Law Commons^™

1787: The Grand Convention, By Clinton Rossiter

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Slumlordism As A Tort, Joseph L. Sax, Fred J. Hiestand

Michigan Law Review

The war against poverty has been fought with rather more vigor than its initiators contemplated. Thus far, however, the major engagements have taken place in the streets of Watts and Chicago, which is not quite what they had in mind. Some, who think it odd that as we pass more laws we get more lawlessness, will perhaps content themselves by observing that the feeding hand is always bitten. Those less easily satisfied have begun to see the need for adopting some legal solutions as far reaching as the problems they are designed to abate; the following article is addressed to …

Constitutional Law - Civil Liberties, Adderley V. Florida, 87 S.Ct. 242 (1966), Glenn J. Sedam Jr.

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Brief Amicus Curiae, Urging Reversal, On Behalf Of - John J. Russell, Bishop Of Richmond; Lawrence Cardinal Shehan, Archbishop Of Baltimore; Paul A. Hallinan, Archbishop Of Atlanta; Philip M. Hannan, Archbishop Of New Orleans; Robert E. Lucey, Archbishop Of San Antonio; Joseph B. Brunini, Apostolic Administrator Of Natchez-Jackson; Lawrence M. Defalco, Bishop Of Amarillo; Joseph A. Dirick, Apostolic Administrator Of Nashville; Thomas K. Gorman, Bishop Of Dallas-Ft. Worth; Joseph H. Hodges, Bishop Of Wheeling; John L. Morkovsky, Apostolic Administrator Of Galveston-Houston; Victor J. Reed, Bishop Of Oklahoma City And Tulsa; L. J. Reicher, Bishop Of Austin; Thomas Tschoepe, Bishop Of San Angelo; Ernest L. Unterkoefler, Bishop Of Charleston; Vincent S. Waters, Bishop Of Raleigh; The National Catholic Conference For Interracial Justice; And The National Catholic Social Action Conference, William M. Lewers C.S.C, William B. Ball

Court Briefs

No. 395
Richard Perry Loving v. Commonwealth of Virginia

On Appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia

From the Summary Statement of the Case

Appellants, Richard Perry Loving and Mildred Jeter Loving, were convicted on January 6, 1959, in the Circuit Court of Caroline County, Virginia, under an indictment charging that "the said Richard Perry Loving being a White person and the said Mildred Delores Jeter [Loving] being a Colored person, did unlawfully and feloniously go out of the State of Virginia, for the purpose of being married and with the intention of returning to the State of …

Judicial Review: A Tri-Dimensional Concept Of Administrative-Constitutional Law, Frank R. Strong

West Virginia Law Review

In the pages of Volume 44 of the West Virginia Law Quarterly, Professor Kenneth Culp Davis, then a young law teacher in this College of Law, found in certain decisions of the supreme court of this State and of the Supreme Court of the United States the paradox that "Separation of powers, the cardinal principle upon which the federal and all the state governments are founded, a great American contribution to the science of government, violates the due process clause!" To Professor Davis this result seemed exceedingly absurd, and in this adverse judgment he has had with him the great …

Constitutional Law--Fair Trial And Free Press--Resolution Of A Conflict, Jack William Debolt

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law--Bodily Intrusions As Violations Of Constitutional Rights, Robert Bruce King

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Abstracts Of Recent Cases, Jerry David Hogg

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Virginia Special Court Of Appeals: Constitutional Relief For An Overburdened Court, David K. Sutelan, Wayne R. Spencer

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

67/01/12 Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Supreme Court Of Ohio, Louis Stokes

United States Supreme Court

Argues that the introduction of evidence (their guns) against Terry and Chilton violated the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments and that "bare suspicion alone" does not meet the requirements for "probable cause" set forth in the Forth and Fourteenth Amendments.

67/01/11 Docket And Journal Entries, Court Of Appeals, Emil J. Masgay

Eighth Judicial District of Ohio, Court of Appeals, Cuyahoga County

Docket and journal entries for Ohio v. Terry and Ohio v. Chilton, prepared by Emil J. Masgay, Clerk of Courts at the Eighth Judicial District Court of Appeals.

67/01/09 Precipe, Louis Stokes

United States Supreme Court

Precipe asking the Court of Common Pleas, Cuyahoga County to prepare and file with the United States Supreme Court a certified transcript of the docket, and journal entries together with the original papers and including the Court's opinion in State of Ohio v. Richard D. Chilton.

Constitutional Law - Search Warrants - Health And Safety Inspections, John M. Campfield

Duquesne Law Review

Health and Safety Inspections- The Fourth Amendment guarantees that a person may not be convicted for refusing to consent to a health or safety inspection of his residence or place of business to be made without a search warrant.

Camara v. Municipal Court, 87 S. Ct. 1727 (1967). See v. City of Seattle, 87 S. Ct. 1737 (1967).

Constitutional Law - Fourth Amendment - Electronic Eavesdropping, Jay Paul Kahle

Duquesne Law Review

Electronic Eavesdropping- Verbal evidence of gambling activities obtained without a warrant by means of an electronic listening device held inadmissable [sic].

Katz v. United States, 88 S. Ct. 507 (1968).

Constitutional Law - Self-Incrimination, Donald J. Burns

Duquesne Law Review

An accused gambler's claim of constitutional privilege against self-incrimination provides a complete defense to federal prosecution for violation of federal tax statutes requiring gamblers to pay excise and occupational taxes.

Marchetti v. United States, 88 S. Ct. 697 (1968). Grosso v. United States, 88 S. Ct. 709 (1968).

Criminal Procedure—Miranda: The Application Of The Fifth Amendment Right Against Self-Incrimination To Confessions—A Change In Approach., Gary M. Cohen

Buffalo Law Review

Miranda v. Arizona (consolidated in a single opinion with three companion cases, Vignera v. New York, Westover v. United States and California v. Stewart), 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

Criminal Law—Punishment—Imprisonment Of Indigent For Non-Payment Of A Fine Unconstitutional If Extended Beyond Minimum Statutory Sentence, David R. Pfalzgraf

Buffalo Law Review

People v. Saffore, 18 N.Y.2d 101, 218 N.E.2d 686, 271 N.Y.S.2d 972 (1966).

Family Law—Application Of The Rules Against Search And Seizure To Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Alan Eber

Buffalo Law Review

Matter of Williams, 49 Misc. 2d 154, 267 N.Y.S.2d 91 (Ulster County Family Ct. 1966).

Family Law—Availability Of Third-Party Collateral Attack On Alabama Bilateral Divorce Decrees In New York, Henry K. Garson

Buffalo Law Review

Weisner v. Weisner, 17 N.Y.2d 799, 218 N.E.2d 300, 271 N.Y.S.2d 252 (1966).

Torts—Libel—A Conditional Privilege To Make Non-Malicious Misstatements Concerning Participants In Public Discussion, Peter J. Brevorka

Buffalo Law Review

Pauling v. Globe-Democrat Publishing Co., 362 F.2d 188 (8th Cir. 1966), petition for cert. filed, 35 U.S.L. Week 3082 (U.S. Sept. 13, 1966) (No. 522).

Present Frontiers In Constitutional Law, William T. Coleman Jr.

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

The Development Of The Right Of Assembly: A Current Socio-Legal Investigation, George P. Smith Ii

Scholarly Articles

It will be the purpose of this article to assay the historical evolution of the freedom of assembly, noting first its development in England and later in America and finally its current position in the twentieth century. Even though the rights of free speech, association, and religion are inescapably drawn into case discussions of freedom of assembly, effort will be made to confine the consideration to the pertinent assembly problems. In addition to considering the fundamental legal propositions embodied in this right, as well as its raison d'etre, thought and discussion will be given to the sociological interpretations of the …

Recent Developments, Various Editors

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

In Re Gault: Understanding The Attorney's New Role, Glenn C. Equi, James D. Hutchinson, Barney B. Welsh

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Law Enforcement States Its Views, John Edgar Hoover

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

The New York Times Rule: Judicial Overkill, Lewis C. Green

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Unauthorized Practice Of Law-Union Program Of Hiring Attorneys Is Unauthorized Practice Of Law--Illinois State Bar Ass'n V. United Mine Workers Of America, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

District 12 of the United Mine Workers (UMW) employed an attorney on a salary basis to prosecute members' claims under the Workmen's Compensation Act. Members were free to employ other counsel, but if they sought help from the union lawyer, the union agreed not to interfere with the attorney-client relationship. The attorney prepared his case from filed reports of the accidents, and, generally, his first contact with the union member was when they appeared before the Commission. Since the attorney was compensated by the union, the entire amount received in award or settlement went to the member. The Illinois Bar …

Montgomery & Smithies: Public Policy, Jameson W. Doig

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Public Policy Volume XIV. Edited by John D. Montgomery and Arthur Smithies

Judgments Rendered Abroad - State Law Or Federal Law, Albert A. Lindner

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Newsmen And The Times Doctrine, Harold L. Nelson

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.