Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

Antibody Claims And The Evolution Of The Written Description/Enablement Requirement, S Sean Tu, Christopher M. Holman

Faculty Works

No abstract provided.

Olympians As Laborers: How Unionizing Can Help Athletes Bargain For Compensation And Better Structural Support, Sherif Farrag

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

Team USA athletes suffer poor structural support and inadequate compensation despite constituting irreplaceable labor for the multi-billion-dollar Olympic sports industry. This poor support is evident in recent complaints made by Olympic stars of the poor mental health support provided by the United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee and in its failure to prevent nearly two decades of sexual abuse perpetrated on USA Gymnastics gymnasts. The inadequate compensation is apparent as athletes continue to receive no wages for their participation in the Olympics or Olympic-sanctioned events, generally struggle financially, and face restrictions on licensing their name, image, and likeness to partners …

Face The Facts, Or Is The Face A Fact?: Biometric Privacy In Publicly Available Data, Daniel Levin

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

Recent advances in biometric technologies have caused a stir among the privacy community. Specifically, facial recognition technologies facilitated through data scraping practices have called into question the basic precepts we had around exercising biometric privacy. Yet, in spite of emerging case law on the permissibility of data scraping, comparatively little attention has been given to the privacy implications endemic to such practices.

On the one hand, privacy proponents espouse the view that manipulating publicly available data from, for example, our social media profiles, derogates from users’ expectations around the kind of data they share with platforms (and the obligations such …

Failed Analogies: Justice Thomas’S Concurrence In Biden V. Knight First Amendment Institute, Sarah S. Seo

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

Twenty-six years ago, twenty-six words created the internet. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is a short, yet powerful, provision that notably protects social media platforms, among other interactive computer services, from liability for content created by third-party users. At the time of its enactment, Section 230 aimed to encourage the robust growth of the then-nascent internet while protecting it from government regulation. More recently, however, it has been wielded by Big Tech companies like Twitter and Facebook to prevent any liability for real-world harms that stem from virtual interactions conducted over their platforms.

Although the Supreme Court has …

Algorithms And Misinformation: The Constitutional Implications Of Regulating Microtargeting, Talia Bulka

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

The increased popularity of social media in recent years has brought with it unwanted consequences. Most notably, the world is experiencing a widespread epidemic of online misinformation and disinformation. In the form of news stories and advertisements, false information about candidates like Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Donald Trump has spread over Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok. Since false information is often more sensational than the truth, this information is reposted and shared until it reaches millions of people. However, the real culprit of this misinformation phenomenon is microtargeting—algorithms that exploit users’ personal information and previous media interactions to target …

I See Dead Patents: How Bugs In The Patent System Keep Expired Patents Alive, Dinis Cheian

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

One of the most important days in the life of a patent is the day it dies.

The moment a patent dies, the patent owner loses her monopoly over her invention, ending the stream of income generated by that patent. Without an enforceable patent to protect the invention, the competitors and public can freely buy and sell copycat products that compete with the patent owner’s. Consumers reap the rewards in the form of more options and lower prices.

Normally, those potential competitors must wait exactly twenty years from the date the patent application is filed with the United States Patent …

Duty Of Disclosure -- Time To Reconsider After The Dawn Of The Information Age, David R. Soucy Esq.

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

Intellectual Property Rights As A Barrier For Developing Countries To Access A Covid-19 Vaccine, Kristina Frkovic

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

Reconstruction Of The Reasonable Person Standard Under Chinese Patent Law, Weihong Yao, Robert H. Hu

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

Patching The Data Security Blanket: How A Stronger, Collaborative Ftc Is The Answer Right Under Our Nose, Jose A. Gonzalez Lopez

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

When Copyright Law Meet Anonymous Street Art, Breanna M. Moe

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

Sabermetrics And Patents?: Open Source, Property Protections, And Alice V. Cls Bank, Keegan L. Rand

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

Incessant Influence: Social Networking Sites Are Utilizing Patented Technology To Commandeer Human Emotion And Behavior, Mirna N. Bazi

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

Justice Breyer And Intellectual Property Law, Daniel Sievert

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

When Love Ends: The Division Of Copyright Between Spouses, Tal Itkin

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

A Machete For The Patent Thicket: Using Noerr-Pennington Doctrine’S Sham Exception To Challenge Abusive Patent Tactics By Pharmaceutical Companies, Lisa Orucevic

Vanderbilt Law Review

Outrageous drug prices have dominated news coverage of the American healthcare system for years. Yet despite widespread condemnation of skyrocketing drug prices, nothing seems to change. Pharmaceutical companies can raise drug prices with impunity because they hold patents on their drugs, which give them monopolies. These monopolies are only supposed to last twenty years, and then competing lower-cost drugs like generics can enter the market, driving down the costs of pharmaceuticals for all. But pharmaceutical companies have created “patent thickets,” dense webs of overlapping patents surrounding one drug, which have artificially extended the companies’ monopolies for years or even decades …

A Tale Of Four Decades: Lessons From Uspto Trademark Prosecution Data, Deborah Gerhardt, Jon J. Lee

Faculty Articles

No abstract provided.

Unauthorized And Unwise: The Lawful Use Requirement In Trademark Law, Robert A. Mikos

Vanderbilt Law Review

For decades, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) has required trademark owners to comply with sundry nontrademark laws governing the sale of their trademarked goods and services. Pursuant to this “lawful use requirement,” the Agency has refused or even cancelled registration of thousands of marks used on everything from Schedule I controlled substances to mislabeled soap. This Article subjects the Agency’s lawful use requirement to long-overdue scrutiny. It suggests that in requiring compliance with other laws for registration, the PTO has lost sight of the one statute it is supposed to administer. In the process, the Agency has …

Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Table of Contents

Covax: A Primer To International Efforts In Vaccine Distribution And Inequities, Diane Desierto

Journal Articles

I have a slightly different view from Dr. Oke in regard to his doubts regarding the utility of a waiver. To the extent that the precedent that we are looking at is whether or not there could be a waiver for countries that lack domestic manufacturing capabilities, to instead import a cheaper generic drug of the Covid vaccines that could be produced in other countries, mainly the particular hubs, such as in India and China, that is still an open question, and part of the proposal that is up before the TRIPS council involves that dimension and that aspect of …

Implementing Data Protection By Design In The Ed Tech Context: What Is The Role Of Technology Providers?, Liane Colonna

Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet

This article explores the specific roles and responsibilities of technology providers when it comes to implementing Data Protection by Design (“DPbD”) and Data Protection by Default (“DPbDf”). As an example, it looks at the Education Technology (“Ed Tech”) sector and the complexities of the supply chains that exist therein to highlight that, in addition to the Higher Education (“HE”) institutions that procure products and services for advancing teaching and learning, Ed Tech vendors may also have responsibility and liability for the processing of student’s personal data. Ultimately, this paper asks whether there are any legal gaps, ambiguities, or normative conflicts …

The Promise Of Patent-Backed Finance For Smes And Universities, And Shifting Patent Eligible Subject Matter, Michael S. Mireles, Mattias Karlsson Dinnetz

McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles

This Article reviews and addresses some of the problems concerning adequate capital to develop patented inventions and products, and inhibiting the widespread use of patents to raise financing.

The Article divides the IP finance market into three separate, but interrelated markets and analyzes problems, including U.S. patent-eligible subject matter doctrine, within those markets impeding patent backed financing. The Article provides numerous proposals, some of which are in the literature, and calls for additional research for addressing the issues.

Patent Reality Checks: Eliminating Patents On Fake, Impossible And Other Inoperative Inventions, Jorge L. Contreras

Utah Law Faculty Scholarship

The recent assertion of patents originally held by Theranos, the defunct blood analysis company whose founders are under federal indictment for fraud, highlights the existence of patents that might claim non-existent or inoperative inventions. While such patents may ultimately be subject to validity challenges in court, their issuance nevertheless has harmful effects on markets and innovation. I propose several administrative and legislative measures directed toward the elimination of patents claiming inoperative inventions including (1) increasing USPTO efforts to detect potentially inoperable inventions, (2) heightening examination requirements, including a certification of enablement, for certain inventions, (3) enabling greater public input into …

Certification (And) Marks – Understanding Usage And Practices Among Standards Organizations, Brad Biddle, Vigdis Bronder, Jorge L. Contreras

Utah Law Faculty Scholarship

In addition to creating technical standards that describe how different products or services interoperate, many standards development organizations (SDOs) also perform testing services that are designed to ensure that products that ostensibly comply with a standard actually work together. SDOs frequently call this process “certification,” and authorize implementers that pass the testing process to use a logo or similar mark. Certification marks are a type of trademark that would seem to be tailor-made for this process. Our empirical analysis shows that SDOs use certification marks only relatively rarely, however. This dissonance is striking, providing insight into both the remarkably sophisticated …

Balance And Standardization: Implications For Competition And Antitrust Analysis, Justus Baron, Jorge L. Contreras, Pierre Larouche

Utah Law Faculty Scholarship

Most technical standards development organizations (SDOs) have adopted internal policies embodying “due process” criteria such as openness, balance of interests, consensus decision making, and appeals. Unlike other aspects of SDO governance, relatively little scholarly research has considered the history, scope, and interpretation of SDO balance requirements. Likewise, existing case law and agency guidance offer little assistance in understanding precisely how these balance principles translate into specific antitrust requirements that apply to standards development. Given the absence of specific guidance on the meaning and implications of balance requirements for SDOs under the antitrust laws, it is necessary to review the development …

Copyright Neutrality? Lessons From Mein Kampf, Michal Shur-Ofry, Noy Lion

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

This Article explores the copyright story of Hitler's Mein Kampf over the past century and uses this case study to shed new light on one of copyright's foundational doctrines: the principle of copyright neutrality. Relying on primary archival materials from German archives, combined with legal proceedings from the 1930s onwards, secondary historical sources, and in-depth interviews, we trace the copyright trails of Mein Kampf across several jurisdictions and periods of time. This intricate inquiry unravels the surprisingly central role that copyright played in spreading the Nazi ideology and illuminates a structural imbalance within the neutrality principle, which may legitimize and …

Will Nfts Solve Some Of The Age-Old Problems In Art Law?, Ursula Von Schlenhenried

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

Non-Fungible Tokens, or NFTs, are digital assets based on blockchain technology and are steadily growing in popularity in the art market. The technology has created a novel way of establishing ownership through tamper-resistant cryptographic records. A majority of NFTs are created via the Ethereum protocol and are most notably associated with other assets, such as digital art. Even prominent auction houses, like Christie’s, have joined the action. NFTs offer a whole host of new and interesting legal concerns, including questions surrounding smart contracts. The concerns surrounding traditional art, however, are long-standing and include (but are not limited to) provenance, authenticity, …

Cryptocurrency And Security Issues: The Tide Awaiting Ripple’S Decision, Robel Tsegu

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

Bitcoin passed the test. Ethereum passed the test. Now, it is XRP’s turn. At the time of this writing, the SEC has the opportunity, through common law, to determine how to regulate the unregulated cryptocurrency world. This is a unique moment because guidance on SEC violations is usually promulgated through statutes, no-action letters, and quotes from SEC Commissioners, rather than common law. Therefore, the decision in SEC v. Ripple will pivot the direction on how cryptocurrencies and digital assets forever be used. Will this pivot be a “hard” or “soft” fork in how we use cryptocurrencies?

This Case Note argues …

The Mysteries Of Nft Taxation And The Problem Of Crypto Asset Tax Evasion, Amy Q. Nguyen

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

Cryptocurrencies have long captured the attention of the financial world, revolutionizing how the world does business by providing virtually costless transactions. More recently, however, a new digital token has taken its place on the world stage. Known as NFTs, non-fungible tokens have allowed for the reinvention of modern finance infrastructure consisting of sophisticated trading and loaning systems for different asset types. Despite cryptocurrencies’ and NFTs’ novelty and popularity, they are not immune to the U.S. Tax Code. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has provided guidance on the tax framework of cryptocurrencies, but the taxation of NFTs is still relatively unclear, …

Reverse Confusion And The Justification Of Trademark Protection, Jeremy N. Sheff

Faculty Publications

Theories of private law are dominated by welfarist normative frameworks, and trademark law is no exception. One such framework—the “search costs” theory associated with the Chicago School of law and economics—has long been the primary accepted justification for trademark rights. However, this theory fails to account for numerous features of actual trademark doctrine, as earlier scholarship has shown. This Article demonstrates how one underexamined area of trademark law—reverse confusion liability— is a similarly poor fit with the predictions and prescriptions of conventional economic theory. Plausible economic theories of trademark rights would either refuse to impose liability in reverse confusion cases …