Law Commons^™

Constitutional Law-Eminent Domain-Destruction Of Private Property To Prevent Enemy Capture, John F. Spindler S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Respondent oil companies owned terminal facilities in Manila at the time of the Japanese attack on the Philippines. The terminals were destroyed by the United States Army as the Japanese entered the city. Although the Army had requisitioned oil from the terminals prior to their destruction, respondents were bound by the decision of the court of claims to the effect that prior to December 27, 1941, when respondents were notified that the terminals themselves were requisitioned for the purpose of destruction, there had been no taking within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment. The court of claims allowed recovery on …

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Constitutional Law--Constitutionality of Group Libel Statute

Federal Employers Liability Act--Liability for Employment of Man with Violent Tendencies

Federal Jurisdiction--Diversity Jurisdiction and the Multi-State Corporation

Federal Jurisdiction--Erie Railroad Doctrine Extended to State-Created Rights Arising under Special Federal Question Jurisdiction

Labor Law--Picketing--Injunction against Breach of Bargaining Agreement

Landlord and Tenant--Exculpatory Agreement--Effect on Right of Subrogation of Landlord's Insurer

Military Law--Failure to Instruct as Prejudicial Error

Military Law--Infiltration of Command Influence as General Prejudice

Trusts--Distribution of Stock Dividends between Life Tenant and Remainderman

Constitutional Law—Privileges And Immunities Clause—Validity Of Statute Charging Higher Fees To Territorial Nonresident Fishermen, Philip A. Trautman

Washington Law Review

P brought an action against the Commissioner of Taxation for the Territory of Alaska to obtain a declaration that a statute imposing a $50 license fee on nonresident commercial fishermen as compared to a $5 fee on residents was unconstitutional. D answered that 90% of the cost of collecting fees was incurred in collecting the nonresident fees. District court held for D. Court of Appeals reversed. On certiorari, Held: Affirmed. The statue violates the privileges and immunities clause of Art. IV of the U. S. Constitution, which clause is made applicable to Alaska by the Organic Act. The amount of …

Habeas Corpus And Court-Martial Prisoners, James Snedeker

Vanderbilt Law Review

The origin of habeas corpus is lost in the mists of history. The leading idea, deliverance by summary legal process from illegal confinement, was present in the laws of countries in existence prior to the beginning of the English law and in other countries which derived none of their principles of jurisprudence or rules of procedure from English law. It was known to Roman law and to old Spanish law. It was recognized by the Magna Charta in 1215, although such recognition was probably not a primary purpose of the barons in forcing King John to sign that document. The …

Constitutional Law-Due Process-Burden Of Proving Insanity As Defense To Crime, Lois H. Hambro S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Defendant was convicted of first degree murder after having pleaded insanity as a defense to the charge. He appealed to the Supreme Court of Oregon, alleging that the Oregon statute, which required an accused pleading insanity to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it placed on him the burden of proving his inability to premeditate and intend the criminal act. The defendant relied in part on the fact that Oregon is the only state requiring insanity to be proved ''beyond a reasonable doubt," while other states require at most that …

Constitutional Law-Right To Bail, Robert L. Sandblom S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The Eighth Amendment of the Constitution provides that "Excessive bail shall not be required . . . ." This clause, as with all of the Bill of Rights, serves as a limitation on the federal government. From a very early date this provision has likewise established a boundary on the discretion of the federal courts in their exercise of criminal jurisdiction. Although this Eighth Amendment provision is a protection against federal encroachment, it does not limit the powers of states, arguments of individual Justices to the contrary notwithstanding.

In the recent Supreme Court decision of Stack v. Boyle, this …

Search And Seizure Under The Fourth Amendment As Interpreted By The United States Supreme Court, E. G. Trimble

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Freedom Of Speech--Group Libel--Beauharnais V. People Of State Of Illinois, Thomas P. Lewis

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Search And Seizure Under The Fourth Amendment As Interpreted By The United States Supreme Court, E. G. Trimble

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law-Fifth Amendment Due Process-Vague And Indefinite Statute-Right To Trial On Question Of Illegal Presence In United States, Marcus A. Rowden S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Defendant, an alien, against whom an order of deportation had been entered in 1930 by reason of his advocacy of the overthrow of the government by force and violence, was indicted for violation of section 20(c) of the Immigration Act of 1917 as amended, which made it a felony for an alien against whom such an order is outstanding to "willfully fail or refuse to make timely application in good faith for travel or other documents necessary to his departure." The lower court dismissed the indictment on the ground that the statute in question was unconstitutionally vague and indefinite for …

Constitutional Law-Commerce Clause-State Taxation Of Vessels Engaged In Interstate Commerce, David W. Rawlinson S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The Standard Oil Company, an Ohio corporation, owned boats and barges which it employed in transporting oil on the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers. These vessels were registered in Ohio but stopped in Ohio only occasionally for fuel or repairs. The maximum distance traversed by these vessels on waters bordering Ohio was 17½ miles. An ad valorem personal property tax levied by the Tax Commissioner of Ohio on all these vessels was upheld by the Supreme Court of Ohio. On appeal, held, reversed, Justices Black and Minton dissenting. Since these vessels are subject to the property taxes of other states …

The New Constitution Of Poland, Wencelas J. Wagner

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Search Warrants Commanding Search Of The Person, William A. Rice

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Claims Against The State Of Kentucky--Reverse Eminent Domain, Paul Leo Oberst, Thomas P. Lewis

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Current Decision, Due Process--Use Of Blood Tests To Determine Intoxication Not Violative Of Due Process, Howard Klemme

Publications

No abstract provided.

Can The Courts Erase The Color Line?, John P. Frank

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law--Privacy--Right Of Individual On Public Conveyances, G. D. H. S.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Conflict Of Laws-Full Faith And Credit As Applied To Statutes, George D. Miller, Jr. S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

While the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution makes no apparent distinction between judgments and public acts, it is clear that statutes have not been afforded the same degree of full faith and credit as judgments. Whether or not a statute will receive full faith and credit has been questionable in most cases, and serious problems of prediction still arise.

Paths To Constitutional Home Rule For Municipalities, Wallace Mendelson

Vanderbilt Law Review

A basic American tradition is that problems which are national in scope (i.e., which "affect more states than one") shall be handled by the national government, while problems of merely state-wide concern are left for state government. Municipal home rule is the application of this basic principal in the relationship of the state to its towns and cities. To put the matter in the most simple and direct terms--nothing should be done at the national level that can be done efficiently by the states and nothing should be handled at the state level that can be dealt with effectively by …

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Recent Cases

Agency--Liability of Master for Servant's Acts--State Permit to Operate

Agency--Possession as Indicia of Ownership

Constitutional Law--Aliens--Detention Where Deportations is Impossible

Courts--Contempt--Delay in Summary Punishment

Criminal Law--Habitual Criminal Statutes--Meaning of Previous Conviction Requirement

Domestic Relations--Liability of Husband for Necessaries of Wife Rightfully Living Apart

Income Taxation--Excludibility from Gross Income of Payment over Ceiling Price

Income Taxation--Taxable Income--Claim of Right

Procedure--Grand Jury--Motion to Expunge Defamatory Remarks in Report

Procedure--Statute of Limitations--Retroactive Operation

Statutes--Holding of Unconstitutionality Overruled--Necessity for Re-Enactment

Wills--Contest--Interest of Legatee's Representative

Silva: Presidential Succession, Wilber M. Brucker, Jr. S. Ed.

Michigan Law Review

A Review of PRESIDENTIAL SUCCESSION. By Ruth C. Silva.

"Constitutional" Limitations On Amendments In Indiana

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law—Freedom Of Religion—Chest X-Ray As A Condition Of Admission To State University, Gordon F. Crandall

Washington Law Review

The Board of Regents of the University of Washington required that each student submit to a chest X-Ray examination for the purpose of disclosing tubercular infection. P, a Christian Scientist, sought to register for her senior year, and when she refused to submit to the examination she was denied admission. She then petitioned to the Regents for an exemption on the ground that to submit would violate her religious convictions. The petition was denied, and P now seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Regents to admit her without requiring the X-Ray examination, contending, inter alia, that the requirement …

Book Reviews, Thomas Reed Powell, Bernard D. Meltzer, Louis L. Jaffe, Edward D. Morgan, Paul H. Sanders, Neill H. Alford Jr., Carl M. Franklin, Fowler Harper, Robert E. Childs, David E. Watts, Joseph L. Frascona, Maynard E. Pirsig, Samuel M. Fahr, Robert S. Stevens, Corwin W. Johnson, W. Friedmann, Thomas A. Cowan

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Damages--Duty To Pay Interest On Funds Withheld Under An Unconstitutional Statute, J. N. C.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Taxation Of Interstate Commerce, L. A. S.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ohio Valley Panorama, Albert S. Abel

West Virginia Law Review

The past and present applications of the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution have been explored elsewhere so clearly and amply that their further investigation would be unrewarding. The stated ground of decision in West Virginia ex rel. Dyer v. Sims opens up for the interstate compact a promising future as a device for co-operative government. A contrary decision would have seriously, indeed almost fatally, weakened the clause. Adoption of proposed alternative reasons could have made its strength a matter of more menace than promise. The former conclusion is fairly obvious, the latter perhaps less so. The task of …

The Role Of The Privy Council In Judicial Review Of The Canadian Constitution--A Post-Script, Edward Mcwhinney

Vanderbilt Law Review

In its Preamble, the Constitution of Canada speaks of the desire of the Provinces of Canada to be "federally united into one Dominion under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, with a Constitution similar in principle to that of the United Kingdom." Historically, then, the Constitution of Canada like the Constitution of the United States, stems from a compact between a number of different territorial units: the Provinces of Lower Canada (Quebec), Upper Canada (Ontario), and the two eastern maritime Provinces of Nova Scotia and New Brtnswick, joined together in 1867 to form the new …

The Unhappy History Of Civil Rights Legislation, Eugene Gressman

Michigan Law Review

The enforcement by federal legislation of the constitutional right of individuals is a story written largely in terms of confusion, distortion and frustration. Seldom, if ever, have the power and the purposes of legislation been rendered so impotent. Indeed, this story constitutes one of the saddest chapters in the historic struggle to effectuate the American ideal of freedom and equality for all.

Constitutional Law-Evidence-Use Of Illegally Obtained Evidence And Due Process Of Law, Allan Neef S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

It is fundamental, even in a federal system, that a state be free to regulate the procedure of its courts in accordance with its own conceptions of proper policy, subject only to constitutional limitations safeguarding individuals from arbitrary action by the state. In the United States this constitutional protection is two-fold-both state and federal constitutions acting as limitations on state action. As a result, a problem arises as to what extent the federal courts can, in the enforcement of federal constitutional limitations, override state criminal procedures and the policies underlying them. It is clear that the states have, by virtue …