Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (44)
- Constitutional Law (34)
- Legal History (21)
- Jurisprudence (18)
- Supreme Court of the United States (15)
-
- Criminal Law (10)
- Law and Politics (10)
- Law and Society (9)
- Criminal Procedure (8)
- Legislation (8)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (7)
- Litigation (7)
- Civil Procedure (6)
- Jurisdiction (6)
- State and Local Government Law (6)
- Election Law (5)
- Intellectual Property Law (5)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (5)
- Administrative Law (4)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- First Amendment (4)
- Law and Gender (4)
- Legal Profession (4)
- Legal Writing and Research (4)
- Common Law (3)
- Law and Philosophy (3)
- Law and Race (3)
- Legal Biography (3)
- Institution
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (14)
- University of Richmond (10)
- UIC School of Law (8)
- Duke Law (7)
- Georgetown University Law Center (7)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (5)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (5)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- Seattle University School of Law (4)
- University of Georgia School of Law (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- Pace University (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Singapore Management University (2)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- University of the Pacific (2)
- Washington University in St. Louis (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (21)
- Supreme Court (11)
- Courts (7)
- Constitutional law (5)
- Decision making (5)
-
- Judicial review (5)
- Bias (4)
- Judicial elections (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Retirement (4)
- United States Supreme Court (4)
- History (3)
- Judicial Review (3)
- Judicial independence (3)
- Judicial process (3)
- Judicial selection (3)
- Judiciary (3)
- Nominations (3)
- Washington (3)
- Accountability (2)
- Adjudication (2)
- Administration of justice (2)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Antitrust (2)
- Comparative Law (2)
- Congress (2)
- Copyright (2)
- Criminal Justice (2)
- Empathy (2)
- Empirical (2)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (17)
- Cardozo Law Review (8)
- Articles (6)
- Scholarly Works (6)
- Faculty Publications (5)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (5)
- University of Richmond Law Review (5)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (4)
- Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Scholarly Articles (4)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (4)
- Seattle University Law Review (4)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (3)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (3)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (3)
- American University Law Review (2)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (2)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Global Business & Development Law Journal (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- Pace Law Review (2)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (2)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- Akron Law Faculty Publications (1)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 138
Full-Text Articles in Judges
The Judicial Power And The Inferior Federal Courts: Exploring The Constitutional Vesting Thesis, A. Benjamin Spencer
The Judicial Power And The Inferior Federal Courts: Exploring The Constitutional Vesting Thesis, A. Benjamin Spencer
Scholarly Articles
The third branch of our federal government has traditionally been viewed as the least of the three in terms of the scope of its power and authority. This view finds validation when one considers the extensive authority that Congress has been permitted to exercise over the Federal Judiciary. From the beginning, Congress has understood itself to possess the authority to limit the jurisdiction of inferior federal courts. The Supreme Court has acquiesced to this understanding of congressional authority without much thought or explanation.
It may be possible, however, to imagine a more robust vision of the Judicial Power through closer …
The Judicial Duty To Give Reasons: Thong Ah Fat V Public Prosecutor [2011] Sgca 65, Siyuan Chen
The Judicial Duty To Give Reasons: Thong Ah Fat V Public Prosecutor [2011] Sgca 65, Siyuan Chen
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
The accused was charged under the Misuse of Drugs Act after being found with 142.41 grams of diamorphine at the Woodlands Checkpoint. The High Court Judge found the accused guilty and sentenced him to death in a brief judgment of five paragraphs. The Court of Appeal, however, ordered a retrial as it was of the view that the Judge’s reasoning was “unclear” and the “judicial duty to give reasoned decisions” was not discharged
Politics In The Non-Political Branch, Justin L. Swanson
Politics In The Non-Political Branch, Justin L. Swanson
College of Journalism and Mass Communications: Professional Projects
Across the country there exists a patchwork of legal systems by which judges are appointed retained. In some states, like Illinois, it is a fully political process where judges actively campaign for election to the bench. But a majority of states, including Nebraska, have adopted the Merit Selection System, which attempts to remove politics from these processes. Nevertheless, politics can enter into the retention votes. And when they do, it can be extremely difficult for judges to overcome.
In Memoriam: The Honorable Leroy Rountree Hassell, Sr., Hon. Harry L. Carrico
In Memoriam: The Honorable Leroy Rountree Hassell, Sr., Hon. Harry L. Carrico
University of Richmond Law Review
Leroy Rountree Hassell, Sr. passed away on February 9, 2011. News of his death devastated those of us associated with him onthe Supreme Court of Virginia. We had lost a dear friend, one always conscious of the needs of his associates and anxious about making sure they were comfortable. Even more, the court lost its peerless leader, and the people of the Commonwealth of Virginialost a dedicated public servant. He will be sorely missed in allcorners of our great state.
Emotional Regulation And Judicial Behavior, Terry A. Maroney
Emotional Regulation And Judicial Behavior, Terry A. Maroney
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Judges are human and experience emotion when hearing cases, though the standard account of judging long has denied that fact. In the post-Realist era it is possible to acknowledge that judges have emotional reactions to their work, yet our legal culture continues to insist that a good judge firmly puts those reactions aside. Thus, we expect judges to regulate their emotions, either by preventing emotion’s emergence or by walling off its influence. But judges are given precisely no direction as to how to engage in emotional regulation.
/="/">
/="/">This Article proposes a model for judicial emotion regulation that goes …
Judge Not - Why Won’T Progressives Fight For Federal Judges?, Sonja R. West
Judge Not - Why Won’T Progressives Fight For Federal Judges?, Sonja R. West
Popular Media
Democrats have taken their eye off the ball on judicial appointments for far too long. It took decades for Republicans to build the court system now in place, and it may take many years to rebalance it. But the time to start is yesterday. Until Democrats start slapping “It’s the courts, stupid!” stickers on their rear bumpers, their elected officials aren’t going to change. Until progressives say, “I’m not going to stop writing my senator until Paul Watford gets a hearing,” Obama judges will be slow-walked through hearings and wait months for a floor vote that might never come. We …
Share Transfer Restrictions In Close Corporations As Mechanisms For Intelligible Corporate Outcomes, Stephen J. Leacock
Share Transfer Restrictions In Close Corporations As Mechanisms For Intelligible Corporate Outcomes, Stephen J. Leacock
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Lochner V. New York (1905) And Kennedy V. Louisiana (2008): Judicial Reliance On Adversary Argument, Douglas E. Abrams
Lochner V. New York (1905) And Kennedy V. Louisiana (2008): Judicial Reliance On Adversary Argument, Douglas E. Abrams
Faculty Publications
Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist called Lochner v. New York (1905) “one of the most ill-starred decisions that [the Supreme Court ever rendered.” The Justices’ deliberations preceding the 5-4 decision demonstrate the courts’ reliance on advocacy in the adversary system of civil and criminal justice. The stark imbalance between the state’s “incredibly sketchy” brief and Joseph Lochner’s sterling submission may have determined Lochner’s outcome, and thus may have changed the course of constitutional history, by leading two Justices to join the majority on the central question of whether New York’s maximum-hours law for bakery workers was a reasonable public health …
Setting The Record Straight On State V. John Ingram Purtle: Reflections On The Great Dissenter, Samuel A. Perroni
Setting The Record Straight On State V. John Ingram Purtle: Reflections On The Great Dissenter, Samuel A. Perroni
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Religious Liberty Of Judges, Daniel R. Suhr
The Religious Liberty Of Judges, Daniel R. Suhr
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
This Article begins by reviewing the government employee line of cases, starting with United Public Workers v. Mitchell in 1947.29 The first section concludes that the modified Pickering balancing test set forth in United States v. National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) is the appropriate level of scrutiny for judicial conduct rules. The body of this Article reviews ways in which the four canons of the ABA Model Code of Judicial Ethics and official interpretations of and rulings regarding them limit the religious activities of judges. I conclude that numerous applications of the Model Code are unconstitutional infringements on judges’ First …
Coming Off The Bench: Legal And Policy Implications Of Proposals To Allow Retired Justices To Sit By Designation On The Supreme Court, Lisa T. Mcelroy, Michael C. Dorf
Coming Off The Bench: Legal And Policy Implications Of Proposals To Allow Retired Justices To Sit By Designation On The Supreme Court, Lisa T. Mcelroy, Michael C. Dorf
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
In the fall of 2010, Senator Patrick Leahy introduced a bill that would have overridden a New Deal-era federal statute forbidding retired Justices from serving by designation on the Supreme Court of the United States. The Leahy bill would have authorized the Court to recall willing retired Justices to substitute for recused Justices. This Article uses the Leahy bill as a springboard for considering a number of important constitutional and policy questions, including whether the possibility of 4-4 splits justifies the substitution of a retired Justice for an active one; whether permitting retired Justices to substitute for recused Justices would …
Revising Canada's Ethical Rules For Judges Returning To Practice, Stephen Ga Pitel, Will Bortolin
Revising Canada's Ethical Rules For Judges Returning To Practice, Stephen Ga Pitel, Will Bortolin
Dalhousie Law Journal
It has recently become more common for retired Canadian judges to return to the practice of law This development raises an array of ethical considerations and potential threats to the integrity of the administration of justice. Although most codes of legal ethics contemplate the possibility of former judges returning to practice, the rules on this particular topic are dated, under-analyzed, and generally inadequate. This article reviews the Canadian ethical rules that specifically relate to former judges and identifies their shortcomings. In doing so, the authors consider, for comparative purposes, Canadian ethical rules directed at former public officers who return to …
The Impeachment Of The Judges Of The Nova Scotia Supreme Court, 1787-1793: Colonial Judges, Loyalist Lawyers, And The Colonial Assembly, Jim Phillips
Dalhousie Law Journal
In 1790 the Nova Scotia House of Assembly passed seven "articles of impeachment" against two ofthe colony's Supreme Courtjudges, the firstattempt bya British North American assembly to remove superior courtjudges. Although the impeachment failed when the British government rejected the charges, it is noteworthy nonetheless. The product of a dispute between newly arrived loyalist lawyers and a local elite of "old inhabitants, " it was at one and the same time a political struggle between the Assembly and the executive branch, and one that involved concerns about judicial competence. The impeachment crisis also demonstrates the close links between the judiciary …
Samantar And Executive Power, Peter B. Rutledge
Samantar And Executive Power, Peter B. Rutledge
Scholarly Works
This essay examines Samantar v. Yousuf in the context of broader debate about the relationship between federal common law and executive power. Samantar represents simply the latest effort by the Executive Branch to literally shape the meaning of law through a process referred to in the literature as “executive lawmaking.” While traditional accounts of executive lawmaking typically have treated the idea as a singular concept, Samantar demonstrates the need to bifurcate the concept into at least two different categories: acts of executive lawmaking decoupled from pending litigation and acts of executive lawmaking taken expressly in response to litigation. As Samantar …
Disrobing Judicial Campaign Contributions: A Case For Using The Buckley Framework To Analyze The Constitutionality Of Judicial Solicitation Bans, Aimee Ghosh
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Of The United States, October Term 2011 Preview, Georgetown University Law Center, Supreme Court Institute
Supreme Court Of The United States, October Term 2011 Preview, Georgetown University Law Center, Supreme Court Institute
Supreme Court Overviews
No abstract provided.
Pliva V. Mensing And Its Implications, Brian Wolfman, Dena Feldman
Pliva V. Mensing And Its Implications, Brian Wolfman, Dena Feldman
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in PLIVA Inc. v. Mensing will immunize generic drug manufacturers facing failure-to-warn claims from state-law liability, and may also have implications for preemption jurisprudence more generally, says attorney Brian Wolfman and co-author Dena Feldman in this BNA Insight. The authors analyze the ruling, and offer their views on the questions that PLIVA raises about the ongoing vitality of the presumption against preemption, the standard for determining ‘‘impossibility’’ preemption, and the propriety of deference to an agency’s views on preemption.
Beyond Common Sense: A Social Psychological Study Of Iqbal's Effect On Claims Of Race Discrimination, Victor D. Quintanilla
Beyond Common Sense: A Social Psychological Study Of Iqbal's Effect On Claims Of Race Discrimination, Victor D. Quintanilla
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) once operated as a notice pleading rule, requiring plaintiffs to set forth only a "short and plain" statement of their claim. In Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, and then Ashcroft v. Iqbal, the United States Supreme Court recast Rule 8(a) into a plausibility pleading standard. To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter "to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." Iqbal requires federal courts, when deciding whether a complaint is plausible, to draw on their "judicial experience and common sense." Courts apply this standard …
The Antislavery Judge Reconsidered, Jeffrey M. Schmitt
The Antislavery Judge Reconsidered, Jeffrey M. Schmitt
School of Law Faculty Publications
It is conventionally believed that neutral legal principles required antislavery judges to uphold proslavery legislation in spite of their moral convictions against slavery. Under this view, an antislavery judge who ruled on proslavery legislation was forced to choose, not between liberty and slavery, but rather between liberty and fidelity to his conception of the judicial role in a system of limited government. Focusing on the proslavery Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, this article challenges the conventional view by arguing that the constitutionality of the fugitive act was ambiguous; meaning that neutral legal principles supported a ruling against the fugitive act …
Judges Henry J. Friendly And Benjamin Cardozo: A Tale Of Two Precedents, David M. Dorsen
Judges Henry J. Friendly And Benjamin Cardozo: A Tale Of Two Precedents, David M. Dorsen
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Interference With Effective Assistance Of Counsel, Bennett L. Gershman
Judicial Interference With Effective Assistance Of Counsel, Bennett L. Gershman
Pace Law Review
Probably the most damaging external impediment to a lawyer’s ability to render effective assistance to a client may come from the interference by the trial judge in counsel’s advocacy. A judge supervises the conduct of a trial but he is more than a mere umpire or moderator. A trial judge, by his rulings, questions, and comments, has an enormous capacity to affect the merits of a party’s case and thereby influence the verdict of the jury. To be sure, the basic requirement of a trial judge, both legally and ethically, is to be impartial in demeanor as well as in …
Chinese Judicial Culture: From Tradition To Modernity, Shen Deyong
Chinese Judicial Culture: From Tradition To Modernity, Shen Deyong
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
Text of an address by the Hon. Justice Shen Deyong at the Brigham Young University Law School, October 21, 2009.
Rethinking Judicial Disqualification Based On Campaign Contributions: A Practical Critique Of Post-Caperton Proposals And A Call For Greater Transparency, Ryan M. Mcinerney
Rethinking Judicial Disqualification Based On Campaign Contributions: A Practical Critique Of Post-Caperton Proposals And A Call For Greater Transparency, Ryan M. Mcinerney
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Paul Verkuil As Institution Builder: The Cardozo Story, Matthew Diller
Paul Verkuil As Institution Builder: The Cardozo Story, Matthew Diller
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Our Class Action Federalism: Erie And The Rules Enabling Act After Shady Grove, Adam N. Steinman
Our Class Action Federalism: Erie And The Rules Enabling Act After Shady Grove, Adam N. Steinman
Faculty Scholarship
The intersection of federalism and class-action litigation has been an area of significant controversy in recent years. With the 2005 Class Action Fairness Act placing more high-stakes class actions into federal court, an especially crucial question is the extent to which the Erie doctrine and the Rules Enabling Act (REA) require federal courts to follow state class-action law. The Supreme Court’s decision in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co. begins to confront this issue, but many unanswered questions remain. Under several lines of argument that were neither made nor considered in Shady Grove, the Erie doctrine and the …
The Kiyemba Paradox: Creating A Judicial Framework To Eradicate Indefinite, Unlawful Executive Detentions, Samuel Chow
The Kiyemba Paradox: Creating A Judicial Framework To Eradicate Indefinite, Unlawful Executive Detentions, Samuel Chow
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
The article examines the Supreme Court's evolving role in reviewing detentions related to national security, particularly focusing on the writ of habeas corpus. It argues that while the Court has expanded habeas protections, significant limitations remain, especially in ordering release into the United States. The author contends that for habeas to be meaningful, courts must have the authority to grant "functional release," balancing individual liberty against executive powers. The analysis highlights key cases like Boumediene v. Bush, Munaf v. Geren, and Kiyemba v. Obama, which reveal the challenges in preventing indefinite detentions and the need for clearer …
The Judiciary In Political Transitions: The Critical Role Of U.S. Constitutionalism In Latin America, Nuno Garoupa, Maria A. Maldonado
The Judiciary In Political Transitions: The Critical Role Of U.S. Constitutionalism In Latin America, Nuno Garoupa, Maria A. Maldonado
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
This paper proposes a theory that explains how political transitions deal with incumbent judiciaries. We argue that a new political regime compares the benefit of reshaping the judiciary with loyal appointees against the political and economic costs of directly interfering, including the cost of international reputation. There are several forms of interventionism including court packing, court purging, and violence against the judiciary. We discuss political transitions in Europe and Latin American civil law jurisdictions through the lens of our theory. We argue that American constitutional influence plays a critical role. In addition, we provide a detailed analysis of the recent …
On The Difficulties Of Generalization - Pcaob In The Footsteps Of Myers, Humphrey's Executor, Morrison, And Freytag, Peter L. Strauss
On The Difficulties Of Generalization - Pcaob In The Footsteps Of Myers, Humphrey's Executor, Morrison, And Freytag, Peter L. Strauss
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Agency Independence After Pcaob, Kevin M. Stack
Agency Independence After Pcaob, Kevin M. Stack
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Endorsement Factor, Marci A. Hamilton