morgan
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
For many years, artists and consumers of pop culture have channeled their artistic skills into creating derivative works of their favorite fictional stories and characters. In the United States, fans of Japanese anime and manga have made a living selling artwork of their favorite characters at anime conventions, large gatherings that bring in fellow fans from all around the country. Despite the prevalence of this practice, there is a glaring legal issue: these fictional characters are the intellectual property of the authors who created them, and fan art is blatant copyright infringement. However, there are still many economic advantages to …
Fairness, Copyright, And Video Games: Hate The Game, Not The Player, Shani Shisha
Fairness, Copyright, And Video Games: Hate The Game, Not The Player, Shani Shisha
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
Creative communities often rely on social norms to regulate the production of creative content. Yet while an emerging body of literature has focused on isolated accounts of social norms operating in discrete, small-scale creative industries, no research to date has explored the social norms that pervade the world’s largest content microcosm—the sprawling video game community.
Now a veritable global phenomenon, the video game industry has recently grown to eclipse the music and motion picture industries. But despite its meteoric rise, the video game industry has provoked little attention from copyright scholars. This Article is the first to explore the shifting …
Trademarks As Surveillance Transparency, Amanda Levendowski
Trademarks As Surveillance Transparency, Amanda Levendowski
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
We know very little about the technologies that watch us. From cell site simulators to predictive policing algorithms, the lack of transparency around surveillance technologies makes it difficult for the public to engage in meaningful oversight. Legal scholars have critiqued various corporate and law enforcement justifications for surveillance opacity, including contract and intellectual property law. But the public needs a free, public, and easily accessible source of information about corporate technologies that might be used to watch us. To date, the literature has overlooked a free, extensive, and easily accessible source of information about surveillance technologies hidden in plain sight: …
Copyright And Parody: Touring The Certainties Of Intellectual Property And Restitution, Wendy J. Gordon
Copyright And Parody: Touring The Certainties Of Intellectual Property And Restitution, Wendy J. Gordon
Faculty Scholarship
The essay that follows examines the boundary between two sets of rules. The first set arises under the law of Restitution, particularly the rule that volunteers ordinarily need not be rewarded. (Another way to state this same Restitution rule is to say that the retention of benefit voluntarily conferred is ordinarily not "unjust enrichment".) The second set of rules are those of Intellectual Property law, which creates property in a special kind of volunteer. My argument is simply that the law of Restitution leads almost directly to the law of Intellectual Property, though the two areas are premised on diametrically …
The Right Of Reattribution, Brian L. Frye
The Right Of Reattribution, Brian L. Frye
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Usually, authors love their works as their children: fiercely and unconditionally. Indeed, many authors refer to their works as their “children,” and some show far more solicitude for their aesthetic children than their actual ones. Of course, authors can also be cruel to their works. As William Faulkner famously observed, “In writing you must kill all your darlings.” But even such merciless culling doesn’t prevent authors from loving what survives. If anything, their love only deepens with each sacrifice.
But even the filial bond can be broken. Many disappointed parents have disowned their prodigal children. Sometimes the relationship can be …
Copyright & Memes: The Fight For Success Kid, Cathay Y. N. Smith, Stacey Lantagne
Copyright & Memes: The Fight For Success Kid, Cathay Y. N. Smith, Stacey Lantagne
Faculty Law Review Articles
This Article explores the complicated relationship between memes and copyright. Internet memes have become a ubiquitous part of social communications. They effectively express an idea, message, or sentiment, often more humorously and efficiently than words. Most memes evolved from original content that Internet users found online and copied, altered, shared, and imbued with new cultural and social meaning. Because memes frequently involve the unauthorized use, alteration, and sharing of a content creator’s original image or photograph, they naturally implicate the content creator’s copyright. But who owns a meme? What rights, if any, does the creator of the original content have …
The Wonderful World Of Patents: "They Do Things Differently There", David Vaver
The Wonderful World Of Patents: "They Do Things Differently There", David Vaver
Editorials and Commentaries
No abstract provided.
Former Chief Judge Paul Michel’S Keynote Address At The 64th Annual Intellectual Property Conference At The Uic John Marshall Law School — The Arc Of American Patent Law: Balance And Rebalance And Rebalance Intellectual Property Policy, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 102 (2021), Paul Michel
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Automated Trade Secret Asset Management: Sfp Classification, Eona Proofs, Blockchaining, And Dtsa Civil Seizure Orders, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 145 (2021), R. Mark Halligan
Automated Trade Secret Asset Management: Sfp Classification, Eona Proofs, Blockchaining, And Dtsa Civil Seizure Orders, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 145 (2021), R. Mark Halligan
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
This Is Fisa Calling To Let You Know You May Be Eligible For A Motion To Suppress: New Notice Requirement From United States V. Moalin, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 166 (2021), Jennifer Armstrong
This Is Fisa Calling To Let You Know You May Be Eligible For A Motion To Suppress: New Notice Requirement From United States V. Moalin, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 166 (2021), Jennifer Armstrong
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Trademark Law After Uspto V. Booking.Com: “Generic.Com” Takeover, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 182 (2021), Paige Miller
Trademark Law After Uspto V. Booking.Com: “Generic.Com” Takeover, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 182 (2021), Paige Miller
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Filtering Innovation Wheat From Chaff: Quick Citations As Indicators Of Patented Invention Value, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 202 (2021), Richard Gruner
Filtering Innovation Wheat From Chaff: Quick Citations As Indicators Of Patented Invention Value, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 202 (2021), Richard Gruner
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
The Scope Of Employment Test Under The Work-Made-For-Hire Doctrine Revisited: How Covid-19, Remote Working, And The Restatement (Third) Of Agency Could Change It, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 232 (2021), Diana Simon
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
A Proposal For A More Objective Method In Determining The Extent Of Similarities Between Musical Works For The Purpose Of Probative Copying, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 251 (2021), Rachael Belensz
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Carpenter V. United States: Step Forward For Smartphones And Their Data, But Maybe Not For Other Technologies, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 308 (2021), Stephen Bartholomew
Carpenter V. United States: Step Forward For Smartphones And Their Data, But Maybe Not For Other Technologies, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 308 (2021), Stephen Bartholomew
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Is Gray V. Perry The One That Got Away? The Idea-Expression Dichotomy And Music Copyright Infringement, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 290 (2021), Marisa Schutz
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
The Blur Between Fact And Fiction: Should Trademark Protections Extend To Aspects Of Fictional Works?, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 451 (2021), Sam Walker
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Replacing The Rogers Test: Will An Inquiry Into Non-Artistic Motive In Selecting Titles Of Expressive Works Remedy The Possibility Of Flagrant Deception?, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 429 (2021), Sabina Nedkova
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Foreword: The Supreme Court’S Changing Approach To Patent Law, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2021), Ted Field
Foreword: The Supreme Court’S Changing Approach To Patent Law, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2021), Ted Field
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Federal Circuit’S Jurisprudence Of The Patent-Eligibility Analysis: Toward A Bright-Line Rule, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 16 (2021), Ping-Hsun Chen
Federal Circuit’S Jurisprudence Of The Patent-Eligibility Analysis: Toward A Bright-Line Rule, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 16 (2021), Ping-Hsun Chen
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
A Retrospective Reflection On Ripl, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 13 (2021), Adam Kelly, Dorien Clark
A Retrospective Reflection On Ripl, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 13 (2021), Adam Kelly, Dorien Clark
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
The Trade Secrecy Standard For Patent Prior Art, Camilla A. Hrdy, Sharon K. Sandeen
The Trade Secrecy Standard For Patent Prior Art, Camilla A. Hrdy, Sharon K. Sandeen
American University Law Review
A fundamental criterion of patentability is that an invention must be new as compared to the prior art—the corpus of preexisting knowledge and technology already available to the public. If an invention is in the prior art, or rendered obvious by it, it cannot be patented.
The U.S. Patent Act has traditionally envisioned a categorical approach for deciding what counts as prior art. Under this approach, courts are supposed to decide whether a particular disclosure about the invention (a reference) falls within one of the categories listed in Section 102 of the Patent Act, such as “described in a printed …
Who Killed The Radio Star? How Music Blanket Licensing Distorts The Production Of Creative Content In Radio, Ariel Katz, Eden Sarid
Who Killed The Radio Star? How Music Blanket Licensing Distorts The Production Of Creative Content In Radio, Ariel Katz, Eden Sarid
American University Law Review
According to popular and scholarly belief, video killed the radio star. The golden age of radio, culminating in the 1930s and 1940s, was gone with the rise of television in the 1950s and 1960s. In this Article, we advance the claim that television’s role in the “death” of the radio star has been more limited than commonly believed. A major culprit, we argue, is the common licensing practice of musical content for broadcasting, or more precisely, the blanket license issued by copyright collective management organizations (CMOs). By setting a zero marginal price for broadcasting additional songs from the CMO’s repertoire, …
Whole Designs, Sarah Burstein
Whole Designs, Sarah Burstein
University of Colorado Law Review
In the past decade, there has been a renewed interest in the concept of patentable subject matter-that is, what kinds of things can you get a patent for? But this attention has, to date, been focused on utility patents, the patents that protect how things work. There has been scant attention paid to statutory subject matter and design patents, the patents that protect how things look. These patents have gained prominence in both practice and scholarship since the $1 billion verdict in Apple v. Samsung. The time has come to take the question of design patentable subject matter seriously. Today, …
Trademarks In Conversation: Assessing Genericism After Booking.Com, Laura A. Heymann
Trademarks In Conversation: Assessing Genericism After Booking.Com, Laura A. Heymann
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
It is a fundamental principle of U.S. trademark law that to serve as a trademark, a word or phrase must "indicate the source" of the goods or services with which it is associated and, conversely, that a term that is understood to be the common name of a good or service is "generic" and cannot be protected as a trademark. Yet it still seems difficult to determine exactly what each concept means, particularly when the actual "source" of any goods or services might be opaque to consumers.
In part, this difficulty comes from the fact that status as a trademark …
Bertillonage In An Age Of Surveillance: Fourth Amendment Regulation Of Facial Recognition Technologies, David C. Gray
Bertillonage In An Age Of Surveillance: Fourth Amendment Regulation Of Facial Recognition Technologies, David C. Gray
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
The Fourth Amendment is a closed hydraulic system. As a general rule, if government conduct is deemed a “search” under the Fourth Amendment, then agents must secure a warrant from a detached and neutral magistrate before engaging in that conduct. There are exceptions, of course, but they just shift the pressure into another valve. Officers who conduct searches based on their own initiative must show not only probable cause, but also good reasons why, in their circumstances, they were not required to get a warrant.
One consequence of these Fourth Amendment hydraulics is a reluctance on the part of the …
Covid-19: Legal Framework For Vaccine Distributions And Mandates, Dana B. Taschner, Ashley Atwood
Covid-19: Legal Framework For Vaccine Distributions And Mandates, Dana B. Taschner, Ashley Atwood
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
The COVID-19 pandemic has created heightened turmoil for at-risk populations, solidified laws allowing the use of mask mandates, raised legal issues surrounding vaccine mandates, and presented the new issue of a vaccine passport. As a nation, we have failed to implement vaccination schemes that properly protect vulnerable populations. Specifically, the homeless population has been overlooked, creating an additional layer of hardship, and contributing to greater community spread. This article contemplates the various methods by which an equitable vaccination scheme could have been achieved and the division of powers that created complications.
Additionally, the legality of vaccine mandates is discussed, and …
Q: Can Booking.Com Be Trademarked? A: Booking.Yeah, Samantha Favela
Q: Can Booking.Com Be Trademarked? A: Booking.Yeah, Samantha Favela
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
By choosing a generic Internet domain as a brand name, that brand can hit the Internet jackpot. But the popularity and use of a generic domain name creates tension with trademark law. While companies want to be easily found on the Internet, they also want to protect themselves from competitors. This Case Note argues that the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States Patent & Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V. is the best possible outcome in protecting brand’s rights and balancing trademark law principles. Through the analysis of past cases, the Supreme Court decision in Booking.com itself, and trademark law principles, …