Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1054)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (767)
- Seattle University School of Law (697)
- William & Mary Law School (533)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (425)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (424)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (396)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (365)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (357)
- Columbia Law School (293)
- Fordham Law School (266)
- University of Miami Law School (239)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (237)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (227)
- BLR (215)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (215)
- University of Richmond (214)
- Roger Williams University (213)
- University of Colorado Law School (205)
- Brigham Young University Law School (192)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (191)
- New York Law School (190)
- Georgetown University Law Center (188)
- Hollins University (185)
- St. John's University School of Law (175)
- University of Georgia School of Law (172)
- UIC School of Law (171)
- Cleveland State University (164)
- Pepperdine University (160)
- University of Washington School of Law (159)
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (1344)
- Civil rights (1003)
- Civil Rights (816)
- Race (644)
- Title VII (462)
-
- Racism (394)
- Constitutional Law (337)
- Supreme Court (325)
- Affirmative action (323)
- Race and law (294)
- Equal protection (291)
- United States Supreme Court (289)
- Equality (284)
- Employment discrimination (283)
- Racial discrimination (278)
- Women (269)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (258)
- Sex discrimination (246)
- Gender (236)
- Constitutional law (235)
- Segregation (234)
- Minorities (230)
- First Amendment (229)
- Diversity (212)
- Constitution (211)
- Education (201)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (198)
- Slavery (185)
- Fourteenth Amendment (184)
- Race discrimination (172)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1046)
- Michigan Law Review (461)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (386)
- Faculty Publications (354)
- Seattle University Law Review (333)
-
- Articles (301)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (281)
- All Faculty Scholarship (275)
- Scholarly Works (271)
- Touro Law Review (217)
- ExpressO (202)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (185)
- Ann B. Hopkins Papers (181)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (178)
- Publications (175)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (173)
- Faculty Articles (166)
- Indiana Law Journal (160)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (159)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (156)
- William & Mary Law Review (151)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (145)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (137)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (132)
- UIC Law Review (130)
- Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality (120)
- Cardozo Law Review (118)
- Pepperdine Law Review (118)
- Law Faculty Publications (115)
- West Virginia Law Review (115)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 961 - 990 of 14926
Full-Text Articles in Law
Accommodating Incompetency In Immigration Court, Elizabeth Jordan
Accommodating Incompetency In Immigration Court, Elizabeth Jordan
Northwestern University Law Review
In criminal law, an individual must be deemed competent to stand trial, yet our immigration courts routinely order the deportation of incompetent noncitizens. A removal proceeding against a noncitizen—where an outcome of deportation often risks life-threatening harm—continues apace even if the noncitizen has been deemed incompetent by the immigration judge. In place of halting proceedings, the immigration judge imposes “safeguards” pursuant to a provision of the immigration code that neither defines nor explains the term. In practice, judges’ application of the term “safeguards” is often absurd. The implications of continuing a proceeding against a noncitizen with a disability affecting competency …
Rising Temperatures, The Prison Litigation Reform Act, And The Heat Death Of Human Dignity In Texas Prisons, Brianne Wylie
Rising Temperatures, The Prison Litigation Reform Act, And The Heat Death Of Human Dignity In Texas Prisons, Brianne Wylie
Northwestern University Law Review
This Note seeks to shed light on the life-threatening danger of extreme heat in un-air-conditioned Texas prisons. The Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) starkly limits the relief available to those suffering and dying in these prisons. This Note proposes an amendment to the legislation that could create a path toward lasting relief for incarcerated people. After analyzing the effects of increasing heat on the particularly vulnerable prison population, this Note analyzes how the Supreme Court and the Fifth Circuit have handled claims alleging constitutionally violative prison conditions under the Eighth Amendment—in short, ineffectively, if at all. This Note then details …
Statutory Religious Accommodation In Employment And The Problems Of Judicial Intent And Outcome, George Wright
Statutory Religious Accommodation In Employment And The Problems Of Judicial Intent And Outcome, George Wright
Texas A&M Law Review
The Groff v. DeJoy case unhappily, but inevitably, generates a variety of realistically unresolvable fundamental problems in typical statutory religious accommodation cases. Perhaps even more important, though, are the unintended and perverse results of Groff’s placing a generally heavier burden of religious accommodation on employers. The Groff standard indeed incentivizes the bringing of more religious discrimination cases, and both the winning and losing of such cases by religious claimants. But our adversarial cultural circumstances, including the typical inseparability of religion, politics, and culture, crucially affect the actual, but unintended, results of judicial reforms. The Groff rule is likely to …
Thurgood Marshall Memorial Lecture: 80 Years After Korematsu V. U.S.: It's All About Us 10-29-2024, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Thurgood Marshall Memorial Lecture: 80 Years After Korematsu V. U.S.: It's All About Us 10-29-2024, Roger Williams University School Of Law
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
Reimagining Judicial Review Of Student Requests For Remote Instruction As An Ada Accommodation In Higher Education, Hannah E. Auten
Reimagining Judicial Review Of Student Requests For Remote Instruction As An Ada Accommodation In Higher Education, Hannah E. Auten
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
#Employerstoo: Expanding Vicarious Liability For Sexual Harassment In Title Vii And Tort Law, Kassandra "Kassie" Fotiadis
#Employerstoo: Expanding Vicarious Liability For Sexual Harassment In Title Vii And Tort Law, Kassandra "Kassie" Fotiadis
Michigan Law Review
When an individual experiences sexual harassment through a workplace, she has limited options for recourse. One seemingly promising possibility is bringing a claim against her perpetrator’s employer. But this option—achievable through vicarious liability—has failed to realize its potential. In 1998, the U.S. Supreme Court established a standard to enforce vicarious liability for sexual harassment claims under Title VII. That standard, though, was limited in scope to begin with and has further narrowed over time. Common law principles also allow courts to hold employers vicariously liable for sexual harassment in tort. But few jurisdictions have adopted those principles, and there is …
Reconstructing Citizenship, Jenny E. Carroll, James Jeter
Reconstructing Citizenship, Jenny E. Carroll, James Jeter
Faculty Scholarship
In our republican democracy, voting is a central right of citizenship. Yet millions of voters are routinely disenfranchised as a result of convictions or because their carceral status creates barriers to voting. In the past decade, academic scholarship has focused on the impact of disenfranchisement based on conviction. This work has mapped the legal and social implications of policies that deny voting rights to over five million otherwise eligible voters nationwide. Yet this work has some gaps. First, by focusing solely on conviction-based disenfranchisement, the existing scholarship has largely ignored fatal barriers to voting created (and at times perpetuated) by …
Anti-Discrimination Clauses In Higher Education Collective Bargaining Agreements, William A. Herbert, Erin Ward, Karen Stubaus
Anti-Discrimination Clauses In Higher Education Collective Bargaining Agreements, William A. Herbert, Erin Ward, Karen Stubaus
Publications and Research
This report presents excerpts from 30 current or recent higher education collective bargaining agreements involving faculty, post-doctoral scholars, or graduate student employees along with hyperlinks to the full agreements. The excerpts are organized by institution and bargaining unit type: combined faculty collective bargaining units; non-tenure track faculty bargaining units; community college faculty bargaining units; post-doctoral scholar and academic researcher bargaining units; and graduate student employee bargaining units.
Balancing Freedom Of Expression And Equality On College Campuses In The Wake Of Intensified Antisemitism, Andrea Martin
Balancing Freedom Of Expression And Equality On College Campuses In The Wake Of Intensified Antisemitism, Andrea Martin
Faculty Scholarship
The long-standing debate about free speech on college campuses was reignited by the latest attack on Israel by Hamas on October 7, 2023. Since then, anti-Israel advocacy at universities has drastically escalated. During demonstrations, protests, and rallies, students shout vile antisemitic slogans, call for the death of Jews and the destruction of Israel, promote violence against Jews, and harass and threaten fellow students because they are Jewish. Some university administrators have been publicly accused of floundering in their responses to intensifying antisemitic campus environments and failing to protect Jewish students from harassment. In defense of their inaction, a frequent retort …
The Common Law’S Resistance To Gender Violence, Victoria Frances Nourse
The Common Law’S Resistance To Gender Violence, Victoria Frances Nourse
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Over twenty years ago, Congress developed a “mountain of evidence” that state criminal and civil remedies against sexual assault and battering were inadequate. The Supreme Court rejected that evidence in United States v. Morrison, striking down a federal civil rights remedy for sexual assault and battering. Since then, there have been many civil cases of sexual assault and battering against high-profile individuals, including the recent E. Jean Carroll lawsuit against a former President. This five-year study, surveying fifty states’ civil law, asks the question prompted by Morrison: Does the civil law today provide adequate remedies to survivors of sexual assault …
School Choice & Religious Discrimination: A Story Of The Illusory "Wall Of Separation," Sour "Lemon Tests," And Overgrown "Baby Blaines", Keren Kendil
Touro Law Review
The significance of elementary school education in shaping a child's future, and the success of society, is immeasurable. The free public school system is built on the premise that every child deserves to have the equal opportunity to learn and succeed. However, this system overlooks the millions of children attending private schools due to their religious and moral convictions. This note delves into the imperative of ensuring universal access to quality elementary education for every child, irrespective of their family's religious affiliations or preferences for private schooling, highlighting the constitutional imperatives of ensuring that every child has the opportunity to …
Affirmative Action’S Asian American Problem, Huyen Pham, Joseph Thai
Affirmative Action’S Asian American Problem, Huyen Pham, Joseph Thai
Faculty Scholarship
Asian American opponents of affirmative action have received both credit and blame for their pivotal role in toppling racial preferences in university admissions in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (SFFA). Allied conservatives highlighted evidence of discrimination against Asian American applicants as a compelling reason to dismantle affirmative action; liberals either denied this discrimination existed or tolerated it as an acceptable cost of helping other minority applicants. But largely unacknowledged is the precipitating history of the Supreme Court’s marginalization of Asian American applicants and its decades of tacit approval of their exclusion from affirmative action programs. This unwritten …
The Troubling Case(S) Of Noncitizens: Immigration Enforcement Through The Criminal Justice System And The Effect On Families, Juan C. Quevedo
The Troubling Case(S) Of Noncitizens: Immigration Enforcement Through The Criminal Justice System And The Effect On Families, Juan C. Quevedo
Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy
No abstract provided.
Dictionaries Denied: Information Poverty In Michigan Prison Libraries, Nicholas Norton, Meghan Mcgowan
Dictionaries Denied: Information Poverty In Michigan Prison Libraries, Nicholas Norton, Meghan Mcgowan
Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development
(Excerpt)
In June of 2022, the Michigan Department of Corrections (“MDOC”) made national news when NPR reported that non-English language dictionaries were banned in state prisons. The rationale for this policy was specious—with an MDOC spokesperson stating: “If certain prisoners all decided to learn a very obscure language, they would be able to then speak freely in front of staff and others about introducing contraband or assaulting staff or assaulting another prisoner.” For instance, Spanish and Swahili dictionaries were restricted or banned based on safety, even though both languages are spoken by millions of people. Dictionaries and other reference materials …
Referenda To Secure The Rights Of Incarcerated People, Jaclyn Kurin
Referenda To Secure The Rights Of Incarcerated People, Jaclyn Kurin
Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development
(Excerpt)
In May 2021, Allegheny County became the first jurisdiction in U.S. history to ban solitary confinement at a jail by voter referendum. This article covers the drafting, passing, implementing, and litigating of voter referenda to ban solitary confinement and the use of weapons in correctional facilities in Pennsylvania. The benefits of voter referenda extend beyond recognizing the legal rights of those incarcerated and reducing mistreatment. This article explains how prior community engagement with key issues involving the Allegheny County Jail (“ACJ”) paved the way for the referendum’s success. Specifically, in the year leading up to the Allegheny County referendum, …
Equalizing Disproportionate Death And Punishment In Black And Brown Communities: An Emergency Shutdown On Death, Inequality, And Deliberate Indifference, Angela Dixon
Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development
(Excerpt)
According to an old saying, “death is the great equalizer.” But is it? It may be in the sense that absent a contravening force, it is an appointment that all must keep. Yet data indicates that all do not die equally. Socioeconomic status (“SES”), which includes levels of occupation, education, income, and wealth, all delay or advance mortality. People of a higher SES outlive, generally, people of a lower SES; moreover, such disparities continue to widen as trends of income inequality intensify.
Perhaps predictably, race, just like class, exacerbates inequities. Black Americans in the United States remain the pivotal …
Transcript: The Intersection Of Race And Poverty In Criminal Justice, Stephen B. Bright
Transcript: The Intersection Of Race And Poverty In Criminal Justice, Stephen B. Bright
Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy
Transcript of the lecture given by Bright at the University of Tennessee College of Law Summers-Wyatt Lecture given on September 27, 2010.
Reverse Discrimination: An Opportunity To Modernize And Improve Employment Discrimination Law, William R. Corbett
Reverse Discrimination: An Opportunity To Modernize And Improve Employment Discrimination Law, William R. Corbett
University of Miami Law Review
The issue of how to prove discrimination in reverse discrimination cases has produced a division in the circuits and some strongly worded opinions about discriminatory discrimination law. The courts begin with the three-stage proof framework developed by the Supreme Court in 1973 in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792. Some courts adjust the prima facie case, the first stage of the analysis, by requiring a reverse discrimination plaintiff to prove background circumstances that justify the inference that the defendant discriminates in a way that is not consistent with historical patterns of discrimination. Other courts reject the background …
The Burden To Reach The Ballots: Tackling Eleventh Circuit Line-Warming Bans And Their Intersectional Harm Under An Ada Framework, Alyssa Clune
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
Line-warming bans present an additional hurdle for voters across America, especially in an era of historically few polling locations and historically long lines to reach the ballot. Particularly in Eleventh Circuit states like Georgia and Florida, line-warming bans, in conjunction with long wait times, have had a disparate impact on Black communities and their ability to cast ballots in key swing districts. Nevertheless, attempts to bring racial discrimination claims against these bans have not been successful in the Eleventh Circuit. This Essay proposes a new strategy to tackle line-warming bans under an ADA framework. It analyzes the harm that these …
Revisiting Marcuse On Repressive Tolerance: A Twenty-First Century Retrospective, David Ingram
Revisiting Marcuse On Repressive Tolerance: A Twenty-First Century Retrospective, David Ingram
Philosophy: Faculty Publications and Other Works
Herbert Marcuse’s essay Repressive Tolerance (RP) has been praised by the Left and vilified by the Right for its alleged promotion of censorship targeting reactionary opinions and actions. I argue that this interpretation of the text is mistaken. According to my alternative reading of the text, RP should be understood as an exercise in provocation and irony aimed at defending civil disobedience and dissent. Marcuse’s defense of dissent, however, appeals to a critique of pure tolerance that exposes the unavoidably partisan practice of tolerance, which invariably favors the reigning undemocratic status quo. The choice whether to tolerate in a manner …
Integrating Doctrine & Diversity Speaker Series: Owning Our Values: Supplementing Our Textbooks For Those Engaged In Social Justice, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Integrating Doctrine & Diversity Speaker Series: Owning Our Values: Supplementing Our Textbooks For Those Engaged In Social Justice, Roger Williams University School Of Law
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
The Potential Impact Of Charter Section 28 On Quebec's Controversial Secularism Law And The Pursuit Of Gender-Equality In Canadian Courts, Nywani Albert
Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies
The Western liberal democratic order, anchored in respect for individual rights and constitutional norms, faces a critical challenge as Quebec follows the pattern of several European nations in enacting laws restricting religious attire. While the Quebec Law 21, “An Act Respecting the Laicity of the State,” is ostensibly neutral, it particularly restricts Muslim women's rights. This paper explores an ongoing, novel legal strategy challenging Quebec's secularism law, focusing on Section 28 of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms. While Section 28 mandates gender equality in Charter implementation, its potential remains largely unexplored in the decades since Charter enactment. Drawing …
Leveling The Playing Field For Racial Justice In The Civil Litigation System, Suzette M. Malveaux
Leveling The Playing Field For Racial Justice In The Civil Litigation System, Suzette M. Malveaux
Scholarly Articles
Under the weight of the #MeToo movement and severe public pressure, Congress stopped this unseemly practice for a subset of Americans—those challenging sexual assault and harassment. The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (EFASASHA), passed in 2022, gives these victims a choice of whether to challenge sexual misconduct in court or in arbitration. Such ubiquitous take-it-or-leave-it contracts are now unenforceable, giving this narrow swath of the population the power to decide for themselves how to challenge such outrageous wrongdoing. In Expanding the Ban on Forced Arbitration, Michael Z. Green argues that race discrimination claims should …
Reasonable Accommodation And Non-Invidious Discrimination Under The Maine Human Rights Act, Stuart W. Tisdale Jr.
Reasonable Accommodation And Non-Invidious Discrimination Under The Maine Human Rights Act, Stuart W. Tisdale Jr.
Maine Law Review
"Invidious," through its Latin root invidia, for envy, hints at the dangers of arbitrary discrimination. Statutes, for instance, that distribute social or economic benefits and allocate burdens in a patently arbitrary manner alienate the burdened class. Such laws tear at the social fabric by instilling resentment and bitterness in the disfavored group. At an extreme they encourage rebellion. The famous Carolene Products footnote, in which Justice Stone suggested that the Court would apply a heightened standard of judicial review to statutes affecting "discrete and insular minorities," draws an implicit connection between invidiousness and fundamental unfairness. Invidiousness thus refers to the …
A Global Comparison Of Communication Intervention Strategies For Justice-Involved Youth, Sophia Janeiro Martinez
A Global Comparison Of Communication Intervention Strategies For Justice-Involved Youth, Sophia Janeiro Martinez
OUR Journal: ODU Undergraduate Research Journal
Purpose: This paper explores the intricate relationship between communication disorders and delinquent youth behavior. It will explore the detrimental impact of zero-tolerance policies and their contribution to the school-to-prison pipeline. It will introduce issues, such as complex Miranda warning diction, and the benefits of including speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to aid in youth comprehension. Additionally, it will propose the integration of SLPs within the juvenile justice system to assist in communication between justice-involved youth (JIY) and justice professionals during conversations, questioning, and trials or hearings. Furthermore, this paper examines the roles of SLPs within juvenile justice systems abroad, including Canada, …
Changemaker: Samuel Filiaggi: Juris Doctorate: The Powerful Combination Of Representation And Advocacy 10-7-2024, Danna Lorch, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Changemaker: Samuel Filiaggi: Juris Doctorate: The Powerful Combination Of Representation And Advocacy 10-7-2024, Danna Lorch, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
A Feedback Loop Of Exclusion: The Treatment Of Bilingualism In The Courtroom, Simone Stover
A Feedback Loop Of Exclusion: The Treatment Of Bilingualism In The Courtroom, Simone Stover
Northwestern University Law Review
In the 1991 case Hernandez v. New York, the United States Supreme Court characterized bilingualism as a race-neutral trait that can be used to exclude individuals from jury service. This Note proceeds by demonstrating how the current state of the law undermines the interests of bilingual individuals and then proposes a solution. Focusing specifically on Hispanic bilingual Spanish speakers, this Note first employs Professor Jennifer Lackey’s multi-directional credibility model to show that bilingual Spanish speakers suffer injustice in the courtroom due to both credibility deficits and excesses. Following this analysis, it proposes a possible solution to this issue: an …
The Obvious Violation Exception To Qualified Immunity: An Empirical Study, Bailey D. Barnes
The Obvious Violation Exception To Qualified Immunity: An Empirical Study, Bailey D. Barnes
Faculty Publications
Qualified immunity shields government officials from civil suits for discretionary actions, as long as the violated right is not clearly established. A right is deemed established when every reasonable official would understand it based on precedent, placing it beyond debate, such that only the plainly incompetent may be held liable. Consequently, even when an act infringes on one's civil rights, a court may deny relief owing to a lack of factually comparable precedent. However, in 2020, the Supreme Court indicated its distrust for overreliance on precedent in certain contexts. In Taylor v. Riojas, the Court held that prison officials violated …
The Rise And Fall Of The Consideration Of Race And Ethnicity In The Admissions Process: The Long-Term Negative Consequences Of The Fall, Kevin Brown
Indiana Law Journal
Chief Justice Roberts wrote the majority opinion for the Supreme Court that struck down the affirmative action policies of Harvard College and the University of North Carolina. While Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh each wrote separate concurring opinions, they also joined Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion along with Justices Alito and Barrett. Thus, unlike the Court’s prior significant decisions that narrowly upheld affirmative action by one vote, this decision’s six-Justice majority allowed Chief Justice Roberts to write an opinion that more definitively rejected affirmative action than the Court’s tentative and cautious opinions upholding it. Despite what many may think about the …
Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Equal Rights & Social Justice, Vol. 31, Iss. 1
Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Equal Rights & Social Justice, Vol. 31, Iss. 1
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
No abstract provided.