Jurisprudence Commons^™

The Conflict Between The Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act And The Extradition Act: Naming The Custodial Parent Both Legal Guardian And Fugitive Comment., Suzanne Y. Lepori

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Copyright Protection For Intellectual Property Rights To Recombinant Deoxyribonucleic Acid: A Proposal Comment., Donna Smith

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Constitutional Law - First Amendment - School Officials Entitled To Regulate Contents Of School Sponsored Newspaper In Reasonable Manner Recent Development., Christopher Nielson Forbis

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Constitutional Law - First Amendment - Public Figures And Public Officials May Not Recover For Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress For Publication Of Ad Parody Absent A Showing That Publication Contained A False Statement Of Fact Made With Actual Malice Recent Development., Evelyn T. Ailts

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Texas Civil Procedure - Bill Of Review - Meritorious Defense Requirement In Bill Of Review Proceeding To Vacate Default Judgment, Without Effective Service Of Process Or Propert Notice Of Default Judgment, And Resulting In Adverse Consequences, Violates The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause Recent Development., William B. Nash

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Federal Taxation - Publicly Traded Partnerships Deemed Corporations For Federal Taxation Purposes: New Internal Revenue Code Section 7704 Recent Development., Edward D. Biggers

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Liability Of Parents For Conduct Of Their Child Under Section 33.01 Of The Texas Family Code: Defining The Requisite Standards Of Culpability., L. Wayne Scott

St. Mary's Law Journal

Section 33.01 of the Texas Family Code uses archaic terms and needs to be updated to eliminate confusion. This section provides an expansive statutory avenue for recovering from the parent damages previously unavailable at common law for a child's acts. However, the extent of parental liability under both of the available statutory provisions—negligence and strict liability—is disputable. While section 33.01 currently uses the terms "willful" and "malicious," these terms should be excluded in favor of "intentional" and "grossly negligent conduct." In an age when tort liability is determined more from an insurance theory than a fault theory, section 33.01 of …

Deadlines And Extension Motions In Civil Appellate Litigation., Timothy Patton

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Scources Of Liberty In The Texas Bill Of Rights., Arvel (Rod) Ponton Iii

St. Mary's Law Journal

Many historical, economic, and philosophical forces have combined to create a uniquely “Texian” perspective on liberty that has heavily influenced the Texas Bill of Rights. The original Texas Bill of Rights was drafted in 1836, during the ascendancy of Jacksonian democracy, following the successful revolt from the military dictatorship of General Santa Anna. Texans had lived under Spanish civil law, Mexican constitutional law, a Mexican military dictatorship, English common law, and the Bill of Rights of the United States. The Texas Revolution, the fact that many Texans looked to American and English jurisprudence for guidance, the violation of many rights …

The Evolving Concept Of Preemption Removal: An Expansion Of Federal Jurisdiction., Scott Roberts

St. Mary's Law Journal

Federal jurisdiction based on preemption removal should extend to federal laws which meet the requirements of Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Taylor. The well-pleaded complaint rule restricts federal removal jurisdiction. The well-pleaded complaint rule requires a federal question appear on the face of the plaintiff’s complaint for federal jurisdiction to attach. Therefore, the defendant’s right to a federal forum depends upon whether the plaintiff chooses to invoke a federal claim in its complaint. Courts routinely criticize the linking of removal jurisdiction to the well-pleaded complaint rule for giving plaintiffs incentive to …

Landlord Implicitly Warrants That Commercial Premises Suited For Inteded Use; Tenant's Duty To Pay Rent Dependent Upon Landlord Honoring Implied Warranty., Troy (Trey) S. Martin Iii

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Rule-Making In Texas: Clarifying The Judiciary's Power To Promulgate Rules Of Civil Procedure., Bruce L. Dean

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Cannibal Moves: An Essay On The Metamorphoses Of The Legal Distinction, Pierre Schlag

Publications

No abstract provided.

Beyond Criticism, Guyora Binder

Journal Articles

During the 1980’s, Critical Legal Studies was frequently criticized for offering no policy prescriptions. This essay explained critical scholars’ reluctance to propose policy as a reflection of their epistemological and political critiques of instrumentalist policy analysis. Because critical scholars saw both causal relationships and interests as highly contingent on normative assumptions, they were skeptical of claims that well-intentioned law reforms would benefit the interests of the poor and the powerless. Valuing democratic participation, critical legal scholars were also reluctant to define the interests of the powerless for them. The essay proceeded to argue that critical legal scholars should see instrumentalism …

The Ontological Basis Of Legal Hermeneutics: A Proposed Model Of Inquiry Based On The Work Of Gadamer, Habermas, And Ricoeur, Francis J. Mootz Iii

McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles

No abstract provided.

The Misadventures Of State Postconviction Remedies, Larry Yackle

Faculty Scholarship

In a colloquium concentrating on the lower federal courts' jurisdiction to determine federal claims, it falls to me to treat state court opportunities to adjudicate the same issues in advance of, as an aid to, or in place of federal litigation. To do that, I will have to recount some conventional wisdom regarding the development of federal habeas corpus and state postconviction remedies in tandem during the last half century. In due course, I hope to solicit support for an unconventional conclusion to be drawn from that experience.

Actual Minds, Possible Worlds (Book Review), Thomas L. Shaffer

Journal Articles

Book review of: Actual Minds, Possible Worlds, by Jerome Bruner; Time, Narrative, and History, by David Carr; Law, Freedom, and Story: The Role of Narrative in Therapy, Society, and Faith, by John C. Hoffman; and Narrative and Morality, by Paul Nelson.

Stare Decisis And Constitutional Adjudication, Henry Paul Monaghan

Faculty Scholarship

Despite endless literature urging that constitutional adjudication be severed from explorations into the understandings at the creation of the Constitution, original understanding continues to play a prominent role in the Supreme Court's jurisprudence. For the Court, originalism seemingly provides a legitimate ground for decisionmaking; for the people, it provides assurances against judicial usurpation of power properly belonging to other branches of government, or retained by the people themselves.

But difficulties with originalism emerge once the existing constitutional order is actually examined. The Supreme Court's repeated invocations of the Framers' understanding notwithstanding, a significant portion of our constitutional order cannot reasonably …

The Tax Treatment Of Qualified Plans: A Classic Defense Of The Status Quo, Edward A. Zelinsky

Articles

The current tax treatment of qualified pension and profit sharing plans has been criticized by commentators as an unfair and expensive tax expenditure. In this Article, Professor Zelinsky challenges this characterization and defends the current treatment of qualified plans on the ground that it is at least as attractive as its alternatives and superior to many of them. After evaluating the current treatment and the alternatives under the criteria of measurability, administrability, liquidity, equity, and simplicity, Professor Zelinsky concludes that the present treatment of qualified plans can be viewed as an acceptable part of a normative income tax.

Update - November 1987, Loma Linda University Center For Christian Bioethics

Update

In this issue:

-- Gerald Winslow joins LLU faculty
-- Thompson library opens September 25

[ Anencephalic Infants as Organ Donors: Ethical Issues ]
-- A Neonatologist's Concern
-- A Neonatologist's Reply
-- Should the Law be Changed?
-- Would Anencephalic Neonates be Citizens?
-- Cadaveric Donors Should be Dead

-- Ethics Center seeks $100,000

Preface, Monroe E. Price

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The First Amendment Jurisprudence Of Judge Robert H. Bork, Michael W. Mcconnell

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Probable Significance Of The Bork Appointment For Issues Of Particular Concern To Women, Mary Ann Glendon

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Bork Nomination, Ronald M. Dworkin

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Judicial Performance Of Robert H. Bork In Administrative And Regulatory Law, Richard B. Stewart

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Judge Robert H. Bork's Decisions In Which He Wrote No Opinion: An Analysis Of The Regulatory And Benefit Cases, Robert A. Anthony

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Analysis Of Judge Robert H. Bork’S Opinions On Standing, Daniel D. Polsby

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

On Critical Legal Studies As Guerilla Warfare, Guyora Binder

Journal Articles

This sardonic 1987 essay defended Critical Legal Studies (CLS) against alarmist attacks from the right, claiming that CLS was dangerously subversive of the rule of law, and seemingly contradictory attacks from the left dismissing CLS as empty theorizing lacking any practical implications for reform. The essay responded that while CLS lacked proposals for legislative reform, it favored a highly participatory process of reform, drawn from experience in the student movements of the 1960’s. It distrusted state power and bureaucracy as engines of change, and favored community organization, civil society, and popular mobilization.

The White House Report: Information On Judge Bork's Qualifications, Judicial Record & Related Subjects

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Evolution Of Law: Continued, Alan Watson

Scholarly Works

In my book The Evolution of Law I sought to give a general theory of legal evolution based on detailed legal examples from which generalizations could be drawn, offering as few examples as were consistent with my case in order to present as clear a picture as possible. I was well aware as I was writing that some critics would regard the examples as mere isolated aberrations and for them and for other readers who, whether convinced of the thesis or not, would like further evidence, I want here to bring forward a few extra significant examples.