Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1054)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (767)
- Seattle University School of Law (697)
- William & Mary Law School (533)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (425)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (424)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (396)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (365)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (357)
- Columbia Law School (293)
- Fordham Law School (266)
- University of Miami Law School (239)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (237)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (227)
- BLR (215)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (215)
- University of Richmond (214)
- Roger Williams University (213)
- University of Colorado Law School (205)
- Brigham Young University Law School (192)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (191)
- New York Law School (190)
- Georgetown University Law Center (188)
- Hollins University (185)
- St. John's University School of Law (175)
- University of Georgia School of Law (172)
- UIC School of Law (171)
- Cleveland State University (164)
- Pepperdine University (160)
- University of Washington School of Law (159)
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (1344)
- Civil rights (1003)
- Civil Rights (816)
- Race (644)
- Title VII (462)
-
- Racism (394)
- Constitutional Law (337)
- Supreme Court (325)
- Affirmative action (323)
- Race and law (294)
- Equal protection (291)
- United States Supreme Court (289)
- Equality (284)
- Employment discrimination (283)
- Racial discrimination (278)
- Women (269)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (258)
- Sex discrimination (246)
- Gender (236)
- Constitutional law (235)
- Segregation (234)
- Minorities (230)
- First Amendment (229)
- Diversity (212)
- Constitution (211)
- Education (201)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (198)
- Slavery (185)
- Fourteenth Amendment (184)
- Race discrimination (172)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1050)
- Michigan Law Review (461)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (386)
- Faculty Publications (354)
- Seattle University Law Review (333)
-
- Articles (301)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (281)
- All Faculty Scholarship (275)
- Scholarly Works (271)
- Touro Law Review (217)
- ExpressO (202)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (185)
- Ann B. Hopkins Papers (181)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (178)
- Publications (175)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (173)
- Faculty Articles (166)
- Indiana Law Journal (160)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (159)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (156)
- William & Mary Law Review (151)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (145)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (137)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (132)
- UIC Law Review (130)
- Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality (120)
- Cardozo Law Review (118)
- Pepperdine Law Review (118)
- Law Faculty Publications (115)
- West Virginia Law Review (115)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 12811 - 12840 of 14930
Full-Text Articles in Law
Rethinking Minority Business Development Strategies, Robert E. Suggs
Rethinking Minority Business Development Strategies, Robert E. Suggs
Faculty Scholarship
Minority business set-asides were created as a prophylactic measure to redress discrimination against minority owned business firms. Predominantly minority jurisdictions found them especially attractive because they promised to provide minority firms a share of the procurement dollars expended by these jurisdictions. The Croson decision invalidated Richmond’s ordinance and posed substantial barriers to further enactments. This article proposes an alternative to such set-aides. It argues that the proposed alternative, an Equal Opportunity Rating Agency (EORA), provides a superior business development policy tool and does not have the constitutional vulnerabilities of set-asides. An EORA would operate much like a credit rating agency, …
Correspondence: November 6, 1990, Note Regarding The Lawton Chiles Rally, Sam Nunn
Correspondence: November 6, 1990, Note Regarding The Lawton Chiles Rally, Sam Nunn
Saffy Collection - All Textual Materials
A note from United States Senator Sam Nunn to Dr. Edna Saffy.
Free Speech: It's Great For Hate, Kenneth Lasson
Free Speech: It's Great For Hate, Kenneth Lasson
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Civil Rights—Marital Status Discrimination—Refusing To Rent To Unmarried Cohabitants Is Not Unlawful Marital Status Discrimination Under The Minnesota Human Rights Act. State Ex Rel. Cooper V. French, 460 N.W.2d 2 (Minn.1990), Steven L. Mcconnell
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sin, Stigma & Society: A Critique Of Morality And Values In Democratic Law And Policy, Timothy W. Reinig
Sin, Stigma & Society: A Critique Of Morality And Values In Democratic Law And Policy, Timothy W. Reinig
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Academic Freedom And The University Title Vii Suit After University Of Pennsylvania V. Eeoc And Brown V. Trustees Of Boston University, Clisby L.H. Barrow
Academic Freedom And The University Title Vii Suit After University Of Pennsylvania V. Eeoc And Brown V. Trustees Of Boston University, Clisby L.H. Barrow
Vanderbilt Law Review
Tenure' is the crowning laurel of academia. The process of reviewing a candidate for tenure at the university level generally begins with an evaluation and recommendation by a group of the candidate's peers. Candidates who are denied tenure may seek judicial review of the decision and discovery of peer review materials. Not surprisingly, universities encourage courts to defer to tenure decisions and to deny plaintiffs access to confidential peer review documents.Traditionally, in fact, courts have given great deference to university tenure decisions. Judicial deference has pervaded every phase of review from discovery to trial and remedy. As deference to university …
Levels Of Generality In The Definition Of Rights, Laurence H. Tribe, Michael C. Dorf
Levels Of Generality In The Definition Of Rights, Laurence H. Tribe, Michael C. Dorf
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
This article focuses on one important aspect of the quest for constitutional meaning: how to determine whether a particular liberty-whether or not expressly enumerated in the Bill of Rights-is a "fundamental" right. Whether under the somewhat tarnished banner of substantive due process or under a different rubric, the designation of a right as fundamental requires that the state offer a compelling justification for limitations of that right. In addition, under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, state-sanctioned inequalities that bear upon the exercise of a fundamental right will be upheld only if they serve a compelling governmental interest. …
The Rhetorical Tapestry Of Race: White Innocence And Black Abstraction, Thomas Ross
The Rhetorical Tapestry Of Race: White Innocence And Black Abstraction, Thomas Ross
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Second Class Rights? Principles And Compromise In The Charter, Denise G. Réaume, Leslie J. M Green
Second Class Rights? Principles And Compromise In The Charter, Denise G. Réaume, Leslie J. M Green
Dalhousie Law Journal
Minority language rights are both historically and politically central to the Canadian constitution. It is also commonly supposed that they are fundamental rights, rooted in principle, and deserving generous interpretation by the courts. For a time, it seemed that the Supreme Court of Canada shared this view. In the Manitoba Language Reference, for example, they said that "The importance of language rights is grounded in the essential role that language plays in human existence, development and dignity." In Mercure v. A.G. of Saskatchewan they reiterated: "It can hardly be gainsaid that language is profoundly anchored in the human condition. Not …
Remarks Made At The Second Circuit Judicial Conference, September 8, 1989, Thurgood Marshall
Remarks Made At The Second Circuit Judicial Conference, September 8, 1989, Thurgood Marshall
Trotter Review
For many years, no institution of American government has been as close a friend to civil rights as the United States Supreme Court. Make no mistake: I do not mean for a moment to denigrate the quite considerable contributions to the enhancement of civil rights by presidents, the Congress, other federal courts, and the legislatures and judiciaries of many states. It is now 1989, however, and we must recognize that the Court's approach to civil rights cases has changed markedly. The most recent Supreme Court opinions vividly illustrate this changed judicial attitude. In Richmond v. Croson, the Court took …
New Judges Get No Rehearsals, Gary Sturgess
New Judges Get No Rehearsals, Gary Sturgess
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Motion For Leave To File Supplemental Brief, United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Motion For Leave To File Supplemental Brief, United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Appellant's Reply Brief, United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Appellant's Reply Brief, United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Motion To Strike The Brief Of The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission As Amicus Curiae, United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Motion To Strike The Brief Of The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission As Amicus Curiae, United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Reply To The Response Of Appellee And The Opposition Of The Eeoc To Price Waterhouse's Motion To Strike The Eeoc's Brief Amicus Curiae, United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Reply To The Response Of Appellee And The Opposition Of The Eeoc To Price Waterhouse's Motion To Strike The Eeoc's Brief Amicus Curiae, United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Motion By Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Amicus Curiae To Participate In Oral Argument (With Letter From Eeoc), United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Motion By Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Amicus Curiae To Participate In Oral Argument (With Letter From Eeoc), United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Appeal From The United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Supplemental Brief, United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Appeal From The United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Supplemental Brief, United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Appeal From The United States District Court For The District Of Columbia, United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Appeal From The United States District Court For The District Of Columbia, United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Eeoc's Opposition To Appellant's Motin To Strike Eeoc's Brief As Amicus Curiae (With Letter From Eeoc), United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Eeoc's Opposition To Appellant's Motin To Strike Eeoc's Brief As Amicus Curiae (With Letter From Eeoc), United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
The Civil Rights Struggle In Retrospect, Robert A. Sedler
The Civil Rights Struggle In Retrospect, Robert A. Sedler
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Hiv Positive Employees As Handicapped Persons Under State And Federal Law: West Virginia Follows The Trend To Cast Aside Irrational Fear And Prejudice In Favor Of Competent Medical Evidence And Sound Public Policy, Frank W. Volk
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Pension Game: Age- And Gender-Based Inequities In The Retirement System, Camilla E. Watson
The Pension Game: Age- And Gender-Based Inequities In The Retirement System, Camilla E. Watson
Scholarly Works
This Article begins by stressing the importance of retirement benefits in general and employer-provided benefits in particular. It then addresses specific current issues of age and gender discrimination under both the private retirement and Social Security systems. Gender-based discrimination is emphasized because of the overlap between gender-based discrimination and age discrimination. Finally, this Article suggests specific reforms for a fairer and more adequate systems in the twenty-first century.
No. 90-7099 Appellee's Response To Motions Regarding The "Brief Of The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission As Amicus Curiae", United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Appellee's Response To Motions Regarding The "Brief Of The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission As Amicus Curiae", United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Brief Of The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission As Amicus Curiae, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Circuit
No. 90-7099 Brief Of The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission As Amicus Curiae, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Circuit
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
Judge's Ruling Is A Victory For Women Who Work, Patricea Mclaughlin
Judge's Ruling Is A Victory For Women Who Work, Patricea Mclaughlin
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
No. 90-7099 Appellee's Response To "Motion By Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Amicus Curiae To Participate In Oral Argument", United States Court Of Appeals
No. 90-7099 Appellee's Response To "Motion By Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Amicus Curiae To Participate In Oral Argument", United States Court Of Appeals
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
Public Remedies For Private Wrongs: Rethinking The Title Vii Back Pay Remedy, Minna J. Kotkin
Public Remedies For Private Wrongs: Rethinking The Title Vii Back Pay Remedy, Minna J. Kotkin
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Women Lawyers And The Quest For Professional Identity In Late Nineteenth-Century America, Virginia G. Drachman
Women Lawyers And The Quest For Professional Identity In Late Nineteenth-Century America, Virginia G. Drachman
Michigan Law Review
Whenever Lelia Robinson, a nineteenth-century woman lawyer, prepared to take a case to court, she faced a particular problem what to do about her hat. "Shall the woman attorney wear her hat when arguing a case or making a motion in court," she asked in 1888, "or shall she remove it?" Robinson's question was not a frivolous matter of fashion, but a serious concern to every woman lawyer who entered the courtroom. As a proper lady of her day, it was not only appropriate that she wear a hat in public, it was expected of her. But as a lawyer, …
Labor Dept. Wants To Take On Job Bias In The Executivesuite, Peters T. Kilborn
Labor Dept. Wants To Take On Job Bias In The Executivesuite, Peters T. Kilborn
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.
Why Women Aren't Getting To The Top, Jaclyn Fierman
Why Women Aren't Getting To The Top, Jaclyn Fierman
Ann B. Hopkins Papers
No abstract provided.