Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

The Cost Of Rules, The Rule Of Costs: A Practical Practitioner's Perspective, Sarah L. Cave

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reality-Testing Questions For Real Life And Simulations – And Ideas For Stone Soup Assignments, John Lande

Faculty Blogs

Although litigants and their lawyers may generally recognize that litigants will incur some intangible costs, they often do not consider the numerous intangible ways that litigants can be harmed and do not carefully assess these costs when making litigation decisions. Sometimes litigants’ intangible costs are much more important to them than the tangible costs. This post provides detailed descriptions of some of these costs, and includes questions that lawyers and mediators should ask clients to identify and value intangible costs.

What Do Litigants Really Want?, John M. Lande

Faculty Blogs

This post discusses Donna Shestowsky’s article, Inside the Mind of the Client: An Analysis of Litigants’ Decision Criteria for Choosing Procedures. Her study found that the decision-making factor that subjects most often cited was their lawyers’ advice. Donna argues, “Given the extent to which litigants are predisposed to following their lawyers’ advice about which procedures to use, lawyers should attempt to understand their clients’ interests, values, and objectives before sharing their personal evaluations of procedures to avoid imposing their own views.”

Outcome Report Of Roundtable On International Investment Regime And Access To Justice, Michelle Chan, Kanika Gupta, Jesse Coleman, Kaitlin Y. Cordes, Lise Johnson

Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Staff Publications

On October 18, 2017, the UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights and the CCSI co-hosted a one-day roundtable on the impacts of the international investment regime on access to justice for investment-affected individuals and communities.

Held at Columbia University in New York, the roundtable brought together 32 individuals from civil society organizations, communities affected by investments at the heart of investor-state claims, governments, academia, donor organizations, UN mandate holders, and other stakeholder groups. The roundtable provided an opportunity for participants to: (i) explore and assess the specific impacts of international investment agreements and investor-state dispute settlement on access …

Human Rights The "Asean Way": Exploring The Possibilities For A Regional Adr And Adjudicative Body In Southeast Asia, Mariam Sarwar

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

... Because "Yes" Actually Means "No": A Personalized Prescriptive To Reactualize Informed Consent In Dispute Resolution

Marquette Law Review

None.

A Closed Mouth Gonna Get You Nothin’: How Conflict Is Handled After Diversity And Inclusion Training, Enrico E. Manalo

Graduate Masters Theses

Diversity and Inclusion training is often used in organizations to engage with the increasing demographic diversity in the United States. However, many organizations continue to base their trainings and initiatives on a paradigm which was primarily motivated to prevent litigation, rather than to ensure economic opportunity for all. Over time, such Diversity efforts failed in many documented instances to ensure such opportunities and in fact, created a host of unwanted side-effects, such as employee turnover, job dissatisfaction, and misconceptions regarding the soundness of Diversity and Inclusion efforts.

However, a number of organizations have undertaken Diversity and Inclusion efforts in earnest. …

Conflicts And Laudato Si': Ten Principles For Environmental Dispute Resolution, Lucia A. Silecchia

Florida State University Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law

No abstract provided.

The Contract Dispute Act's Statute Of Limitations: The Failure To Deliver Procedural Predictability, Peter M. Casey

Texas A&M Journal of Property Law

The Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (“CDA”) governs disputes “relating to a contract” between federal executive agencies and contractors. It establishes the process for parties to seek administrative remedies for claims under covered contracts. It also limits the right to judicial review of agency decisions to specific “boards of contract appeals” (“BCA”) and the United States Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”). According to the CDA’s sponsors, Congress enacted the law to bring reliability and order to a hodgepodge of conflicting and inconsistent rules for adjudicating contract disputes used by the various executive agencies. The law aimed to simplify the process …

Im Skaugen Se V Man Diesel & Turbo Se [2018] Sghc 123, Adeline Chong

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

In IM Skaugen SE v MAN Diesel & Turbo SE [2018] SGHC 123, the Singapore High Court had the occasion to discuss and resolve various meaty private international law issues. The facts concerned the alleged negligent or fraudulent misrepresentation by the defendants on the fuel consumption of a specific model of engine that was sold and installed into ships owned by the plaintiffs. The issue before the court was whether the Singapore courts had jurisdiction over the misrepresentation claim. The defendants were German and Norwegian incorporated companies so the plaintiffs applied for leave to serve the writ out of Singapore. …

Feel The Earth Move – Shifts In The International Dispute Resolution Landscape, Eunice Chua

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

This blog post discusses the themes in international dispute resolution that emerged from a panel on 25 July 2018 at the 2018 UNCITRAL Emergence Conference, moderated by Professor Nadja Alexander, CEO of the Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy.

A Contribution To The Conversation On Mixing The Modes Of Mediation And Arbitration: Of Definitional Consistency And Process Structure, Eunice Chua

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

One of the trends that has been growing in importance in international commercial dispute resolution has been the combining and mixing of modes, particularly of mediation and arbitration. Surveys of users indicate that the reason for this growth has been the perception that mixing of non-adjudicative and adjudicative modes can help to achieve certain process goals, such as international enforceability, cost-effectiveness and relationship preservation. This article first suggests an approach towards articulating the myriad ways that mediation and arbitration may be combined, focusing on mediation followed by arbitration (med-arb), arbitration followed by mediation (arb-med), and opening mediation windows in the …

How Should The Courts Know Whether A Dispute Is Ready And Suitable For Mediation? An Empirical Analysis Of The Singapore Courts’ Referral Of Civil Disputes To Mediation, Dorcas Quek Anderson, Eunice Chua, Tra My Ngo

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

In line with international developments in court-connected mediation, the Singapore courts have strongly supported the use of mediation and have taken steps to encourage litigants to attempt mediation. This article features the very first empirical analysis of the Singapore courts' referral of civil cases to mediation. Although focused on Singapore, the results of the study also inform the referral policies of other judiciaries that similarly engage in the practice of referring cases for mediation. The study uses a rigorous method to shed light on the crucial factors to be considered by the courts in referral practice and designing of mediation …

2001 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Hearings Charts

No abstract provided.

2000 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Hearings Charts

No abstract provided.

2002 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Hearings Charts

No abstract provided.

2003 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Hearings Charts

No abstract provided.

2007 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Hearings Charts

No abstract provided.

2006 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Hearings Charts

No abstract provided.

2004 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Hearings Charts

No abstract provided.

2008 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Hearings Charts

No abstract provided.

2005 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Hearings Charts

No abstract provided.

2009 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Hearings Charts

No abstract provided.

2015 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Hearings Charts

No abstract provided.

2011 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Hearings Charts

No abstract provided.

2017 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Hearings Charts

No abstract provided.

2010 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Hearings Charts

No abstract provided.

2012 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Hearings Charts

No abstract provided.

Keet And Heavin On Why Litigation Interest And Risk Assessment Is So Darn Important For Lawyers And Mediators – And How You Can Make Stone Soup With It, John Lande

Faculty Blogs

This post provides links to law review articles by Michaela Keet and Heather Heavin that provide the foundation for the LIRA book.

2018 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Hearings Charts

No abstract provided.