Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1054)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (766)
- Seattle University School of Law (697)
- William & Mary Law School (533)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (425)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (424)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (396)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (365)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (357)
- Columbia Law School (293)
- Fordham Law School (266)
- University of Miami Law School (239)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (237)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (227)
- BLR (215)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (215)
- University of Richmond (214)
- Roger Williams University (213)
- University of Colorado Law School (205)
- Brigham Young University Law School (192)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (191)
- New York Law School (190)
- Georgetown University Law Center (188)
- Hollins University (185)
- St. John's University School of Law (175)
- University of Georgia School of Law (172)
- UIC School of Law (171)
- Cleveland State University (164)
- Pepperdine University (160)
- University of Washington School of Law (159)
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (1343)
- Civil rights (1003)
- Civil Rights (816)
- Race (644)
- Title VII (462)
-
- Racism (394)
- Constitutional Law (337)
- Supreme Court (325)
- Affirmative action (323)
- Race and law (294)
- Equal protection (291)
- United States Supreme Court (289)
- Equality (284)
- Employment discrimination (283)
- Racial discrimination (278)
- Women (269)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (258)
- Sex discrimination (246)
- Gender (236)
- Constitutional law (235)
- Segregation (234)
- Minorities (230)
- First Amendment (229)
- Diversity (212)
- Constitution (211)
- Education (201)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (198)
- Slavery (185)
- Fourteenth Amendment (184)
- Race discrimination (172)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1045)
- Michigan Law Review (461)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (386)
- Faculty Publications (354)
- Seattle University Law Review (333)
-
- Articles (301)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (281)
- All Faculty Scholarship (275)
- Scholarly Works (271)
- Touro Law Review (217)
- ExpressO (202)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (185)
- Ann B. Hopkins Papers (181)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (178)
- Publications (175)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (173)
- Faculty Articles (166)
- Indiana Law Journal (160)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (159)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (156)
- William & Mary Law Review (151)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (145)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (137)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (132)
- UIC Law Review (130)
- Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality (120)
- Cardozo Law Review (118)
- Pepperdine Law Review (118)
- West Virginia Law Review (115)
- Fordham Law Review (114)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 601 - 630 of 14923
Full-Text Articles in Law
Changemakers: Susannah Johnson : L'25 : Charting A New Course : From Navy Officer To Legal Advocate, Jane Govednik
Changemakers: Susannah Johnson : L'25 : Charting A New Course : From Navy Officer To Legal Advocate, Jane Govednik
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Splitting Equality: Access To Gender-Affirming Care In The Fourth Circuit, Gilbert D. Jones
Splitting Equality: Access To Gender-Affirming Care In The Fourth Circuit, Gilbert D. Jones
Journal of Law and Health
This Note critically examines the evolving legal landscape surrounding transgender individuals' access to gender-affirming care in the United States, focusing on two pivotal cases before the Fourth Circuit: Kadel v. Folwell (North Carolina) and Fain v. Crouch (West Virginia). These cases present a constitutional and statutory challenge to the exclusion of medically necessary gender-affirming care from state health plans, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Note contextualizes these lawsuits within a broader historical trajectory of transgender rights, highlighting legal and cultural milestones that have shaped access …
Brief Of Amici Curiae Center For Civil Rights And Critical Justice, Aclu Of Washington And King County Department Of Public Defense, Center For Civil Rights And Critical Justice, Jessica Levin, Melissa Lee, Ronald A. Peterson Law Clinic, David Montes, La Rond Baker
Brief Of Amici Curiae Center For Civil Rights And Critical Justice, Aclu Of Washington And King County Department Of Public Defense, Center For Civil Rights And Critical Justice, Jessica Levin, Melissa Lee, Ronald A. Peterson Law Clinic, David Montes, La Rond Baker
Center for Civil Rights and Critical Justice Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Hindsight Is 20/20: Epilepsy Is Not One-Size-Fits-All, Raika Kim
Hindsight Is 20/20: Epilepsy Is Not One-Size-Fits-All, Raika Kim
Northwestern University Law Review
For many, epilepsy is one of the first conditions that come to mind when thinking of a disability, and for good reason: over 50 million people in the world live with epilepsy. Yet misunderstandings about epilepsy have perpetuated social stigma surrounding the disability for centuries. Ableist beliefs led to the passage of laws in the 1900s condoning—and in some cases, requiring—sterilization of individuals with epilepsy and restriction of their right to marry. Even today, state driving laws, justified as promoting public safety, categorically prevent anyone diagnosed with epilepsy from driving unless they are seizure free for an arbitrary, nonuniform period …
Challenging Race-Based Health Care Discrimination: A New Private Right Of Action, Aaron Pinkett
Challenging Race-Based Health Care Discrimination: A New Private Right Of Action, Aaron Pinkett
Northwestern University Law Review
The Hippocratic Oath calls on doctors to “do no harm.” Yet we know from extensive public health research that clinicians repeatedly cause harm to Black patients by dismissing their medical concerns, misdiagnosing them, and undertreating their pain. These practices of differential treatment for Black patients have led to steadily increasing racial disparities in health care outcomes throughout the United States. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits this type of disparate impact, but modern Supreme Court jurisprudence forecloses opportunities for affected parties to seek legal relief—despite the clearly established legislative intent of Title VI. However, another legal …
Cruising Over Controversy: Addressing Discrimination Gaps In The Montreal Convention's Framework, Catherine Mitri
Cruising Over Controversy: Addressing Discrimination Gaps In The Montreal Convention's Framework, Catherine Mitri
Seattle Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Re-Evaluating Fulton V. City Of Philadelphia: A “Narrow” “Wisp” Of A Decision Or Free Exercise “Bedrock?”, Mark Rienzi
Re-Evaluating Fulton V. City Of Philadelphia: A “Narrow” “Wisp” Of A Decision Or Free Exercise “Bedrock?”, Mark Rienzi
Catholic University Law Review
In Fulton v. City of Philadelphia (2021), a unanimous Supreme Court held that Philadelphia violated the Free Exercise Clause by excluding Catholic Social Services from participating in its foster program because CSS would not certify same-sex couples. Both supporters and critics of the Court’s decision publicly characterized the decision as “narrow” and noted that Philadelphia (and other governments) can easily sidestep Fulton and continue excluding religious providers from foster and adoption programs.
Four years later, the evidence shows that Fulton is anything but narrow. In Philadelphia and in other jurisdictions, Fulton has played a strong role in ending litigation against …
Champions For Justice 2025 03-27-2025, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Champions For Justice 2025 03-27-2025, Roger Williams University School Of Law
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
State V. Hayes: Privacy Of The Mind And The Incompetent Defendant, Maine Law Review
State V. Hayes: Privacy Of The Mind And The Incompetent Defendant, Maine Law Review
Maine Law Review
Although numerous jurisdictions have faced the question of whether a criminal defendant can be considered competent to stand trial when his competency is medically induced, the question of whether the state may force the accused to take competency-inducing medication during trial over the pretrial objections of the defense is relatively novel. Confronted with that issue recently, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire in State v. Hayes held that the state could compel a criminal defendant to take psychotropic drugs' necessary to maintain competency if the jury was informed about the use of medication. It is clear from the New Hampshire …
Bakke, Lochner, And Law School: The Nobility Clause Versus A Republican Form Of Medicine, James E. Lobsenz
Bakke, Lochner, And Law School: The Nobility Clause Versus A Republican Form Of Medicine, James E. Lobsenz
Maine Law Review
Alan Bakke, an unsuccessful medical school applicant, filed suit challenging the constitutionality of the minority admissions program administered by the Medical School of the University of California at Davis. The practice of reserving sixteen special places for minority students out of a total of 100 positions in the entering class, Bakke contended, constituted a denial of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution. Bakke's suit afforded the justices of both the California Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court a unique opportunity to examine the substantive nature of the "equality" …
The Misuse Of Land Use Control Powers Must End: Suggestions For Legislative And Judicial Responses, Orlando E. Delogu
The Misuse Of Land Use Control Powers Must End: Suggestions For Legislative And Judicial Responses, Orlando E. Delogu
Maine Law Review
Municipal governments in almost all parts of the country are frequently inclined to exercise their police, spending, and policymaking powers in an impermissibly exclusionary manner. Their objective in many instances is simply to keep population growth and local property taxes down. In Maine these tendencies are very much in evidence. This misuse of local governmental powers is almost totally predicated on a misconception of the status of local governments and the purposes for which they exist. Local governments are not sovereign. They are not independent units of government. They are subunits of state government, creatures of the state analogous to …
A Response To Professor Delogu: Is Impermissible Exclusion A Reality In Maine?, Madge Baker
A Response To Professor Delogu: Is Impermissible Exclusion A Reality In Maine?, Madge Baker
Maine Law Review
A basic premise of Professor Orlando Delogu's article, The Misuse of Land Use Control Powers Must End: Suggestions for Legislative and Judicial Responses, is that many Maine municipalities are using their land use regulatory powers in impermissibly exclusionary ways. Professor Delogu proposes that the legislature and courts of Maine should respond to correct the situation. This Commentary will attempt to illustrate that Professor Delogu has failed to document his premise or to define accurately the difference between permissible and impermissible exclusion. He is unable, therefore, to substantiate the need for state intervention in an area of law traditionally delegated to …
A Final Note On The Misuse Of Land Use Control Powers Must End: Suggestions For Legislative And Judicial Responses, Orlando E. Delogu
A Final Note On The Misuse Of Land Use Control Powers Must End: Suggestions For Legislative And Judicial Responses, Orlando E. Delogu
Maine Law Review
The Baker criticism of my article is flawed in several major respects. First, while tacitly accepting the basic premise of the article that impermissible exclusion may be achieved by local misuse of a wide variety of facially permissible land use control tools, Ms. Baker argues that merely because the article did not demonstrate a sufficient degree of misuse in Maine, the corrective measures suggested are unwarranted. But a full reading of the article makes clear that no such exhaustive indictment of Maine towns was intended. The article was not an empirical study. The article intended to point out a widening …
The Prima Facie Case Approach To Employment Discrimination, Joanne F. Cole
The Prima Facie Case Approach To Employment Discrimination, Joanne F. Cole
Maine Law Review
Employment discrimination litigation has increased dramatically during the past decade. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964—Congress' sweeping prohibition of discrimination in employment decisions on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin –older federal civil rights statutes and state counterparts to Title VII, courts have developed discrete, cognizable theories of discrimination. An analytical framework has also developed by which to evaluate the facts, innuendoes, and statistics that constitute the claims and defenses in a discrimination case. Within the generally accepted approach to the evidence, however, there is no consensus about the weight each element …
Perspectives On Older Workers: Maine's Prohibition Of Mandatory Retirement, Susan Dana Kertzer
Perspectives On Older Workers: Maine's Prohibition Of Mandatory Retirement, Susan Dana Kertzer
Maine Law Review
The 1978 Amendments to the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), which generally prohibit mandatory retirement before the age of seventy, have been criticized as proposing to "extend freedom of choice by restricting freedom of contract. Despite such criticisms and other less philosophical objections to the Act, the 108th Maine Legislature in 1977 passed the first part of a legislative program which, as of January 1, 1980, prohibits all mandatory retirement in Maine, in both the public and private sectors. Emphasizing the parallels between age discrimination legislation and other civil rights legislation, one of the bill's senate supporters acknowledged …
Beware Of The Dangers Of The State-Created Danger Doctrine: A Look At The Ninth Circuit's Approach, Julia Steiner
Beware Of The Dangers Of The State-Created Danger Doctrine: A Look At The Ninth Circuit's Approach, Julia Steiner
University of Miami Law Review
The Fourteenth Amendment applies to state, not private, actors. It, like the whole of our Constitution, operates as a negative restraint on government. The Due Process Clause thus forbids states from taking certain action—but it does not and cannot compel the state to act ab initio. These core concepts formed the basis of the Supreme Court’s decision in DeShaney v. Winnebago County, where the Court reaffirmed that the only instance where the state assumes an affirmative duty to provide safety and security is when the state itself restrains an individual from protecting themselves.
Yet, since DeShaney, the circuit …
The Development And Consequences Of The "Good Faith" Exception To The Exclusionary Rule And The Qualified "Good Faith" Immunity From Liability Under Section 1983, Philip M. Coffin Iii, Paul F. Driscoll
The Development And Consequences Of The "Good Faith" Exception To The Exclusionary Rule And The Qualified "Good Faith" Immunity From Liability Under Section 1983, Philip M. Coffin Iii, Paul F. Driscoll
Maine Law Review
The remedies fashioned to redress violations of the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution continue to be the subject of much judicial, legislative, and scholarly inquiry. In striking the balance between the need to protect individual freedom and the need to protect society from criminal activity, the Supreme Court and Congress have developed two principal remedies for fourth amendment violations: the exclusionary rule and civil actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or under theories of constitutional tort. on the development of both of these remedies it is assumed that their effectiveness is the true measure of fourth amendment liberties. …
This Is Not History
The Civil Rights Movement (HIS/BLS 347) Zine Project
No abstract provided.
Resilience Against Neglect
The Civil Rights Movement (HIS/BLS 347) Zine Project
No abstract provided.
Violence And Artistic Resistance, Tucker Brown
Violence And Artistic Resistance, Tucker Brown
The Civil Rights Movement (HIS/BLS 347) Zine Project
No abstract provided.
The Power Of Poetry, Madison Haji
The Power Of Poetry, Madison Haji
The Civil Rights Movement (HIS/BLS 347) Zine Project
No abstract provided.
Cointelpro's Assassination Of Fred Hampton
Cointelpro's Assassination Of Fred Hampton
The Civil Rights Movement (HIS/BLS 347) Zine Project
No abstract provided.
What's Going On, Jesse Spadaccini
What's Going On, Jesse Spadaccini
The Civil Rights Movement (HIS/BLS 347) Zine Project
No abstract provided.
The Importance Of Multicultural Clubs At Pc, Courtney Wight
The Importance Of Multicultural Clubs At Pc, Courtney Wight
The Civil Rights Movement (HIS/BLS 347) Zine Project
No abstract provided.
Freedom Lyrics, Lily Allan
Freedom Lyrics, Lily Allan
The Civil Rights Movement (HIS/BLS 347) Zine Project
No abstract provided.
Flourish, Chanel Perez
Flourish, Chanel Perez
The Civil Rights Movement (HIS/BLS 347) Zine Project
No abstract provided.
Uncovering The Covered, Matthew Ouellette
Uncovering The Covered, Matthew Ouellette
The Civil Rights Movement (HIS/BLS 347) Zine Project
No abstract provided.
Beyond The Game: Black Power In Sports
Beyond The Game: Black Power In Sports
The Civil Rights Movement (HIS/BLS 347) Zine Project
No abstract provided.
Incarceration As New Jim Crow, Courtney Butts
Incarceration As New Jim Crow, Courtney Butts
The Civil Rights Movement (HIS/BLS 347) Zine Project
No abstract provided.
The Real History: A Freedom School Curriculum
The Real History: A Freedom School Curriculum
The Civil Rights Movement (HIS/BLS 347) Zine Project
No abstract provided.