Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Vacating Arbitrators' Awards Under The Public Policy Exception: Are Courts Second-Guessing Arbitrators' Decisions, Laurie A. Tribble

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Internal Dispute Resolution: The Transformation Of Civil Rights In The Workplace, John M. Lande, Lauren B. Edelman, Howard S. Erlanger

Faculty Publications

Many employers create internal procedures for the resolution of discrimination complaints. We examine internal complaint handlers' conceptions of civil rights law and the implications of those conceptions for their approach to dispute resolution. Drawing on interview data, we find that complaint handlers tend to subsume legal rights under managerial interests. They construct civil rights law as a diffuse standard of fairness, consistent with general norms of good management. Although they seek to resolve complaints to restore smooth employment relations, they tend to recast discrimination claims as typical managerial problems. While the assimilation of law into the management realm may extend …

The Quiet Revolution Comes To Kentucky: A Case Study In Community Mediation, Thomas J. Stipanowich

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Establishing A Joint State Bar Association And Supreme Court Commission On Alternative Dispute Resolution, Jack P. Etheridge

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Practice And Procedure Before The Growth Planning Hearings Boards, Wm. H. Nielsen, M. Peter Philley, Chris Smith Towne

Seattle University Law Review

In 1990, the Washington State Legislature took the first significant step toward growth management when it enacted the Washington Growth Management Act (GMA). The GMA directs cities and counties to protect natural features and to begin planning to accommodate anticipated population increases. The legislature examined the recommendation of the Growth Strategies Commission' to create an independent dispute resolution system to resolve conflicts under the GMA. The Commission recommended the use of a panel of independent arbitrators with mediation and binding arbitration. Appeals would be limited to the Washington State Court of Appeals only on constitutional and procedural issues. The legislature …

Consumer Redress Through Alternative Dispute Resolution And Small Claims Court: Theory And Practice, David S. Cohen

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

There are significant difficulties in providing consumers with redress because dispute resolution costs are high relative to the sums being sought. Consumers also manifest a reluctance to enter legal processes for other reasons. This prompted the creation of user-friendly small claims courts and encouraged the discussion and sometimes the use of non-judicial, alternative dispute resolution forums for addressing consumer redress. This paper explores the theoretical and practical distinction between these two types of dispute resolution forums. The practical differences are examined on the basis of observation of both types of forums and discussions with practitioners of alternative dispute resolution.

The …

Post-Conviction Mediation Of Rape Cases: Working Within The Criminal Justice System To Achieve Well-Rounded Justice, Matthew J. Sauter

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Comment will focus on the steps that can be taken within our criminal justice system to help change the attitudes of police, prosecutors, judges, jurors, and legislators toward the crime of rape. It will particularly focus on how mediation can be used concurrently with the criminal courts system in order to achieve justice for all parties involved, victims as well as offenders

Appellate Settlement Conference Programs: A Case Study, Susan A. Fitzgibbon

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The 1990s may be the decade in which the courts bring alternative dispute resolution "in house." Professor Owen Fiss' nightmare that private settlement will rob courts of cases for the dispensation of justice and the furtherance of societal goals3 has become Professor Carrie Menkel-Meadow's foreboding that the courts will "co-opt" and drain the life from true alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes.4 It may be argued that appellate court-sponsored settlement programs dodge both of these criticisms because parties have had a day in court, the process is a form of mediation, and the settlement is thus final only if the parties …

Class Action Settlement Bars, Cross Claims, And Co-Defendants: The Search For A Uniform Standard - In Re U.S. Oil & (And) Gas Litigation, Craig Richard Heidemann,

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Prior to the U.S. Oil & Gas decision, the federal courts had only considered settlement bars as related to non-settling defendants. In the U.S. Oil & Gas case, all of the defendants sought to settle with the plaintiff. 2 Only one settling defendant chose to contest the entry of the bar order. 3 In U.S. Oil & Gas, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals was faced with a defendant who settled with the plaintiff but opposed an order barring its seemingly independent claims against the third-party defendant who also settled. For this reason it was a case of first impression. …

On The Growth And Development Of Dispute Resolution, Patrick Fn'piere, Linda Work

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Training Interveners For Adr Processes, Joseph B. Stulberg

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

State Offices Of Mediation: Thoughts On The Evolution Of A National Network, Peter S. Adler

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Neighborhood Justice Center Movement, Edith B. Primm

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Running Statewide Dispute Resolution Programs--The New York Experience, Thomas F. Christian

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Implementing Custody Mediation In Family Court: Some Comments On The Jefferson County Family Court Experience, Louise Everett Graham

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Court-Annexed Arbitration--The Northern Kentucky Experience, Christopher J. Mehling, Donald Stepner

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Reflections On The Role Of The Neutral Lawyer: The Lawyer As Mediator, Karen A. Zerhusen

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Implementing Custody Mediation In Family Court: Some Comments On The Jefferson County Family Court Experience, Louise Everett Graham

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

The Jefferson Family Court's custody mediation service was developed as part of a larger program creating the first family court system in Kentucky. The mediation service's connection with the Family Court has influenced both practical and policy aspects of its development. Any description of the mediation project necessarily entails some description of the court system that created it.

This Article describes the structure of the Jefferson Family Court and the custody mediation process as it has developed in Jefferson County. A review of one community's approach to custody mediation may be useful not only as a blueprint for a system's …

New Paradigm, Normal Science, Or Crumbling Construct? Trends In Adjudicatory Procedure And Litigation Reform, Jeffrey W. Stempel

Scholarly Works

One aspect of a possible new era is the increasing ad hoc activity of various interest groups, including the bench and the organized bar, primarily pursued through official organizations such as the Judicial Conference, the Federal Judicial Center, the American Bar Association (“ABA”), and the American Law Institute. Traditionally, of course, judges and lawyers have lobbied Congress and state legislatures for litigation change, as demonstrated by the saga of the Rules Enabling Act (“Enabling Act” or “Act”). But, the legal profession's more recent “political” activity regarding litigation reform differs from the traditional model in several ways. First, the participation of …

Settling In New York: Abdicating Traditional Agency Principles In The Context Of Settlement Disputes, Dean C. Harvey

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Title Page

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Compulsory Alternative Dispute Resolution And Voluntarism: Two-Headed Monster Or Two Sides Of The Coin , Lucy V. Katz

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Article broadly defines compulsory ADR3 to include any process in which the parties experience a lack of free choice about their participation, other than a civil or criminal trial with full due process protections. Thus, it includes not only court-ordered ADR4 (or alternatives mandated by statute), but also judicial mediation, settlement conferences, non-mandatory summary jury trials, and other techniques5 in which there is pressure on litigants to forgo trials, at least temporarily, and to utilize alternatives to bring about settlement.6

Punitive Damages In Securites Arbitration: The Interplay Of State And Federal Law (Or A Smaller Bite Of The Big Apple), Marilyn B. Cane

Journal of Dispute Resolution

As the United States Supreme Court has observed, the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) 2 "is something of an anomaly in the field of federal-court jurisdiction. It creates a body of federal substantive law establishing and regulating the duty to honor an agreement to arbitrate, yet it does not create any independent federal-question jurisdiction."' The parameters and effect of state law under the FAA are continually being refined by the courts. Since the FAA is silent regarding the award of punitive damages, the role state law plays with respect to this issue is unsettled.

Table Of Contents - Issue 1

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Issue 2

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Transforming At-Will Employment Disputes Into Wrongful Discharge Claims: Fertile Ground For Adr, Mary A. Bedikian

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Article begins by reviewing the historical evolution of the at-will rule and examining the common law wrongful dismissal theories. Next, it describes the recent trend of arbitrating wrongful discharge disputes, a trend which the author suggests provides a practical, sound forum for the resolution of employment claims.' 3 Finally, since arbitration is in derogation of the common law, this Article discusses the constitutional and pragmatic barriers to full-scale reform and use of arbitration. The author concludes that fragmentation of interests, political motivations, and the reluctance of the United States Supreme Court to confront an indispensable provision of the Federal …

Arbitration - Sure, But Only On Our Terms: Escape Clauses In Uninsured Motorist Policies - Schaefer V. Allstate Ins. Co., Steven R. Leppard

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Historically, the insurance industry has widely used arbitration to resolve disputes.2 Insurance companies have increasingly included "escape clauses" in their policies.' These clauses allow an insurance company to ignore an arbitrator's award and have a claim directly heard in a trial court if the award exceeds a pre-determined amount.' The Ohio Supreme Court in Schaefer v. Allstate Insurance Co. addressed this issue and decided that the escape clause was unenforceable due to public policy.'

Giving Competency Its Day In Court - In Re Fellman, Michael C. Kirkham

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Note will examine the decision in In re Fellman,4 where the Superior Court of Pennsylvania determined that the issue of competency was a matter for the courts, not arbitration, to determine.5 Furthermore, this Note will explain how Fellman is consistent with cases concerning different issues, but which similarly denied arbitrators authority based upon similar reasoning.

Efficient Injustice: The Demise Of Teh Substantial Injustice Exception To Arbitral Finality - Moncharsh V. Heily & (And) Blase, Michael J. Smith

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Judicial review of an arbitrator's decision has been a point of much controversy and discussion among jurisdictions. Many state legislatures have enacted arbitration statutes that list the grounds for review of an arbitrator's decision. However, over time, the courts have also developed some common law grounds for judicial review. Conflict often arose when a state's statute did not provide for review on the same grounds as common law. This Note examines how the California Supreme Court dealt with the difference in the statutory and common law grounds for judicial review of an arbitrator's decision.

Negotiated Sovereignty: Intergovernmental Agreements With American Indian Tribes As Models For Expanding First Nations’ Self-Government, David H. Getches

Publications

Constitutional issues related to First Nations sovereignty have dominated Aboriginal affairs in Canada for a considerable period. The constitutional entrenchment of Aboriginal self-government has, however, received a setback with the recent failure of the Charlottetown Accord in October of 1992. Nonetheless, day-to-day issues must be accommodated, even while this more fundamental constitutional question remains unresolved. This paper illustrates the American experience with negotiated intergovernmental agreements between tribes and individual states. These agreements have, for example, resolved jurisdictional disputes over taxation, solid waste disposal, and law enforcement between state governments and tribal authorities. The author suggests that these intergovernmental agreements in …