Law Commons^™

The Continuity Of Statutory And Constitutional Interpretation: An Essay For Phil Frickey, Ernest A. Young

Faculty Scholarship

This Essay seeks to honor Phil by exploring the contributions of his Legal Process approach to a problem near and dear to his heart: the uses and legitimacy of canons of statutory construction. I focus, as Phil did in his most recent work, on the canon of constitutional avoidance—that is, the rule that courts should construe statutes to avoid significant ―doubt as to their constitutionality.

This Essay largely supports Phil‘s defense of the avoidance canon, but links that defense to another set of canons that Phil has criticized: the various clear statement rules of statutory construction that Phil and Bill …

To Be Real: Sexual Identity Politics In Tort Litigation, Anne Bloom

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

On The Use And Abuse Of Standards For Law: Global Governance And Offshore Financial Centers, Richard K. Gordon

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Whose Loss Is It Anyway - Effects Of The Lost-Chance Doctrine On Civil Litigation And Medical Malpractice Insurance, Steven R. Koch

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Protecting The Greater Good: A Critique Of The Public Duty Doctrine As Applied In Murray V. County Of Person, Alexander B. Punger

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Capteton V. A.T. Massey Coal Co.: The Texas Implications., Catherine Stone, Wendy Martinez

St. Mary's Law Journal

In Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., the United States Supreme Court addressed whether the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution was violated by the denial of a motion to recuse. The motion sought to recuse a Supreme Court of Appeals Justice from West Virginia. The justice received an extraordinary campaign contribution from the chief officer of a corporate party to a case pending before the court. Several Texas courts addressed whether recusal was necessary based on campaign contributions prior to the decision in Caperton. Texas courts have universally held that recusal was not required. The United States …

Help Is On The Way: Senior Legal Hotlines Respond To Elder Abuse, Eleanor Crosby Lanier

Scholarly Works

Helplines are an important component of efforts to protect elders from abuse. This article describes the development of the senior legal hotline. After 20 years, these hotlines exist in at least half of the states and provide legal advice and other legal services at no cost to callers. Senior legal hotlines can provide information on financial scams, adult guardianship, advance directives, housing, medical care, and public benefits.

The Ilc And The Reconstruction Of U.S. Banking, Mehrsa Baradaran

Scholarly Works

Since the Great Depression, bank regulators in the United States have endeavored to separate banking institutions from commercial firms, believing such separation was necessary for stability and growth. The recent collapse of our financial system indicates that this premise may be false, as Industrial Loan Companies ("ILCs") – the only institutions where commercial firms are permitted to own banks – remain sound. ILCs have persisted throughout U.S. banking history through exceptions and omissions in banking legislation, but the strength and resilience they have exhibited in the current financial collapse are worth investigating and even emulating. This article examines recent controversy …

Glimmers And Signs Of Innovative Health In The Commercial Internet, Shane Greenstein

Colorado Technology Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Innovations In The Internet's Architecture That Challenge The Status Quo, Christopher S. Yoo

Colorado Technology Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Wikipedia's Labor Squeeze And Its Consequences, Eric Goldman

Colorado Technology Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Are Your Bits Worn Out? The Dmca, Replacement Parts, And Forced Repeat Software Purchases, Todd C. Adelmann

Colorado Technology Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Text Message Price Gouging: A Perfect Storm Of Tacit Collusion, Per Larsen

Colorado Technology Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents, Journal On Telecommunications & High Technology Law

Colorado Technology Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Case Studies In Abandoned Empiricism And The Lack Of Peer Review At The Federal Communications Commission, Rob Frieden

Colorado Technology Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Why The Iphone Won't Last Forever And What The Government Should Do To Promote Its Successor, Robert Hahn, Hal J. Singer

Colorado Technology Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Lawless Surveillance, Warrantless Rationales, Cindy Cohn

Colorado Technology Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Caught In The Cloud: Privacy, Encryption, And Government Back Doors In The Web 2.0 Era, Christopher Soghoian

Colorado Technology Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Academic Author Objections To The Google Book Search Settlement, Pamela Samuelson

Colorado Technology Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Rough Waters Ahead: The Status Of The Safe Harbor Provision After Proveris Scientific Corp. V. Innovasystems, Inc., Kelli Brensdal

Colorado Technology Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Blood Code: The History And Future Of Video Game Censorship, Jeffrey O'Holleran

Colorado Technology Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Substitution Effects: A Problematic Justification For The Third-Party Doctrine Of The Fourth Amendment, Blake Ellis Reid

Colorado Technology Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Law And Mental Health: A Relationship In Crisis? (Introduction), Sheila Wildeman

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

An Introduction to the Lectures of Supreme Court of Canada Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin and Nova Scotia Provincial Court Judge Anne Derrick. What is the significance of the rule of law to the area of professional knowledge and practice that is “mental health”—or to the interaction of those two aspirational, one might say euphemistically-named social systems: the mental health and justice systems? This question centres upon the rule of law—specifically, I suggest (as I relate further in closing), a thick conception of the rule of law grounded in an ideal of state-subject reciprocity1 —and not, or not directly, upon the …

Front Matter

Journal of Air Law and Commerce

No abstract provided.

Kwiatkowski: Privacy Protection And Risk Analysis: Losing The Forest In The Telephoto Shots Of The Trees, Steve Coughlan

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

Checklists of factors are a helpful feature in assisting courts to determine how to find the proper balance in a variety of situations. Properly used they can help to achieve a certain level of uniformity and predictability, though they do not guarantee it. However, it is also important to recognize that checklists are a way of getting at the right analysis — they are not in and of themselves that analysis. Checklists also create the possibility of becoming encumbered in specifics and therefore losing sight of the overall goal. The Supreme Court decided two decades ago that the reasonable expectation …

Tribunal Jurisdiction Over Charter Remedies: Now You See It, Now You Don't, Steve Coughlan

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

The Supreme Court's decision in R. v. Conway (reported ante p. 201) simplifies the test for deciding whether an administrative tribunal has jurisdiction to grant Charter remedies. At least in principle, it heralds a broader approach to allowing litigants to seek such remedies at the earlier stage of a proceeding, rather than waiting for a review before a court or pursuing a parallel action. The attitude behind Conway signals a greater willingness to allow administrative tribunals to grant Charter remedies. The test on the key question of whether a tribunal has jurisdiction over a particular remedy is still essentially the …

Conceptualizing The Home State Duty To Protect Human Rights, Sara Seck

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

The Special Representative to the UN Secretary-General on Business and Human Rights (SRSG) has identified the State duty to protect against human rights abuses by non-State actors, including business, as one of the fundamental pillars of the Framework for Business and Human Rights [Framework].1 The Framework “rests on differentiated but complementary responsibilities”, and is comprised of three “core principles”: the State duty to protect, the corporate responsibility to respect human rights, and the need for more effective access to remedies.2 However, the jurisdictional scope of the State duty to protect is disputed. According to the SRSG, international law provides that …

Slipping Away From Justice: The Effect Of Attorney Skill On Trial Outcomes, Jennifer B. Shinall

Vanderbilt Law Review

Fred Goldman blamed the defense attorneys when a Los Angeles jury found O.J. Simpson not guilty of murdering his son, Ron Goldman, and Nicole Brown Simpson on October 3, 1995. Yet Goldman was not the only one who blamed the defense attorneys for the acquittal; much of the media agreed that Simpson was guilty and had escaped his rightful punishment. As one New York Times reporter lamented, "To watch Mr. Simpson slip away from justice ... was an infuriating sight." People who believed in Simpson's guilt cited Johnnie Cochran's decision to "play the race card" and his clever catch phrases …

Freedom, Finality, And Federal Preemption: Seeking Expanded Judicial Review Of Arbitration Awards Under State Law After Hall Street, Brian T. Burns

Fordham Law Review

When the U.S. Supreme Court decided Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc. in March 2008, the Court held that under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), parties to an arbitration agreement may not contractually expand the grounds for judicial review of an arbitration award beyond the grounds enumerated in the FAA. In dicta, however, the Court expressly left open the possibility that parties nonetheless may obtain expanded review by relying on state arbitration law, rather than the FAA. This Note examines the availability of contractually expanded review under state law and addresses the question of whether, in light of Hall …

Matters Of Public Safety And The Current Quarrel Over The Scope Of The Quarles Exception To Miranda, Rorie A. Norton

Fordham Law Review

In October 1984, the Burger Court set forth an exception to the Miranda doctrine in New York v. Quarles permitting officers to intentionally abstain from administering Miranda warnings to suspects where a threat to the safety of the public or officers exists. However, latent ambiguity arising from the Quarles decision authored by Justice William Rehnquist has resulted in a split among the federal courts of appeals as to what constitutes a “public safety threat.” Some courts broadly extend the Quarles exception to inherently dangerous situations, including the threat of an officer mishandling an undiscovered weapon. Other courts narrowly apply Quarles …