Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Criminal Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 13921 - 13950 of 27909

Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law

Revisiting Anna Moscowitz's Kross's Critique Of New York City's Women's Court: The Continued Problem Of Solving The "Problem" Of Prostitution With Specialized Criminal Courts, Mae C. Quinn Jan 2006

Revisiting Anna Moscowitz's Kross's Critique Of New York City's Women's Court: The Continued Problem Of Solving The "Problem" Of Prostitution With Specialized Criminal Courts, Mae C. Quinn

Journal Articles

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Assessing Legal Responses To Prenatal Drug Use: Can Therapeutic Responses Produce More Positive Outcomes Than Punitive Responses, Elizabeth E. Coleman, Monica K. Miller Jan 2006

Assessing Legal Responses To Prenatal Drug Use: Can Therapeutic Responses Produce More Positive Outcomes Than Punitive Responses, Elizabeth E. Coleman, Monica K. Miller

Journal of Law and Health

Expressing a growing concern for fetal well being, the 2006 Idaho Senate passed legislation that permits criminal charges to be brought against women who abuse illegal drugs while pregnant. This bill allows for the potential incarceration of violators for up to five years, as well as a possible $50,000 fine. In some locations, women have the option of choosing to go to drug court instead of serving time in jail or prison. These drug courts provide drug treatment, case management, drug testing, and supervision, while requiring women who abuse illegal drugs to regularly report to scheduled status hearings before a …

Go to article

Inconsistent Methods For The Adjudication Of Alleged Mentally Retarded Individuals: A Comparison Of Ohio's And Georgia's Post-Atkins Frameworks For Determining Mental Retardation, Scott R. Poe Jan 2006

Inconsistent Methods For The Adjudication Of Alleged Mentally Retarded Individuals: A Comparison Of Ohio's And Georgia's Post-Atkins Frameworks For Determining Mental Retardation, Scott R. Poe

Cleveland State Law Review

This Note compares Ohio's and Georgia's post-Atkins frameworks for determining mental retardation. Ohio's framework offers a fairer application of Atkins and should serve as a guide for a national legal standard for use by state trial courts to determine mental retardation. Specifically, Ohio's use of preponderance of the evidence is a more appropriate standard of proof for determining mental retardation because it better reaches the overall goal in Atkins. Allowing the judge to make the mental retardation determination protects the alleged mentally retarded defendant from potential jury bias. Because Ohio's and Georgia's definitions of mental retardation are substantially similar and …

Go to article

Aedpa Statute Of Limitations: Is It Tolled When The United States Supreme Court Is Asked To Review A Judgment From A State Post-Conviction Proceeding, Diane E. Courselle Jan 2006

Aedpa Statute Of Limitations: Is It Tolled When The United States Supreme Court Is Asked To Review A Judgment From A State Post-Conviction Proceeding, Diane E. Courselle

Cleveland State Law Review

This thirty-seven word provision [the tolling provision in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act] has been construed by the United States Supreme Court three times since 1996, and yet several questions remain unanswered. One such unanswered question is whether tolling occurs when a petitioner files a petition for writ of certiorari to the United State Supreme Court from the state court postconviction decision. In other words, does seeking the United States Supreme Court's review from a state court's final decision on an "application for State post-conviction or other collateral review" keep the state post-conviction application "pending?" That is the …

Go to article

Booker And Our Brave New World: The Tension Among The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Judicial Discretion, And A Defendant's Constitutional Right To Trial By Jury, Kristina Walter Jan 2006

Booker And Our Brave New World: The Tension Among The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Judicial Discretion, And A Defendant's Constitutional Right To Trial By Jury, Kristina Walter

Cleveland State Law Review

This Note examines the inherent conflict among the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, judicial discretion, and a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury. Part two of this Note will provide a historical overview of the Guidelines. Part three will discuss the application of the Guidelines and the role of juries and judges at sentencing hearings. Part four will highlight criticisms relating to how the Guidelines often usurp power from juries and judges. Part five will examine the milestone cases of Blakely v. Washington, United States v. Booker, and United States v. Fanfan (hereinafter "Booker" refers to the combined cases …

Go to article

A Tribute To Professor Charles J. Ogletree, Jr., Roger Fairfax Jan 2006

A Tribute To Professor Charles J. Ogletree, Jr., Roger Fairfax

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

I recall vividly how, as a junior at Harvard College, I landed a coveted position on Professor Ogletree's office hours list. My ostensible purpose for taking an office hours slot away from a deserving law school student was to discuss the college seminar paper I was writing on the District of Columbia statehood movement. Although I did leave that meeting with several fruitful research leads, I was much more satisfied with achieving my true aim-to meet in person this man about whom I had heard so many wonderful things. The professor did not disappoint. As I sat in his office-the …

Go to article

Multicultural Feminism: Assessing Systemic Fault In A Provocative Context, Camille Nelson Jan 2006

Multicultural Feminism: Assessing Systemic Fault In A Provocative Context, Camille Nelson

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

INTRODUCTION Strictly speaking, the cultural defense is really no defense at all. Instead, it is the moniker attached by defense attorneys to their advocacy which seeks to personalize the accused in one of two ways: First by injecting a reasonable doubt into the mens rea intent requirement - this would result in acquittal, or second, by contextualizing an affirmative defense, like provocation, by the provision of cultural information about the accused - this would result in mitigated sentencing. Central to defense attorneys' uses of the cultural defense is the criminal defendant's perceived "foreignness." This much has been recognized by scholars …

Go to article

Blameworthiness, Intent And Cultural Dissonance, Nancy Kim Jan 2006

Blameworthiness, Intent And Cultural Dissonance, Nancy Kim

Faculty Scholarship

Criminal law assumes that the judge and jury share the same cultural and experiential framework as the defendant; accordingly, crimes are defined with this assumption as an underlying premise. In this article, I will explain how the determination of mens rea often fails to reflect culpability because the definition of crimes fail to account for the cultural dissonance that often exists between the judge/juror and the accused. In this Article, I propose an analysis and reconceptualization of intent that bridges gaps in perception and understanding attributable to cultural dissonance.

Go to article

Privatization Of Corrections: A Violation Of U.S. Domestic Law, International Human Rights, And Good Sense, Ira Robbins Jan 2006

Privatization Of Corrections: A Violation Of U.S. Domestic Law, International Human Rights, And Good Sense, Ira Robbins

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Inter-American System, Claudia Martin Jan 2006

Inter-American System, Claudia Martin

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.

Go to article

The New "Fetal Protection": The Wrong Answer To The Crisis Of Inadequate Health Care For Women And Children, Linda C. Fentiman Jan 2006

The New "Fetal Protection": The Wrong Answer To The Crisis Of Inadequate Health Care For Women And Children, Linda C. Fentiman

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

This article will expand upon the feminist critique by focusing on children's health as well as the health and liberty interests of their mothers. In the first part of this article, I examine the legal and cultural underpinnings of “fetal protection” and explore its current manifestations. In the second part, I place “fetal protection” in a broader context, documenting the ways in which American law currently promotes fetal life, while simultaneously neglecting the lives and health of born children. The third part of the article offers concrete recommendations about how government, both state and federal, can actually achieve the goal …

Go to article

Are Civilian Informants From Al Dujayl Liable Before The Iht?, Kevin Pendergast Jan 2006

Are Civilian Informants From Al Dujayl Liable Before The Iht?, Kevin Pendergast

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Multi-Jurisdictional And Successive Prosecution Of Environmental Crimes: The Case For A Consistent Approach, John F. Cooney Jan 2006

Multi-Jurisdictional And Successive Prosecution Of Environmental Crimes: The Case For A Consistent Approach, John F. Cooney

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Stevens's Ratchet: When The Court Should Decide Not To Decide, Joel A. Flaxman Jan 2006

Stevens's Ratchet: When The Court Should Decide Not To Decide, Joel A. Flaxman

Michigan Law Review First Impressions

Hidden underneath the racy death penalty issues in Kansas v. Marsh lurks a seemingly dull procedural issue addressed only in separate opinions by Justices Stevens and Scalia: whether the Court should have heard the case in the first place. As he did in three cases from the Court’s 2005 term, Justice Stevens argued in Marsh that the Court has no legitimate interest in reviewing state court decisions that overprotect federal constitutional rights. Instead, the Supreme Court should exercise its certiorari power to tip the scales against states and in favor of individuals. Granting certiorari in Marsh, Stevens argued, was not …

Go to article

The High Court Remains As Divided As Ever Over The Death Penalty, George H. Kendall Jan 2006

The High Court Remains As Divided As Ever Over The Death Penalty, George H. Kendall

Michigan Law Review First Impressions

More than three decades ago, in Furman v. Georgia, a sharply divided Supreme Court struck down all existing capital punishment schemes be-cause the results they generated were arbitrary, discriminatory, and unreasoned. No member of that Court remains on the Court today, and the Court has grown increasingly conservative ever since. Nevertheless, impor-tant questions concerning the administration of capital punishment continue to wrought deep divisions within the Court, for instance in determining whether racial bias influences the system, in determining the sufficiency of new evidence of innocence to justify review of a defaulted claim in habeas corpus proceedings, in determining a …

Go to article

Roman Rape: An Overview Of Roman Rape Laws From The Republican Period To Justinian's Reign, Nghiem L. Nguyen Jan 2006

Roman Rape: An Overview Of Roman Rape Laws From The Republican Period To Justinian's Reign, Nghiem L. Nguyen

Michigan Journal of Gender & Law

The modern Western crime of rape is commonly defined as "[u]nlawful sexual activity (esp. intercourse) with a person (usu. a female) without consent and usu. by force or threat of injury," and it is often seen as an assault of the person's body and a violation of self-autonomy. However, this differs significantly from the conception of rape in ancient Rome. In fact, "there is no single word in... Latin with the same semantic field as the modern English word 'rape.'” For the Romans, the act of rape was covered under a variety of legal terms, but each of those words …

Go to article

Putting The Guesswork Back Into Capital Sentencing, Sean D. O'Brien Jan 2006

Putting The Guesswork Back Into Capital Sentencing, Sean D. O'Brien

Michigan Law Review First Impressions

In 1972, in Furman v. Georgia, the Supreme Court deemed it “incon-testable” that a death sentence is cruel and unusual if inflicted “by reason of [the defendant’s] race, religion, wealth, social position, or class, or if it is imposed under a procedure that gives room for the play of such prejudices.” Arbitrary and discriminatory patterns in capital sentencing moved the Court to strike down death penalty statutes that required judges or juries to cast thumbs-up or thumbs-down verdicts against offenders found guilty of capi-tal crimes. The issue of innocence was barely a footnote in Furman; the Court’s concerns focused on …

Go to article

The Revolution Enters The Court: The Constitutional Significance Of Wrongful Convictions In Contemporary Constitutional Regulation Of The Death Penalty, Jordan Steiker Jan 2006

The Revolution Enters The Court: The Constitutional Significance Of Wrongful Convictions In Contemporary Constitutional Regulation Of The Death Penalty, Jordan Steiker

Michigan Law Review First Impressions

Over the last decade, the most important events in American death pen-alty law have occurred outside the courts. The discovery of numerous wrongfully convicted death-sentenced inmates in Illinois led to the most substantial reflection on the American death penalty system since the late 1960s and early 1970s. Former Illinois Governor George Ryan, a Republi-can, first declared a moratorium on executions in 2000 and eventually commuted all 167 inmates on Illinois’s death row in 2003. The events in Illinois reverberated nationwide. Almost overnight, state legislative agendas shifted from expanding or maintaining the prevailing reach of the death penalty to studying its …

Go to article

Legitimizing Error, Rebecca E. Woodman Jan 2006

Legitimizing Error, Rebecca E. Woodman

Michigan Law Review First Impressions

Since Furman v. Georgia, the Supreme Court has sought to harmonize competing constitutional demands under Eighth Amendment rules regulat-ing the two-step eligibility and selection stages of the capital decision-making process. Furman’s demand for rationality and consistency requires that, at the eligibility stage, the sentencer’s discretion be limited and guided by clear and objective fact-based standards that rationally narrow the class of death-eligible defendants. The selection stage requires a determination of whether a specific death-eligible defendant actually deserves that punish-ment, as distinguished from other death-eligible defendants. Here, fundamental fairness and respect for the uniqueness of the individual are the cornerstones of …

Go to article

The Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines Project: Sentencing Factors Applicable To All Offense Types, Model Sentencing Guidelines §3.1 - 3.6, Frank O. Bowman Iii Jan 2006

The Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines Project: Sentencing Factors Applicable To All Offense Types, Model Sentencing Guidelines §3.1 - 3.6, Frank O. Bowman Iii

Faculty Publications

This Article is the ninth of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed to illustrate the feasibility and advantages of a simplified approach to federal sentencing proposed by the Constitution Project Sentencing Initiative. The Model Sentencing Guidelines and the Constitution Project report are all to be published in Volume 18, Number 5 of the Federal Sentencing Reporter. The project is described in an essay titled 'Tis a Gift To Be Simple: A Model Reform of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.

Go to article

Comment, Saving Toby: Extortion, Blackmail, And The Right To Destroy, Stephen E. Sachs Jan 2006

Comment, Saving Toby: Extortion, Blackmail, And The Right To Destroy, Stephen E. Sachs

Faculty Scholarship

On the website SaveToby.com, one may find many endearing pictures of Toby, the cutest little bunny on the planet. Unfortunately, on June 30, 2005, the lovable Toby was scheduled to be butchered and eaten - unless the website's readers sent $50,000 to save his life. Though Toby's owner has since granted him a temporary reprieve - until Nov. 6, 2006 - the threat raises a fascinating issue of law. Extortion statutes prohibiting threats to destroy property generally do not prohibit threats to destroy one's own property. The law thus provides insufficient protection to a variety of resources on which others …

Go to article

One Of The Likely Defendants Before The Extraordinary Chambers, Mr. Ieng Sary, Received A Pardon By The King Of Cambodia In Relation To His 1979 Conviction For Genocide. The U.N. And Cambodia Have Agreed That [The Eccc] Should Decide The Scope Of This Pardon.., Conor Mclaughlin Jan 2006

One Of The Likely Defendants Before The Extraordinary Chambers, Mr. Ieng Sary, Received A Pardon By The King Of Cambodia In Relation To His 1979 Conviction For Genocide. The U.N. And Cambodia Have Agreed That [The Eccc] Should Decide The Scope Of This Pardon.., Conor Mclaughlin

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Go to article

To What Extent Does The Cambodian Extraordinary Chambers Meet The Requirements For A Tribunal To Be Deemed Legitimate As Set Out By The Appeals Chamber Of The Icty In The Tadic Case?, Brianne Draffin Jan 2006

To What Extent Does The Cambodian Extraordinary Chambers Meet The Requirements For A Tribunal To Be Deemed Legitimate As Set Out By The Appeals Chamber Of The Icty In The Tadic Case?, Brianne Draffin

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Go to article

After The 1991 Gulf War Ended, The Shiite Population In Southern Iraq And The Kurdish Population In Northern Iraq Revolted Against The Iraqi Government... : Deliberate Attacks, Imams From These Mosques Were Providing Medical Treatment And Shelter To Injured Civilians And Insurgents..., Emily J. Peters Jan 2006

After The 1991 Gulf War Ended, The Shiite Population In Southern Iraq And The Kurdish Population In Northern Iraq Revolted Against The Iraqi Government... : Deliberate Attacks, Imams From These Mosques Were Providing Medical Treatment And Shelter To Injured Civilians And Insurgents..., Emily J. Peters

War Crimes Memoranda

. 3) Iraqi troops entered hospitals in Basrah and Karbala and summarily murdered any males between the age of 12 and 70. Iraqi troops also murdered, tortured, and raped medical personnel who had provided treatment to insurgents. 4) Ali Hassan Al Majid rounded up male civilians (of fighting age) and ordered them to drink petrol. After these men drank the petrol, Al Majid ordered his troops to fire or personally fired himself tracer bullets into the victims so that the petrol would ignite and the victim would explode. This tactic was used to intimidate people into offering information about insurgent …

Go to article

Bail In The 21st Century: Is There A Role For Ankle Monitors, Electronic Supervision, And The Like Within International Criminal Justice In Light Of Long Pre-Trial Detention?, David Selby Jan 2006

Bail In The 21st Century: Is There A Role For Ankle Monitors, Electronic Supervision, And The Like Within International Criminal Justice In Light Of Long Pre-Trial Detention?, David Selby

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Can The International Criminal Court Accept A Referral From The United Nations Security Council Of The Murder Of Former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri?, Madhusha Dissanayake Jan 2006

Can The International Criminal Court Accept A Referral From The United Nations Security Council Of The Murder Of Former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri?, Madhusha Dissanayake

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Do Any Of The Following Acts, Which Occurred During Iraq’S Invasion And Occupation Of Kuwait, Constitute Crimes Under The Iht Statute: (1) The Removal Of Food, Medical Supplies, And Medical Equipment From Kuwait To Iraq; (2) The Destruction Of Kuwaiti Assets And Infrastructures; And (3) The Destruction Of Kuwaiti Oil Wells And Oil Refineries, And The Deliberate Release Of Oil Into The Persian Gulf?, Andrew M. Katz Jan 2006

Do Any Of The Following Acts, Which Occurred During Iraq’S Invasion And Occupation Of Kuwait, Constitute Crimes Under The Iht Statute: (1) The Removal Of Food, Medical Supplies, And Medical Equipment From Kuwait To Iraq; (2) The Destruction Of Kuwaiti Assets And Infrastructures; And (3) The Destruction Of Kuwaiti Oil Wells And Oil Refineries, And The Deliberate Release Of Oil Into The Persian Gulf?, Andrew M. Katz

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Does International Law Provide Guidance About The Obligations Of The Iraqi Government And/Or Multinational Forces-Iraq To Provide Security For The Defense Attorneys And Their Families?, David Willis Jan 2006

Does International Law Provide Guidance About The Obligations Of The Iraqi Government And/Or Multinational Forces-Iraq To Provide Security For The Defense Attorneys And Their Families?, David Willis

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Does The Principle Of Lex Mitior Limit The Iraqi High Tribunal’S Ability To Impose The Death Sentence On Those Found Guilty Of Capital Crimes?, Meredith Wood Bowen Jan 2006

Does The Principle Of Lex Mitior Limit The Iraqi High Tribunal’S Ability To Impose The Death Sentence On Those Found Guilty Of Capital Crimes?, Meredith Wood Bowen

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Evidentiary Challenges Due To The Lapse Of Thirty Years: Investigations Conducted By Ngo’S, The Role Of Hearsay Evidence, Forensic Evidence As An Important Feature, As Well As National And International Jurisprudence On Such Factors, Kathleen Rudis Jan 2006

Evidentiary Challenges Due To The Lapse Of Thirty Years: Investigations Conducted By Ngo’S, The Role Of Hearsay Evidence, Forensic Evidence As An Important Feature, As Well As National And International Jurisprudence On Such Factors, Kathleen Rudis

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Go to article

First Prev Next Last