Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- First Amendment (1633)
- Constitutional Law (1192)
- Religion Law (238)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (230)
- Law and Society (196)
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (191)
- Intellectual Property Law (184)
- Internet Law (172)
- Communications Law (143)
- Education Law (133)
- Jurisprudence (126)
- Law and Politics (117)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (116)
- Courts (108)
- State and Local Government Law (100)
- Legislation (96)
- Criminal Law (95)
- Legal History (86)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (85)
- Fourteenth Amendment (82)
- Privacy Law (79)
- Judges (71)
- Administrative Law (69)
- Labor and Employment Law (68)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (64)
- Law and Gender (62)
- Health Law and Policy (60)
- Election Law (57)
- Litigation (56)
- Institution
-
- SelectedWorks (346)
- Selected Works (305)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (167)
- Fordham Law School (120)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (107)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (95)
- Pepperdine University (93)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (67)
- American University Washington College of Law (66)
- University of Georgia School of Law (66)
- The University of Akron (56)
- Seattle University School of Law (53)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (52)
- University of South Carolina (47)
- Cleveland State University (45)
- Columbia Law School (45)
- St. Mary's University (43)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (43)
- New York Law School (39)
- Boston University School of Law (38)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (37)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (34)
- Notre Dame Law School (34)
- University of Baltimore Law (34)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (33)
- George Washington University Law School (29)
- University of Miami Law School (28)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (28)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (27)
- University of Richmond (24)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (113)
- Touro Law Review (91)
- Publications (86)
- Scholarly Works (77)
- Indiana Law Journal (75)
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (75)
- Faculty Publications (57)
- All Faculty Scholarship (52)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (52)
- Seattle University Law Review (49)
- Journal Articles (48)
- Fordham Law Review (47)
- Akron Law Review (46)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (44)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (43)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (40)
- South Carolina Law Review (38)
- Supreme Court Case Files (34)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (34)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (32)
- GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works (29)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (29)
- Law Faculty Publications (28)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (28)
- American University Law Review (26)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (26)
- Articles (25)
- Cleveland State Law Review (24)
- Jack C Dolance II (23)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (23)
- Publication Type
Articles 241 - 270 of 2896
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Second Founding And The First Amendment, William M. Carter Jr.
The Second Founding And The First Amendment, William M. Carter Jr.
Articles
Constitutional doctrine generally proceeds from the premise that the original intent and public understanding of pre-Civil War constitutional provisions carries forward unchanged from the colonial Founding era. This premise is flawed because it ignores the Nation’s Second Founding: i.e., the constitutional moment culminating in the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments and the civil rights statutes enacted pursuant thereto. The Second Founding, in addition to providing specific new individual rights and federal powers, also represented a fundamental shift in our constitutional order. The Second Founding’s constitutional regime provided that the underlying systemic rules and norms of the First Founding’s Constitution …
Free Speech And Democracy: A Primer For Twenty-First Century Reformers, Toni M. Massaro, Helen Norton
Free Speech And Democracy: A Primer For Twenty-First Century Reformers, Toni M. Massaro, Helen Norton
Publications
Left unfettered, the twenty-first-century speech environment threatens to undermine critical pieces of the democratic project. Speech operates today in ways unimaginable not only to the First Amendment’s eighteenth-century writers but also to its twentieth-century champions. Key among these changes is that speech is cheaper and more abundant than ever before, and can be exploited — by both government and powerful private actors alike — as a tool for controlling others’ speech and frustrating meaningful public discourse and democratic outcomes.
The Court’s longstanding First Amendment doctrine rests on a model of how speech works that is no longer accurate. This invites …
The Fourth Amendment’S Forgotten Free-Speech Dimensions, Aya Gruber
The Fourth Amendment’S Forgotten Free-Speech Dimensions, Aya Gruber
Publications
No abstract provided.
How The Supreme Court Talks About The Press (And Why We Should Care), Helen Norton
How The Supreme Court Talks About The Press (And Why We Should Care), Helen Norton
Publications
No abstract provided.
Fish On First, Larry Alexander
Dehors The Record: A Correction Of A Final Jeopardy Question, Thomas E. Baker
Dehors The Record: A Correction Of A Final Jeopardy Question, Thomas E. Baker
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is Free Speech An Academic Value? Is Academic Freedom A Constitutional Value?, Daniel Gordon
Is Free Speech An Academic Value? Is Academic Freedom A Constitutional Value?, Daniel Gordon
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor Fish—Why Are You Still Picking On Liberalism?, Micah Schwartzman
Professor Fish—Why Are You Still Picking On Liberalism?, Micah Schwartzman
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Stanley Fish, The First, And The Life Of The Law, Samuel A. Terilli, Jr.
Stanley Fish, The First, And The Life Of The Law, Samuel A. Terilli, Jr.
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Kent State And The Failure Of First Amendment Law, Gregory P. Magarian
Kent State And The Failure Of First Amendment Law, Gregory P. Magarian
Scholarship@WashULaw
Since the U.S. Supreme Court decided its first free speech case 100 years ago, two very different eras have defined First Amendment law. For a half century, before 1970, the Supreme Court focused on protecting the expressive freedom of political dissidents and social reformers. In 1970, amid protests against the Vietnam War, the Ohio National Guard senselessly gunned down four students at Kent State University. The Kent State massacre exposed the fragility in our country of political protest, free speech, and democracy itself. That atrocity should have inspired First Amendment law to affirm and enhance its protection of dissenters and …
The Corporation As Trinity, David A. Skeel Jr.
The Corporation As Trinity, David A. Skeel Jr.
All Faculty Scholarship
In “Corporate Capitalism and ‘The City of God,’” Adolf Berle references Augustine’s theological classic The City of God in service of his contention that corporate managers have a social responsibility. In this Article, I turn to another work by Augustine, The Trinity, for insights into another feature the corporation, corporate personhood. The Trinity explicates the Christian belief that God is both three and one. I argue that corporations have analogously Trinitarian qualities. Much as theologically orthodox Christians understand God to be both one and three, I argue that corporations are best seen as both a single entity and through …
Business As Usual: Hobby Lobby And The Purpose Of Corporate Rights, Dalia Tsuk Mitchell
Business As Usual: Hobby Lobby And The Purpose Of Corporate Rights, Dalia Tsuk Mitchell
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
This article explores the interdependence of the discourse of corporate rights and the law of corporate purpose. I argue that the history of corporate rights reflects changing reactions of the U.S. Supreme Court to social, political, and cultural concerns, each reaction offering a different purpose for corporations in our modern society. At the turn of the twentieth century, in response to fears about the advance of socialism, the Court used liberal assumptions to justify protecting the publicly held corporation’s property rights as derived from the rights of individual shareholders. In so doing, the Court helped turn the corporation, with its …
Lawyers For White People?, Jessie Allen
Lawyers For White People?, Jessie Allen
Articles
This article investigates an anomalous legal ethics rule, and in the process exposes how current equal protection doctrine distorts civil rights regulation. When in 2016 the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct finally adopted its first ever rule forbidding discrimination in the practice of law, the rule carried a strange exemption: it does not apply to lawyers’ acceptance or rejection of clients. The exemption for client selection seems wrong. It contradicts the common understanding that in the U.S. today businesses may not refuse service on discriminatory grounds. It sends a message that lawyers enjoy a professional prerogative to discriminate against …
Transparency And The First, Mark Fenster
The Varieties Of Counterspeech And Censorship On Social Media, Dawn C. Nunziato
The Varieties Of Counterspeech And Censorship On Social Media, Dawn C. Nunziato
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
The year 2020 was without a doubt a remarkable and unprecedented one, on many accounts and for many reasons. Among other reasons, it was a year in which the major social media platforms extensively experimented with the adoption of a variety of new tools and practices to address grave problems resulting from harmful speech on their platforms — notably, the vast amounts of misinformation associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and with the 2020 presidential election and its aftermath. By and large — consistent with First Amendment values of combatting bad speech with good speech — the platforms sought to respond …
The First Amendment And The Female Listener, Loren Jacobson
The First Amendment And The Female Listener, Loren Jacobson
New Mexico Law Review
When the Supreme Court has considered whether laws that affect women’s decisions about their health and bodies violate the Free Speech Clause, it has ignored the informational needs of the very women that such laws regulate. I argue that, instead, the Supreme Court should value women’s informational and decision-making needs and properly place them at the center of a First Amendment analysis of laws that affect women in particular. Towards that goal, the Supreme Court should take a listener-centered approach to laws that affect women’s decision-making. There is a strong basis for a listener-centered approach in the Court’s Free Speech …
What Was The "Dartmouth College" Case Really About?, Charles R.T. O'Kelley
What Was The "Dartmouth College" Case Really About?, Charles R.T. O'Kelley
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Article is the first modern work of corporation law scholarship fully examining the Dartmouth College case as it was lived and understood at the time. Earlier scholars, the author of this Article included, have relied on the case to make doctrinal and theory-of-the firm arguments about Supreme Court precedents regarding the constitutional rights of corporations. Moreover, these earlier works have primarily focused on, and found talismanic meaning, in two sentences in Marshall’s opinion:
"A corporation is an artificial being, invisible, intangible, and existing only in contemplation of law. Being the mere creature of law, it possesses only those properties …
Transparency And The First, Mark Fenster
Transparency And The First, Mark Fenster
UF Law Faculty Publications
In his book The First: How to Think About Hate Speech, Campus Speech, Religious Speech, Fake News, Post-Truth, and Donald Trump, Stanley Fish neatly reverses the polarity of rights-based claims that the public enjoys, under the First Amendment’s free speech and press rights, a right to government information. Transparency and free speech ideals are indeed related, he concedes, because they share a political vision and conceptual grounding in the notion that robust conceptions of free speech carry a commitment to increase the flow of information. But this is not a good thing, Fish argues—rather, the relationship between the two merely …
Curing The First Amendment Scrutiny Muddle Through A Breyer-Based Blend Up? Toward A Less Categorical, More Values-Oriented Approach For Selecting Standards Of Judicial Review, Clay Calvert
UF Law Faculty Publications
This Article argues that the United States Supreme Court should significantly alter its current categorical approach for discerning standards of judicial review in free-speech cases. The present system should become nondeterminative and be augmented with a modified version of Justice Stephen Breyer’s long-preferred proportionality framework. Specifically, the Article’s proposed tack fuses facets of today’s policy, which largely pivots on distinguishing content-based laws from content-neutral laws and letting that categorization determine scrutiny, with a more nuanced, values-and-interests methodology. A values-and-interests formula would allow the Court to climb up or down the traditional ladder of scrutiny rungs – strict, intermediate or rational …
Scrutiny-Determination Avoidance In First Amendment Cases: Laudable Minimalism Or Condemnable Evasion?, Clay Calvert
Scrutiny-Determination Avoidance In First Amendment Cases: Laudable Minimalism Or Condemnable Evasion?, Clay Calvert
UF Law Faculty Publications
This Article examines the United States Supreme Court’s practice in First Amendment cases of not resolving the precise level of scrutiny that applies to measure a statute’s validity. Rather than opting for one of two tiers of scrutiny — one more rigorous than the other—the Court sometimes dodges the issue. It does this by concluding that a statute would not pass muster under the more lenient standard, thereby rendering it unnecessary to decide which test was, in fact, more appropriate. The Court thus adopts an “assuming-without-deciding” logic in such cases, simply supposing the lesser standard applies without definitively holding as …
What Is Caesar's, What Is God's: Fundamental Public Policy For Churches, Lloyd Histoshi Mayer, Zachary B. Pohlman
What Is Caesar's, What Is God's: Fundamental Public Policy For Churches, Lloyd Histoshi Mayer, Zachary B. Pohlman
Journal Articles
Bob Jones University v. United States is both a highly debated Supreme Court decision and a rarely applied one. Its recognition of a contrary to fundamental public policy doctrine that could cause an otherwise tax-exempt organization to lose its favorable federal tax status remains highly controversial, although the Court has shown no inclination to revisit the case and Congress has shown no desire to change the underlying statutes to alter the case’s result. That lack of action may be in part because the IRS applies the decision in relatively rare and narrow circumstances.
The mention of the decision during oral …
Weaponizing Proof Of Harm In First Amendment Cases: When Scientific Evidence And Deference To The Views Of Professional Associations Collide In The Battle Against Conversion Therapy, Clay Calvert
UF Law Faculty Publications
This Article uses the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit’s divided decision in Otto v. City of Boca Raton in late 2020 as a springboard for examining battles in First Amendment jurisprudence over proof of causation of harm and the level of deference owed to the judgments of learned societies. A two-judge majority held in Otto that a pair of local ordinances banning speechbased conversion therapy on minors violated the First Amendment, with those measures failing the rigorous strict scrutiny standard of review. Crucial to the majority’s ruling was its conclusion that insufficient evidence exists that conversion therapy—also …
From Lex Informatica To The Control Revolution, Julie E. Cohen
From Lex Informatica To The Control Revolution, Julie E. Cohen
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Legal scholarship on the encounter between networked digital technologies and law has focused principally on how legal and policy processes should respond to new technological developments and has spent much less time considering what that encounter might signify for the shape of legal institutions themselves. This essay focuses on the latter question. Within fields like technology studies, labor history, and economic sociology, there is a well-developed tradition of studying the ways that new information technologies and the “control revolution” they enabled—in brief, a quantum leap in the capacity for highly granular oversight and management—have elicited long-term, enduring changes in the …
Rethinking Protections For Indigenous Sacred Sites, Stephanie H. Barclay, Michalyn Steele
Rethinking Protections For Indigenous Sacred Sites, Stephanie H. Barclay, Michalyn Steele
Journal Articles
Meaningful access to sacred sites is among the most important principles to the religious exercise of Indigenous peoples, yet tribes have been repeatedly thwarted by the federal government in their efforts to vindicate this practice of their religion. The colonial, state, and federal governments of this Nation have been desecrating and destroying Native American sacred sites since before the Republic was formed. Unfortunately, the callous destruction of Indigenous sacred sites is not just a troubling relic of the past. Rather, the threat to sacred sites and cultural resources continues today in the form of spoliation from development, as well as …
Blackness As Fighting Words, Etienne C. Toussaint
Blackness As Fighting Words, Etienne C. Toussaint
Faculty Publications
The resurgence of worldwide protests by activists of the Movement for Black Lives (BLM) has ushered a global reckoning with the meaning of this generation’s rallying cry – “Black Lives Matter.” As citizens emblazon their streets with this expression in massive artistic murals, the Trump administration has responded with the militarized policing of non-violent public demonstrations, revealing not merely a disregard for public safety, but far worse, a concerted dismantling of protestors’ First Amendment rights. Nevertheless, BLM protests have persisted. Accordingly, this Essay considers the implications of this generation’s acclamation of Black humanity amidst the social tensions exposed during the …
Sonograms And Speech: Informed Consent, Professional Speech, And Physicians' First Amendment Rights, Oliana Luke
Sonograms And Speech: Informed Consent, Professional Speech, And Physicians' First Amendment Rights, Oliana Luke
Washington Law Review
Abortion is an extremely divisive topic that has caused waves of litigation. The right to access abortion has traditionally been challenged based on due process, equal protection, and privacy grounds. However, in a more recent string of cases, physicians have been challenging laws that require the physician to narrate an ultrasound before an abortion as an abridgment of their First Amendment rights. These cases require courts to balance the government’s ability to reasonably regulate a physician through professional licensing with the physician’s First Amendment protections against government-compelled speech. This Comment argues that, to balance these ideals and survive First Amendment …
Buckeyes Against The Boycott: Why Ohio's Law Opposing Bds Is Protected Under The First Amendment, Hannah Kraus
Buckeyes Against The Boycott: Why Ohio's Law Opposing Bds Is Protected Under The First Amendment, Hannah Kraus
Cleveland State Law Review
In 2016, Ohio became the fourteenth state to enact legislation denouncing the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement against Israel. Codified as § 9.76 of the Ohio Revised Code, this legislation prohibits any state agency from contracting with a company that boycotts Israel during the contractual period. While the constitutionality of § 9.76 has not been challenged, anti-BDS statutes passed by other state legislatures have faced First Amendment challenges. This Note argues that § 9.76 of the Ohio Revised Code complies with the First Amendment under the government speech doctrine. In 1991, the Supreme Court applied the government speech doctrine in …
Death Sentence: A Compendium Against Assailment, John F. Serafine
Death Sentence: A Compendium Against Assailment, John F. Serafine
Lincoln Memorial University Law Review Archive
Getting people to kill themselves is the oldest trick in the book. There ought to be a constitutional law against it. This Article proposes one.“Assailment” means asking, telling, or tempting a person under the age of eighteen to attempt or complete suicide. It also includes extorting or blackmailing a child into suicidal behavior. Such a law is necessary because of the skyrocketing rate of youth suicide. Death Sentence: A Compendium Against Assailment encourages lawmakers to enact an assailment statute. It further tells the stories of 41 completed youth suicides, 15 attempts, and 8 cases of suicidal ideation. The rigors of …
As Winding As The Serpentine Wall: Tennessee's Adoption Statute Under Lemon, Thomas Rader
As Winding As The Serpentine Wall: Tennessee's Adoption Statute Under Lemon, Thomas Rader
Lincoln Memorial University Law Review Archive
This comment argues that Tenn. Code Ann. 36-1-147 is unconstitutional under both the Tennessee and U.S. Constitutions by demonstrating that the test outlined in Lemon v. Kurzman is appropriate for legislation of this kind, as it is a statute regulating a secular activity in which religious institutions participate. The Comment continues by diving into the legislative history of 36-1-147 before faithfully applying the Lemon test to the statute at hand.
Essay: The Fighting Words Doctrine: Alive And Well In The Lower Courts, David L. Hudson, Jr.
Essay: The Fighting Words Doctrine: Alive And Well In The Lower Courts, David L. Hudson, Jr.
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
No abstract provided.