Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

A Trade-Off In Smart Contract Arbitration; Sacrificing Arbitrators’ Anonymity For Transparency?, Bahadir Köksal

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

The recent growth in blockchain usage has substantially affected the number of transactions executed via smart contracts. In parallel, the number of transactions will likely increase the number of disputes that arise from these smart transactions. Some innovative arbitration platforms have emerged in response to the urgent need for a tailor-made dispute resolution mechanism. These platforms tend to promote the anonymity of arbitrators because of their decentralized nature and secured proceedings. Does the anonymity of arbitrators’ identities and skills increase the transparency in smart contract arbitration? And to what extent can the anonymity of arbitrators be sacrificed for more transparent …

Innovator Ecosystem Diversity As A Global Competitiveness Imperative, Margo A. Bagley

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

Looking For Liability For Harmful Social Media Content And Cyberbullying After Gonzalez V. Google, Llc, Elizabeth M. Jaffe

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

A Questionable Categorization — Trademark's Struggle To Protect Tribal Cultural Property, Emilie (Smith) Rohde

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

Keeping It Wreal: How The Eleventh Circuit's Wreal Decision Is Better Suited For A Uniform Reverse Confusion Multifactor Analysis, Sean J. Flaherty

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

The Effects Of Section 101'S Subject Matter Eligibility Requirement On Fintech Patent Valuation Models, Fhernam Batiz

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

Withdrawing Lanham Act Section 2(C) Consent: What Should Courts Do?, Zachary R. Semancik

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

The dispute between Luka Dončić and his mother over his ability to withdraw consent to a trademark of his name revealed a gap in trademark law. This Comment explains the lack of legal guidance on how a court should rule if a person initially gives their consent to use their name as a trademark but later wishes to withdraw that consent. The Comment addresses two contrasting ideas. The first is the freedom to contract and the desire of courts to protect the voluntary consent of individuals to allow others to trademark their name. Alternatively, the Comment addresses the right of …

Protecting The Brand: Analyzing The Legal Landscape Of Negative Product Placements, Katie M. Brown, Sarah M. Brown, W. Eric Brown

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

Innovative Or Invalid: Amgen, Inc. V. Sanofi, Special Masters, & The Seventh Amendment Right To A Trial By Jury In Civil Proceedings, Nivory Gordon Iii

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

Solving The Consideration Problem In Non-Compete Agreements: Continued At-Will Employment Is Inadequate Consideration, Alexander H. Ferrone

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

What Is "Substantial Similarity"? Towards A Methodology For Reducing Subjectivity In Design Copyright Disputes, Robert Greenstreet, Karen Greenstreet

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

Dmca's Double Scienter Requirement: Allowing Intermediary Software Companies To Be Worry-Free In Making A Buck Off Another's Dime, Kayleigh Lemery

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

The First Amendment And Trademark Law: A Conflict Of Rights, Maia Hentges

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None

Ai, The New Frontier: An Analysis On Trademark Litigation Strategies In The Face Of Generative Artificial Intelligence, Melissa Biesmann

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

No abstract provided.

Territorial Intellectual Property Rights, Fhernam Batiz

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

No abstract provided.

Navigating The Game: Balancing Innovation And Intellectual Property Rights In Video Game Development, Alek Giecewicz

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

No abstract provided.

Precision Is Necessary In Patents, Twinkle Dutta

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Taylor Swift Effect And International Law, Katrin Kuhlmann

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour has come to an end, but the Taylor Swift Effect will remain a powerful force with influence well beyond even Swift herself. Often used to describe Swift’s economic impact through her fandom, it has become shorthand for the broader network effect that amplifies and extends the reach of her discography and cultural influence. As this article discusses, the Taylor Swift Effect has real implications for international relations and international law at a time when many nations are withdrawing from constructive international engagement, with devastating consequences in terms of global rights, liberties, and norms.

This article explores …

The Subsistence And Enforcement Of Copyright And Trademark Rights In The Metaverse, Cheng Lim Saw, Zheng Wen Samuel Chan

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

The metaverse has been widely hailed as a symbol of technological progress, presenting an immersive virtual realm that has the potential to transform how individuals engage in social and commercial activities. However, this conception of a borderless virtual world - which purportedly transcends the capabilities and reach of Web 2.0 - sits uncomfortably with the territorial nature of intellectual property rights. This chapter examines the complexities surrounding the subsistence and enforcement of intellectual property rights within the metaverse, with a specific focus on copyright and trademarks. Especial attention is paid to issues concerning choice of law and jurisdiction. Finally, the …

Navigating Copyright Law In A Digital World With An Analog Rulebook: Guidance For Visual Artists, Stephanie Moser

University of San Francisco Law Review

No abstract provided.

Data In Business & Society, Tabrez Y. Ebrahim

Lewis & Clark Law Review

Data, it is sometimes said, is the world’s new oil. Unlike the days when information was transmitted in print form, data is transmitted at the touch of a fingertip through the click of a mouse or a push of an icon on a phone app. Algorithms and computing systems have drastically expanded the scope, speed, and volume of access and use of data for consumers. Additionally, businesses, in variety of forms, including business-to-business, business-to-consumer, online, and even brick-and-mortar, have employed data to interact with other businesses and with consumers. Data has drastically expanded in use throughout business and society, and …

Non-Fungible Tokens (Nfts) And Copyright Law, Ochoa, Tyler T.

Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal

The concept of using non-fungible tokens (NFTs) to facilitate and authenticate sales of digital art dates back to 2014; but it took several years before the concept really captured public attention. Since copyright law governs the reproduction of works of art, including digital images, the connection to NFTs seems obvious. Yet, copyright law is only tangentially related to NFTs, for two reasons. First, buying an NFT does not, by itself, convey any rights to reproduce or display the work associated with that token. Instead, those rights are governed entirely by the contract that accompanies the sale. Second, minting and selling …

The Copyright Work Of Authorship, Hemnes, Thomas

Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal

The “work of authorship” lies at the heart of the Copyright Act of 1976. It is what copyright protects. Central though the concept is, the Act never defines what a work of authorship might be. According to the Act, it can be perceived in tangible fixations, but is distinct from the fixations. The Act also provides examples: writings, drawings, computer programs, but never describes how these might be distinguished from their fixations. Unlike the Patent Act, where “metes and bounds” of a patentable invention are defined by a patent’s claims, the Copyright Act provides no guidance as to what the …

Analysis Of Global Data Privacy Regulations And How Transnational Companies Are Impacted, Fujimori-Smith, Aska

Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal

Privacy regulations are being developed and altered globally. An American company working transnationally will want to make sure to comply with the privacy regulations of each country in which the company either conducts business or otherwise utilizes that country’s citizens’ data. Currently, the GDPR has the strictest standards regarding data processing agreements between a primary organization and another data processor. While the CCPA/CPRA and the PDPA require DPAs, a company in compliance with the GDPR will likely comply with the CCPA/CPRA and the PDPA. Case law is evolving to address the extent of the reach of the extraterritorial legislation. However, …

Relying On Unreliable Tech: Unchecked Police Use Of Algorithmic Technologies, Fraerman, Ali

Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal

In the past two decades, police forces have come to rely on algorithm-based technologies for investigative leads. Several of these technologies are unreliable. They are prone to error, misidentifying suspects, and crimes. When relied upon, they lead to false arrests and unnecessary stop-and-frisks. Yet, there is no coercive mechanism, either regulatory or judicial, that meaningfully governs the use of these algorithmic technologies in law enforcement. As a result, law enforcement agencies are free to disregard potential errors and deploy emerging technologies against communities with little recourse.

This Article looks closely at three technologies—ShotSpotter gunshot detection, facial recognition technology, and rapid …

In Event Of An (Ai) Emergency: Interpreting Continuity Of Government Provisions In State Constitutions, Frazier, Kevin T.

Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal

“Of this I am certain: If we prepare ourselves so that a terrible attack—although it might hurt us—could not destroy us, then such an attack will never come.” - Edward Teller, the “Father of the Hydrogen Bomb,” in an interview with Allen Brown of This Week Magazine in 1957.

Bad actors have already used or may soon use AI to disrupt critical infrastructure, influence elections, and upend economies. Those most concerned about the risks posed by AI argue that it is a matter of when and not if state governments will have to respond to threatened or realized acts of …

Human Reproductive Cloning, Heritable Genome Editing, And The Future Of Novel Reproductive Technologies, Macintosh, Kerry Lynn

Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal

This Article compares human reproductive cloning (HRC) and heritable genome editing (HGE) to identify factors that encourage bans on novel reproductive technologies. HRC drew legislative opposition in part because it involved asexual reproduction and was incorrectly associated with copying. HGE and other technologies that involve sexual reproduction do not have those problematic qualities. HRC also became entangled with research in which human embryos were cloned to be harvested for their stem cells. HGE did not because scientists learned how to create and edit pluripotent stem cells without creating embryos. However, the legal history of HRC predicts that reproductive technologies strongly …

A Promise Without A Remedy: The Supposed Incompatibility Of The Gplv2 And Apache V2 Licenses, Chestek, Pamela S.

Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal

License “incompatibility” in free and open source software licensing means that, when two differently licensed pieces of software are combined, one cannot comply with both licenses at the same time. It is commonly accepted that the GNU General Public License version 2 is incompatible with the Apache License, version 2 because certain provisions of the Apache License would be considered “further restrictions” not permitted by the GPLv2. However, this article will explain why there is no legally cognizable claim for combining the two, either under a copyright infringement theory or a breach of contract theory.

Batok In The East, Aloha In The West: Intellectual Property Protections Of Indigenous Peoples In The Philippines And United States, Maria Regina Martinez

University of San Francisco Law Review

No abstract provided.

What The Warhol Court Got Wrong: Use As An Artist Reference And The Derivative Work Doctrine, Jessica Silbey, Eva E. Subotnik

Faculty Publications

In Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith, the Supreme Court conflated “use as an artist reference” with preparing a “derivative work." It did so on the erroneous assumption that permission to use a copyrighted work as an artist reference is a license to prepare a derivative work. But copyright law does not necessarily deem all uses of references for making new art to be the preparation of a derivative work. In other words, not all adaptations of an original work are infringing. Some may be neither derivative works nor substantially similar copies, and some may …