Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (2123)
- Law and Society (2084)
- Courts (1661)
- State and Local Government Law (1589)
- Legal History (1404)
-
- Judges (1285)
- Health Law and Policy (1268)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1256)
- Military, War, and Peace (1215)
- Environmental Law (1200)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (1188)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1120)
- International Law (1108)
- Immigration Law (1099)
- Criminal Law (969)
- Legislation (960)
- Criminal Procedure (802)
- Law and Politics (777)
- Administrative Law (740)
- Law and Philosophy (703)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (672)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (670)
- Human Rights Law (643)
- International Trade Law (637)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (628)
- Litigation (614)
- Civil Procedure (605)
- Law and Economics (578)
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (885)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (830)
- University of Michigan Law School (383)
- Seattle University School of Law (309)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (309)
-
- UIC School of Law (290)
- University of New Mexico (255)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (226)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (226)
- University of Colorado Law School (212)
- Georgetown University Law Center (204)
- BLR (175)
- American University Washington College of Law (174)
- Pepperdine University (167)
- Barry University School of Law (166)
- Notre Dame Law School (165)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (158)
- University of Georgia School of Law (137)
- Universitas Indonesia (131)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (120)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (115)
- University of Miami Law School (113)
- Saint Joseph University of Beirut (109)
- New York Law School (105)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (104)
- Brooklyn Law School (103)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (99)
- Fordham Law School (97)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (97)
- Cornell University Law School (96)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (1422)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (397)
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (395)
- Supreme Court (268)
- Constitutional law (220)
-
- Constitutional Law (212)
- Constitution (207)
- Judges (191)
- Law (186)
- United States Supreme Court (182)
- Courts (144)
- First Amendment (131)
- Judicial review (126)
- Law and Society (116)
- Legislation (111)
- Legal History (105)
- Legal theory (97)
- Statutory interpretation (94)
- Inc. (87)
- Justice (87)
- Criminal law (83)
- Federalism (83)
- Due process (82)
- Evidence (80)
- Fourteenth Amendment (78)
- Originalism (77)
- International Law (76)
- Legal history (76)
- Federal courts (72)
- Discrimination (71)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (856)
- Cardozo Law Review (483)
- Faculty Scholarship (395)
- Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association (297)
- Seattle University Law Review (294)
-
- UIC Law Review (277)
- Articles (272)
- United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005) (253)
- Michigan Law Review (246)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (198)
- Publications (198)
- Touro Law Review (171)
- ExpressO (170)
- Scholarly Works (158)
- Journal Articles (128)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Indiana Law Journal (118)
- Barry Law Review (109)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (109)
- Faculty Publications (98)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (95)
- Journal of Legal Education (91)
- Pepperdine Law Review (86)
- UAEU Law Journal (80)
- Akron Law Review (79)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (74)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (74)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (72)
- Maine Law Review (70)
- Northwestern University Law Review (67)
- Publication Type
Articles 7771 - 7800 of 9176
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Judicial Discretion: Is One More Of A Good Thing Too Much?, David B. Sentelle
Judicial Discretion: Is One More Of A Good Thing Too Much?, David B. Sentelle
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Judicial Discretion by Aharon Barak
Sociological Justice, Christopher M. Adams
Sociological Justice, Christopher M. Adams
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Sociological Justice by Donald Black
History's Challenge To Feminism, Jeanne L. Schroeder
History's Challenge To Feminism, Jeanne L. Schroeder
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe by James A. Brundage
Rawls On Political Community And Principles Of Justice, James W. Nickel
Rawls On Political Community And Principles Of Justice, James W. Nickel
Articles
No abstract provided.
The Hohfeldian Approach To Law And Semiotics, J. M. Balkin
The Hohfeldian Approach To Law And Semiotics, J. M. Balkin
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Of Persons And Property: The Politics Of Legal Taxonomy, David Cohen, Allan C. Hutchinson
Of Persons And Property: The Politics Of Legal Taxonomy, David Cohen, Allan C. Hutchinson
Dalhousie Law Journal
To talk of law without politics or history is nonsensical. All lawyers must concede that what they do takes place in historical circumstances and has political consequences. Every piece of law-making and law-application is a governmental act; it relies on political authority and claims binding force. Moreover, all legal activity occurs within a particular historical context; it is intended to respond to or influence a past, existing or anticipated state of affairs. This means that the study of law must concern itself with politics and history generally: it must not confine itself to only the politics and history of law. …
Retrieving Positivism: Law As Bibliolatry, Frederick C. Decoste
Retrieving Positivism: Law As Bibliolatry, Frederick C. Decoste
Dalhousie Law Journal
Legal positivism is a curious phenomenon in both its theoretical and sociological parts. It is curious as theory because its very existence, as theory, is often questioned, and because, even when its existence is admitted, the nature of the theory, and who does and does not qualify as an adherent most often remains in dispute. It is curious sociologically because rare is the legal theoretician who forthrightly endorses positivism: positivists, it would appear, are as scarce as the formalists among whom they used to be numbered.
Nomos And Thanatos (Part B). Feminism As Jurisgenerative Transformation, Or Resistance Through Partial Incorporation?, Richard F. Devlin
Nomos And Thanatos (Part B). Feminism As Jurisgenerative Transformation, Or Resistance Through Partial Incorporation?, Richard F. Devlin
Dalhousie Law Journal
In Part A of this essay, "The Killing Fields", I developed a critique of the disciplinary impulses that underlie modern law and legal theory. Invoking a number of perspectives and a plurality of analyses, I proposed that male-stream legal theory and contemporary law both assume as inevitable, and legitimize as appropriate, the funnelling of violence through law. The problem with a funnel, however, is that it does not curtail or reduce that which is channelled through it. On the contrary, to funnel is to condense and to intensify. Viewed from this perspective, interpreted from the bottom up, law and legal …
Evolutionary Jurisprudence: Prospects And Limitations On The Use Of Modern Darwinism Throughout The Legal Process, Steven Kasten
Evolutionary Jurisprudence: Prospects And Limitations On The Use Of Modern Darwinism Throughout The Legal Process, Steven Kasten
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Evolutionary Jurisprudence: Prospects and Limitations on the Use of Modern Darwinism Throughout the Legal Process by John H. Beckstrom
The Role Of International Law As A Canon Of Domestic Statutory Construction, Ralph G. Steinhardt
The Role Of International Law As A Canon Of Domestic Statutory Construction, Ralph G. Steinhardt
Vanderbilt Law Review
From the beginning of our constitutional life, the Supreme Court has articulated principles that structure the juridical relationship between international law and domestic law. These principles purportedly offer rules of decision for resolving in domestic courts the potential in-consistencies between external and internal sources of law, and they do so with the surface simplicity of axioms. Treaties, for example, cannot trump constitutional norms.' Customary international law can provide a rule of decision at least in the absence of controlling legislative or executive acts. In the case of an irreconcilable conflict between a treaty and a statute, the latter-in-time prevails. When …
Contracts—The Trend Toward Legal Realism. Shearson Lehman Cmo, Inc. V. Tcf Banking & Savings And Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association V. Tribune Co., 670 F. Supp. 491 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)., Janne G. Siegel
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Narrative Jurisprudence And Other Heresies: Legal Education At The Margin, David O. Friedrichs
Narrative Jurisprudence And Other Heresies: Legal Education At The Margin, David O. Friedrichs
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Stare Decisis And Judicial Restraint, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Stare Decisis And Judicial Restraint, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Corrective Justice From Aristotle To Second Order Liability: Who Should Pay When The Culpable Cannot?, Kathryn R. Heidt
Corrective Justice From Aristotle To Second Order Liability: Who Should Pay When The Culpable Cannot?, Kathryn R. Heidt
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Progressive And Conservative Constitutionalism, Robin West
Progressive And Conservative Constitutionalism, Robin West
Michigan Law Review
The article's central thesis is that the understandings of the constitutional tradition most central to both paradigms are determined by sometimes implicit, but more often explicit, political dispositions toward various forms of social and private power, and the normative authority to which social and private power gives rise. Very broadly, conservative constitutionalists view private or social normative authority as the legitimate and best source of guidance for state action; accordingly, they view both the Constitution and constitutional adjudication as means of preserving and protecting that authority and the power that undergirds it against either legislative or judicial encroachment. Progressive constitutionalists, …
Not Beyond Justice: A Reply To Heller And Eisele, Arthur J. Jacobson
Not Beyond Justice: A Reply To Heller And Eisele, Arthur J. Jacobson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor Brudner's Crisis, Ernest J. Weinrib
Professor Brudner's Crisis, Ernest J. Weinrib
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor Weinrib's Coherence, Alan Brudner
Florida Star V. B.J.F.: The Rape Of The Right To Privacy, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 731 (1990), Barbara Lynn Pedersen
Florida Star V. B.J.F.: The Rape Of The Right To Privacy, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 731 (1990), Barbara Lynn Pedersen
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
European Community Law And The Doctrine Of Legitimate Expectations: How Legitimate, And For Whom, Eleanor Sharpston
European Community Law And The Doctrine Of Legitimate Expectations: How Legitimate, And For Whom, Eleanor Sharpston
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
This article aims to provide a fairly succinct, practical analysis of the way in which the Court of Justice of the European Communities (the "supreme court" for all questions of interpretation arising under the EEC, ECSC and Euratom Treaties) has developed one particular fundamental principle of Community law, the doctrine of "legitimate expectations". The emphasis throughout is not only on the exact legal formulation of the doctrine, but also on whether or not the doctrine can be said to match up to expectations that, economically, might be regarded as "legitimate". Before embarking on the substance, it may be useful to …
The Copyrightability Of Useful Articles: The Second Circuit's Resistance To Conceptual Separability, Sally M. Donahue
The Copyrightability Of Useful Articles: The Second Circuit's Resistance To Conceptual Separability, Sally M. Donahue
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Construction On The Road To Recovery: New York Limits Loss Of Enjoyment Of Life, Bonnie Sue Goodman
Construction On The Road To Recovery: New York Limits Loss Of Enjoyment Of Life, Bonnie Sue Goodman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Retrospective Justification, Jeffrey Malkan
Policing Discovery Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 219(C): A Search For Judicial Consistency, Kathleen M. Potocki
Policing Discovery Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 219(C): A Search For Judicial Consistency, Kathleen M. Potocki
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
When Does Parental Liability End?: Holding Parents Liable For The Acts Of Their Adult Children, Joan Morgridge
When Does Parental Liability End?: Holding Parents Liable For The Acts Of Their Adult Children, Joan Morgridge
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Brief Argument For Greater Control Of Litigation Discretion - The Public Interest And Public Choice Contexts, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1990), Walter J. Kendall Iii
A Brief Argument For Greater Control Of Litigation Discretion - The Public Interest And Public Choice Contexts, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1990), Walter J. Kendall Iii
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
On The Steadfastness And Courage Of Government Lawyers, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 165 (1990), Roger C. Cramton
On The Steadfastness And Courage Of Government Lawyers, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 165 (1990), Roger C. Cramton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Edmonson V. Leesville Concrete Company, Inc.: Can The "No State Action" Shibboleth Legitimize The Racist Use Of Peremptory Challenges In Civil Actions, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 271 (1990), David Park
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Stanford V. Kentucky: The Minimum Age For The Maximum Penalty - Death, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 453 (1990), Alison R. Faltersack
Stanford V. Kentucky: The Minimum Age For The Maximum Penalty - Death, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 453 (1990), Alison R. Faltersack
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered V. United States: Supreme Court Approves Attorney Fee Foreiture, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 471 (1990), Stephen M. Kightlinger
Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered V. United States: Supreme Court Approves Attorney Fee Foreiture, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 471 (1990), Stephen M. Kightlinger
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.