Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (3052)
- Science and Technology Law (2867)
- Internet Law (1909)
- Computer Law (1599)
- Communications Law (1422)
-
- International Law (1149)
- International Trade Law (1091)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (946)
- Privacy Law (898)
- Constitutional Law (813)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (802)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (706)
- Health Law and Policy (691)
- Law and Society (680)
- Litigation (612)
- Food and Drug Law (611)
- First Amendment (601)
- Legislation (583)
- Law and Economics (544)
- Library and Information Science (540)
- Human Rights Law (530)
- Courts (506)
- Administrative Law (505)
- Commercial Law (501)
- Contracts (495)
- Environmental Law (482)
- Cultural Heritage Law (465)
- Agriculture Law (446)
- Institution
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (984)
- Fordham Law School (980)
- UC Law SF (879)
- UIC School of Law (829)
- American University Washington College of Law (815)
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (660)
- University of Michigan Law School (595)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (520)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (431)
- University of Washington School of Law (403)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (393)
- Marquette University Law School (385)
- Boston University School of Law (363)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (358)
- Seattle University School of Law (355)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (350)
- Santa Clara Law (328)
- University of Richmond (322)
- Columbia Law School (314)
- Duke Law (302)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (282)
- William & Mary Law School (267)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (252)
- The University of Akron (208)
- Southern Methodist University (202)
- Universitas Indonesia (183)
- University of New Hampshire (179)
- Georgetown University Law Center (176)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (164)
- BLR (163)
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (2091)
- Intellectual property (1577)
- Patent (871)
- Patents (757)
- Trademark (599)
-
- Patent law (550)
- Copyright law (533)
- Intellectual Property (414)
- Fair use (372)
- Technology (369)
- Intellectual Property Law (354)
- Infringement (298)
- Internet (298)
- Copyright infringement (287)
- Law (249)
- Innovation (233)
- Trademarks (213)
- Lanham Act (207)
- Copyright Act (197)
- Antitrust (187)
- First Amendment (185)
- Licensing (181)
- IP (179)
- Trademark law (170)
- Google (165)
- Federal Circuit (159)
- Patent infringement (154)
- Software (150)
- Privacy (143)
- Artificial intelligence (141)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1115)
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (846)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (823)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (550)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (495)
-
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law (467)
- Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. (374)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (355)
- Articles (313)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (309)
- Faculty Publications (281)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (273)
- Seattle University Law Review (236)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (233)
- Michigan Law Review (229)
- Scholarly Works (185)
- Cardozo Law Review (181)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (180)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (173)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (158)
- ExpressO (157)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (150)
- Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix) (147)
- SMU Science and Technology Law Review (146)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (143)
- Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal (143)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (142)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (138)
- Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series (134)
- Law Faculty Publications (132)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2311 - 2340 of 17083
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Rethinking Equitable Estoppel In Patent Law, Joshua J. Lustig
Rethinking Equitable Estoppel In Patent Law, Joshua J. Lustig
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
In almost every context, the Federal Circuit has used estoppel doctrines to provide protection to parties from some sort of injustice. Yet recently, with equitable estoppel, the Federal Circuit has decided to infuse concepts of Article III justiciability to justify limiting the doctrine as only applicable to issued patents. In doing so, the Federal Circuit has ignored the long history behind equitable estoppel in favor of a rule that is improperly rationalized by the Constitution. This note argues that Federal Circuit's recent equitable estoppel jurisprudence is inconsistent with equity's goal of fairness and presents a new theory of equitable estoppel …
Overqualified And Underrepresented: Gender Inequality In Pharmaceutical Patent Law, S. Sean Tu, Paul R. Gugliuzza, Amy Semet
Overqualified And Underrepresented: Gender Inequality In Pharmaceutical Patent Law, S. Sean Tu, Paul R. Gugliuzza, Amy Semet
BYU Law Review
Pharmaceutical patents represent some of the most valuable intellectual property assets in the world: they can be worth billions of dollars if courts uphold their validity and find them infringed. But, if invalidated, generic drug manufacturers can get to market earlier, generating billions of dollars of revenue for themselves and creating enormous savings for consumers. Accordingly, drug patents are the product of careful, high-cost prosecution and are associated with high-stakes, bet-the-company litigation.
But women lawyers are noticeably absent from pharmaceutical patent practice. This article reports an original empirical study finding that women comprise only one-third of the top pharmaceutical patent …
Data Quality Assurance At Research Data Repositories, Maxi Kindling, Dorothea Strecker
Data Quality Assurance At Research Data Repositories, Maxi Kindling, Dorothea Strecker
Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.
This paper presents findings from a survey on the status quo of data quality assurance practices at research data repositories.
The personalised online survey was conducted among repositories indexed in re3data in 2021. It covered the scope of the repository, types of data quality assessment, quality criteria, responsibilities, details of the review process, and data quality information and yielded 332 complete responses.
The results demonstrate that most repositories perform data quality assurance measures, and overall, research data repositories significantly contribute to data quality. Quality assurance at research data repositories is multifaceted and nonlinear, and although there are some common patterns, …
The Impact Of Library Publishing Through The Lens Of The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, Marie O'Neill
The Impact Of Library Publishing Through The Lens Of The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, Marie O'Neill
Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.
Abstract
As library publishing programmes expand around the world, reports and research pertaining to standards and workflows have proliferated. This paper calls for library publishing programmes to explore the impact of their pogrammes at local, national and international level in relation to their contribution to open access publishing, EDI agendas and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The presentation highlights the UN's SDG Publishers Compact and argues that the SDGs are an ideal lens through which library publishers could examine their impact as library publishers have a strong publishing record in areas such as gender, education and climate as examples.
The Intersection Of Data Science, Tech And Law, Cardozo Law And Data Science Society, Cardozo Business Law Society, Cardozo Antitrust Society, Cardozo Intellectual Property Law Society (Ipls)
The Intersection Of Data Science, Tech And Law, Cardozo Law And Data Science Society, Cardozo Business Law Society, Cardozo Antitrust Society, Cardozo Intellectual Property Law Society (Ipls)
2022–2023 Flyers
No abstract provided.
Intellectual Property & Information Law Fall 2022 Speaker Series, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law
Intellectual Property & Information Law Fall 2022 Speaker Series, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law
2022–2023 Flyers
Join us for a conversation with Jonathan Herstoff, Partner at the law firm of Haug Partners LLP (formerly Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP).
Centering Black Women In Patent History, Jessica Silbey
Centering Black Women In Patent History, Jessica Silbey
Faculty Scholarship
Professor Kara Swanson’s latest article is a remarkable example of legal historical scholarship that excavates stories from the past to illuminate the present. It is chock full of archival evidence and historical analysis that explains gaps and silences in the United States patent registry as evidence of marginalized inventors–particularly Black women–who should be named inventors but are not.
The article is arresting reading for anyone interested in antebellum history, intellectual property, and the intersection of racism and sexism in law. Mostly, I am grateful to Professor Swanson for doing the obviously very hard work of digging through archives, reading microfiche, …
Marshalling Copyright Knowledge To Understand Four Decades Of Berne, Peter K. Yu
Marshalling Copyright Knowledge To Understand Four Decades Of Berne, Peter K. Yu
IP Theory
In the year 1978, the 1976 Copyright Act had just entered into effect. Marshall Leaffer, whom this article will affectionately refer to by his first name, had just completed his duties as an attorney advisor at the U.S. Copyright Office. On his way to academia, he, like the fictional character Captain William “Buck” Rogers, was to experience cosmic forces beyond all comprehension. In a freak mishap, his car veered off a rarely used mountain road and was frozen by temperatures beyond imagination. He did not return to academia until more than forty years later. What will he discover upon his …
Automatic Takedowns: How Contentid Has Changed Copyright Enforcement, Cardozo Fame Center, Cardozo Entertainment Law Society, Cardozo Intellectual Property Law Society
Automatic Takedowns: How Contentid Has Changed Copyright Enforcement, Cardozo Fame Center, Cardozo Entertainment Law Society, Cardozo Intellectual Property Law Society
2022–2023 Flyers
No abstract provided.
Community Forum On The 2022 Ostp Public Access Policy Guidance [Presentation Slides], White House Office Of Science And Technology Policy
Community Forum On The 2022 Ostp Public Access Policy Guidance [Presentation Slides], White House Office Of Science And Technology Policy
Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.
Included:
● Public access background and context
● Summary of the 2022 OSTP Memorandum
● Clarification about the scope of the 2022 OSTP Memorandum
● Timeline for agency adoption of the 2022 OSTP Memorandum
● Agency perspectives: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS)
● Questions and answers
Against Secondary Meaning, Jeanne C. Fromer
Against Secondary Meaning, Jeanne C. Fromer
Notre Dame Law Review
Trademark law premises protection and scope of marks on secondary meaning, which is established when a mark develops sufficient association to consumers with a business as a source of goods or services in addition to the mark’s linguistic primary meaning. In recent years, scholars have proposed that secondary meaning plays an even more central role in trademark law than it already does. Yet enshrining secondary meaning in the law undermines the ultimate goals of trademark law: promoting fair competition and protecting consumers. The dangers of enshrining secondary meaning include the problematic doctrine that has built up to assess it or …
The Status Of Reproduction Rights Organisations (Rros) In Africa, Desmond Oriakhogba, Dick Kawooya
The Status Of Reproduction Rights Organisations (Rros) In Africa, Desmond Oriakhogba, Dick Kawooya
Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series
This report is based on desk research conducted from June 2021 to May 2022 by way of a survey of publicly available information on Reproduction Rights Organisations (RROs) in all 55 African Union (AU) member states. It is the first of a two-part study. The second part of the study will be conducted as empirical research where data will be obtained from relevant stakeholders in the collective management systems of African countries to address key issues flagged in this report as requiring further evidence.
This report examines the current status of RROs in Africa to help inform policy and legislative …
The 14th Annual Sir Hugh Laddie Lecture - Mr. Justice Laddie And His Intellectual Property Cases: Of Millefeuilles And A Fish Called Elvis, David Vaver
Articles & Book Chapters
For me, it was a trip through the judgments of a master craftsman who could succinctly summarize the dispute before him; weigh the conflicting evidence; say what rang true and what did not; state the applicable law, often from first principles set in their historical and policy context; and end by saying who won and lost and what to do. Copyright law might be "over-strong", as he suggested in a 1996 lecture;14 but when he had to decide whether a TV documentary critical of cheque-book journalism could freely use another channel's footage to make its point, Laddie J. said his …
Proving Copying, Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Peter S. Menell
Proving Copying, Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Peter S. Menell
William & Mary Law Review
Proof that a defendant actually copied from a copyrighted work is a critical part of a claim for copyright infringement. Indeed, absent such copying, there is no infringement. The most common method of proving copying involves the use of circumstantial evidence, consisting of proof that a defendant had “access” to the protected work, and a showing of “similarities” between the copy and the protected work. In inferring copying from the combination of such evidence, courts have for many decades developed a framework known as the “inverse ratio rule,” which allows them to modulate the level of proof needed on access …
Infringement Or Identification?: Nominative Fair Use And The Resale Of Luxury Goods, Jordan Phelan
Infringement Or Identification?: Nominative Fair Use And The Resale Of Luxury Goods, Jordan Phelan
Fordham Law Review
The market for luxury resale is booming and is predicted to continue its massive growth. Luxury resellers typically market and describe goods using the luxury brand’s trademarks, including the brand name and logos. Luxury brands utilize their market power to “bully” smaller resellers and often take issue with third parties using their trademarks in any context, even when the use of the mark does not encroach on the luxury brand’s share of the market. However, the doctrine of nominative fair use allows the use of a brand’s trademark when referring to that brand’s goods. An alleged infringer will be found …
The Value In Secrecy, Camilla A. Hrdy
The Value In Secrecy, Camilla A. Hrdy
Fordham Law Review
Trade secret law is seen as the most inclusive of intellectual property regimes. So long as information can be kept secret, the wisdom goes, it can be protected under trade secret law, even if patent and copyright protections are unavailable. But keeping it a secret does not magically transform information into a trade secret. The information must also derive economic value from being kept secret from others. This elusive statutory requirement—called “independent economic value”—might at first glance seem redundant, especially in the context of litigation. After all, if information had no value, why would the plaintiff have bothered to keep …
Discretionary Denial Of Inter Partes Review And The Patent Trial And Appeal Board, Xinni Cai
Discretionary Denial Of Inter Partes Review And The Patent Trial And Appeal Board, Xinni Cai
Fordham Law Review
The inter partes review (IPR) is an administrative procedure conducted by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), an adjudicative body within the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). IPR provides an opportunity for third parties to challenge a patent’s validity after it has already been granted. A petitioner can file a petition with the PTAB to “institute” IPR. If the review is instituted, the PTAB considers the evidence presented and issues a final written decision, either holding the patent valid or striking it down as invalid. Although IPR was introduced as an alternative to litigation, it is often used …
Marshalling Copyright Knowledge To Understand Four Decades Of Berne, Peter K. Yu
Marshalling Copyright Knowledge To Understand Four Decades Of Berne, Peter K. Yu
Faculty Scholarship
In the year 1978, the 1976 Copyright Act had just entered into effect. Marshall Leaffer, whom this article will affectionately refer to by his first name, had just completed his duties as an attorney advisor at the U.S. Copyright Office. On his way to academia, he, like the fictional character Captain William “Buck” Rogers, was to experience cosmic forces beyond all comprehension. In a freak mishap, his car veered off a rarely used mountain road and was frozen by temperatures beyond imagination. He did not return to academia until more than forty years later. What will he discover upon his …
Path Choice Of Algorithm Intellectual Property Protection, Yulu Jin, Youdan Xiao
Path Choice Of Algorithm Intellectual Property Protection, Yulu Jin, Youdan Xiao
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)
Protection of algorithm by intellectual property is a powerful way to stimulate innovation and regulate the risk of the algorithm. Algorithm that can be protected by intellectual property right is the program algorithm, which is compiled in computer language, in the form of coded instruction sequence, run by the computer and produce independent rational value results. The article is combed out that there are drawbacks to the traditional path of IP to protect program algorithms:it has conflict between program algorithm and copyright law system; the trade secret path is at odds with program algorithmic governance; and program algorithm can hardly …
Providing Farmers With The Legal Tools Needed To Keep The Equipment Running: An Update On The Agricultural Right To Repair Movement, Greg Nies, Bruce Elder
Providing Farmers With The Legal Tools Needed To Keep The Equipment Running: An Update On The Agricultural Right To Repair Movement, Greg Nies, Bruce Elder
Mountain Plains Business Conference
This presentation examines and summarizes the right to repair movement from the perspective of its origins, development, legal basis and – most significantly – its unique manifestation within an agriculture perspective. The agricultural equipment sector is more concentrated and less competitive than many other industries, while the typical farmer remains fiercely independent and self-reliant. This unique situation has led to conflict, forming the basis of the current agricultural right to repair dispute. Accordingly, the current state of the agricultural right to repair movement is examined and explained based on the recent policy, legislation, and litigation efforts employed at federal and …
Life After Google V. Oracle: Three Reflections On A Theme, Daryl Lim
Life After Google V. Oracle: Three Reflections On A Theme, Daryl Lim
IP Theory
In 2004, Professor Leaffer published an article titled Life after Eldred: The Supreme Court and the Future of Copyright. He wrote about three cases decided in or after 2001 to provide a snapshot of the Supreme Court’s position on copyright issues. This Article discusses three reflections on this theme. The first reflection flows directly from Google. It discusses fair use in Andy Warhol Found. for Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith, as well as text and data mining for artificial intelligence uses. This Article then reflects on Arnstein v. Porter’s lessons for modern copyright infringement law. Finally, it reflects on the …
Brief Of Patent Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioners, Christa J. Laser
Brief Of Patent Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioners, Christa J. Laser
Law Faculty Briefs and Court Documents
This Court should reverse the Federal Circuit and hold that IPR estoppel extends only to grounds that were raised or could have been raised during the IPR proceeding. Estoppel would therefore extend to instituted grounds, whether raised during the proceeding or not. Estoppel would not extend to uninstituted grounds, such as grounds which might have been challenged in the petition for review but were not.
Reconciling Copyright "Restoration" For Pre-1972 Foreign Sound Recordings With The Classics Protection And Access Act, Tyler T. Ochoa
Reconciling Copyright "Restoration" For Pre-1972 Foreign Sound Recordings With The Classics Protection And Access Act, Tyler T. Ochoa
IP Theory
When Congress first added sound recordings to the Copyright Act, it acted prospectively only: sound recordings fixed on or after February 15, 1972, received federal statutory copyright protection, while sound recordings fixed before February 15, 1972, were left to the vagaries of state law. This historic inequity was corrected in 2018 with enactment of the Classics Protection and Access Act (CPA), which provides sui generis protection to pre-1972 sound recordings that is similar, but not identical, to federal copyright protection. But there is a subset of pre-1972 sound recordings that already had federal copyright protection before the CPA was enacted: …
Research Exceptions In Comparative Copyright, Sean Flynn, Luca Schirru, Michael Palmedo, Andrés Izquierdo
Research Exceptions In Comparative Copyright, Sean Flynn, Luca Schirru, Michael Palmedo, Andrés Izquierdo
Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series
This Article categorizes the world’s copyright laws according to the degree to which they provide exceptions to copyright exclusivity for research uses. We classify countries based on the degree to which they have a research exception in their law that is sufficiently open to be able to permit reproduction and communications of copyrighted work needed for academic (i.e. non-commercial) text and data mining (TDM) research. We show that nearly every copyright law has at least one exception that promotes uses for research purposes. We find six different approaches to the provision of research exceptions that implicate application to TDM. Notably, …
Myles Away From Perfect: The Potential Impact On Nil Deals Following Lsu Quarterback’S Retirement, Brian Ahle
Myles Away From Perfect: The Potential Impact On Nil Deals Following Lsu Quarterback’S Retirement, Brian Ahle
SLU Law Journal Online
Just prior to the 2022 College Football Season, Louisiana State University Quarterback Myles Brennan decided to abruptly retire from football. Despite the unexpected finish to his career, Brennan is still going to likely retain all of the money he received in endorsements that were paid through the newly approved “NIL” deals available to collegiate athletes, as a result of a stipulation that these deals cannot be “performance-based”. In this article, Brian Ahle evaluates the potential ways in which endorsers may be able to protect their investments, while still complying with the NIL Policies that provide protections towards the athletes.
Countering Personalized Speech, Leon G. Ho
Countering Personalized Speech, Leon G. Ho
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
Social media platforms use personalization algorithms to make content curation decisions for each end user. These personalized recommendation decisions are essentially speech conveying a platform's predictions on content relevance for each end user. Yet, they are causing some of the worst problems on the internet. First, they facilitate the precipitous spread of mis- and disinformation by exploiting the very same biases and insecurities that drive end user engagement with such content. Second, they exacerbate social media addiction and related mental health harms by leveraging users' affective needs to drive engagement to greater and greater heights. Lastly, they erode end user …
Tokenized: The Law Of Non-Fungible Tokens And Unique Digital Property, Joshua A.T. Fairfield
Tokenized: The Law Of Non-Fungible Tokens And Unique Digital Property, Joshua A.T. Fairfield
Indiana Law Journal
Markets for unique digital property—digital equivalents of rare artworks, collectible trading cards, and other assets that gain value from scarcity—have exploded in the past few years. At root is the next iteration of blockchain technology, unique digital assets called non-fungible tokens. Unlike bitcoin, where one coin is the same as another, NFTs are unique, each with different attributes. An NFT that represented ownership of Boardwalk would be quite different from one that represented Baltic Avenue.
NFTs have grown from a few early breakout successes to a rapidly developing market for unique digital treasures. The attraction to buyers is that, unlike …
Check Your Bank Account First: Examining Copyright Formalities And Remedies Through A Race Conscious Lens, Emma Burri
Check Your Bank Account First: Examining Copyright Formalities And Remedies Through A Race Conscious Lens, Emma Burri
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
This Note examines copyright formalities through a race conscious lens and concludes that further change is necessary given the legacy of economic inequality that communities of color experience. It examines the history of copyright formalities in the United States and the disenfranchisement of Black musical creators through the theft of their intellectual property. In exploring the relationship between race, wealth, and musical copyright protection this Note explains why considering the economic inequality is relevant to ensure copyright protection for Black creators. This Note proposes abolishing the registration timeline for certain remedies and altering the filing fee structure of the copyright …
Comments On Preliminary Draft 8 [Black Letter And Comments], Jane C. Ginsburg
Comments On Preliminary Draft 8 [Black Letter And Comments], Jane C. Ginsburg
Faculty Scholarship
PD8 represents a great deal of labor, for which the Reporters deserve recognition. As detailed below, however, PD8’s occasional departures from or omissions of statutory text may not only be misleading or confusing, but – as has been the case with prior drafts – often have the result, if not the purpose, of whittling down the scope of copyright protection. In addition to identifying those instances and explaining their consequences, the following comments will suggest clarifications to some of the Comments and Illustrations.
Creativity Without Ip? Vindication And Challenges In The Video Game Industry, Bj Ard
Creativity Without Ip? Vindication And Challenges In The Video Game Industry, Bj Ard
Washington and Lee Law Review
This Article intervenes in the longstanding debate over whether creative production is possible without exhaustive copyright protection. Intellectual property (IP) scholars have identified “negative spaces” like comedy and tattoo art where creativity thrives without IP, but critics dismiss these examples as niche. The video game industry allows for fresh headway. It is now the largest sector in entertainment—with revenues greater than Hollywood, streaming, and music combined—yet IP does not protect key game elements from duplication. Participants navigate this absence using non-IP strategies like those identified in negative-space industries: AAA developers invest in copy-resistant features while indie game developers rely on …