Law Commons^™

Schools—District Liability: Political Subdivision Liability And School Duties Prevail Over Recreational Use Immunity, Vanessa Anderson

North Dakota Law Review

M.M. v. Fargo Public School District No. 1, 2010 ND 102, 783 N.W.2d 806In M.M. v. Fargo Public School District No. 1, the North Dakota Supreme Court held North Dakota’s recreational use immunity statutes were not applicable when a student was injured on school grounds during school hours. Thus, a school district, as a political subdivision, can be liable for a student’s injuries pursuant to section 32-12.1-03 of the North Dakota Century Code. Recreational use immunity statutes, or some variation of the statutes, can be found in all states and are in place to encourage landowners to open their property …

Drafting A Naming Rights Agreement For A Conceptual Collegiate Football Stadium, Gene Allen

North Dakota Law Review

No abstract provided.

Before The Redskins Were The Redskins: The Use Of Native American Team Names In The Formative Era Of American Sports, 1857-1933, J. Gordon Hylton

North Dakota Law Review

No abstract provided.

Relative Doubt: Familial Searches Of Dna Databases, Erin Murphy

Michigan Law Review

The continued growth of forensic DNA databases has brought about greater interest in a search method known as "familial" or "kinship" matching. Whereas a typical database search seeks the source of a crime-scene stain by making an exact match between a known person and the DNA sample, familial searching instead looks for partial matches in order to find potential relatives of the source. The use of a familial DNA search to identify the alleged "Grim Sleeper" killer in California brought national attention to the method, which has many proponents. In contrast, this Article argues against the practice of familial searching …

When A Company Confesses, Christopher Jackson

Michigan Law Review

Under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a defendant is normally obligated to attend all of the proceedings against her. However Rule 43(b)(2) carves out an exception for organizational defendants, stating that they "need not be present" if represented by an attorney. But on its face, the language of 43(b)(2) is ambiguous: is it the defendant or the judge who has the discretion to decide whether the defendant appears? That is, may a judge compel the presence of an organizational defendant? This Note addresses the ambiguity in the context of the plea colloquy, considering the text of several of the …

Pleading With Congress To Resist The Urge To Overrule Twombly And Iqbal, Michael R. Huston

Michigan Law Review

In Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, the Supreme Court changed the rhetoric of the federal pleading system. Those decisions have been decried by members of the bar, scholars, and legislators as judicial activism and a rewriting of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Such criticism has led members of both houses of Congress to introduce legislation to overrule the decisions and return to some variation of the "notice pleading" regime that existed before Twombly. This Note argues that both of the current proposals to overrule Twombly and Iqbal should be rejected. Although the bills take different …

Engineering The Endgame, Ellen D. Katz

Michigan Law Review

This Article explores what happens to longstanding remedies for past racial discrimination as conditions change. It shows that Congress and the Supreme Court have responded quite differently to changed conditions when they evaluate such remedies. Congress has generally opted to stay the course, while the Court has been more inclined to view change as cause to terminate a remedy. The Article argues that these very different responses share a defining flaw, namely, they treat existing remedies as fixed until they are terminated. As a result, remedies are either scrapped prematurely or left stagnant despite dramatically changed conditions. The Article seeks …

Aldo Leopold’S Land Ethic And The Great Lakes: A Paradigm For Understanding The Morality Of Aquatic Invasive Species Management, M. Andrew Sanford, John Uglietta, Phd

Student Summer Scholars Manuscripts

Abstract: This essay explores what obligations we have to protect the Great lakes ecosystem from the threat of aquatic invasive species within the context of Aldo Leopold‟s seminal essay in environmental philosophy The Land Ethic. In this essay I argue that Leopold‟s land ethic provides a consistent and dynamic paradigm for how we perceive and protect the natural environment. The land ethic is summarized in what I call Leopold’s Edict which directs us to preserve the health and beauty of the natural environment. The land ethic implies that people interested in conservation must develop a firm understanding of what …

The Fourth Circuit And Its Future, J. Harvie Wilkinson Iii

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Drug Policy In Context: Rhetoric And Practice In The United States And The United Kingdom, Richard C. Boldt

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Minor Courts And Communities At The Frontier: The Justice Of The Peace In Early Missouri, Bonnie Aileen Speck

Wayne State University Dissertations

ABSTRACT

MINOR COURTS AND COMMUNITIES AT THE FRONTIER JUSTICES OF THE PEACE IN EARLY MISSOURI

by

BONNIE A. SPECK

May 2011

Advisor: Sandra VanBurkleo

Major: American Legal and Constitutional History

Degree: History

This study focused on local and county courts operated by Missouri's justices of the peace between the Louisiana Purchase and roughly 1875. Its purpose was to investigate the role of township justices’ courts and county courts of commissioners in terms of interactions with local residents; effects of rulings and other court actions on everyday affairs; and wider impacts on Missouri society. Sources included territorial and …

Masthead, Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 11 (2009-10), Iss. 2

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

For Business Dispute Solutions, Process Matters, David C. Albalah, Jesse D. Steele

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Business mediation should be common sense, but it is all too often corrupted by nonsensical rules and practices. The ground rules that serve as a foundation for the mediation come from an antithetical adversary system, so the traditional mediation process has been adulterated with counterproductive adversarial practices. To consistently reach mutually beneficial mediated settlements, that are exponentially better than anything attainable through traditional mediation, both the structure of mediation ground rules and the practices utilized throughout the mediation process need to be changed and refocused on the ultimate purpose: enabling business decision makers to address the underlying business interests in …

Negotiating Implementation Of A Peace Agreement: Lessons Learned From Five Years At The Negotiating Table, Amos N. Guiora

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

For five years (1994-1999), I directly negotiated on-theground implementation of the Oslo Peace Process in the Gaza Strip. In my capacity as the Judge Advocate General's ("JAG") Corps Legal Advisor to the Israel Defense Forces ("IDF") Commander, Gaza Strip (1994-1997), I had primary responsibility for both interpretation and negotiation, first for the Gaza-Jericho Agreement and subsequently for the Interim Agreement as it applied to the Gaza Strip.

Mandatory Mediation: An Oxymoron? Examining The Feasibility Of Implementing A Court-Mandated Mediation Program, Dorcas Quek

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The introduction of the "multi-door courthouse" concept at the Pound Conference is said to have ushered in a modern era of dispute resolution within the United States. This watershed event in the history of Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") spawned greater involvement by the courts in ADR. Court-annexed ADR programs were set up throughout the U.S. and legislation was enacted to encourage the use of ADR. In 1983, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was amended to exhort courts to consider the "possibility of settlement" or "the use of extrajudicial procedures to resolve the dispute" at pre-trial conferences. …

Recommendations Regarding Establishment Of A Mediation Clinic, Cynthia A. Savage

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This article proposes utilizing consistent terminology and goals and recommends methods and approaches for effective design and implementation of supervised, hands-on, mediation training programs within conflict resolution graduate programs. Although law school programs are not addressed directly in this article and might differ in some respects as to their goals, effective methods and approaches will be much the same regardless of the setting.

Part I of this article will discuss terminology and propose a consistent clinic definition and clinic goals, and Part II will explore and make recommendations concerning clinic design. Part III will outline additional recommendations. Part IV provides …

Fulfilling The Washington Principles: A Proposal For Arbitration Panels To Resolve Holocaust-Era Art Claims, Jessica Mullery

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note highlights increased efforts to foster the restitution of Nazi-looted art, particularly on the U.S. front, during the 1990s, with emphasis on the Washington Conference in 1998. It is then contended that the Washington Principles have ultimately failed to result in the adoption of ADR mechanisms to deal with continuing Holocaust-era art claims in both the United States and abroad. The lack of both United States and international efforts subsequent to the Washington Conference, especially in failing to establish ADR mechanisms, is stressed in order to demonstrate the inadequacy of the Washington Principles. Ongoing cases and emerging litigation within …

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 12, Iss. 1

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

The High Cost Of Mandatory Arbitration, Martha Nimmer

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note traces the development of voluntary and mandatory arbitration in the United States, including the reasons for the rise in arbitration and the implications for Americans' civil rights. In voluntary arbitration, an employee agrees to arbitrate a workplace dispute instead of litigating a claim. Mandatory arbitration, in contrast, "requires an employee, as a condition of employment, to forego all access to a jury trial and use arbitration in place of a judicial forum for resolving statutory and contractual claims." The use of mandatory arbitration, particularly in employment disputes arising under Title VII, has increased dramatically since 1991 as a …

Restoring Human Trafficking Victims Through Victim-Offender Dialogue, Carina Patritti

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note will explore the pros and cons of using victim-offender dialogue in cases of human trafficking. In the first part of the Note, a background on human trafficking will be provided, including current statistics on human trafficking cases and the effects on victims. Restorative justice will be discussed in the second part of the note, with specific emphasis on VOD. The third part of the Note will explore how the criminal system has used VOD, beginning with low-level crimes and then exploring how VOD has been applied to serious and violent crimes. This Note will then propose the application …

Online Dispute Resolution With China: Advantageous, But At What Cost?, Jennifer Sackin

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note will discuss the use of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) between businesses and consumers in the United States (U.S.) and their counterparts in the People's Republic of China (P.R.C.). ODR is a growing, highly attractive, and arguably necessary phenomenon in the e-commerce world. It is an accommodating and useful process in that it employs online technology to provide traditional alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms via the Internet.

Expanding The Brand: The Case For Greater Enforcement Of Mandatory Mediation In Trademark Disputes, Max Vilenchik

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Currently, far too many trademark disputes that could have been settled outside of court end up in litigation. While alternative dispute resolution (ADR) has become more prevalent in other areas of the law, many trademark attorneys and their clients do not regularly consider ADR processes, such as mediation, as one of their options because these processes are still relatively new to the trademark law area. This Note will propose that mandatory trademark mediation programs be expanded to ensure that trademark cases that are well suited for mediation end up in mediation rather than in mounting court dockets.

In Section I, …

Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Corporate Power In The Public Eye: Reassessing The Implications Of Berle’S Public Consensus Theory, Marc T. Moore, Antoine Rebérioux

Seattle University Law Review

We analyze Berle’s overall corporate governance project in accordance with what we see as its four core sub-themes: (A) the limitations of external market forces as a constraint on managerial decision-making power; (B) the desirability of internal (corporate) over external (market) actors in allocating corporate capital; (C) civil society and the public consensus as a continuous informal check on managerial decision-making power; and (D) shareholder democracy (as opposed to shareholder primacy or shareholder wealth maximization) as a socially instrumental institution. We seek to debunk the popular misconception that Berle’s early work was a defense of the orthodox shareholder primacy paradigm …

Summary Judgment And The Influence Of Federal Rulemaking (Foreword To Symposium: The Future Of Summary Judgment), Bernadette Bollas Genetin

Akron Law Faculty Publications

This essay provides an overview of symposium articles on The Future of Summary Judgment, which were submitted in connection with the Section on Litigation’s program on summary judgment at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the Association of American Law Schools. Contributions to the symposium by Professors Edward Brunet, Stephen Burbank, Jeffrey Cooper, Steven Gensler, and Linda Mullenix, explore issues regarding (1) amendments to Federal Rule 56 that are set to take effect on December 1, 2010; (2) emerging safeguards to prevent improvident grant of summary judgment; (3) the potential of summary judgment to impact interrelated aspects of the pretrial process, …

A 2010 Update: What Every Entertainment Lawyer Needs To Know - How To Avoid Being The Target Of A Legal Malpractice Claim Or Disciplinary Action, John P. Sahl

Akron Law Faculty Publications

There is significant risk today that lawyers will become the target of a disciplinary or legal malpractice action, especially given the complexity of the law and advances in technology that reduce the amount of time that lawyers have to reflect about client matters. This risk is heightened by the increased competition in the bar to deliver legal services in a cost-effective manner, the sophistication of clients who expect competent, efficient and reasonably priced services, and the litigious nature of consumers. The risk is further exacerbated by the ever-changing methods and rules for electronic communication and the storage of information. The …

Recovery Of An Endangered Provision: Untangling And Reviving Critical Habitat Under The Engangered Species Act, Kalyani Robbins

Akron Law Faculty Publications

There has been long-term confusion among courts, agencies, developers, and environmental organizations regarding the legal, environmental, and economic impacts of designating critical habitat for species listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA. At the heart of this difficulty has been a need to understand the degree to which the protections for critical habitat can be distinguished from those for listed species generally. Critical habitat is primarily protected via section 7’s requirement that federal agencies consult with the Fish & Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service to determine whether a proposed federal action either jeopardizes a listed species …

Otc Derivatives Trading Under The Financial Reform Bill: Is It Tough Enough?, Willa E. Gibson

Akron Law Faculty Publications

Both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate have drafted financial reform legislation prompted by the financial market failings the country experienced in 2008. Both versions provide for comprehensive regulation of the OTC derivatives products, which were used extensively by those financial institutions that lost millions of dollars from investments in mortgage securities to insure against subprime mortgage defaults. This paper discusses the efficiency of proposed Congressional legislation to regulate the Over-the-Counter (OTC) derivatives market in light of the provision in the legislation that effectively exempts customized OTC derivatives contracts from clearing requirements and exchange trading. The exemption …

The Influence Of Abraham Lincoln On The Supreme Court's Interpretation Of The Constitutional Principles Of Liberty And Equality, Wilson Huhn

Akron Law Faculty Publications

The purpose of this article is to demonstrate that the Supreme Court has embraced Abraham Lincoln’s transcendent understanding of the principles of liberty and equality – transcendent in the sense that these principles are considered to be timeless, universal, and morally binding. The article briefly summarizes the Transcendental Movement, sets forth Lincoln’s understanding of liberty and equality, and describes how, in the modern era, the Supreme Court has “constantly approximated” the principles that Lincoln believed that this country is dedicated to.

Foreword: The New Era- Quo Vadis?, John Sahl

Akron Law Faculty Publications

The Inaugural MBI Symposium’s twenty-six participants highlight many important developments and challenges caused by MJP and new technologies. Their assessments and suggestions provide a helpful roadmap for lawyers and regulators to negotiate the increasingly complex, fast-paced, and ethically risky landscape for delivering legal services. Several panelists suggested regulatory reforms that range from the creation of a regulatory framework for lawyers engaged in crossborder practice to the creation of standards for the supervision of offshore outsourced legal services268 and the mining of metadata. Some of the panelists’ suggestions and reforms are especially important given the “high [financial] stakes” involved in the …