Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Dispute Resolution In The United States: Concerns And Opportunities In An Era Of Globalization Of Securities Markets, Mary Kay Kane

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Good Intentions Gone Awry: The Impact Of New York's Equitable Distribution Law On Divorce Outcomes, Marsha Garrison

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Strategy And Compliance With Bilateral Trade Dispute Settlement Agreements: Ustr's Section 301 Experience In The Pacific Basin, Michael P. Ryan

Michigan Journal of International Law

The paper is laid out in five parts. First, the conceptual linkages among strategy, goals, and agreement compliance are developed. Second, the study research design and findings are reported. Third, the strategy of trade dispute settlement negotiation is discussed with regard to bureaucratic politics. Fourth, case evidence that illustrates the key study findings is reviewed. Finally, effective monitoring and the notion of unilateral surveillance within the context of the present GATT-based, multilateral trading system are explored.

The Represented Client In A Settlement Conference: The Lessons Of G. Heileman Brewing Co. V. Joseph Oat Corp., Leonard L. Riskin

UF Law Faculty Publications

This Article sets out various perspectives that litigants, lawyers and judges commonly bring to settlement conferences, perspectives on lawyer-client relations, negotiation, and the role of the judicial host. In examining the opinions in the Heileman case, along with other materials, the Article attempts to uncover the underlying assumptions about the settlement conference that informed the behavior of the judges and lawyers in that case, arguing that Heileman's explanation lies in the lawyers' and judges' tendency to embrace one of two radically different visions of the settlement conference. The Article then catalogs the advantages and disadvantages of involving clients in settlement …

Out With The Old, In With The New: The Mini-Trial Is The New Wave In Resolving International Disputes, Mark D. Calvert

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Historically, merchants used arbitration to settle commercial disputes among themselves.1 However, the early American courts viewed arbitration unfavorably, often refusing to acknowledge its validity. 2 During the 1970's, however, the courts' attitude toward arbitration shifted. The United States Supreme Court decision, The Breman v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.,3 ushered in an era of growing acceptance toward arbitration agreements. The change in the Court's attitude has allowed businesses to provide for arbitration agreements in their contracts without fearing that their desire to avoid litigation would be thwarted

Statutory Claims Under Erisa: Is Arbitration The Appropriate Forum, Amy L. Brice

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) 2 provides a regulatory scheme for the myriad of employee benefit plans that affect so many workers and their families today. 3 One ERISA issue is whether claims under the Act may be arbitrated or if they must be heard in a judicial forum. The Supreme Court has not yet spoken on this issue, but the district court in Southside Internists Group PC Money Purchase Pension Plan v. Janus Capital Corp. relied on the Supreme Court's determinations of arbitrability in various other cases 4 to conclude that ERISA claims may be …

Union Representation Election Reform: Equal Access And The Excelsior Rule, Randall J. White

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

A Better Approach To Arbitrability, Jeffrey W. Stempel

Scholarly Works

Historically, Anglo-American courts refused to enforce arbitration agreements, jealously guarding their dispute resolution monopoly. During the early twentieth century, merchants and attorneys began seeking legislation requiring courts to defer to arbitration. The United States Abitration Act took effect January 1, 1926 and has remained essentially unchanged. It was written with the implicit assumption that it would be invoked by commercial actors having relatively equal bargaining power and emotive appeal to a jury. The Act says nothing to direct the court's inquiry concerning the quality of either party's assent to the arbitration clause other than requiring a written arbitration agreement and …

Reconsidering The Employment Contract Exclusion In Section 1 Of The Federal Arbitration Act: Correcting The Judiciary's Failure Of Statutory Vision, Jeffrey W. Stempel

Scholarly Works

The Federal Arbitration Act (the Act), seeks to eliminate centuries of perceived judicial hostility toward arbitration agreements. The Act made written arbitration agreements involving interstate commerce specifically enforceable. It also provided a procedural structure for enforcing awards, which were protected through deferential judicial review. The Act intended to have a wide reach, employing a broad definition of commerce that has presumably grown in breadth along with the expansion of judicial notions of commerce. Although courts applied the Act in tentative and cautious fashion until the 1960's, arbitration gained momentum during the 1970's and the 1980's. Despite growing judicial enthusiasm for …

Introduction To Symposium: Achieving Justice In Arbitration, Thomas E. Carbonneau

Faculty Scholarship

This symposium attests to the depth of scholarship that now surrounds the law of arbitration and to arbitration's widening adjudicatory mission in matters international and domestic. Authored by senior and emerging scholars who share a commitment to professional excellence, the various contributions not only assure continuity in arbitral scholarship, but also underscore the growing sophistication of arbitral practice and illustrate the complexity of the relationship between arbitration and the legal process. This symposium represents an inquiry into the convergence and divergence of legal and arbitral adjudicatory values and what impact these similarities and differences might have upon the functioning and …

International Transactions And Claims Involving Government Parties: Case Law Of The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, Richard M. Mosk, Nils Mangard, Koorosh H. Ameli

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

International Transactions and Claims Involving Government Parties: Case Law of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal

By John A. Westberg

International Law Institute

Washington, D.C.: 1991. Pp. 412. $125.

=========================

Richard M. Mosk - reviewer

Nils Mangard - reviewer

Koorosh H. Ameli - reviewer

Alternative Methods Of Resolving Environmental Disputes, Editors

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

Mandated Mediation: A Contradiction In Terms - Lessons From A Recent Attempts To Institutionalize Alternative Dispute Resolution Practices, Jonathan Brock

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

Title Page

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Issue 1

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Issue 2

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Summary Jury Trial: Who Will Speak For The Jurors, The, Charles W. Hatfield

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Since its inception in 1980, the summary jury trial has received much attention in the scholarly journals and the courts. Most of the arguments and litigation center around the impact of the summary jury trial on the parties or their lawyers. One issue which has gone almost untouched is the authority of the courts to empanel the advisory jury; the backbone of the entire procedure. In Hume v. M,& C Management,2 the court addressed its authority to require citizens to serve as jurors in this alternative method of dispute resolution.

Curtailing The Arbitrator's Power: Valid Withholding Of Jurisdictionor Judicial Flaw, Kevin L. Wibbenmeyer

Journal of Dispute Resolution

With the movement toward alternative dispute resolution comes the issue of how much freedom arbitrators will be given before the courts will find the arbitrator's rulings to be beyond their jurisdiction. This Note will provide an understanding of the decision in Cobler v. Stanley, Barber, Southard, Brown & Associates, where the court limited the power of the arbitrator. 2 Further, this Note will explain how Cobler is inconsistent with California case law which suggests that great deference shall be given to the power of arbitrators.

Arbitration In Latin America: Overcoming Traditional Hostility (An Update), Horacio A Grigera Naon

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.

Elizabeth Dutson Gee - 1945-1991, Lloyd Burton, Gerald Williams

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Valuation Of Cases For Settlement: Theory And Practice, Peter Toll Hoffman

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Trial lawyers frequently talk about the value of their cases when they are counseling clients' negotiating with opposing counsel, or conversing with their fellow attorneys. The term "value" may have several definitions when referring to cases, but most attorneys intend it to mean the amount at which they expect a case to settle. However, despite the frequency with which they speak of value, the subject remains cloaked with a miasma of lawyer folklore.

Your Forum Or Mine - Where To Arbitrate Investor-Broker Securities Claims, Christopher J. Moeller

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Comment will discuss the present forums available for customer-broker arbitration disputes, the problems arising in the current system, what changes in the present system may help resolve these problems, and the desirability of creating a new forum to handle all securities arbitrations between customers and brokers. This Comment will not challenge the desirability of arbitrating customer-broker disputes in general. Indeed, many scholars and commentators argue that arbitration is beneficial to both the customer and the broker because it provides a more efficient and less expensive means of settling disputes than litigation. However, for arbitration to effectively handle customer grievances, …

Is Settlement Conditioned On Vacatur An Option - Should It Be, Elizabeth L. Anstaett

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Currently, whether a court grants or denies a motion to vacate resulting from settlement depends more on the particular court in which the request is made, than on the facts of the case and the effect of vacatur. Courts not permitting vacatur have expressed the fear that parties sensing they are going to lose will "buy their way out of an unfavorable precedent often at the relatively cheap price asked by the single opponent they face in that appeal."1 Other courts routinely grant requests for vacatur. Settlements conditioned on the court's granting vacatur, and thereby avoiding precedent or issue preclusion, …

Promise And Problems In Divorce Mediation, Steven T. Knuppel

Journal of Dispute Resolution

In the past two decades, mediation in general has gained increasing acceptance in the legal community.' "[T]he search for alternative methods of resolving disputes has burgeoned to 'a movement'."2 In the divorce context, particularly, mediation has been seen by some as a more suitable process than the adversary system. 3 Proponents of mediation assert that the adversary system involves debilitating expense, frustrating delay, 4 and fails to address the emotional needs of the parties.5 Adversarial tactics often aggravate rather than resolve spousal differences, 6 though an amicable settlement might be in the best interests of both parties, especially when there …

Quasi-Judicial Immunity: The Arbitrator's Shield Or Sword, Robert M. Carroll

Journal of Dispute Resolution

With the rising number of divorces in today's society 2 and with the national emphasis to resolve child custody disputes through alternative forms of dispute resolution,3 the ability to hold arbitrators accountable for their actions within settlement conferences is becoming a prevalent issue. Arbitrators and mediators, commonly outside of the court's supervision, are now determining the best interests of the child, a role traditionally reserved to the courts.4 This increase of out-of-court settlements creates a need for certain standards which hold these quasi-judicial officers responsible for their decisions and liable for their actions. The court in Howard v. Drapkin addressed …

Struggle Over Consolidation Of Arbitration Proceedings Continues: The Eighth Circuit Chooses Sides, The, Scott E. Blair

Journal of Dispute Resolution

In response to rising litigation costs and overburdened court dockets, parties are realizing the opportunity to resolve disputes more efficiently through the use of arbitration. 2 To ensure access to arbitration, parties are including provisions in contracts requiring arbitration of future disputes.3 Courts enforce these agreements pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 4 originally adopted by Congress in 1925, which officially acknowledged the validity of private agreements to arbitrate.5 As a result, courts are faced with procedural issues, such as consolidation of separate arbitration proceedings, in their attempt to enforce the contracts in accordance with the parties' agreement. 6 …

Book Review , Timothy J. Heinsz

Journal of Dispute Resolution

As the use of arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism continues to increase not only in the area of labor relations but also in other fields as well, the authority of arbitrators to issue remedies has likewise become a more important topic. The breadth of this power was established early on in labor-management arbitrations in the Steelworkers Trilogy.1 There the Supreme Court concluded that by entering into an arbitration agreement, a company and union could commission the arbitrator to bring an informed judgment to bear in reaching a fair resolution. The Court stated: "This is especially true when it comes …

Model Uniform Employment Termination Act, National Conference Of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws

Other Publications

The Scope and Program Committee, at its meeting on January 11-12, 1985, recommended to the Executive Committee that it appoint a Committee to draft a Uniform Wrongful Termination Act. The recommendation was based in part on studies indicating that recent judicial modifications in the doctrine of employment at will had created great uncertainty for both employers and employees. (That uncertainty has grown. See infra.) Members of the Scope and Program Committee stressed that uniformity would be desirable because employees might be hired in one state, work in another, and be fired in a third, and that the subject gave the …

Generating Precedent In Securities Industry Arbitration, David A. Lipton

Scholarly Articles

The author charts the progress made by the securities industry’s dispute resolution system as it went from judicial litigation to a system that relies almost exclusively on arbitration. Further advances were made by the adoption of the 1989 Rules Amendments, which, by introducing prehearing conferences and setting deadlines for document exchanges, cleared up many procedural issues. However, one serious problem remains: The present system does not provide a means to generate case precedent. The author suggests various ways to cure this defect.

The Interplay Of Civil Service And Collective Bargaining Law In Public Sector Employee Discipline Cases, Ann C. Hodges

Law Faculty Publications

This article undertakes such a review with respect to one aspect of the potential conflict between merit systems and collective bargaining- employee discipline and the appeal of discipline decisions. Protection from arbitrary or unjust discipline is a primary motivation for employee unionization. As a result, achieving protection from unjust disciplinary action becomes a fundamental goal of unions in collective bargaining. Public sector unions in the United States are particularly interested in "discipline, grievance procedures and organizational due process"....

Section IV of this article reviews the approaches of the various states that have addressed the issue, analyzing them in light of …