Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Research Methods in Life Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Animal Experimentation and Research (103)
- Animal Sciences (89)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (61)
- Animal Studies (60)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (41)
-
- Poultry or Avian Science (38)
- Diseases (35)
- Animal Diseases (34)
- Beef Science (28)
- Meat Science (17)
- Zoology (15)
- Microbiology (10)
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (9)
- Food Science (9)
- Veterinary Medicine (8)
- Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology (7)
- Molecular Biology (6)
- Pathogenic Microbiology (6)
- Food Microbiology (5)
- Genetics (5)
- Genetics and Genomics (5)
- Immunology and Infectious Disease (5)
- Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology (5)
- Bacteriology (4)
- Behavior and Ethology (4)
- Biology (4)
- Cell Biology (4)
- Cell and Developmental Biology (4)
- Keyword
-
- Animal health (17)
- Beef cattle production (17)
- Food science (17)
- Forages and pastures (17)
- Broiler (6)
-
- Cattle (5)
- Broilers (4)
- Chicken (4)
- Nutrition (4)
- Poultry (4)
- Microbiota (3)
- Necrotic enteritis (3)
- Salmonella (3)
- Stress (3)
- Turkey (3)
- Animal welfare (2)
- Bacteria (2)
- Behavior (2)
- Bovine respiratory disease (2)
- Climate change (2)
- Conservation biology (2)
- Diet (2)
- Disease (2)
- Disease ecology (2)
- Eimeria (2)
- Eimeria maxima (2)
- Enzyme (2)
- Food web (2)
- Genetics (2)
- Growth performance (2)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Graduate Theses and Dissertations (72)
- Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series (17)
- Discovery, The Student Journal of Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences (6)
- Poultry Science Faculty Publications and Presentations (2)
- Animal Science Faculty Publications and Presentations (1)
-
- Animal Science Undergraduate Honors Theses (1)
- Biological Sciences Faculty Publications and Presentations (1)
- Biological Sciences Undergraduate Honors Theses (1)
- Biomedical Engineering Faculty Publications and Presentations (1)
- Horticulture Faculty Publications and Presentations (1)
- Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science (1)
- Poultry Science Undergraduate Honors Theses (1)
- Sociology and Criminology Undergraduate Honors Theses (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 106 of 106
Full-Text Articles in Research Methods in Life Sciences
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2011, David L. Kreider
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2011, David L. Kreider
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2010, David L. Kreider
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2010, David L. Kreider
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2010, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2010, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Letter From The Dean, Lalit Verma
Letter From The Dean, Lalit Verma
Discovery, The Student Journal of Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2008, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2008, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Impact Of Stressing A Pen Mate On Physiological Responses Of Growing Pigs, Brent Koonce, Elizabeth B. Kegley, Doug Galloway, Jason Apple
Impact Of Stressing A Pen Mate On Physiological Responses Of Growing Pigs, Brent Koonce, Elizabeth B. Kegley, Doug Galloway, Jason Apple
Discovery, The Student Journal of Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences
Crossbred barrows and gilts (n = 36), weighing 16.59 ± 2.1 kg, were used to test the effects of stressing a pen mate on the physiological responses of growing pigs. Pigs were randomly allotted to 6 groups after stratifying according to gender, litter origin, and body weight. Dominance order was determined within each group, and 1 to 3 d prior to the stress treatment the most- and least-dominant pigs within a group were fitted with indwelling catheters in their vena cavas. Over 3 d, groups were either: 1) isolated from audile and visual contact with stressed pigs in a separate …
Investigating Current Efficacies Of Several Nematocides For Use In Cattle According To The Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test, Tifanie Silver, Chris Tucker, Jeremy Powell, Jana Reynolds, Zelpha Johnson, Bill Lindsey, Pete Hornsby, T. A. Yazwinski
Investigating Current Efficacies Of Several Nematocides For Use In Cattle According To The Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test, Tifanie Silver, Chris Tucker, Jeremy Powell, Jana Reynolds, Zelpha Johnson, Bill Lindsey, Pete Hornsby, T. A. Yazwinski
Discovery, The Student Journal of Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences
Utilizing small groups of naturally infected replacement heifers, fecal egg count reduction tests (FECRT) were conducted in the later months of 2007 at the University of Arkansas Savoy Research Station. Each test was 28 d in length, consisting of individual fecal nematode egg counts (EPG) and coprocultures. For the first test, the calves were ranked by beginning EPG, blocked, and randomly assigned treatment within each block. Nine to ten animals were in each treatment group. In this test, neither IVOMEC (® Merial) or IVERMECTIN (® Durvet), both delivered as an injectable at the rate of 0.2 mg of ivermectin kg-1 …
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2006, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2006, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2004, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2004, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2003, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2003, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
The faculty and staff of the Animal Science Program are pleased to present the sixth edition of the Arkansas Animal Science Report. As with virtually all programs in the country, budget constraints presented serious challenges to teaching, research, and extension programming. However, the faculty and staff responded with innovation, good management, and hard work to maintain a productive program designed to benefit the students of the University and the citizens of the state. We are committed to remaining faithful to our Land-Grant mission. A sincere thank you is owed to Dr. Zelpha Johnson and Dr. Wayne Kellogg for editing this …
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2002, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2002, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2000, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2000, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
Animal Science is very much devoted to youth education and development. During the past year, over 20,000 youth were involved in 4-H livestock projects. Two very successful activities that took place last year were the Mid-American Grassland Evaluation Contest and Livestock Judging Camps. The Grassland Contest is designed to teach students about grassland resource management for livestock and wildlife uses. The contest was held in Cape Girardeau, Missouri. Firstplace honors in the 4-H division went to White County, and second place honors went to Van Buren County. Two Livestock Judging Camps (Fayetteville and Hope) were conducted this past year. A …
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 1999, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 1999, Zelpha B. Johnson, D. Wayne Kellogg
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 1998, Stacey Gunter
Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 1998, Stacey Gunter
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
No abstract provided.
Arkansas Cooperative Beef Bull Performance Test 1991, M. W. Eaton, A. E. Brown Jr., J. A. Hornsby, R. W. Parham, J. D. Shockey, W. C. Loe
Arkansas Cooperative Beef Bull Performance Test 1991, M. W. Eaton, A. E. Brown Jr., J. A. Hornsby, R. W. Parham, J. D. Shockey, W. C. Loe
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series
Performance testing of beef bulls was initiated to improve productivity of Arkansas beef cattle through breeding. This cooperative testing program provides cattlemen with reliable information for identifying animals with superior breeding value for the traits of production measured in the test. By using the information as a basis for herd sire selection, a breeder can greatly increase the chances of obtaining a bull that will sire rapid-gaining, more efficient, highquality calves. Such calves can increase profits for both the breeder and the feeder. This testing program provides information that is useful to financial institutes in arranging their lending programs and …
Repair Of Lethal Damage Induced In A Hamster X Amphibian Hybrid Tissue Culture Cell Line By Ultraviolet Light And Gamma Ray, Susan Kulp, Ann Page, H. Gaston Griggs
Repair Of Lethal Damage Induced In A Hamster X Amphibian Hybrid Tissue Culture Cell Line By Ultraviolet Light And Gamma Ray, Susan Kulp, Ann Page, H. Gaston Griggs
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science
A hybrid cell line was formed by fusing cells from two established vertebrate tissue culture cell lines (V79B1 hamster and A84 Xenopus), which were known to differ substantially in resistance to some radiation-induced lesions and in associated repair potential. Ultraviolet and gamma ray dose-survival relations were then determined and analyzed for the three cell lines, primarily to compare the radiosensitivity (Do dose) of the hybrid line with that of each parental line for each radiation. Further experimentation was conducted to determine the extent to which observed differences in these Do doses could be attributed to interactions of the combined parental …