Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Afghanistan

Discipline
Institution
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 301 - 330 of 340

Full-Text Articles in Public Policy

Ddasaccident153, Hd-Aid Aug 1997

Ddasaccident153, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators decided that the victim had got a reading with his detector and investigated it but found nothing. He swept the area again and still got a reading, so without remarking the spot, he squatted to prod again [presumed to have been wearing his helmet and visor].


Ddasaccident154, Hd-Aid Aug 1997

Ddasaccident154, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators decided that the two victims were assigned a breaching lane to clear. Victim No.1 was eager to finish investigating a signal when a rest period was announced, so hurried and used excessive force. Victim No.2: was not maintaining the safety distance required and was also injured.


Ddasaccident012, Hd-Aid Aug 1997

Ddasaccident012, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The victim had last attended a revision course seven months before and had last been on leave eight days before the accident. The accident occurred on ground described as soft agricultural land. A photograph showed the ground which appeared to be dust on top of compacted fine-silt.


Ddasaccident157, Hd-Aid Aug 1997

Ddasaccident157, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim was working in a “small garden”. His detector registered a signal and he prodded and located a fragment. He checked the area with the detector and it signalled again, so he prodded the same area and the mine initiated. The deminer's helmet and bayonet prodder were "destroyed". A photograph showed that the visor has been torn from the helmet on one side.


Ddasaccident158, Hd-Aid Jul 1997

Ddasaccident158, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim was clearing a portion of the minefield with bushes, grass and defensive wire. While he was searching for a tripwire with the feeler, the deminer set off a tripwire-controlled device with the feeler. He was not wearing a helmet and visor at the time.


Ddasaccident082, Hd-Aid Jul 1997

Ddasaccident082, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim had checked the area with a detector then started to cut the grass and bush with a sickle. He stepped on a mine that he has missed at the end of his work on the previous day. The investigation was limited by bad security in the area and the investigators were unable to validate a claim that the Schiebel detector signalled constantly and so was unreliable.


Ddasaccident084, Hd-Aid Jul 1997

Ddasaccident084, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim was clearing the side of a small stream when he got a detector signal and marked it, then prodded but could not find anything. He checked the reading but did not "remark" it and started to prod again. The mine detonated. The victim's visor shattered into many shards in the blast (as shown in a photograph). His bayonet had a bent blade and the handle had broken up.


Ddasaccident083, Hd-Aid Jul 1997

Ddasaccident083, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The victim had been a deminer for three years. It was two months since he had last attended a revision course and seven days since his last leave. The area being cleared was described as "hard and bushy". The investigators decided that the mine involved was a PMN and that either the victim was cutting bushes without sweeping/detecting the area in front of him, or the deminer lost his balance while squatting to cut bush and stepped sideways onto a mine. His helmet was reported to have been damaged in the blast.


Ddasaccident085, Hd-Aid Jun 1997

Ddasaccident085, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim's detector was reading constantly so he was excavating with a shovel without having marked any suspicious points. He was prodding with a bayonet to loosen the soil, then removing it with the shovel. His shovel was "destroyed/lost" in the accident.


Ddasaccident086, Hd-Aid Jun 1997

Ddasaccident086, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim had investigated a reading in the squatting position with a prod. He was not "wearing his helmet properly". They identified the mine as a PMN (from "found fragments") and recorded that the victim's helmet and bayonet were "destroyed".


Ddasaccident087, Hd-Aid Jun 1997

Ddasaccident087, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim was in a known POMZ minefield but neglected to use a tripwire feeler before advancing beneath a big bush with the detector, so pulled a tripwire with the detector head. It was recorded that there was "No damage to equipment", but photographs of a damaged Schiebel detector were included in the report.


Ddasaccident088, Hd-Aid Jun 1997

Ddasaccident088, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that, after a dog had signalled at a spot, the deminer located a signal with a detector and marked it, then started digging with a pick. His partner warning him to change to a bayonet at the second marker but he ignored the warning. He dug up to the third marker with the pick, so struck the mine. His pick was "destroyed".


Ddasaccident101, Hd-Aid Jun 1997

Ddasaccident101, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim thought a detector reading was a fragment and was careless when prodding. The mine was identified as a PMN (from "found fragments/pieces"). The victim's bayonet was "lost" and his helmet damaged.


Ddasaccident089, Hd-Aid Jun 1997

Ddasaccident089, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim was prodding with a bayonet in the squatting position, but was not wearing a frag-vest. He was wearing his helmet when he prodded onto a PMN mine. The victim's bayonet was "lost" and the helmet damaged.


Ddasaccident090, Hd-Aid Jun 1997

Ddasaccident090, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim was working in a bushy clearance lane with continuous detector readings. Because of the continuous reading, he was digging all of the area and prodded with excessive force and let off a PMN. They identified the device by "found fragments". The victim believing that he had touched a tripwire with his bayonet.


Ddasaccident091, Hd-Aid Jun 1997

Ddasaccident091, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim was clearing an area containing numerous fuzes. Instead of destroying the fuze where it was, he carried the fuze to another place where he "might have" dropped it and caused the accident. The device was identified as a mortar fuze, one among many UXO spread around the area and blast damaged.


Ddasaccident092, Hd-Aid Jun 1997

Ddasaccident092, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators decided that the accident occurred because the victim ignored technical safety procedures and used a shovel for investigation and prodding purposes. He applied too much pressure on the device and "caused the explosion".


Ddasaccident093, Hd-Aid Jun 1997

Ddasaccident093, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The Investigators determined that the accident occurred when the Assistant Team Leader and the Section Leader went to inspect the site of another accident that had occurred the day before [believed to be 1st June]. They did this without the permission of the Team Leader, and without his being aware of it.


Ddasaccident094, Hd-Aid Jun 1997

Ddasaccident094, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim was working in an area with barbed wire obstacles (that should have been cut and removed). After going around the wire and detecting again he got a reading. He did not mark the reading but squatted and started to prod with his bayonet, and detonated the mine (which was identified as a PMN from "found fragments".


Ddasaccident095, Hd-Aid May 1997

Ddasaccident095, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim did not centralise the reading point from his detector and "did not follow the marking procedures properly". He prodded while in a squatting position. They noted that the device was identified as a PMN (from "found fragments") and that the victim's helmet and bayonet were "destroyed".


Ddasaccident097, Hd-Aid May 1997

Ddasaccident097, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim got a detector reading and started prodding in a prone position. As he removed loose soil he pulled a tripwire with his hand. A POMZ six metres away was initiated. The device was identified as a POMZ from "found fragments".


Ddasaccident096, Hd-Aid May 1997

Ddasaccident096, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim was checking the boundary land and got a reading with his detector and investigated it with his prodder. He prodded in the squatting position but found nothing. As he stood up to recheck the position with his detector the device went off in front of him.


Ddasaccident098, Hd-Aid May 1997

Ddasaccident098, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the two victims found a "UXO" fuze while working in a bushy area.


Ddasaccident099, Hd-Aid May 1997

Ddasaccident099, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim was marking the cleared area up to a mine he had uncovered and which was awaiting detonation. It was near the end of the day so he wanted to go off duty after the found mine was destroyed. He dropped a stone close (25cm) to the found mine and the impact detonated another mine close by. His visor was up at the time, so his face was unprotected. The mine was identified as a PMN [presumably by inference].


Ddasaccident100, Hd-Aid May 1997

Ddasaccident100, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the minefield was old and the mines had fallen and become buried. The victim did not mark the detector reading point before investigating with a pick, so triggered the mine which was identified as a POMZ from "fragments found". The victim's pick and helmet were damaged.


Ddasaccident102, Hd-Aid May 1997

Ddasaccident102, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim was clearing the dry bed of a lake [this appears to conflict with "hillside"] and prodded to investigate an area that the dog had indicated. He used his detector then investigated the reading with a pick. The mine was identified as a PMN (from "found fragments"). The victim's pick handle and his visor were damaged. The victim walked out of mined area unaided.


Ddasaccident103, Hd-Aid Apr 1997

Ddasaccident103, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim was clearing a breaching lane bordered by barbed wire. When the wire got in the way too much, he stopped work to pull it aside. In pulling it aside he stepped outside the cleared area and trod on the mine. The mine was believed to be a PMN (from "found fragments") but there was concern expressed that the mine was "an MS3 (anti-lift device)" at the time. The victim's visor was damaged.


Ddasaccident104, Hd-Aid Apr 1997

Ddasaccident104, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim returned to his breaching lane after the short break and accidentally walked beyond the area he had cleared before the break, where he stepped on a mine. He may have not marked the end of his work properly. The device was identified as a PMN (from "found fragments").


Ddasaccident105, Hd-Aid Mar 1997

Ddasaccident105, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The victim had been a deminer for seven years. It was five months since his last revision course and 35 days since his last leave. The demining group reported that the victim was digging with a pick when suddenly a PMN mine exploded.


Ddasaccident106, Hd-Aid Mar 1997

Ddasaccident106, Hd-Aid

Global CWD Repository

The investigators determined that the victim was clearing inside a collapsed building. The mines were probably laid on the roof, which had fallen in, so may have been in any position in the ground. The mine was identified as a PMN-2 (from "found fragments"). The victim's visor shattered and a photograph showed jagged fractures and little evidence of blast impact. [This damage implies a twisting force on a brittle plastic, indicating that the visor was probably raised, so explaining the facial injuries.] The deminer's pick was also damaged.