Comparative and Foreign Law Commons^™

Human Rights In Indefinite Occupation: Palestine, Sari Bashi

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article examines the tension between international humanitarian law (IHL) and international human rights law (IHRL) in the context of prolonged occupations, specifically focusing on Israel's 53-year occupation of Palestinian territory. It proposes a framework that integrates human rights norms, such as nondiscrimination and progressive realization of economic and social rights, into IHL to enhance protections for civilians under occupation. The analysis highlights the limitations of IHL in addressing long-term occupations and advocates for a more robust approach that balances military necessity with the welfare of the occupied population, while also addressing the challenges of enforcing these standards in the …

Human Rights In The Six Arab States Of The Gulf Cooperation Council (Gcc): From Vision To Reality, Eleni Polymenopoulou

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article examines the evolving landscape of human rights in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) States, arguing that while there is a noticeable shift toward better human rights compliance, this progress is primarily driven by economic diversification and geopolitical strategies rather than a genuine embrace of international human rights norms. The analysis highlights that despite advancements in social and economic rights, significant challenges persist in areas such as civil liberties and media freedom. The article posits that human rights are increasingly viewed as essential for economic growth and development in the region, rather than merely as universal values.

Israeli Perfidy In The Disputed Occupied Palestinian Territories (Opt), Daniel Benoliel, Yohai Edery

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

This article considers Israel's controversial capture of wanted Palestinians in the disputed Occupied Palestinian Territories ("OPT') by resort to perfidy while feigning civilian status. That is given that Israel's call of choice for perfidy revolves almost entirely around capture as opposed to injuring or killing which Israel justly rejects as unlawful. While the prohibition of perfidy is accepted as customary international law, its practical definition and application in the OPT remain unsettled.

The article first considers the differences between the conduct of hostilities and law enforcement paradigms governing the disputed OPT. In certain situations that arise in armed conflicts, it …

Corruption Abroad: From Conflict To Co-Operation: A Comparison Of French And American Law And Practice, Fred Einbinder

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article examines the divergent approaches of France and the United States in combating corporate foreign corruption, highlighting their shared commitment to addressing the issue but differing legal frameworks and practices. While the U.S. employs participatory, lawyer-led systems with tools like plea bargaining and whistleblowing, France's inquisitorial, state-centric model has historically resisted such practices. The enactment of Sapin 2 in France marks a shift toward integrating American-style anti-corruption mechanisms, such as the Convention Judiciaire d'Intérêt Public (CJIP), while preserving core principles of French criminal law. The analysis underscores the challenges and opportunities of cross-border enforcement and the evolving cooperation between …

Return Of The King: Corruption Backsliding In America, Pedro Gerson

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The United States appears to be going through a crisis of corruption. However, it is hard to know whether this is a matter of appearance or if the country is at risk of high levels of corruption making a comeback. The Article applies the equilibrium model of corruptionthe leading social science account of how corruption operates-to the current U.S. system, and shows that the United States may indeed be backsliding. The potential for corruption to creep back up is due to more than the political moment. Rather, it is the result ofpolitics combined with the relatively powerless institutional controls for …

Legal Exportation: The Case Of European Labor Law And Third Countries, Lior Zemer, Neta Nadiv

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The frequency of change in industry and human mobility has brought new legal issues before labor courts. These changes constantly create a need to rethink and renew national labor law principles. In this process countries search for and import labor law principles from foreign legal systems. This Article focuses on Israeli labor law as a test case. Israeli courts considering labor law matters often turn to foreign legal systems in a manner that arguably influences the courts' interpretation and development of local labor laws. In practice, labor courts in Israel, when faced with a lack of appropriate domestic legislation, model …

Table Of Contents - Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 3, Iss. 2

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Privacy In The Digital Age: Is Our Data Safe?, Ezra Wolfson

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note examines the Cambridge Analytica scandal and its implications for digital privacy, advocating for enhanced regulatory frameworks to protect user data. It draws parallels with the Enron scandal, suggesting that similar legislative responses, such as the proposed Social Media Transparency Act, are necessary to ensure corporate accountability and user protection in the digital age. The note also explores the potential adoption of GDPR-like regulations in the U.S. and discusses the concept of digital data as property, advocating for compensation for data breaches.

Addressing The Supreme Court’S ‘Constitutional Orphan’: Determining The Scope Of The Second Amendment In Public, Along With Its Need To Be Regulated, Eli Zlotowitz

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Who Owns African Art? Envisioning A Legal Framework For The Restitution Of African Cultural Heritage, Charity Gates

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note advocates for the establishment of a legal framework to address the restitution of African cultural heritage, emphasizing the need to return looted art and artifacts from Western museums to their countries of origin. It highlights the historical injustices of colonial looting and the current legal barriers that hinder restitution, proposing solutions that balance cultural preservation with international cooperation.

Nyc V. Airbnb: New York City's Attempt To Regulate Home-Sharing Platforms And Airbnb's Attempt To Fight Back, Moshe Goldblatt

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note examines the legal battle between New York City (NYC) and Airbnb over the Homesharing Surveillance Ordinance, arguing that the ordinance violates constitutional rights and federal laws. It suggests that while NYC aims to regulate short-term rentals to address housing issues, the ordinance oversteps by compelling platforms to disclose private information without warrants, infringing on Fourth and First Amendment rights, and violating the Stored Communications Act. The note proposes a balanced approach allowing individuals to rent their homes while curbing commercial exploitation.

Paradigm Perplexities: Does International Humanitarian Law Or International Human Rights Law Govern The Gaza Border Protests Of 2018-2019, & What Are The Consequences? A Response To The Supreme Court’S Opinion In Yesh Din V. Idf Chief Of Staff (Hcj 3003/18), Anthony Carl

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note critically examines the Israeli Supreme Court's ruling on the 2018 Gaza border protests, arguing that the Court's classification of the conflict as an international armed conflict (IAC) is legally flawed. This classification allowed the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to use live-fire policies under international humanitarian law (IHL), which the author contends is inappropriate for the context. The analysis asserts that the conflict should instead be treated as a non-international armed conflict (NIAC), with corresponding implications for the application of human rights law (IHRL). The Court's conflation of the law enforcement (LE) paradigm under IHL with the conduct of …

Healers Or Dealers: The Effect Of Doctors Committing Health Care Fraud On The Opioid Epidemic, Peri Novick

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note argues that doctors who commit healthcare fraud by improperly prescribing opioids for personal gain should be held criminally liable for patient deaths resulting from their actions. It emphasizes that these physicians, often operating as "pill mills," violate ethical and legal standards, contributing significantly to the opioid epidemic. The analysis advocates for stronger legal enforcement and accountability to address this issue effectively.

The Convention On The Elimination Of All Forms Of Discrimination Against Women: What Impact, If Any, Has It Had On Reproductive Health And Abortion Rights Around The World?, Casey Katz Pearlman

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note examines the impact of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) on reproductive rights and abortion laws, with a focus on Ireland's 2018 repeal of the Eighth Amendment, which legalized abortion. While CEDAW did not directly cause the repeal, it contributed to a broader international framework influencing the decision. The note also compares Ireland's experience with the United States, where CEDAW has not been ratified, and highlights the ongoing challenges in advancing reproductive rights globally.

Dirty Business: Accountability For Harmful Pesticide Use In Brazil, Anna Goldstein

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note argues that the alarming rise in pesticide use in Brazil, particularly under President Jair Bolsonaro, has severe human health and environmental consequences. It emphasizes the need for a binding international legal framework to hold multinational corporations accountable for human rights abuses and environmental harm in their supply chains. Current voluntary frameworks and domestic laws, such as Brazil's Law 7802, are insufficient due to weak enforcement and lack of binding standards. The proposed UN Draft Treaty on Business and Human Rights is presented as a critical solution to address these gaps and ensure corporate accountability.

Global Justice Vs. U.S. Global Hegemony: Rejecting Bolton’S Opposition To The Icc, Norman Swazo

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Former U.S. National Security Advisor John R. Bolton has announced that as an official Trump Administration national security policy, the USA will not support the International Criminal Court (ICC) and instead will work for its demise. At issue here is a concept of global justice versus insistence on US global hegemony and a Pax Americana. Here, the author argues against Bolton's position rejecting the legitimacy of international law and the ICC. Bolton 's appeal to a principle of consent must yield to a principle of salience, as defended by Ronald Dworkin; a concept ofjustice, as advocated by Amartya Sen; and …

Legitimacy In International Dispute Resolution In The Age Of Anti-Globalization, Nationalism, And Isolationism: How Geographical And Legal Cultural Diversity On The International Bench Can Promote Regional And International Cooperation, Alina Ng Boyte

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article argues that implicit biases, such as availability bias, affect heuristic, and endowment effect, significantly impede international cooperation and effective problem-solving in the global legal system. By addressing these cognitive errors, international legal institutions can foster trust, promote collaboration, and achieve socially just outcomes. The analysis highlights the role of legal frameworks and distributive justice in overcoming these biases, using the example of global efforts to eliminate child labor as a successful case study.

Masthead - Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 3 (2019-20)

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 3, Iss. 1

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

225 Years To The Jay Treaty: Interstate Arbitration Between Progress And Stagnation, Tamar Meshel

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article challenges the contemporary judicialized conception of interstate arbitration, arguing that it has strayed from its traditional purpose of effectively resolving disputes that are not suitable for judicial settlement. It advocates for a return to the hybrid nature of arbitration, which combines both legal and political dimensions, as reflected in the Jay Treaty. The article contends that a narrow, legalistic approach to arbitration often fails to address the complex, intertwined legal and political issues present in interstate disputes, such as territorial conflicts. It highlights the importance of arbitration as a flexible and effective mechanism for resolving such disputes, emphasizing …

The State Of Juvenile Diversion In Kosovo, Jason R. Tashea

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Through original, in-country interviews and research, this Article will introduce Kosovo's current juvenile diversion system and the need for its continued improvement. Kosovo-Europe 's youngest country-has instituted juvenile diversion, mediation, and educational alternatives to the traditional criminal justice system. This is positive progress, since research shows that children are developmentally more susceptible to reform and reeducation than adults. Thus, rehabilitating a child instead ofpunishing him lessens the chance the child will recommit a crime. However, there is evidence-informed by interviews with national and local stakeholders-that there is still room for procedural and statutory changes to expand the adoption, use, and …

The Struggle For Marriage Equality And The Need To Focus On Transgender Rights In Taiwan, M. Bob Kao

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Marriage equality has been the primary focus of LGBTQ rights activists in Taiwan for the past decade. After numerous setbacks, same-sex marriage was finally legalized in May 2019 by the Taiwanese Constitutional Court's decision finding that limiting marriage under the Civil Code as solely between a man and a woman was unconstitutional on grounds that it violated the principles of equality and the freedom of marriage. Moving forward, while ensuring marriage equality is enforced in practice, LGBTQ rights activists in Taiwan must strategize their next steps, including combating other types of discrimination based on gender and sexual orientation and advocating …

The “National Security” Of Nations: President Trump’S Pretextual Tariff Rationale And How To Overcome It, Jacob Ely

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note argues that President Trump's use of Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act to impose tariffs on steel, aluminum, and automobiles under the pretext of national security constitutes an abuse of executive power. It contends that this action undermines the constitutional authority of Congress to regulate trade and tariffs, raising significant concerns about the separation of powers and the potential for future presidential overreach. The note advocates for legislative reforms to reclaim congressional oversight and ensure that national security justifications for tariffs are genuine and narrowly defined.

The Eu-U.S. Privacy Shield: An Uncertain Future, Catherine Read

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note examines the challenges facing the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield due to the renewal of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and the U.S. government's uneven implementation of Privacy Shield recommendations. It argues that without reforms, such as incorporating Presidential Policy Directive-28 (PPD-28) protections into Section 702, maintaining a fully staffed Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB), and enforcing stricter compliance measures, the future of the Privacy Shield and transatlantic data flows remains uncertain.

Methodological Pluralism And The Methods Of Comparative Constitutional Law, Michael Da Silva

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

This article defends comparative constitutional law's status as a genuine academic discipline capable of producing knowledge. In so doing, it argues that common claims about the necessary conditions for being an academic discipline are false: a field does not need a unique method or set of methods to be an academic discipline. Comparative constitutional law requires multiple methods to produce the valuable knowledge that makes the product of comparative constitutional law research unique, but it remains a discipline. It is not the only example of an academic discipline that does not fulfill the claimed methodological conditions on disciplinarily. A discipline …

For Institutional Investors, The Alternative Of “Exit Or Voice,” Or “Empowerment Or Engagement” In The United States And The United Kingdom, Akio Otsuka

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article examines the role of institutional investors in corporate governance systems in the United States and the United Kingdom, focusing on their potential to address agency gaps created by the separation of ownership and control. It argues that while institutional investors, particularly activist hedge funds, can play a crucial role in monitoring and engaging with portfolio companies, challenges such as passivity and regulatory frameworks often hinder their effectiveness. The analysis draws on law and economics to evaluate how institutional activism can contribute to long-term corporate success and stakeholder value, highlighting differences in approaches between the two jurisdictions.

Table Of Contents, Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 2, Iss. 3

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Rethinking The Law And Ethics Of Undercover Warfare, Raphael Bitton

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

This paper offers a new ethical and legalframework for undercover warfare. It begins by criticizing the traditional reasoning for the duty to wear unform. It demonstrates the insufficiency of the principle of 'distinction'. which dominates current discourse. It argues, instead, that the rationale for the duty to wear unforms is based on a new principle in international law that this paper advocates: the principle of accountability. The active form of global accountability requires some degree of states' transparency about their military activity. This allows other states to respond by exercising passive form of accountability and punish violations of international law. …

Living Illegal: Being Lgbt In Russia, Jeremy M. Tsuchitani-Watson

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

As lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning (LGBTQ) rights around the world continue a wave of progress, it is hard to imagine that the advances are being erased at the same pace. It is even harder to imagine this happening in a democratic society in a developed country. Finally, it is even more astounding that this is happening in a country that is considered a super power. However, it is happening, and has been happening since 2006.

For many reasons, the LGBTQ community has become a target of the Russian government; both the federal government and localized governments. …

Stand For The National Flag And Sing The National Anthem, Yuichiro Tsuji

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

This paper uses a comparative law approach to review a national anthem case that is one of the most famous decisions coming from the Japanese Supreme Court. Public school teachers in Japan are required to stand up in front of the national flag and sing the national anthem during public school ceremonies. This paper reviews their constitutional rights.