Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

2001

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 7111 - 7140 of 9191

Full-Text Articles in Law

Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Labor And Employment Law, Thomas M. Winn Iii Jan 2001

Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Labor And Employment Law, Thomas M. Winn Iii

University of Richmond Law Review

This article discusses six areas of labor and employment law in which there was significant activity in Virginia's courts over the past year: (1) covenants not to compete and employee's fiduciary duties to employers; (2) the doctrine of respondeat superior; (3) negligent hiring, retention, and supervision; (4) wrongful discharge in violation of public policy; (5) workers' compensation exclusivity; and (6) employment agreements. Beyond the scope of this article are decisions rendered in other areas of law that affect the employment relationship, including defamation, claims under Virginia's Occupational Safety and Health Act, public employment claims, and unemployment compensation claims.


Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Family Law, Elizabeth P. Coughter, Ronald R. Tweel Jan 2001

Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Family Law, Elizabeth P. Coughter, Ronald R. Tweel

University of Richmond Law Review

The most significant case decisions regarding family law issues in Virginia this year are those cases involving the preemptive effect of federal law on equitable distribution issues. These cases held that federal law preempts state law when beneficiary provisions of certain insurance policies and retirement plans are being determined. Other important decisions struck down the self-executing provisions of property settlement agreements regarding the payment of child support. Additionally, a decision by the Court of Appeals of Virginia would have abrogated all property settlement agreements endorsed prior to 1998 were it not for a subsequent statutory modification.


Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Legal Issues Involving Children, Robert E. Shepherd Jr. Jan 2001

Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Legal Issues Involving Children, Robert E. Shepherd Jr.

University of Richmond Law Review

This article examines the pertinent legislative and judicial developments of the past year that have effected juvenile law in Virginia. Specifically, this article discusses new laws and amendments passed by the Virginia General Assembly with respect to juvenile delinquency, non-criminal misbehavior, and termination of parental rights. Part IV discusses changes to Title 22.1 of the Virginia Code that affect school disciplinary matters. Part V examines developments in the area of juvenile mental health. Finally, Part VI discusses various miscellaneous developments affecting youth abortions, teenage driving, parental negligence in the tort context, and a significant amendment made to the Comprehensive Services …


The State Tobacco Litigation And The Separation Of Powers In State Governments: Repairing The Damage, Michael Debow Jan 2001

The State Tobacco Litigation And The Separation Of Powers In State Governments: Repairing The Damage, Michael Debow

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Comment, Hubert Humphrey Iii Jan 2001

Comment, Hubert Humphrey Iii

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Comment, William Pryor Jan 2001

Comment, William Pryor

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Multistate Settlement Agreement And The Problem Of Social Regulation Beyond The Power Of State Government, Christopher Schroeder Jan 2001

The Multistate Settlement Agreement And The Problem Of Social Regulation Beyond The Power Of State Government, Christopher Schroeder

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Presentation, Charles Fried, David Rosenberg Jan 2001

Presentation, Charles Fried, David Rosenberg

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Defending Courts: A Brief Rejoinder To Professors Fried And Rosenberg, David Vladeck Jan 2001

Defending Courts: A Brief Rejoinder To Professors Fried And Rosenberg, David Vladeck

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Roundtable: Redressing Harm: Who Decides?, Roundtable Discussion Jan 2001

Roundtable: Redressing Harm: Who Decides?, Roundtable Discussion

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Separation Of Powers And Civil Justice Reform: A Crisis Of Legitimacy For Law And Legal Institutions, Stephen B. Presser Jan 2001

Separation Of Powers And Civil Justice Reform: A Crisis Of Legitimacy For Law And Legal Institutions, Stephen B. Presser

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Comment, Hon. Stanley Feldman Jan 2001

Comment, Hon. Stanley Feldman

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


In Defense Of Fundamental Principles: The Unconstitutionality Of Tort Reform, Robert Peck Jan 2001

In Defense Of Fundamental Principles: The Unconstitutionality Of Tort Reform, Robert Peck

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Constitutionality Of State Tort Reform Legislation And Lochner, George Priest Jan 2001

The Constitutionality Of State Tort Reform Legislation And Lochner, George Priest

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Judicial Nullification Of Tort Reform: Ignoring History, Logic, And Fundamentals Of Constitutional Law, Victor Schwartz Jan 2001

Judicial Nullification Of Tort Reform: Ignoring History, Logic, And Fundamentals Of Constitutional Law, Victor Schwartz

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Roundtable: Does Tort Reform Threaten Judicial Independence?, Roundtable Discussion Jan 2001

Roundtable: Does Tort Reform Threaten Judicial Independence?, Roundtable Discussion

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Respecting A State's Tort Law, While Confining Its Reach To That State, John Baker Jr. Jan 2001

Respecting A State's Tort Law, While Confining Its Reach To That State, John Baker Jr.

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Conflict Between Federalism And Corporate Interests, Arthur Bryant Jan 2001

The Conflict Between Federalism And Corporate Interests, Arthur Bryant

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Tort Reform Debate: A View From Colorada, Allison Eid Jan 2001

The Tort Reform Debate: A View From Colorada, Allison Eid

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Comment, Theodore B. Olson Jan 2001

Comment, Theodore B. Olson

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Comment, Richard Willard Jan 2001

Comment, Richard Willard

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Roundtable: Tort Law In The Federal System: An Exchange On Constitutional And Policy Considerations, Roundtable Discussion Jan 2001

Roundtable: Tort Law In The Federal System: An Exchange On Constitutional And Policy Considerations, Roundtable Discussion

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Constructing Professionalism: The Professional Project Of The Israeli Judiciary, Issachar Rosen-Svi Jan 2001

Constructing Professionalism: The Professional Project Of The Israeli Judiciary, Issachar Rosen-Svi

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Career Choice Critique Of Legal Ethics Theory, Andrew M. Perlman Jan 2001

A Career Choice Critique Of Legal Ethics Theory, Andrew M. Perlman

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Board Of Editors - Vol. 31, No. 3 2001 Jan 2001

Board Of Editors - Vol. 31, No. 3 2001

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Table Of Contents - Vol. 31, No. 3 2001 Jan 2001

Table Of Contents - Vol. 31, No. 3 2001

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Roundtable: State Attorney General Litigation: Regulation Through Litigation And The Separation Of Powers, Roundtable Discussion Jan 2001

Roundtable: State Attorney General Litigation: Regulation Through Litigation And The Separation Of Powers, Roundtable Discussion

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.


Review Of Human Rights In Global Politics, Christine M. Chinkin Jan 2001

Review Of Human Rights In Global Politics, Christine M. Chinkin

Reviews

The fiftieth anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1998, coming in the decade after the resurgence of Western-style liberal democracies, has generated much writing and activity over the current status and future development of international human rights law, practice, and discourse. International lawyers tend to take for granted the canon of rights that, in the wake of the Universal Declaration, have been enshrined within the body of international instruments that have been adopted within regional and global arenas. In the 1990s, these lawyers largely turned their attention away from standard setting and to issues of effectiveness. Considerable …


For Terry Sandalow - Challenger And Creator, Christina B. Whitman Jan 2001

For Terry Sandalow - Challenger And Creator, Christina B. Whitman

Articles

In the popular imagination, legal education is the experience of sitting in a classroom and being pushed to think deeply by a brilliant and demanding teacher. Some law schools are lucky enough to have a faculty member who actually fulfills this expectation - one professor in particular whose courses are the testing ground for the very best and most engaged students. When I was a student at Michigan in the 1970s, and until his retirement last year at the end of the century, that teacher was Terry Sandalow. For many Michigan graduates, taking Federal Courts or Fourteenth Amendment from Professor …


From Miranda To §3501 To Dickerson To...(Symposium: Miranda After Dickerson: The Future Of Confession Law), Yale Kamisar Jan 2001

From Miranda To §3501 To Dickerson To...(Symposium: Miranda After Dickerson: The Future Of Confession Law), Yale Kamisar

Articles

Once the Court granted [certiorari in Dickerson] court-watchers knew the hour had come. At long last the Court would have to either repudiate Miranda, repudiate the prophylactic-rule cases [the cases viewing Miranda's requirements as not rights protected by the Constitution, but merely "prophylactic rules"] or offer some ingenious reconciliation of the two lines of precedent. The Supreme Court of the United States, however, doesn't "have to" do anything, as the decision in Dickerson once again reminds us.