Comparative and Foreign Law Commons^™

Crime Doesn't Pay But Neither Can Ex-Offenders: A Comparative Analysis Of Criminal Restitution In The United States And Canada, Justin Gendler

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note argues that the U.S. criminal restitution system is flawed, prioritizing punishment over rehabilitation, leading to significant hardships for indigent offenders, victims, and society. It proposes reforming the system to focus on disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and consider offenders' financial situations, drawing lessons from Canada's more rehabilitative approach.

Advance To The Nearest Dispensary: How Quebec's Marijuana Monopoly Is A Model For Future Legalized States, Jason Levine

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note argues that a state-run monopoly model for marijuana sales, inspired by Quebec's approach, could more effectively promote public health and reduce black-market competition compared to the current license authorization model used in U.S. states like Colorado and California. By centralizing control over pricing, distribution, and product regulation, a monopolistic structure could address challenges such as high taxes, slow transition phases, and the dominance of illegal markets. The analysis draws parallels to alcohol sales frameworks and highlights how a government-run system could avoid federal tax burdens under Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code.

Duty To Rescue In The Digital Age: A Comparative Analysis, Cameron Kellett

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article advocates for the enactment of state legislation establishing a duty-to-rescue doctrine, arguing that the absence of such a legal duty leads to preventable harm and undermines societal solidarity. It critiques the arbitrary nature of the special relationship exception under current law and proposes Minnesota's duty-to-rescue statute as a model for reform. The analysis emphasizes that requiring bystanders to provide reasonable assistance, without endangering themselves, is both feasible and morally justifiable, as it aligns with human tendencies to help others in distress.

Sex Work Is Real Work: The Implications Of U.S. Strippers Winning The Right To Unionize, An International Comparative Study, Katherine Fustich

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note examines the landmark NLRB decision in *Nolan Enterprises*, which granted U.S. strippers the right to unionize by classifying them as employees rather than independent contractors. This ruling has significant implications for labor rights in the sex work industry, both domestically and internationally. The analysis compares this development with international perspectives from the UK, Germany, and the Netherlands, highlighting the challenges and opportunities for sex worker unionization and the broader implications for labor movements globally.

The Global Red Scare And The Anti-Worker Repressive Model, 1913-1927, Christopher M. Roberts

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

This article considers the extensive repressive measures enacted around the world during and in the wake of the First World War. While repressive developments in the World War I and post-war periods have previously been examined in different national contexts, little scholarship has adopted a more global lens. To better organize and consider the relevant developments, this article develops a typology of six different categories of public order governance into which the majority of the repressive measures of the period may be classified: the passage of new laws; the development of new institutions; raids, arrests, prosecutions, and other judicial and …

Table Of Contents - Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 5, Iss. 2

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Tightwire Of National Interests And Publicity In The Evolved Process Of Democratization And Constitutional Transformation: Lessons From Taiwan, Hsin-Hsuan Lin

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Achieving an optimal balance between government secrecy and democratic accountability has led to long-standing questions in the discussion of contemporary constitutionalism. To address the complex contemporary phenomenon of government secrecy within a democratic society, a more in-depth understanding of its tension with democratic accountability and transparency is essential. This article provides a descriptive overview of Taiwan's legal system, its legal implications in relation to government secrecy, and its normative implications. The article begins with a historical background of Taiwan's legal system, focusing on legal reform as it relates to government secrecy. The article investigates the complex interactions between the administrative, …

Remedying Online Shaming, Miriam Marcowitz-Bitton, Hillel Sommer

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Shaming is an act of subjecting someone publicly to shame, disgrace, humiliation, or disrepute.1 This act has challenged many existing legal regimes. Its effects are devastating, and efforts to cope with it within the current legal framework have been largely unsuccessful, mainly due to the challenges posed by anonymous, online shaming. This article rethinks the remedies currently available to handle shaming. It touches upon both civil and criminal remedies and penalties, considering the role that the right to be forgotten can play in handling shaming effectively. The article argues that only by complementing existing remedies with victims' rights can we …

Same As It Ever Was: The Tijuana River Sewage Crisis, Non-State Actors, And The State, James M. Cooper

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article examines the ongoing environmental crisis caused by sewage contamination in the Tijuana River Valley, highlighting the inadequacy of current governance structures and international agreements in addressing transboundary pollution. It critiques the growing influence of non-state actors (NSAs) in border governance, arguing that privatization and deregulation undermine state accountability and sovereignty. The analysis emphasizes the need for a more effective and sustainable framework to manage environmental devastation and balance public and private interests at the U.S.-Mexico border.

Rule Of Law And International Human Rights, Vincent J. Samar

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

This article reviews the field of international human rights with particular attention to the way that the International Court of Justice, the International Criminal Court, the Human Rights Committee, and local domestic courts operate to resolve human rights cases. It first notes what internationally recognized human rights there are and the sources that give rise to them. It then explains how relativism enters human rights decision-making, especially at the domestic court level, in part because a common grounding for the human rights propounded was never adopted. Even at the level of the International Court of Justice, its failure to include …

Polarization And Reform: Rethinking Separation Of Emergency Powers, Kevin Rizzo

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note examines the challenges posed by the expansion of presidential emergency powers, particularly under the National Emergencies Act (NEA), and argues that political polarization has weakened Congress's ability to check the President's use of these powers. It advocates for reforms to balance national security needs with constitutional checks and balances, emphasizing the need to address the structural and political factors that enable presidential overreach.

A Bull In A China Shop: How Cfius Made Tiktok A National Security Problem, Adina Feder

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note critiques the expansion of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' (CFIUS) mandate under the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA), particularly its inclusion of "sensitive personal data" as a factor in national security reviews. This expansion has led to overly broad and vague definitions, resulting in unnecessary restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) without adequately addressing legitimate national security concerns. The note argues that data privacy issues should be addressed through separate federal privacy legislation rather than CFIUS, which is ill-suited to handle such matters. It calls for clearer definitions and a …

Water Privatization And The Case For A Public Model, Jessica Wang

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note examines the risks associated with privatizing water systems, focusing on cases in Flint, Michigan, and Buenos Aires, Argentina. It argues that privatization can undermine public rights, exacerbate inequalities, and lead to environmental injustice. The analysis highlights the failure of regulatory oversight and advocates for stronger legal frameworks to protect vulnerable communities.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 5, Iss. 1

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Conflicting Limitation Periods: A Comparison Between Hong Kong And Mainland China, Alan Gibb, King Fung Tsang

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article examines the conflicting approaches to limitation periods in private international law between Hong Kong and Mainland China. It highlights the complexities arising from Hong Kong's traditional common law approach, which characterizes limitation periods as procedural, and Mainland China's structured approach, which treats them as substantive. The article advocates for legislative reform in Hong Kong to adopt a more modern approach, aligning with international practices and reducing forum shopping and legal uncertainty.

What Is Wrong With Intimate Partner Abuse And Why It's Criminalization Might Not Be Right, Galia Schneebaum

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Considering a contemporary debate between United States ("US') and United Kingdom ("UK') approaches, this article probes the appropriateness of criminalizing non-violent abuse in intimate partner relationships. Criminal lawyers in the US and the UK are divided on prohibiting intimate partner abuse. Whereas US jurisdictions retain a traditionalfocus on physical injury, England and Wales enforce a novel prohibition on "controlling or coercive behavior," covering conduct such as micromanaging intimate partners'schedules or restricting their behaviors through rules. While the US approach has been criticized as conservative, this article questions the progressiveness of the UK approach. It suggests, first, that in prohibiting "controlling …

Striking The Balance Between Contractual Rights And Obligations: Restructured Contract Law In The Newly Enacted Chinese Civil Code, Mo Zhang

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Contract legislation in China experienced a significant change as a result of the Civil Code's enactment in 2020. With a focus on civil rights and private interests, contract law and other areas of law are expected to help promote the development of a rights-based society under the Civil Code-a much wanted shift from the traditionally obligation-based society. In this context, the Civil Code is hailed in China as a milestone in the country's legal landscape.

The Civil Code consolidated the 1999 Contract Law with judicial practices and restructured the legal framework governing contracts by modifying or adding provisions aimed at …

Transforming Affirmative Action Jurisprudence: Applying Eidelson's Theory On The Supreme Court Of India, Sawinder Singh

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

This paper compares the affirmative action jurisprudence developed by the Indian Supreme Court with United States affirmative action jurisprudence in the context of the philosophy of equality developed by Harvard Law School Professor Benjamin Eidelson. It evaluates the potential of Eidelson's claim that if the U.S. Supreme Court accepts his philosophy, it may incrementally allow the Court to adopt a more favorable attitude towards the affirmative action policies. The question raised here is whether Eidelson's approach can provide a constitutionalfoundation capable of giving us a consistently benevolent interpretation of affirmative action policies, as he hoped. This article concludes that, at …

Climate Reparations: Moral, Historical, And Legal Justifications For United States Reparations Payments To Female Population Groups In Developing Countries, Kate Belsito

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note advocates for a community-based reparations program targeting women in rural, developing countries most affected by climate change. It asserts that the United States, as a major historical emitter of greenhouse gases, bears significant responsibility for these harms and has failed to meet its international treaty obligations. The proposed program would address past injustices while promoting future adaptation, emphasizing moral accountability and systemic change.

The Right To Dine: Why New York City's Restaurant Culture Is Worth Saving, Evelyn Baert

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note argues that New York City's restaurant culture, akin to Paris's, holds significant cultural and economic value and should be preserved through comprehensive government relief measures. It advocates for adopting a French-inspired approach to economic aid, emphasizing the importance of restaurants as social and cultural hubs beyond mere economic entities.

Title Vii Prohibits Employment Discrimination... Except When It Doesn't: Eliminating The Small Firm Exemption, Hayley Bronner

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note argues that the small firm exemption in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which excludes employers with fewer than fifteen employees from coverage, undermines the law's purpose of eradicating employment discrimination. The exemption, initially a political compromise, lacks an evidence-based foundation and disproportionately affects vulnerable groups such as women and minorities. The analysis suggests that eliminating this exemption is essential to achieve universal protection and align Title VII with broader state and international laws, proposing measures like damage caps to mitigate potential burdens on small businesses.

Hamiltonian Shifts In State Aid And The Coming Breakdown Of The Internal Market: Can The European Union Survive Its Covid-19 Response?, Richard Dacher

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

This Note analyzes the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic to the legal structure of the EU and its path forward. The EU's and the member states' actions to combat the pandemic have brought the political and economic union to the precipice of a breakdown of the Internal Market. Fiscal policies mirroring those of the United States will likely rise in its place. Recent tax court decisions, acquiescence to federal debt-sharing schemes, and deregulated state aid policies highlight the federalization of the EU as a unified economic structure, and also foreshadow its diminished influence over the member states' state aid policies. …

Multinational Corporations' Responsibility For Tortious And Human Rights Violations: A Comparative Study, Fatemeh Bagherzadeh

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Many legal systems make it hard for the victims of human rights violations of multinational corporations to have access to their judicial systems. Multinational corporations are so powerful that they can form our lives and also escape liabilities for the damages caused by their activities. The limited liability theory of corporate law enables the parent company of a corporate group to enjoy privileges and avoid its responsibilities for human rights violations. Recently, litigators and human rights activists are trying to hold multinational corporations liable by expanding some well-established, but infrequent applicable theories such as "piercing the corporate veil" theory. Courts …

Aging In The 21st Century: Establishing A Uniform Protection Of Elderly Persons In The United States Through An International And Comparative Law Analysis, Jessica Garcia-Brown

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article argues that the elderly population lacks robust legal protections both internationally and domestically, with existing measures being fragmented and insufficient. It emphasizes the need for comprehensive federal legislation in the United States and a universal international convention to address elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The analysis highlights how current protections fail to provide uniform enforcement and often perpetuate harmful stereotypes by grouping the elderly with disabled individuals. The article advocates for dedicated legal frameworks to empower the elderly, dispel ageism, and ensure their rights are safeguarded globally.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 4, Iss. 3

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Contractual Protections Against The Resource Nationalism Cycle In Zambia, Sangwani Patrick Ng'ambi

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Foreign direct investment (FDI) in resource rich nations is typically fostered through concession or development agreements, which enable investors to explore and exploit the host State's natural resources. Under these agreements various incentives are offered to the investor by the host State, so as to attract their capital. However, once the investment is sunk, the investor becomes susceptible to the resource nationalism cycle. Investors are particularly vulnerable when the natural resource experiences a sustained upward trend. In such instances, the host State seeks to maximize the benefits accruingfrom the natural resource. This can either be accomplished through reversing the tax …

A Concept Of Shared Principles And The Constitutional Homogeneity In Europe: The Case Of Subsidiarity, Volker Roeben

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article explores the concept of subsidiarity as a shared legal principle in both the European Union (EU) and German law, focusing on its role in ensuring the accountability of central authority while safeguarding the autonomy of peripheral legislatures. It highlights the convergence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) on a rationale of legality, aimed at preventing central overreach into peripheral competences. Despite this alignment, the article notes divergent outcomes in the application of subsidiarity, with the FCC more frequently invalidating federal legislation compared to the CJEU's more restrained …

Interior Landmark Designation And Regulation: Should Government Regulate Publicity Inaccessible Interior Landmarks, Victoria Tesone

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note argues that government regulation of interior landmarks should be contingent upon public access, as such regulation otherwise fails to serve its intended public benefit and unjustly burdens property owners. It proposes that without public access, landmark designation should not impose regulatory obligations on property owners, and suggests that the financial burden of preservation should shift to taxpayers rather than private owners.

Policing Pregnancy Loss: Misuse Of Abuse Of A Corpse Laws, Monica Siwiec

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note examines the misuse of abuse of a corpse laws to criminalize pregnant persons for pregnancy loss, arguing that such prosecutions violate constitutional principles, including the void-for-vagueness doctrine and equal protection. These laws, originally designed to regulate corpse desecration and mistreatment, are increasingly being applied in ways that disproportionately target marginalized groups, particularly women of color. The analysis highlights how the broad and vague language of these statutes enables arbitrary enforcement, undermining legal clarity and perpetuating reproductive injustice.

Dignity, Freedom, And Digital Rights: Comparing American And European Approaches To Privacy, Virginia Kozemczak

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note examines the contrasting approaches of the United States and the European Union to digital privacy, emphasizing how the US prioritizes liberty while the EU focuses on dignity. It argues that US privacy law, particularly under the Fourth Amendment, struggles to adapt to technological advancements, as seen in cases like Carpenter v. United States. In contrast, the EU's framework, guided by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, offers more comprehensive protections by addressing the broader context of data collection and processing. The author suggests that the US could enhance its privacy protections by adopting elements …