Law Commons^™

Gender-Based Wage Discrimination And The Bennett Amendment: County Of Washington V. Gunther, Chris Bramhall

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Tragic Choices In Special Education: The Effect Of Scarce Resources On The Implementation Of Pub. L. No. 94-142, James Stark

Faculty Articles and Papers

No abstract provided.

Basis Of Liability In A Section 1983 Suit: When Is The State-Of-Mind Analysis Relevant?, William A. Lockhart

Indiana Law Journal

NOTE: A printing error labeled this issue Spring 1982, it should have been labeled Summer 1982

Survey Of Developments In The Fourth Circuit: 1981

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law—Equal Protection—California's Gender Based Statutory Rape Law Upheld, Lynn Wintory Wilhite

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law—Due Process—Equal Protection—Exclusion Of Females From Registration For Draft Not Violative Of Fifth Amendment, Neil Deininger

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Defense Of The Civilly Disobedient, Deborah Greenblatt

North Carolina Central Law Review

No abstract provided.

Intent Or Impact: Proving Discrimination Under Title Vi Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

This Note analyzes the controversy and concludes that courts must apply an impact standard in title VI cases. After reviewing the relevant Supreme Court decisions, Part I contends that Bakke did not overrule Lau's approval of an impact standard. Part II examines the regulations on which the Lau court relied. It first characterizes them as legislative; they derive the force of law from an explicit congressional delegation of substantive power. Part II then tests the regulations' impact standard against the language, legislative history, and policy of title VI and finds it valid. Since courts may not disregard valid legislative regulations, …

Review Article Of Women In Law, Doris Marie Provine

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Privacy Of Association: A Burgeoning Privilege In Civil Discovery, Joan E. Steinman

All Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Charles Black's Rediscovery Of The Ninth Amendment, And What He Found There, Russell L. Caplan

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Decision According to Law by Charles L. Black, Jr.

Vi. Constitutional Law & Civil Rights

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Viii. Employment Discrimination & Affirmative Action, H. David Natkin

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Skokie Legacy: Reflections On An "Easy Case" And Free Speech Theory, Lee C. Bollinger

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Defending My Enemy: American Nazis, the Skokie Case, and the Risks of Freedom by Aryeh Neier

Legal History And The Law Of Blasphemy, Morris S. Arnold

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Treason Against God: A History of the Offense of Blasphemy by Leonard W. Levy

Trial And Error: The Detroit School Segregation Case, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Trial and Error: The Detroit School Segregation Case by Eleanor P. Wolf

The Numbers Game: Statistical Inference In Discrimination Cases, David H. Kaye

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Statistical Proof of Discrimination by David Baldus and James Cole

The Limits Of Litigation: Putting The Education Back Into Brown V. Board Of Education, T. Alexander Aleinikoff

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Shades of Brown: New Perspectives on School Desegregation edited by Derrick Bell

Section 1983: Doctrinal Foundations And An Empirical Study, Theodore Eisenberg

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

Constitutional Accountability In Section 1983 Litigation, Sheldon Nahmod

All Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Civil Liberties: Adherence To Established Principles, Ivan E. Bodensteiner, Rosalie Levinson

Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

42 U.S.C. § 1983 - Exhaustion Of State Administrative Remedies, Joseph H. Chivers

Duquesne Law Review

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that state administrative remedies, where adequate and appropriate, must be exhausted before proceeding with a section 1983 action in a federal court.

Patsy v. Florida International University, 612 F.2d 946 (5th Cir. 1980), vacated on rehearing, 634 F.2d 900 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. granted, 50 U.S.L.W. 3213 (U.S. Oct. 5, 1981) (No. 80-1874).

The Scope Of Section 1985(3) In Light Of Great American Federal Savings And Loan Association V. Novotny: Too Little Too Late?, Taunya Lovell Banks

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Displacement Of Federal Due Process Claims By State Tort Remedies: Parratt V. Taylor And Logan V. Zimmerman Brush Company, Rodney A. Smolla

Scholarly Articles

None available.

The Pregnant Employee's Appearance As A Bfoq Under The Pregnancy Discrimination Act, Jacqueline H. Lower

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law And Civil Rights, Kingsley R. Browne

Law Faculty Research Publications

During the period covered by this survey, most of the constitutional law and civil rights cases considered by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals were discrimination actions brought under either section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871 or Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Some of the other topics dealt with by the court were age discrimination, Indian rights, prisoners' rights, drug paraphernalia, ballot access, religious freedom, and the supremacy clause.

Rostker V. Goldberg: Gender Based Equal Protection V. The War Power, 15 J. Marshall L. Rev. 725 (1982), James Graney

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law - Fifth Amendment - Due Process - Equal Protection - Sex Discrimination, Michael B. Sedlock

Duquesne Law Review

The United States Supreme Court has held that enactment of a male-only draft registration requirement does not violate the equal protection component of the fifth amendment due process clause.

Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981).

Evaluation Of An Employment Discrimination Case: The Plaintiff's Perspective, 15 J. Marshall L. Rev. 621 (1982), Lynn D. Feiger, Leslie M. Lawson

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Pennslyvania V. Porter: The State As Plaintiff Under 42 U.S.C. 1983, 15 J. Marshall L. Rev. 515 (1982), Cheryl Johnson

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.