Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Hollins University (77)
- William & Mary Law School (16)
- Boston College Law School (8)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (5)
-
- Cleveland State University (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (4)
- University of Baltimore Law (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- Selected Works (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Campbell University School of Law (2)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Wayne State University (2)
- West Virginia University (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Civil Rights (14)
- Civil rights (12)
- Title VII (6)
- Affirmative action (5)
- Constitution (5)
-
- Discrimination (5)
- Minorities (5)
- Race (5)
- Women (5)
- Racial discrimination (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- United States Supreme Court (4)
- Civil rights litigation (3)
- Fourteenth amendment (3)
- James Madison (3)
- Municipalities (3)
- Race and law (3)
- Racism (3)
- W&M Former Faculty (3)
- Academic Freedom (2)
- Book review (2)
- Brown v. Board of Education (2)
- Business justification (2)
- Charles A. Reich (2)
- City of Richmond (2)
- Civil rights law (2)
- Color (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (2)
- Disparate impact (2)
- Publication
-
- Ann B. Hopkins Papers (77)
- William & Mary Law Review (13)
- All Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Boston College Third World Law Journal (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
-
- Scholarly Works (5)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Michigan Law Review (4)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (4)
- Boston College Law Review (3)
- Touro Law Review (3)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (3)
- Articles (2)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- BYU Law Review (2)
- Buffalo Law Review (2)
- Campbell Law Review (2)
- Cleveland State Law Review (2)
- Florida State University Law Review (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (2)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (2)
- Publications (2)
- West Virginia Law Review (2)
- Angela P Harris (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Bryant Garth (1986-1987 Acting; 1987-1990) (1)
- Candace Kovacic-Fleischer (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 179
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appeals Court Upholds Order To Make Woman A Partner, Albert B. Crenshaw
Appeals Court Upholds Order To Make Woman A Partner, Albert B. Crenshaw
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
Some Words Are Injurious . . . Some Cause A Raging Storm, Kenneth Lasson
Some Words Are Injurious . . . Some Cause A Raging Storm, Kenneth Lasson
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Judge Orders Partnership In A Bias Case, Ann Hagadorn, Wade Lambert
Judge Orders Partnership In A Bias Case, Ann Hagadorn, Wade Lambert
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
Litigant Closer To Partnership, The Washington Times
Litigant Closer To Partnership, The Washington Times
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
Sex Bias Plaintiff Wins Appeal, Richmond Times
Sex Bias Plaintiff Wins Appeal, Richmond Times
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
Redefining The Burdens Of Proof In Title Vii Litigation: Will The Disparate Impact Theory Survive Wards Cove And The Civil Rights Act Of 1990?, L Camille Hebert
Redefining The Burdens Of Proof In Title Vii Litigation: Will The Disparate Impact Theory Survive Wards Cove And The Civil Rights Act Of 1990?, L Camille Hebert
Boston College Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rethinking Minority Business Development Strategies, Robert E. Suggs
Rethinking Minority Business Development Strategies, Robert E. Suggs
Faculty Scholarship
Minority business set-asides were created as a prophylactic measure to redress discrimination against minority owned business firms. Predominantly minority jurisdictions found them especially attractive because they promised to provide minority firms a share of the procurement dollars expended by these jurisdictions. The Croson decision invalidated Richmond’s ordinance and posed substantial barriers to further enactments. This article proposes an alternative to such set-aides. It argues that the proposed alternative, an Equal Opportunity Rating Agency (EORA), provides a superior business development policy tool and does not have the constitutional vulnerabilities of set-asides. An EORA would operate much like a credit rating agency, …
Correspondence: November 6, 1990, Note Regarding The Lawton Chiles Rally, Sam Nunn
Correspondence: November 6, 1990, Note Regarding The Lawton Chiles Rally, Sam Nunn
Saffy Collection - All Textual Materials
A note from United States Senator Sam Nunn to Dr. Edna Saffy.
Free Speech: It's Great For Hate, Kenneth Lasson
Free Speech: It's Great For Hate, Kenneth Lasson
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Academic Freedom And The University Title Vii Suit After University Of Pennsylvania V. Eeoc And Brown V. Trustees Of Boston University, Clisby L.H. Barrow
Academic Freedom And The University Title Vii Suit After University Of Pennsylvania V. Eeoc And Brown V. Trustees Of Boston University, Clisby L.H. Barrow
Vanderbilt Law Review
Tenure' is the crowning laurel of academia. The process of reviewing a candidate for tenure at the university level generally begins with an evaluation and recommendation by a group of the candidate's peers. Candidates who are denied tenure may seek judicial review of the decision and discovery of peer review materials. Not surprisingly, universities encourage courts to defer to tenure decisions and to deny plaintiffs access to confidential peer review documents.Traditionally, in fact, courts have given great deference to university tenure decisions. Judicial deference has pervaded every phase of review from discovery to trial and remedy. As deference to university …
Levels Of Generality In The Definition Of Rights, Laurence H. Tribe, Michael C. Dorf
Levels Of Generality In The Definition Of Rights, Laurence H. Tribe, Michael C. Dorf
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
This article focuses on one important aspect of the quest for constitutional meaning: how to determine whether a particular liberty-whether or not expressly enumerated in the Bill of Rights-is a "fundamental" right. Whether under the somewhat tarnished banner of substantive due process or under a different rubric, the designation of a right as fundamental requires that the state offer a compelling justification for limitations of that right. In addition, under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, state-sanctioned inequalities that bear upon the exercise of a fundamental right will be upheld only if they serve a compelling governmental interest. …
Civil Rights—Marital Status Discrimination—Refusing To Rent To Unmarried Cohabitants Is Not Unlawful Marital Status Discrimination Under The Minnesota Human Rights Act. State Ex Rel. Cooper V. French, 460 N.W.2d 2 (Minn.1990), Steven L. Mcconnell
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sin, Stigma & Society: A Critique Of Morality And Values In Democratic Law And Policy, Timothy W. Reinig
Sin, Stigma & Society: A Critique Of Morality And Values In Democratic Law And Policy, Timothy W. Reinig
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Second Class Rights? Principles And Compromise In The Charter, Denise G. Réaume, Leslie J. M Green
Second Class Rights? Principles And Compromise In The Charter, Denise G. Réaume, Leslie J. M Green
Dalhousie Law Journal
Minority language rights are both historically and politically central to the Canadian constitution. It is also commonly supposed that they are fundamental rights, rooted in principle, and deserving generous interpretation by the courts. For a time, it seemed that the Supreme Court of Canada shared this view. In the Manitoba Language Reference, for example, they said that "The importance of language rights is grounded in the essential role that language plays in human existence, development and dignity." In Mercure v. A.G. of Saskatchewan they reiterated: "It can hardly be gainsaid that language is profoundly anchored in the human condition. Not …
The Rhetorical Tapestry Of Race: White Innocence And Black Abstraction, Thomas Ross
The Rhetorical Tapestry Of Race: White Innocence And Black Abstraction, Thomas Ross
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remarks Made At The Second Circuit Judicial Conference, September 8, 1989, Thurgood Marshall
Remarks Made At The Second Circuit Judicial Conference, September 8, 1989, Thurgood Marshall
Trotter Review
For many years, no institution of American government has been as close a friend to civil rights as the United States Supreme Court. Make no mistake: I do not mean for a moment to denigrate the quite considerable contributions to the enhancement of civil rights by presidents, the Congress, other federal courts, and the legislatures and judiciaries of many states. It is now 1989, however, and we must recognize that the Court's approach to civil rights cases has changed markedly. The most recent Supreme Court opinions vividly illustrate this changed judicial attitude. In Richmond v. Croson, the Court took …
New Judges Get No Rehearsals, Gary Sturgess
New Judges Get No Rehearsals, Gary Sturgess
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Eeoc's Opposition To Appellant's Motin To Strike Eeoc's Brief As Amicus Curiae (With Letter From Eeoc), United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Eeoc's Opposition To Appellant's Motin To Strike Eeoc's Brief As Amicus Curiae (With Letter From Eeoc), United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Motion By Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Amicus Curiae To Participate In Oral Argument (With Letter From Eeoc), United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Motion By Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Amicus Curiae To Participate In Oral Argument (With Letter From Eeoc), United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Appellant's Reply Brief, United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Appellant's Reply Brief, United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Appeal From The United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Supplemental Brief, United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Appeal From The United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Supplemental Brief, United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Motion For Leave To File Supplemental Brief, United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Motion For Leave To File Supplemental Brief, United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Appeal From The United States District Court For The District Of Columbia, United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Appeal From The United States District Court For The District Of Columbia, United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Reply To The Response Of Appellee And The Opposition Of The Eeoc To Price Waterhouse's Motion To Strike The Eeoc's Brief Amicus Curiae, United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Reply To The Response Of Appellee And The Opposition Of The Eeoc To Price Waterhouse's Motion To Strike The Eeoc's Brief Amicus Curiae, United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Motion To Strike The Brief Of The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission As Amicus Curiae, United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Motion To Strike The Brief Of The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission As Amicus Curiae, United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
Hiv Positive Employees As Handicapped Persons Under State And Federal Law: West Virginia Follows The Trend To Cast Aside Irrational Fear And Prejudice In Favor Of Competent Medical Evidence And Sound Public Policy, Frank W. Volk
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Pension Game: Age- And Gender-Based Inequities In The Retirement System, Camilla E. Watson
The Pension Game: Age- And Gender-Based Inequities In The Retirement System, Camilla E. Watson
Scholarly Works
This Article begins by stressing the importance of retirement benefits in general and employer-provided benefits in particular. It then addresses specific current issues of age and gender discrimination under both the private retirement and Social Security systems. Gender-based discrimination is emphasized because of the overlap between gender-based discrimination and age discrimination. Finally, this Article suggests specific reforms for a fairer and more adequate systems in the twenty-first century.
No. 90-7099 Appellee's Response To Motions Regarding The "Brief Of The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission As Amicus Curiae", United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Appellee's Response To Motions Regarding The "Brief Of The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission As Amicus Curiae", United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Brief Of The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission As Amicus Curiae, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Circuit
No. 90-7099 Brief Of The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission As Amicus Curiae, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Circuit
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
Judge's Ruling Is A Victory For Women Who Work, Patricea Mclaughlin
Judge's Ruling Is A Victory For Women Who Work, Patricea Mclaughlin
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.