Comparative and Foreign Law Commons^™

The Prison Litigation Reform Act And The Physical Injury Requirement In The Context Of Transgender Inmates, Hunter Kravitz

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note examines the impact of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) on transgender inmates, focusing on its physical injury requirement, which disproportionately bars access to justice for those with mental or emotional injuries. It highlights the ethical and constitutional concerns arising from the PLRA's application, particularly its unequal treatment of transgender inmates, and advocates for reforms to ensure equitable access to justice.

Prostitutes And Policing - Analysis Of Tactics Used To Reduce The Demand For Sex, Morgan Helfman

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note critically examines the tactics used to reduce demand for commercial sex, focusing on the Nordic Model and its implementation in the U.S. It argues that while these tactics aim to deter buyers through shaming and criminalization, they raise ethical, legal, and practical concerns, particularly regarding police misconduct and the impact on marginalized communities. The analysis advocates for a shift toward education and rehabilitation over punitive measures to address the root causes of prostitution.

Can Investment Dispute Settlement Ever Be Depoliticized?, Fernando Dias Simões

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Investor-state arbitration was created with the hope of depoliticizing investment disputes. However, the adoption of the traditional party-appointment system, in which disputing parties play a direct role in the composition of the tribunal, is increasingly criticized. Many believe that party appointment is a tool ofpolitical influence over the arbitrators' interpretative space. Suggestions for reform of the system have proliferated. The most radical proposal currently on the table-the creation of a permanent investment court-would cause a paradigm shift in the selection of adjudicators, moving from a disputing party framework, to a treaty party context. This article analyzes different options to reduce …

A Philosophical Inquiry Into The Concept Of Territorial Sovereignty: A New Analytical Framework Of The Territorial Disputes In The China Seas, Henan Hu

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Existing normative legal efforts that focus on territorial acquisition, appear inadequate in providing a uniform and final answer to the issue of territorial disputes in the South and East China Seas. China's historical claims are a unique and difficult issue therein. This article returns legal attention to the central concept of territorial sovereignty within territorial disputes by engaging in a philosophical inquiry to examine if the concept could be more fully understood and to ask to what extent do historical claims relate to the concept of territorial sovereignty and international law. This article argues that a definite answer to these …

Masthead - Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 5 (2021-22)

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 4, Iss. 2

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Assassin Was Not Insane: The Acquittal Of The Assassin Of A Genocide's Architect As Symbolic Jury Nullification, Christian G. Ohanian

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The acquittal of Soghomon Tehlirian for assassinating Talaat Pasha, a key architect of the Armenian Genocide, represents a significant instance of symbolic jury nullification. This verdict symbolically addressed the moral and legal failure to hold Talaat Pasha accountable, influencing the development of international human rights law and figures like Raphael Lemkin.

Social Rights And The Welfare State: A Necessary Relation, Mario Santiago Juarez

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article argues that the welfare state is indispensable for fulfilling social rights, emphasizing that mere recognition of these rights is insufficient without robust state commitment to public policies and systems. It traces the historical development of social rights from the industrial revolution to modern times, highlighting the role of key reforms and international frameworks. The analysis critiques the limitations of judicial enforcement and advocates for structural policies, such as progressive taxation and full employment, to ensure equitable access to essential services like education, healthcare, and housing.

Learning From Experience: Comparing Legal Approaches To Foreign Bribery And Modern Slavery, Hannah Harris, Justine Nolan

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article examines two distinct regulatory frameworks addressing global corruption and human rights issues: the criminal law approach to foreign bribery and the disclosure-based approach to modern slavery in supply chains. It argues that while the foreign bribery framework, exemplified by laws like the FCPA and the UK Bribery Act, relies on strict criminal liability, the modern slavery framework, as seen in laws like the Australian and UK Modern Slavery Acts, focuses on disclosure with limited enforcement mechanisms. The article proposes integrating elements of experimental governance, such as penalty defaults and stakeholder collaboration, to enhance the effectiveness of both frameworks …

The Recent Changes Introduced To The Method Of Removal Of Judges Of The Supreme Court Of Bangladesh & The Consequent Triumph Of An All-Powerful Executive Over The Judiciary: Judicial Independence In Peril, M. Ehteshamul Bari

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Nothing contributes more to the firmness and independence of the judiciary as permanency in office, as it enables judges to decide cases, regardless of whether their decisions please the executive or the legislature. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, originally empowered the Parliament to remove judges of the Supreme Court only on the grounds of proved misbehavior or incapacity. However, the Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1975, which replaced parliamentary democracy with a presidential form of government, empowered the President to remove the judges of the Supreme Court in accordance with his own will. But two years later in April 1977, the …

India's Aadhaar Card - A Violation Of Indian Citizen's Right To Privacy, Sonal Chhugani

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article examines the implications of India's Aadhaar Card program, arguing that while it may comply with Indian law, it violates the right to privacy under Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The Aadhaar Card, a mandatory biometric identification system, centralizes vast amounts of citizen data, posing significant risks to privacy and security. Despite the Indian Supreme Court's ruling that the program does not violate domestic privacy rights, the article contends that it fails to meet international privacy standards, necessitating reforms to align with global human rights obligations.

Applicability Of International Schemes Of Legal Safeguards In Physician Assisted Suicide To Future United States Policy, Annie M. Bonazzi

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note argues that the United States can draw from international models, particularly those in Switzerland, Colombia, and Australia, to develop a more cohesive and effective policy on physician-assisted suicide (PAS). By combining existing U.S. state safeguards with international approaches, such as Colombia's panel-based system and Switzerland's nonprofit mechanism, the U.S. could address ethical, legal, and practical challenges more comprehensively.

Hong Kong Small House Policy: Modernity, Crisis, Morality & Policies For Repair, Conor J. Hyatt

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note critiques Hong Kong's Small House Policy (SHP), arguing that it is unconstitutional and perpetuates inequality by granting exclusive housing rights to male indigenous villagers, while failing to address the city's severe housing crisis. The policy discriminates based on gender, ethnicity, and class, violating the Basic Law and the Hong Kong Bill of Rights. The author contends that the SHP is outdated, unsustainable, and contributes to fraudulent practices, urging its replacement with a more equitable housing system.

California's Autonomy Under The Clean Air Act: Does Epa Have The Authority To Withdraw An Emissions Standards Waiver?, Ethan Siegel

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note argues that the EPA lacks the authority to unilaterally revoke the 2013 Clean Air Act (CAA) waiver granted to California. It contends that the EPA must rely on preemption under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) rather than asserting inherent authority or reinterpretation of the CAA text to justify revocation.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 4, Iss. 1

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Ethics Of Asymmetric Warfare, Waseem Ahmad Qureshi

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

With the rise of terrorism after the events of 9/11, and considering the conflicts and aftermath of the global war on terror, the international community has seen a surge in the use of nonstate actors (NSAs), mercenaries, private military companies (PMCs), and asymmetric warfare tactics, at the hands of both weak/victim states and powerful/aggressor states. In modern times, for example, NSAs and mercenaries are being used in the Syrian war, the Yemeni conflict, Afghanistan, and Iraq, in the form of rebel groups, insurgencies, terrorist organizations, and so on. So why has there been a sudden surge in the use of …

Masthead - Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 4 (2020-21)

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Blockchain, Disintermediation And The Future Of The Legal Professions, Paola Heudebert, Claire Leveneur

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Will the 2020s herald the death warrant of the legal professions? If we listen to blockchain technology's most devout advocates, the answer is a resounding yes. Blockchain is often proclaimed as the ultimate tool for allowing unrestrained exchanges between contracting parties with no preexisting relationships, thus suppressing the need for intermediaries. In other words, blockchain could be a "trust machine," which could open up the possibility of conducting transactions in full confidence, without the risk of nonperformance or misguidance. However, it is utopian idealism to assume that blockchain technology could enable pure and total disintermediation. All trusted third parties cannot …

Japanese Government Actions Against Covid-19 Under The Directives Of Constitutional And Administrative Law, Yuichiro Tsuji

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

This paper presents law on the State ofEmergency held jointly on June 16, 2020, by the Asian Law Center of Melbourne University and School of Law, and Vietnam National University, Hanoi.

This paper further elucidates the actions of the Japanese government against COVID-19 during the first five months of 2020. On May 25, 2020, the government fied the emergency declaration passed under the amended Art. 49(2) of the amended Influenza Special Measures Act (ISMA).

This paper argues that the effects of the Japanese government action is not unique, but is instead similar to those of other countries. In 2012, the …

Coups, Constitutional Democracy, And The Rule Of Law: Why Africans Must Care, John Mukum Mbaku

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The rule of law is the foundation and cornerstone of any legitimate democratic State. The rule of law, at its minimum, requires that the State subject the people and itself to publicly promulgated laws. In addition, the State's legislative function must be made separate from its adjudicative one and the law must be supreme, meaning that all citizens, including those who hold important positions in government, are subject to the law. The rule of law is so important to the practice of democracy that it is virtually impossible to have a constitutional government without it. Adherence to the rule of …

Escape From Plurality: Why The Best Interest Of The Child Is At Risk, Nicole Wren Friedlander

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note argues that the best interest of children in polygamous marriages is at risk due to the lack of legal protections in the United States. It highlights the financial and emotional vulnerabilities faced by women and children when polygamous unions dissolve, emphasizing the need for legal reforms to ensure equitable asset distribution and custody arrangements.

Should They Stay, Or Should They Go? Statue Politics In Shifting Societies: The Permissibility Of Peacetime Removal, Alteration And Destruction Of Problematic Political Monuments In The United States, Adrienne Liebenberg Nel

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note argues that Confederate monuments in the U.S. are often protected by outdated preservationist laws that hinder efforts to remove or alter them, despite their association with systemic racism and oppression. It advocates for legal reform to allow local governments to address these problematic symbols, drawing on international examples and emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that respects history while promoting inclusivity.

Time For Change: How Google's Anticompetitive Conduct Reveals The Deficiencies Of Modern Antitrust Regulation, Benjamin Clay Hughes

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note examines the divergent approaches of U.S. and EU antitrust regulations in addressing anticompetitive conduct by tech giants, such as Microsoft and Google. It highlights how the EU has adopted a more aggressive and proactive stance in enforcing antitrust laws, whereas the U.S. has taken a more cautious approach. The analysis underscores the challenges of regulating digital platforms and the need for streamlined procedures to address anticompetitive practices effectively.

Table Of Contents, Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 3, Iss. 3

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Nietzsche And The Law Of The “The Other”: The Jew In Refraction, Jeffrey Meyers

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

This article asks what Nietzsche might tell us about the possibility and conditions of having knowledge of the legal other or "the Other" in law. lthough not a familiar formulation, this line of inquiry must be permitted to take shape because it goes directly to the most basic theoretical conundrum of comparative law. This conundrum lies well beyond the moribund debate over the purported "commensurability'" or "incommensurability" of differing legal "systems" or "traditions. " Instead it takes comparative lawyers to task by asking them to explain how they might know, or hope to have knowledge of legal otherness. In this …

The History Of A Mystery: The Evolution Of The Law Of Unjust Enrichment In Germany, England And China, Steve Gallagher, Lin Siyi, Lutz-Christian Wolff

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The law of unjust enrichment, despite being recognized in all modern jurisdictions, remains controversial due to its complexities. This article examines the historical development of unjust enrichment in Germany, England, and China, arguing that the concept's simplicity and academic influence are root causes of ongoing doctrinal and practical challenges. The analysis critiques the single principle approach—whereby any unjustified enrichment must be returned—highlighting its failure to address diverse scenarios effectively. The article concludes that this flawed foundational concept, compounded by academic ambitions, has led to persistent issues across all three jurisdictions.

The Need For Certainty And Written Form In Land Sale Contracts In China: A Legal Reform Recommendation, Wei Wen

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Despite the significance of land sale contracts, China's Contract Law (the supreme authority in contractual matters) fails to articulate whether written form is mandatory for land sale contracts as a prerequisite for contractual remedies. The result of this ambiguity is that urban and rural courts across China have delivered contradictory judgments on this matter, and Chinese claimants do not have clear rules or authorities to follow. This imposes unfairness on those claimants. This article examines and analyzes the uncertainty and its causes, reaching a conclusion that the solution to addressing the nationwide uncertainty is a legal reform-Contract Law should articulate …

State Intent Under International Law, Stephen Townley

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The question of legislative intent has long been a topic of intense scholarly focus in the United States. There has also been a recent uptick in discussion of executive branch intent with the filing of highprofile lawsuits predicated upon allegations of improper motives. However, there has been no corollary effort to unpack the concept of state intent at the international level, where it arises with respect to such varied questions as how to understand the scope of a state's consent, whether a state should be deemed to be negotiating in good faith, and whether a state has engaged in genocide. …

Are We In Good Hands? A Comparative Analysis Of Compensation Schemes Concerning Catastrophes And Their Administrative Structure, Yi Ming Zeng

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note critiques the administrative structure of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund (VCF), highlighting its limitations in providing equitable and transparent compensation. It proposes integrating elements from Germany's and Japan's administrative systems to address these shortcomings and improve future disaster compensation schemes in the U.S.

Terrorist Victim Or Perpetrator?: Foreign Solutions To Challenges Posed By The U.S.’S Terrorist Bars To Asylum, Stephanie Blum, Nadav Morag

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

This article analyzes the challenges presented by the U.S.'s Terrorism-Related Inadmissibility Grounds ("TRIG") for asylum applicants and looks overseas for potential solutions. TRIG is the method by which the U.S. government bars terrorists and those who materially support terrorism from obtaining asylum and related protections. TRIG, however, is overbroad and inefficient, encompassing terrorist victims who currently pose and never posed any threat to U.S. security. Specifically, TRIG does not consider duress, or the provision of trivial support, when analyzing whether applicants should be barred from asylum because of material support of terrorism. Additionally, current law defines a terrorist organization for …