Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- International Law (597)
- Constitutional Law (436)
- Legal Education (286)
- Environmental Law (285)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (263)
-
- Comparative and Foreign Law (257)
- Criminal Law (257)
- Health Law and Policy (247)
- Legislation (227)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (225)
- Intellectual Property Law (205)
- Labor and Employment Law (200)
- Law and Society (192)
- Jurisprudence (183)
- Courts (176)
- Human Rights Law (164)
- Criminal Procedure (158)
- State and Local Government Law (156)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (149)
- Legal Profession (145)
- Torts (137)
- Law and Gender (136)
- Internet Law (132)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (130)
- Legal History (128)
- Evidence (125)
- Business Organizations Law (117)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (117)
- Administrative Law (116)
- Institution
-
- Brigham Young University Law School (1746)
- Duke Law (304)
- Fordham Law School (286)
- University of Michigan Law School (204)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (191)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (184)
- William & Mary Law School (180)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (178)
- UC Law SF (177)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (176)
- University of Denver (156)
- Southern Methodist University (152)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (147)
- University of Miami Law School (134)
- Seton Hall University (128)
- University of Chicago Law School (125)
- University of South Carolina (123)
- Cornell University Law School (121)
- University of the Pacific (120)
- University of Missouri School of Law (119)
- University of Richmond (119)
- Marquette University Law School (114)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (114)
- Nova Southeastern University (109)
- University of Colorado Law School (107)
- Georgetown University Law Center (105)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (105)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (91)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (87)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (86)
- Keyword
-
- Law (129)
- Discrimination (65)
- International law (63)
- Constitutional law (59)
- International Law (51)
-
- United States Supreme Court (50)
- Constitution (49)
- Human rights (47)
- Internet (46)
- LSU Student Government (45)
- Federalism (44)
- Evidence (43)
- Torts (43)
- First Amendment (39)
- United States (39)
- Capital punishment sentencing (38)
- Judicial review (38)
- History (36)
- Courts (35)
- Globalization (35)
- Peach Sheet (35)
- Privacy (35)
- Legislative History (34)
- Children (33)
- Legal ethics (32)
- Analysis (31)
- Canada (31)
- Jurisdiction (31)
- Ethics (30)
- Federal government (29)
- Publication
-
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020) (1150)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006) (512)
- Faculty Scholarship (453)
- Articles (204)
- Faculty Publications (180)
-
- Water Law Review (141)
- Scholarly Works (96)
- SMU Law Review (92)
- McGeorge Law Review (91)
- Fordham Law Review (89)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (88)
- Cardozo Law Review (77)
- Journal Articles (70)
- All Faculty Scholarship (69)
- North Carolina Law Review (68)
- Saint Louis University Law Journal (60)
- Michigan Law Review (59)
- Duke Law Journal (57)
- The Journal of Law and Education (57)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (57)
- ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law (56)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (55)
- University of Miami Law Review (55)
- St. Thomas Law Review (54)
- Journal of Legal Education (53)
- BYU Law Review (52)
- Case Western Reserve Law Review (52)
- Fordham International Law Journal (52)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (52)
- South Carolina Law Review (51)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 7471 - 7500 of 9191
Full-Text Articles in Law
Mandatory Rent Escrowing: Putting The Summary Back In Summary Process, Christopher Paul Ferragamo
Mandatory Rent Escrowing: Putting The Summary Back In Summary Process, Christopher Paul Ferragamo
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
A Question Of Intent: The Massachusetts Abuse Protection Order And The Innocent Doer Of Harm, Kostantinos Sofronas
A Question Of Intent: The Massachusetts Abuse Protection Order And The Innocent Doer Of Harm, Kostantinos Sofronas
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
The Evolving Treatment Of Garden-Variety Claims Under The Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege, Ryan M. Gott
The Evolving Treatment Of Garden-Variety Claims Under The Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege, Ryan M. Gott
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Pre-Trial Hurdles In Citizens' Environmental Enforcement Actions, Gayann Barbella Crowe
Pre-Trial Hurdles In Citizens' Environmental Enforcement Actions, Gayann Barbella Crowe
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Using Prior Convictions To Impeach The Credibility Of A Defendant-Witness In Massachusetts - Do We Go Too Far, Marc L. Caine
Using Prior Convictions To Impeach The Credibility Of A Defendant-Witness In Massachusetts - Do We Go Too Far, Marc L. Caine
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Alternative Sentencing: Using The 1997 Amendments To The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act To Keep Children In School And Out Of Juvenile Detention, Mark Peikin
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Click: Do We Have A Deal, James C. Hoye
Click: Do We Have A Deal, James C. Hoye
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
A Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words: The Use Of Graphic Photographs As Evidence In Massachusetts Murder Trials, Julie Rubenstein
A Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words: The Use Of Graphic Photographs As Evidence In Massachusetts Murder Trials, Julie Rubenstein
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Shooting An Elephant - Massachusetts Maintains Reasonable Suspicion: Protecting Individual Privacy During Traffic Stops And Battling Racial Profiling, Colin M. Black
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
High Income/High Asset Divorce: An Annotated Bibliography, Mary Kay Kisthardt, Nancy Levit
High Income/High Asset Divorce: An Annotated Bibliography, Mary Kay Kisthardt, Nancy Levit
Faculty Works
This bibliography covers articles published after 1995 and A.L.R.s that have supplements published after 1995. In the interest of brevity, A.L.R. collections (the titles of which are usually self-explanatory) and articles concerning individual cases or single state’s statutes are cited but not annotated.
Just Between Us - Aba Considers New Ethical Rules, Irma S. Russell
Just Between Us - Aba Considers New Ethical Rules, Irma S. Russell
Faculty Works
This article briefly describes one of the proposed rule revisions (Model Rule 1.6) to the Model Rules of Professional Conduct that will be presented to the ABA House of Delegates in July 2001 by the Ethics 2000 Commission.
Some Philosophical, Political And Legal Implications Of American Archeological And Anthropological Theory, John W. Ragsdale Jr
Some Philosophical, Political And Legal Implications Of American Archeological And Anthropological Theory, John W. Ragsdale Jr
Faculty Works
Archaeological and anthropological theories about the origins and practices of ancient peoples, and about events and histories, distant in time, but blending into the present, have had impacts that transcend the tenets and borders of the sciences as discrete disciplines. Our suppositions about the factual past can influence our present beliefs - not only our understandings and conclusions about the tangible and practical - but our feelings and faiths about the intangible and the spiritual as well. Our values, principles, world views, and cosmologies may thus be shaped by our scientific backdrop. Beyond this, our social activity, our national policy, …
It's Time To Put The Military's Death Penalty To Sleep , Michael I. Spak
It's Time To Put The Military's Death Penalty To Sleep , Michael I. Spak
Cleveland State Law Review
Part I will focus on the death penalty in the civilian sector of the United States. It begins with a brief history of and an introduction to death penalty laws in the United States. A critical examination of the primary arguments used to justify the death penalty follows. Part I next offers a brief overview of other independent reasons for the abolition of the death penalty. After having concluded that the application of the death penalty is unfair in the civilian sector and should thus be abolished, the article will then shift its focus to the death penalty in the …
Bringing The Camel Into The Tent: State And Federal Power Over Electricity Transmission , Cassandra Burke Robertson
Bringing The Camel Into The Tent: State And Federal Power Over Electricity Transmission , Cassandra Burke Robertson
Cleveland State Law Review
This paper provides a framework for understanding the current controversy regarding jurisdiction over the power grid, and provides policy-oriented solutions to ensure an adequate, low-cost transmission supply. The main thesis of this paper is that sound transmission policy requires greater federal power, and that Congress is better equipped than the courts to enact such policy. To this end, Part I of the paper offers an historical outline of the problem and analyzes the statutes and regulations that form the backbone of both the federal and state jurisdictional claims. Part II looks at legal considerations regarding the scope of federal jurisdiction. …
The Effects Of Mediation In A Juvenile Incarceration Facility: Reduction Of Violence Through Transformation, Linda Morton, Floralynn Einesman
The Effects Of Mediation In A Juvenile Incarceration Facility: Reduction Of Violence Through Transformation, Linda Morton, Floralynn Einesman
Cleveland State Law Review
The use of mediation techniques to resolve conflicts among American youth has grown in popularity over the past two decades; Conflict resolution programs have blossomed in school systems, but there has been a dearth of mediation programs for one of our most violent youth groups: incarcerated juveniles. In this article, we describe and analyze the effects and the potential success of our program through the data we have collected. Our article will first describe the objectives and content of our mediation program in Juvenile Hall in San Diego. Relying on sociological and psychological theory in our second section, we will …
Introduction Symposium: Toward More Reliable Jury Verdicts - Law, Technology, And Media Development Since The Trials Of Dr. Sam Sheppard , Patricia J. Falk
Introduction Symposium: Toward More Reliable Jury Verdicts - Law, Technology, And Media Development Since The Trials Of Dr. Sam Sheppard , Patricia J. Falk
Cleveland State Law Review
The three Sheppard cases, spread over almost half a century, serve as a point of departure to explore how the multiple forces of law, science, and the media have interacted in criminal trials and in later challenges to the reliability of those trials. The Sheppard cases have resulted in five enduring legacies. Perhaps the most obvious legacy of the Sheppard cases is the new law the case made when it was heard by the United States Supreme Court on a federal habeas corpus appeal. In Sheppard v. Maxwell, the Court created a new legal standard regarding the effects of pretrial …
Witness To History: The Role Of Legal Commentators In High Profile Trials - Opening Remarks, Laurie L. Levenson
Witness To History: The Role Of Legal Commentators In High Profile Trials - Opening Remarks, Laurie L. Levenson
Cleveland State Law Review
As legal commentators, our role is, first and foremost, to educate the public and the media. The next thing that a commentator can do is, of course, provide some type of expertise. An experienced lawyer or legal commentator should know enough to say, if given the opportunity, that a certain fact will not necessarily make a difference in the case because the jurors will not hear it or because it is unrelated to the legal issues in the case. Another thing legal commentators can do is address problems in the presentation of what the law and the legal process is. …
Open Courts: How Cameras In Courts Help Keep The System Honest, Clara Tuma
Open Courts: How Cameras In Courts Help Keep The System Honest, Clara Tuma
Cleveland State Law Review
Why is it important to televise coverage in trials? The basic answer is that our judicial system needs to be as open as possible. There is a reason we do not hold trials in private and a reason we open the courtroom doors and invite in the world. The reason is that justice shines brightest in the sunshine. In today's busy world only a few people can actually attend court proceedings. With so many people relying on television as their primary resource of information, televised coverage of trials exposes greater numbers o f citizens to our justice system. A camera …
Convicting The Innocent Beyond A Reasonable Doubt: Some Lessons About Jury Instructions From The Sheppard Case, Lawrence M. Solan
Convicting The Innocent Beyond A Reasonable Doubt: Some Lessons About Jury Instructions From The Sheppard Case, Lawrence M. Solan
Cleveland State Law Review
Indeed, it is difficult to prove one's innocence, and the legal system purports not to require defendants in criminal cases to do so. The shift in the burden of proof happened for a number of reasons. In this article, I will discuss another factor that I believe pervades the criminal justice system: jury instructions that shift the burden from the government to the defendant. Part II of this article establishes three criteria for good criminal jury instructions. They are fidelity to the law, comprehensibility, and consistency with the presumption of innocence. It then discusses the presumption of innocence, burden of …
A Distant Mirror: The Sheppard Case From The Next Millennium, James Robertson
A Distant Mirror: The Sheppard Case From The Next Millennium, James Robertson
Cleveland State Law Review
My own vantage point is that of a trial judge, and for me, revisiting the Sheppard case is a chance to ruminate on the relationship between judges and the media and how judges deal with high profile cases. I will consider that subject, and then meander a little farther along and share a few thoughts about what I call hermetically sealed justice - our modem insistence that judges say nothing and juries know nothing. Finally, I will have a few words to say about DNA evidence and the "reliable verdict" ideal that appears to be one of the propositions to …
Scientific Evidence In The Sam Sheppard Case , Paul C. Giannelli
Scientific Evidence In The Sam Sheppard Case , Paul C. Giannelli
Cleveland State Law Review
My panel is discussing reliable jury verdicts, and my topic is "scientific" evidence. One way to approach this issue is to compare scientific evidence with other methods of proof. The trial lawyers that I worked with viewed cases as falling primarily into one of three categories: eyewitness cases, confession cases, and "scientific" evidence cases. In this scheme, anything that was not an eyewitness, confession, or snitch case was a "scientific evidence" case. These categories, of course, are neither exhaustive nor mutually exclusive; often two and sometimes all three are involved. Nevertheless, these categories are helpful because they present trial attorneys …
Quest For Fairness In Compensating Victims Of September 11, The, Robert L. Rabin
Quest For Fairness In Compensating Victims Of September 11, The, Robert L. Rabin
Cleveland State Law Review
Aside from natural disasters, when tragedy strikes - taking its toll in fatalities and serious injuries - we ordinarily look to the tort system for redress. Tort is not the exclusive form of redress, of course, in this era of private insurance and government disability programs. But still, it remains our most highly visible mechanism for assigning responsibility and providing compensation. In this Article, I will begin by describing the approach to compensation taken in the Victim Compensation Fund. I will then discuss the implementing regulations promulgated by the Special Master appointed under the Fund. Next, I will offer a …
United States Supreme Court: 2001 Term, Paul C. Giannelli
United States Supreme Court: 2001 Term, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Icc's Jurisdiction Over The Nationals Of Non-Party States: A Critique Of The U.S. Position, Michael P. Scharf
The Icc's Jurisdiction Over The Nationals Of Non-Party States: A Critique Of The U.S. Position, Michael P. Scharf
Faculty Publications
This article analyzes the validity of the U.S. argument against the ICC's jurisdiction over the nationals of non-party states in the context of historic precedent and the principles underlying international criminal jurisdiction, and demonstrates that it is not the jurisdiction of the ICC over the nationals of non- party states, but the U.S. government's legal argument, which rests on shaky foundations. The article also highlights the potential unintended repercussions of the current U.S. legal position. This analysis could have a substantial bearing on the approach the United States takes to the Rome Statute, for it indicates that the United States …
Don't Ask Us To Explain Ourselves, Don't Tell Us What To Do: The Boy Scouts' Exclusion Of Gay Members And The Necessity Of Independent Judicial Review, Taylor Flynn
Faculty Scholarship
In Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, the U.S. Supreme Court held by a five to four majority that the Boy Scouts of America is entitled to ban gay persons from membership despite New Jersey's prohibition against sexual orientation discrimination. The Dale majority sharply departed from the Court's long line of expressive association cases, in which it has rejected the claims of private clubs that application of civil rights laws to their membership policies violates their associational rights. This Author argues that by "reading" the plaintiff in Boy Scouts of America v. Dale as a cipher for gay sex, and …
State Of Utah V. James W. Mooney, Linda T. Mooney, And Oklevueha Earthwalks Native American Church Of Utah, Inc. : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Supreme Court
State Of Utah V. James W. Mooney, Linda T. Mooney, And Oklevueha Earthwalks Native American Church Of Utah, Inc. : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Supreme Court
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020)
Interlocutory Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court, Utah County, State of Utah, Judge Gary D. Stott
Handling Workplace Conflict: Why Transformative Mediation?, Robert A. Baruch Bush
Handling Workplace Conflict: Why Transformative Mediation?, Robert A. Baruch Bush
Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal
The several articles in this Symposium represent a unique and multifaceted examination of the largest workplace conflict mediation program in the United States-the United States Postal Service's ("Postal Service") REDRESS Tm Program. Begun on a pilot basis in 1994 as part of the settlement of a class-action discrimination lawsuit, REDRESST was subsequently expanded to a nationwide program for mediation of discrimination claims, available to all of the Postal Service's over 800,000 employees. However, it is not only the size of the REDRESSTM Program that makes it a remarkable development in the field of workplace conflict resolution-and the field of mediation …
Transformative Mediation In The Usps Redress Program: Observations Of Adr Specialists, Lisa B. Bingham, Tina Nabatchi
Transformative Mediation In The Usps Redress Program: Observations Of Adr Specialists, Lisa B. Bingham, Tina Nabatchi
Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal
The transformative model of mediation, although well established in the mediation of family and community disputes, is a relatively new approach to dispute resolution in employment settings. In contrast to traditional mediation approaches that focus on problem-solving, transformative mediation seeks to provide opportunities for empowerment and recognition among the disputing parties. In 1998, the United States Postal Service ("USPS") implemented a nation-wide mediation program called REDRESS (TM) (Resolve Employment Disputes Reach Equitable Solutions Swiftly) based on this model. This study takes the form of a process evaluation. It focuses on this question: How well does employment mediation practice in the …
From Statute To Contract: The Law Of The Employment Relationship Reconsidered, Eileen Silverstein
From Statute To Contract: The Law Of The Employment Relationship Reconsidered, Eileen Silverstein
Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal
Most observers would say that the employment relationship is regulated largely by statutes. This Article argues that the statutory regulation of the employment relationship, and its correction of market failures, is disappearing under the cloak of judicial decisions upholding contracts which, in one form or another, find individuals to have waived their and the public's statutory rights. In a variation on the nineteenth century's transformation of the employment relationship from status to contract, we have the contemporary move from statute to contract. Part I of this Article examines how contractual waivers operate within the framework of the statutory regulation of …
Do As We Say Or Do As We Do?: How The Supreme Court Law Clerk Controversy Reveals A Lack Of Accountability At The High Court, Robert M. Agostisi, Brian P. Corrigan
Do As We Say Or Do As We Do?: How The Supreme Court Law Clerk Controversy Reveals A Lack Of Accountability At The High Court, Robert M. Agostisi, Brian P. Corrigan
Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal
No abstract provided.