Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (3127)
- Constitutional Law (1499)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1460)
- Jurisprudence (1297)
- State and Local Government Law (991)
-
- Legal History (865)
- Legal Profession (852)
- Law and Society (829)
- Administrative Law (774)
- Law and Politics (768)
- Criminal Law (732)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (675)
- Criminal Procedure (650)
- Legislation (592)
- Legal Biography (585)
- Litigation (585)
- Civil Procedure (554)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (549)
- Jurisdiction (510)
- Legal Education (507)
- Law and Gender (439)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (414)
- Legal Writing and Research (409)
- Law and Race (403)
- Civil Law (380)
- International Law (378)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (377)
- Evidence (375)
- Institution
-
- University of Richmond (529)
- University of Michigan Law School (420)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (392)
- Pepperdine University (383)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (322)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (276)
- UC Law SF (258)
- New York Law School (243)
- Seattle University School of Law (241)
- University of Colorado Law School (170)
- Duke Law (166)
- Roger Williams University (161)
- Fordham Law School (155)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (141)
- William & Mary Law School (141)
- Georgetown University Law Center (139)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (139)
- UIC School of Law (134)
- American University Washington College of Law (128)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (115)
- Cornell University Law School (106)
- University of Georgia School of Law (104)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (99)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (94)
- Notre Dame Law School (93)
- University of Washington School of Law (84)
- Cleveland State University (78)
- BLR (77)
- Brigham Young University Law School (76)
- University of Maine School of Law (74)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (1002)
- Supreme Court (457)
- Courts (291)
- United States Supreme Court (222)
- Judge (190)
-
- Jurisprudence (189)
- Judiciary (182)
- Constitution (176)
- Judicial review (155)
- Constitutional law (153)
- Constitutional Law (131)
- Justice (123)
- Court (113)
- Federal courts (111)
- Judicial independence (111)
- Law (103)
- Roger J Miner (103)
- Judicial process (99)
- Judicial selection (97)
- Federal (95)
- Politics (87)
- Due process (83)
- Congress (80)
- Evidence (77)
- Lawyers (75)
- National Association of Administrative Law Judges (74)
- Litigation (72)
- New York (72)
- Justices (71)
- Administrative law (69)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (418)
- University of Richmond Law Review (396)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (270)
- Touro Law Review (258)
- Michigan Law Review (244)
-
- Seattle University Law Review (233)
- Indiana Law Journal (206)
- Articles (186)
- Cardozo Law Review (168)
- The Judges' Book (148)
- Faculty Publications (139)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (129)
- Law Faculty Publications (127)
- Scholarly Works (107)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (105)
- Pepperdine Law Review (99)
- Publicity & News Clippings (98)
- UIC Law Review (92)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (89)
- Publications (86)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (86)
- Journal Articles (84)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (84)
- Northwestern University Law Review (72)
- ExpressO (70)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (69)
- Nevada Law Journal (67)
- Faculty Articles (65)
- West Virginia Law Review (64)
- Maine Law Review (62)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2251 - 2280 of 7580
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Table Of Contents And Editorial Board, Michelle Wellnitz
Table Of Contents And Editorial Board, Michelle Wellnitz
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Humphrey’S Executor Squared: Free Enterprise Fund V. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board And Its Implications For Administrative Law Judges, Robert S. Garrison Jr.
Humphrey’S Executor Squared: Free Enterprise Fund V. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board And Its Implications For Administrative Law Judges, Robert S. Garrison Jr.
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
A Matter Of Interpretation: Federal Courts And The Law, Charles R. Priest
A Matter Of Interpretation: Federal Courts And The Law, Charles R. Priest
Maine Law Review
Justice Scalia's engaging essay, “Common-Law Courts in a Civil-Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting the Constitution and Laws,” and the four comments it provokes, should provide lawyers, judges, and other lawmakers with an interesting evening. Instead of presenting a theoretical view of the role of the federal courts in interpretation, Justice Scalia sketches out a case for “textualism.” “Textualism” is one of several currently contending methods of interpreting statutes and the United States Constitution, and is currently popular among federal judges who see their role as restricting government's powers to those expressly stated in the …
Solitary Troubles, Alexander A. Reinert
Solitary Troubles, Alexander A. Reinert
Notre Dame Law Review
Solitary confinement is one of the most severe forms of punishment that can be inflicted on human beings. In recent years, the use of extreme isolation in our prisons and jails has been questioned by correctional officials, medical experts, and reform advocates alike. Yet for nearly the entirety of American history, judicial regulation of the practice has been extremely limited. This Article explains why judges hesitate to question the use of solitary confinement, while also providing a path forward for greater scrutiny of the practice.
Sadomasochism: Descent Into Darkness, Annotated Accounts Of Cases, 1996-2014, Robert Peters
Sadomasochism: Descent Into Darkness, Annotated Accounts Of Cases, 1996-2014, Robert Peters
Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence
A collection of accounts of sadomasochistic sexual abuse from news reports and scholarly and professional sources about the dark underbelly of sadomasochism and the pornography that contributes to it. It focuses on crimes and other harmful sexual behavior related to the pursuit of sadistic sexual pleasure in North America and the U.K. It is intended to be a resource to educate people about how sadomasochism can lead to harmful and even deadly sadistic sexual behavior.
The Origins (And Fragility) Of Judicial Independence, Tara Leigh Grove
The Origins (And Fragility) Of Judicial Independence, Tara Leigh Grove
Faculty Publications
The federal judiciary today takes certain things for granted. Political actors will not attempt to remove Article III judges outside the impeachment process; they will not obstruct federal court orders; and they will not tinker with the Supreme Court’s size in order to pack it with like-minded Justices. And yet a closer look reveals that these “self-evident truths” of judicial independence are neither self-evident nor necessary implications of our constitutional text, structure, and history. This Article demonstrates that many government officials once viewed these court-curbing measures as not only constitutionally permissible but also desirable (and politically viable) methods of “checking” …
Newsroom: Court As Classroom 03-01-2018, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Newsroom: Court As Classroom 03-01-2018, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
A Non-Originalist Separation Of Powers, Eric J. Segall
A Non-Originalist Separation Of Powers, Eric J. Segall
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The President, Prosecutorial Discretion, Obstruction Of Justice, And Congress, Henry L. Chambers Jr.
The President, Prosecutorial Discretion, Obstruction Of Justice, And Congress, Henry L. Chambers Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Delegation Enforcement By State Attorneys General, Jonathan David Shaub
Delegation Enforcement By State Attorneys General, Jonathan David Shaub
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
States Suing The Federal Government: Protecting Liberty Or Playing Politics?, Elbert Lin
States Suing The Federal Government: Protecting Liberty Or Playing Politics?, Elbert Lin
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Emphatic Plea For The Empathic Judge, Gary Low
Emphatic Plea For The Empathic Judge, Gary Low
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
Justice must not only be done. it must be seen to be done. Thus, the contemporary orthodoxy is that the dispensation of justice must be dispassionate and blind, for to do otherwise is to risk accusations of subjectivity and bias. This article adopts the contrarian position — judges ought. in their decision- making. to take full account of the different perspectives of the parties involved. and can only properly do so if they possess and exercise empathy. The prejudice-related risks involved in embracing empathy are acknowledged. and strategies for dealing with these excesses are explored. With that in mind. this …
What Judges Need To Know: Schemas, Implicit Bias, And Empirical Research On Lgbt Parenting And Demographics, Todd Brower
What Judges Need To Know: Schemas, Implicit Bias, And Empirical Research On Lgbt Parenting And Demographics, Todd Brower
DePaul Journal of Women, Gender and the Law
No abstract provided.
Judging Implicit Bias: A National Empirical Study Of Judicial Stereotypes, Justin D. Levinson, Mark W. Bennett, Koichi Hioki
Judging Implicit Bias: A National Empirical Study Of Judicial Stereotypes, Justin D. Levinson, Mark W. Bennett, Koichi Hioki
Florida Law Review
American judges, and especially lifetime-appointed federal judges, are often revered as the pinnacle of objectivity, possessing a deep commitment to fairness, and driven to seek justice as they interpret federal laws and the U.S. Constitution. As these judges struggle with some of the great challenges of the modern legal world, empirical scholars must seek to fully understand the role of implicit bias in judicial decision-making. Research from the field of implicit social cognition has long documented negative implicit biases towards a wide range of group members, some of whom may well be harmed in various ways across the legal system. …
Who Determines What Is Egregious? Judge Or Jury: Enhanced Damages After Halo V. Pulse, Brandon M. Reed
Who Determines What Is Egregious? Judge Or Jury: Enhanced Damages After Halo V. Pulse, Brandon M. Reed
Georgia State University Law Review
Enhanced damages in patent law are a type of punitive damage that can be awarded in the case of “egregious misconduct” during the course of patent infringement. Authorization for enhanced damages comes from 35 U.S.C. § 284, which allows the district court to increase total damages up to three times the amount of actual damages found by the jury. It is well understood that, since enhanced damages are punitive in nature, enhancement should only be considered for cases of “wanton” or “deliberate” infringement. However, determining what constitutes this “egregious” misconduct has vastly transformed over time to include a negligence standard, …
Newsroom: A Mentor And A Friend 2-21-2018, Michael M. Bowden
Newsroom: A Mentor And A Friend 2-21-2018, Michael M. Bowden
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Maine's Overburdened Law Court: Has The Time Come For A Maine Appeals Court?, Peter L. Murray
Maine's Overburdened Law Court: Has The Time Come For A Maine Appeals Court?, Peter L. Murray
Maine Law Review
For the entire 178 years of Maine's statehood, its Supreme Judicial Court, “sitting as the Law Court,” has served as Maine's appellate court of first and last resort for all appeals from its trial courts of general jurisdiction. Over this time span, and particularly over the last three decades, the growth in number and complexity of civil and criminal appeals has placed the Law Court under an extremely heavy burden of cases. The sheer number of the appeals which the Law Court is expected to consider and decide risks exceeding the capacity of the institution for careful, thorough, and deliberate …
Creating Mischief: The Tenth Circuit Declares The Sec’S Administrative Law Judges Unconstitutional In Bandimere V. Securities Exchange Commission, Casey M. Olesen
Creating Mischief: The Tenth Circuit Declares The Sec’S Administrative Law Judges Unconstitutional In Bandimere V. Securities Exchange Commission, Casey M. Olesen
Maine Law Review
Since the passage of the APA, administrative agencies’ use of Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) to preside over hearings has exploded, and now far outpaces the number trials conducted before federal judges. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is one such agency that heavily utilizes ALJs to conduct their hearings. Recently, following an apparent higher percentage of SEC wins before their own ALJs as compared to before federal judges, a new constitutional challenge on the basis of the Appointments Clause has been brought before several circuits; that the SEC’s ALJs are inferior officers of the SEC, not employees, and therefore are …
The Judicial Role In Criminal Charging And Plea Bargaining, Darryl Brown
The Judicial Role In Criminal Charging And Plea Bargaining, Darryl Brown
Hofstra Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Responsibility For Justice In Criminal Courts, Lisa Foster
Judicial Responsibility For Justice In Criminal Courts, Lisa Foster
Hofstra Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law Library Blog (February 2018): Legal Beagle's Blog Archive, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Law Library Blog (February 2018): Legal Beagle's Blog Archive, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Law Library Newsletters/Blog
No abstract provided.
Newsroom: 'You Can't Help Being In Awe' 1-30-2018, Michael M. Bowden, Edward Fitzpatrick
Newsroom: 'You Can't Help Being In Awe' 1-30-2018, Michael M. Bowden, Edward Fitzpatrick
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
"We Are All Textualists Now": The Legacy Of Justice Antonin Scalia, Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain
"We Are All Textualists Now": The Legacy Of Justice Antonin Scalia, Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain
St. John's Law Review
(Excerpt)
One of my favorite extra-judicial activities is meeting with law students, and it is a pleasure to be with you today. But it is a special privilege to come back to the Jamaica campus of St. John’s College from which I graduated 60 years ago, long before the Law School had moved here from Schermerhorn Street in Brooklyn, and when there was only one building on this former golf course.
I was honored to call Justice Scalia a role model and friend. What I hope to convey to you today, however, is the effect Justice Scalia’s tenure on the …
Judicial Externships: Sharing Current Practices, Dinah Lennon Archambeault
Judicial Externships: Sharing Current Practices, Dinah Lennon Archambeault
Duke Law Master of Judicial Studies Theses
The need for externships has risen over the years as the importance of providing experiential education to supplement traditional doctrinal law school education has become generally acknowledged. Despite the many articles on externships, few, if any, have addressed how judicial externs are selected and how judicial externships are structured in the courts.
It was necessary to conduct qualitative research to determine how various courts address their extern programs, if at all. Based on the research I have undertaken, practices vary among courts and judges. Not only is there no uniform practice with respect to which courts and even judges place …
Certification Of Legal Questions To The Utah Supreme Court, David Nuffer
Certification Of Legal Questions To The Utah Supreme Court, David Nuffer
Duke Law Master of Judicial Studies Theses
For 30 years, federal courts have certified questions of state law to the Utah Supreme Court. This thesis examines the history and utility of the process and recommends changes to the process in the federal district court and in the Utah Supreme Court.
The current focus of federal judges in certifying questions is on utility for the case before the court. But certification of questions from a federal court to a state court is an expression of federalism—a humble acknowledgment by a federal authority which is often regarded as supreme that the state is the proper and best authority to …
Clerking For God’S Grandfather: Chauncey Belknap’S Year With Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Todd C. Peppers, Ira Brad Matetsky, Elizabeth R. Williams, Jessica Winn
Clerking For God’S Grandfather: Chauncey Belknap’S Year With Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Todd C. Peppers, Ira Brad Matetsky, Elizabeth R. Williams, Jessica Winn
Scholarly Articles
Most of what we know about law clerks comes from the clerks themselves, usually in the form of law review articles memorializing their Justices and their clerkships or in interviews with reporters and legal scholars. In a few instances, however, law clerks have contemporaneously memorialized their experiences in diaries. These materials provide a rare window into the insular world of the Court. While the recollections contained in the diaries are often infused with youthful hero worship for their employer—in contradistinction to Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.’s claim that no man is a hero to his valet— they offer a real-time, …
Supreme Court Of The United States, October Term 2018 Preview, Georgetown University Law Center, Supreme Court Institute
Supreme Court Of The United States, October Term 2018 Preview, Georgetown University Law Center, Supreme Court Institute
Supreme Court Overviews
No abstract provided.
Savings—The Missing Element In Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Cases?, David R. Jones
Savings—The Missing Element In Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Cases?, David R. Jones
Duke Law Master of Judicial Studies Theses
This paper examines the effects of debtor savings on the viability of chapter 13 bankruptcy plans. The paper further examines the impact of lawyer culture, debtor participation in the bankruptcy process and judicial activism on the use of the savings program by chapter 13 debtors. Using a data set of randomly selected chapter 13 bankruptcy cases filed in the Southern District of Texas, the analysis demonstrates that while savings has a direct positive impact on the success of chapter 13 plans, the degree of that success is significantly influenced by the views held by debtors’ lawyers, chapter 13 trustees and …
Brock Turner: Sorting Through The Noise, Michael Vitiello
Brock Turner: Sorting Through The Noise, Michael Vitiello
McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles
PART I. THE MEDIA’S ROLE ............................................................................... 634
A. Six Months for Rape? ............................................................................ 634
B. Okay, But Sixth Months for Sexual Assault? ......................................... 638
C. But Vitiello, You are Cherry-Picking the Facts ..................................... 643
D. But Judge Persky Showed Bias, Racial or Otherwise ........................... 646
PART II: TAKING THE WRONG PATH TOWARDS RECALL ................................... 649
A. Existing Checks on Judicial Misconduct ............................................... 650
B. What’s Not to Like About Recall? ......................................................... 652
III. CONCLUDING THOUGHTS ............................................................................. 659
Why Courts Fail To Protect Privacy: Race, Age, Bias, And Technology, Bernard Chao, Catherine Durso, Ian Farrell, Christopher Robertson
Why Courts Fail To Protect Privacy: Race, Age, Bias, And Technology, Bernard Chao, Catherine Durso, Ian Farrell, Christopher Robertson
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable “searches and seizures,” but in the digital age of stingray devices and IP tracking, what constitutes a search or seizure? The Supreme Court has held that the threshold question depends on and reflects the “reasonable expectations” of ordinary members of the public concerning their own privacy. For example, the police now exploit the “third party” doctrine to access data held by email and cell phone providers, without securing a warrant, on the Supreme Court’s intuition that the public has no expectation of privacy in that information. Is that assumption correct? If judges’ intuitions about …