Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (41)
- Selected Works (32)
- SelectedWorks (28)
- Brigham Young University Law School (22)
- UIC School of Law (20)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (17)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (17)
- University of Richmond (15)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (12)
- William & Mary Law School (12)
- American University Washington College of Law (11)
- Duke Law (11)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (11)
- Georgetown University Law Center (9)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (9)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (7)
- University of Missouri School of Law (7)
- Barry University School of Law (6)
- University of Baltimore Law (6)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (5)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (5)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (4)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (4)
- University of Georgia School of Law (4)
- University of the Pacific (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (44)
- Judges (16)
- United States Supreme Court (14)
- Supreme Court (11)
- Jurisprudence (10)
-
- Constitutional Law (8)
- Constitutional law (8)
- Federal courts (8)
- International law (8)
- Litigation (8)
- Civil procedure (7)
- Discrimination (7)
- Conflicts of law (private international law) (6)
- Congress (6)
- Due process (6)
- Judicial review (6)
- Jurisdiction (6)
- Problem-solving courts (6)
- Remedies (6)
- Statistics (6)
- Tribunals (6)
- Adjudication (5)
- Authority (5)
- Civil rights (5)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (5)
- International Criminal Court (5)
- Law reform (5)
- Legitimacy (5)
- Procedure (5)
- Race (5)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (27)
- All Faculty Scholarship (21)
- Articles (21)
- BYU Law Review (18)
- Faculty Publications (18)
-
- Faculty Working Papers (17)
- UIC Law Review (17)
- Indiana Law Journal (13)
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class (8)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (7)
- University of Richmond Law Review (7)
- Barry Law Review (6)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (6)
- Law Faculty Publications (6)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (6)
- American Indian Law Review (5)
- Dean M. Hashimoto (5)
- Journal Articles (5)
- Michigan Law Review (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- Allison D Redlich (4)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (4)
- Golden Gate University Law Review (4)
- Maryland Law Review (4)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- Claudio Fuentes Maureira (3)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (3)
- Faculty Works (3)
- Gabriel Martinez Medrano (3)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 410
Full-Text Articles in Law
Aplicación De La Ley De Defensa Del Consumidor Para La Restitución Colectiva De Sumas Indebidamente Percibidas De Los Consumidores, Gabriel Martinez Medrano
Aplicación De La Ley De Defensa Del Consumidor Para La Restitución Colectiva De Sumas Indebidamente Percibidas De Los Consumidores, Gabriel Martinez Medrano
Gabriel Martinez Medrano
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Of The United States, October Term 2010 Preview, Update: December 7, 2010, Georgetown University Law Center, Supreme Court Institute
Supreme Court Of The United States, October Term 2010 Preview, Update: December 7, 2010, Georgetown University Law Center, Supreme Court Institute
Supreme Court Overviews
No abstract provided.
Law Clerks Out Of Context, Parker B. Potter Jr.
Law Clerks Out Of Context, Parker B. Potter Jr.
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] “In a previous article, I examined judicial opinions in cases in which law clerks have gone wild, principally by doing things that law clerks just aren‘t supposed to do, such as convening court, conducting independent factual investigations into matters before their judges, or leaking drafts of opinions to the press. Here, I focus on opinions in federal cases that discuss two other categories of unusual law-clerk activity, serving as a source of evidence, and going to court, as a litigant.
The article is informed by my ten years of experience as a trial court law clerk in the state …
Justice Souter And The Civil Rules, Scott Dodson
Justice Souter And The Civil Rules, Scott Dodson
Faculty Publications
Justice Souter’s recent retirement from the Court after nearly twenty years presents a unique opportunity to comment on his legacy. No doubt others will eulogize or castigate him for his membership in the Planned Parenthood v. Casey troika, but there is much more to the man and his jurisprudence. Indeed, the danger is that Justice Souter will be pigeonholed into one opinion, an opinion that he wrote early in his Supreme Court career, to the detriment of understanding the complex justice that he was. And what it finds is a justice deeply committed to the fair treatment of the litigants …
Two Contrasting Approaches In The Interpretation Of Outdated Statutory Provisions, Yihan Goh
Two Contrasting Approaches In The Interpretation Of Outdated Statutory Provisions, Yihan Goh
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
Some statutes in operation today were passed a long time ago. Inevitably, through the passage of time, social norms at the time of enactment may now be unrecognizable. Two recent cases show contrasting approaches towards the interpretation of outdated statutory provisions. The first approach is seen in the Singapore High Court case of WX v.WW. That case concerned the interpretation of section 114 of the Evidence Act, a decidedly ancient statutory provision. The second approach was adopted by the Singapore Court of Appeal in AAG v. Estate of AAH, deceased. In that case, the Court of Appeal had to interpret …
Judicial Case Management: Caught In The Crossfire, Steven S. Gensler
Judicial Case Management: Caught In The Crossfire, Steven S. Gensler
Steven S. Gensler
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court’S Rationale In Capital Cases: A One Way Street?, Kimberly Bliss
The Supreme Court’S Rationale In Capital Cases: A One Way Street?, Kimberly Bliss
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
Panelist, Use Of Evidence-Based Treatment Guidelines In Workers' Compensation, Dean Hashimoto
Panelist, Use Of Evidence-Based Treatment Guidelines In Workers' Compensation, Dean Hashimoto
Dean M. Hashimoto
No abstract provided.
Análisis Económico De La Intervención Judicial En Los Contratos ¿Una Cuestión De Justicia?, Daniel Monroy
Análisis Económico De La Intervención Judicial En Los Contratos ¿Una Cuestión De Justicia?, Daniel Monroy
Daniel A Monroy C
Desde la perspectiva del AED, una de las funciones principales del derecho de contratos, sobre la cual diferentes autores hacen mayor énfasis, es la relacionada con la “disuasión del oportunismo”; en igual sentido, otra de las funciones del derecho de contratos es la relativa a la “interpolación eficiente de términos contractuales”. Dichas funciones suelen explicar buena parte de la regulación en materia de contratos, además de justificar la intervención judicial. Por otro lado, algunos autores nos llevan a considerar que propugnar exclusivamente por la libertad y la autonomía contractual, puede llevarnos a garantizar que los contratos, además de ser mecanismos …
Fool Me Once, Shame On Me; Fool Me Again And You're Gonna Pay For It: An Analysis Of Medicare's New Reporting Requirements For Primary Payers And The Stiff Penalties Associated With Noncompliance, Brent M. Timberlake, Monica A. Stahly
Fool Me Once, Shame On Me; Fool Me Again And You're Gonna Pay For It: An Analysis Of Medicare's New Reporting Requirements For Primary Payers And The Stiff Penalties Associated With Noncompliance, Brent M. Timberlake, Monica A. Stahly
University of Richmond Law Review
This article discusses the new requirements and the issues that currently face insurers, claimants, and attorneys in cases involving Medicare-eligible beneficiaries.
Replacing Context For Plain Meaning In United States V. Cox
Replacing Context For Plain Meaning In United States V. Cox
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
But What If The Court Reporter Is Lying? The Right To Confront Hidden Declarants Found In Transcripts Of Former Testimony, Peter Nicolas
But What If The Court Reporter Is Lying? The Right To Confront Hidden Declarants Found In Transcripts Of Former Testimony, Peter Nicolas
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Pragmatic Incrementalism Of Common Law Intellectual Property, Shyamkrishna Balganesh
The Pragmatic Incrementalism Of Common Law Intellectual Property, Shyamkrishna Balganesh
All Faculty Scholarship
‘Common law intellectual property’ refers to a set of judge-made legal regimes that create exclusionary entitlements in different kinds of intangibles. Principally the creation of courts, many of these regimes are older than their statutory counterparts and continue to co-exist with them. Surprisingly though, intellectual property scholarship has paid scant attention to the nuanced law-making mechanisms and techniques that these regimes employ to navigate through several of intellectual property law’s substantive and structural problems. Common law intellectual property regimes employ a process of rule development that this Article calls ‘pragmatic incrementalism’. It involves the use of pragmatic and minimalist techniques …
Use Of Evidence-Based Treatment Guidelines In Workers' Compensation, Dean Hashimoto
Use Of Evidence-Based Treatment Guidelines In Workers' Compensation, Dean Hashimoto
Dean M. Hashimoto
No abstract provided.
Compliance Requirements For Chinese Automobile Market Players, Tao Liang
Compliance Requirements For Chinese Automobile Market Players, Tao Liang
Tao LIANG
Foreign Investment Catalogues And Investment Environment In China, Tao Liang
Foreign Investment Catalogues And Investment Environment In China, Tao Liang
Tao LIANG
A Call For Uniformity In Appellate Courts' Rules Regarding Citation Of Unpublished Opinions, Analisa Pratt
A Call For Uniformity In Appellate Courts' Rules Regarding Citation Of Unpublished Opinions, Analisa Pratt
Golden Gate University Law Review
This Comment is divided into seven parts. Part I provides an overview of the current practice concerning citation of unpublished opinions, including a look at how unpublished opinions came into existence, the types of opinions currently published, and the courts' reasoning for limiting citation of unpublished opinions. Part II describes the variations on precedential value an opinion could receive and describes the no-citation rules by circuit. Part III discusses the debate between the Eighth and the Ninth Circuits - the two most vocal circuits on the issue of citability. Part IV deconstructs the reasoning behind no-citation rules. Part V examines …
New Pleading, New Discovery, Scott Dodson
New Pleading, New Discovery, Scott Dodson
Faculty Publications
Pleading in federal court has a new narrative. The old narrative was one of notice, with the goal of broad access to the civil justice system. New Pleading, after the landmark Supreme Court cases of Twombly and Iqbal, is focused on factual sufficiency, with the purpose of screening out meritless cases that otherwise might impose discovery costs on defendants. The problem with New Pleading is that factual insufficiency often is a poor proxy for meritlessness. Some plaintiffs lack sufficient factual knowledge of the elements of their claims not because the claims lack merit but because the information they need is …
Oral Dissenting On The Supreme Court, Christopher W. Schmidt, Carolyn Shapiro
Oral Dissenting On The Supreme Court, Christopher W. Schmidt, Carolyn Shapiro
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
In this Article we offer the first comprehensive evaluation of oral dissenting on the Supreme Court. We examine the practice in both historical and contemporary perspective, take stock of the emerging academic literature on the subject, and suggest a new framework for analysis of oral dissenting. Specifically, we put forth several claims. Contrary to the common assumption of scholarship and media coverage, oral dissents are nothing new. Oral dissenting has a long tradition, and its history provides valuable lessons for understanding the potential and limits of oral dissents today. Furthermore, not all oral dissents are alike. Dissenting Justices may have …
The Exclusionary Rule In Immigration Proceedings: Where It Was, Where It Is, Where It May Be Going, Irene Scharf
The Exclusionary Rule In Immigration Proceedings: Where It Was, Where It Is, Where It May Be Going, Irene Scharf
San Diego International Law Journal
The piece examines the treatment of the Fourth Amendment in immigration courts by surveying its jurisprudential history in those courts and then analyzes the judicial responses thereto. Disparities among circuit court rulings add to the confusion and unpredictability typical of Immigration Court decisions. Finally, the article discusses the difficulties raised by the divergent circuit court opinions and offers suggestions as to how we may resolve these difficulties in accordance with the Constitution's requirement of fair play.
Two Paths To Judicial Power: The Basic Structure Doctrine And Public Interest Litigation In Comparative Perspective, Manoj Mate
San Diego International Law Journal
This Article analyzes two key critical moments in the empowerment of the Supreme Court of India--the assertion of the basic structure doctrine, in which the Court asserted that constitutional amendments may be held unconstitutional on substantive grounds, and the development of the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) regime, through which the Court sought to protect and promote the rule of law and assume an expanded role in governance. I argue, in this article, that these two moments are exemplars of two types of moments that capture distinct aspects of the role of courts in different polities--"constitutional entrenchment" and "judicialization of governance" …
Protecting Nominative Fair Use, Parody, And Other Speech-Interests By Reforming The Inconsistent Exemptions From Trademark Liability, Samuel M. Duncan
Protecting Nominative Fair Use, Parody, And Other Speech-Interests By Reforming The Inconsistent Exemptions From Trademark Liability, Samuel M. Duncan
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Federal trademark law exempts certain communicative uses of a trademark from liability so that the public can freely use a trademark to comment on the markowner or to describe its products. These exemptions for "speech-interests" are badly flawed because their scope is inconsistent between infringement and dilution law, and because the cost and difficulty of claiming their protection varies significantly from court to court. Many speech-interests remain vulnerable to the chilling threat of litigation even though they are "protected" by current law. This Note proposes a simple statutory reform that will remedy this inconsistency by creating an express safe harbor …
Presumed Guilty Until Proven Innocent: The Burden Of Proof In Wrongful Conviction Claims Under State Compensation Statutes, Daniel S. Kahn
Presumed Guilty Until Proven Innocent: The Burden Of Proof In Wrongful Conviction Claims Under State Compensation Statutes, Daniel S. Kahn
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Despite significant efforts to uncover and prevent wrongful convictions, little attention has been paid to the compensation of wrongfully convicted individuals once they are released from prison. State compensation statutes offer the best path to redress because they do not require the claimant to prove that the state was at fault for the wrongful conviction and because they are not susceptible to the same political influences as other methods of compensation. However, even under compensation statutes, too many meritorious claims are dismissed, settled for far too little, or never brought in the first place. After examining the current statutory framework, …
Designing Bespoke Transitional Justice: A Pluralist Process Approach, Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Designing Bespoke Transitional Justice: A Pluralist Process Approach, Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Michigan Journal of International Law
Although many scholars agree that contemporary transitional justice mechanisms are flawed, a comprehensive and unified alternative approach to accountability for mass violence has yet to be propounded. Like many international lawyers, transitional justice theorists have focused their assessment efforts on the successes and failures of established institutions. This Article argues that before we can measure whether transitional justice is working, we must begin with a theory of what it is trying to achieve. Once we have a coherent theory, we must use it ex ante, to design effective transitional justice mechanisms, not just to assess their effectiveness ex post. Drawing …
Reinventing The Eeoc, Nancy M. Modesitt
Reinventing The Eeoc, Nancy M. Modesitt
All Faculty Scholarship
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has struggled to be a meaningful force in eradicating employment discrimination since its inception. The primary reasons for this are structural in nature. The EEOC was designed to react to discrimination complaints by investigating and conciliating all of the thousands of complaints filed annually. The EEOC has never been able to investigate all these complaints despite using the vast majority of its resources attempting to do so. The devotion of resources to managing and investigating the huge volume of complaints prevents the EEOC from taking more effective steps to eliminate discrimination. This article proposes …
That Ain't Kosher, Robert Steinbuch, Brett Tolman
That Ain't Kosher, Robert Steinbuch, Brett Tolman
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Expanding The Role Of North Carolina State Courts In Resolving Public Housing Disputes, Nooree Lee
Expanding The Role Of North Carolina State Courts In Resolving Public Housing Disputes, Nooree Lee
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Response To "Snyder V. Louisiana: Continuing The Historical Trend Towards Increased Scrutiny Of Peremptory Challenges", Bidish J. Sarma
Response To "Snyder V. Louisiana: Continuing The Historical Trend Towards Increased Scrutiny Of Peremptory Challenges", Bidish J. Sarma
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
John P. Bringewatt's recent note makes several important observations about the Supreme Court's opinion in Snyder v. Louisiana. Although he provides reasonable support for the claim that Snyder represents a sea change in Batson jurisprudence, the US Supreme Court's fresh opinion in Thaler v. Haynes (rendered on February 22, 2010) reads the Snyder majority opinion narrowly and suggests the possibility that Snyder is not as potent as it should be. The Haynes per curiam's guarded reading of Snyder signals the need for courts to continue to conduct the bird's-eye cumulative analysis that the Court performed in Miller-El v. Dretke[hereinafter Miller-El …
Unlv Magazine, Tony Allen, Shane Bevell, Donna Mcaleer, Ched Whitney, Cate Weeks
Unlv Magazine, Tony Allen, Shane Bevell, Donna Mcaleer, Ched Whitney, Cate Weeks
UNLV Magazine
No abstract provided.